{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T00:52:51Z","timestamp":1740099171764,"version":"3.37.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":29,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030017125"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030017132"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,1]],"date-time":"2018-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1514764800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-01713-2_16","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,11,23]],"date-time":"2018-11-23T19:22:06Z","timestamp":1543000926000},"page":"219-234","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Comparison Criteria for Argumentation Semantics"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Sylvie","family":"Doutre","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Jean-Guy","family":"Mailly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,14]]},"reference":[{"key":"16_CR1","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-40381-1_11","volume-title":"Scalable Uncertainty Management","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2013","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Ben-Naim, J.: Ranking-based semantics for argumentation frameworks. In: Liu, W., Subrahmanian, V.S., Wijsen, J. (eds.) SUM 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8078, pp. 134\u2013147. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-40381-1_11"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Dimopoulos, Y., Moraitis, P.: A unified and general framework for argumentation-based negotiation. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2007, p. 158 (2007)","key":"16_CR2","DOI":"10.1145\/1329125.1329317"},{"unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Dimopoulos, Y., Moraitis, P.: Making decisions through preference-based argumentation. In: Proceedings of KR 2008, pp. 113\u2013123 (2008)","key":"16_CR3"},{"key":"16_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888911000166","volume":"26","author":"P Baroni","year":"2011","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Caminada, M., Giacomin, M.: An introduction to argumentation semantics. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 26, 365\u2013410 (2011)","journal-title":"Knowl. Eng. Rev."},{"issue":"6","key":"16_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"854","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2009.02.006","volume":"50","author":"P Baroni","year":"2009","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Giacomin, M.: Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 50(6), 854\u2013866 (2009)","journal-title":"Int. J. Approx. Reason."},{"key":"16_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2005.05.006","volume":"168","author":"P Baroni","year":"2005","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Giacomin, M., Guida, G.: SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics. Artif. Intell. 168, 162\u2013210 (2005)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"unstructured":"Baumann, R.: What does it take to enforce an argument? Minimal change in abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of ECAI 2012, pp. 127\u2013132 (2012)","key":"16_CR7"},{"unstructured":"Baumann, R., Brewka, G.: Expanding argumentation frameworks: Enforcing and monotonicity results. In: Proceedings of COMMA 2010, pp. 75\u201386 (2010)","key":"16_CR8"},{"key":"16_CR9","series-title":"Communications in Computer and Information Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-08855-6_35","volume-title":"Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems","author":"P Besnard","year":"2014","unstructured":"Besnard, P., Doutre, S., Herzig, A.: Encoding argument graphs in logic. In: Laurent, A., Strauss, O., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R.R. (eds.) IPMU 2014. CCIS, vol. 443, pp. 345\u2013354. Springer, Cham (2014). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-08855-6_35"},{"unstructured":"Besnard, P., Doutre, S., Ho, V.H., Longin, D.: SESAME - a system for specifying semantics in abstract argumentation. In: Thimm, M., Cerutti, F., Strass, H., Vallati, M. (eds.) Proceedings of SAFA 2016, vol. 1672, pp. 40\u201351. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2016)","key":"16_CR10"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bonzon, E., Delobelle, J., Konieczny, S., Maudet, N.: A comparative study of ranking-based semantics for abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of AAAI 2016 (2016)","key":"16_CR11","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v30i1.10116"},{"unstructured":"Caminada, M.: Semi-stable semantics. In: Proceedings of COMMA 2006 (2006)","key":"16_CR12"},{"unstructured":"Caminada, M.: Comparing two unique extension semantics for formal argumentation: ideal and eager (2007)","key":"16_CR13"},{"key":"16_CR14","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1007\/11518655_28","volume-title":"Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty","author":"S Coste-Marquis","year":"2005","unstructured":"Coste-Marquis, S., Devred, C., Marquis, P.: Symmetric argumentation frameworks. In: Godo, L. (ed.) ECSQARU 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3571, pp. 317\u2013328. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/11518655_28"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"16_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1016\/S0304-3975(96)80707-9","volume":"170","author":"Y Dimopoulos","year":"1996","unstructured":"Dimopoulos, Y., Torres, A.: Graph theoretical structures in logic programs and default theories. Theor. Comput. Sci. 170(1\u20132), 209\u2013244 (1996)","journal-title":"Theor. Comput. Sci."},{"unstructured":"Doutre, S., Mailly, J.G.: Quantifying the Difference between Argumentation Semantics. In: Computational models of argument (COMMA), vol. 287, pp. 255\u2013262. IOS Press (2016)","key":"16_CR16"},{"key":"16_CR17","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-67582-4_14","volume-title":"Scalable Uncertainty Management","author":"S Doutre","year":"2017","unstructured":"Doutre, S., Mailly, J.-G.: Semantic change and extension enforcement in abstract argumentation. In: Moral, S., Pivert, O., S\u00e1nchez, D., Mar\u00edn, N. (eds.) SUM 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10564, pp. 194\u2013207. Springer, Cham (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-67582-4_14"},{"issue":"2","key":"16_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321\u2013357 (1995)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"unstructured":"Dung, P., Mancarella, P., Toni, F.: Adialectic procedure for sceptical, assumption-based argumentation. In: COMMA 2006 (2006)","key":"16_CR19"},{"key":"16_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1559","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2009.09.001","volume":"173","author":"PE Dunne","year":"2009","unstructured":"Dunne, P.E.: The computational complexity of ideal semantics. Artif. Intell. 173, 1559\u20131591 (2009)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"1\/2","key":"16_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(02)00261-8","volume":"141","author":"PE Dunne","year":"2002","unstructured":"Dunne, P.E., Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Coherence in finite argument systems. Artif. Intell. 141(1\/2), 187\u2013203 (2002)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"16_CR22","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-87803-2_14","volume-title":"Logics in Artificial Intelligence","author":"PE Dunne","year":"2008","unstructured":"Dunne, P.E., Caminada, M.: Computational complexity of semi-stable semantics in abstract argumentation frameworks. In: H\u00f6lldobler, S., Lutz, C., Wansing, H. (eds.) JELIA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5293, pp. 153\u2013165. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-540-87803-2_14"},{"key":"16_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2013.06.004","volume":"202","author":"PE Dunne","year":"2013","unstructured":"Dunne, P.E., Dvor\u00e1k, W., Woltran, S.: Parametric properties of ideal semantics. Artif. Intell. 202, 1\u201328 (2013)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"unstructured":"Dvor\u00e1k, W., Spanring, C.: Comparing the expressiveness of argumentation semantics. In: Proceedings of COMMA 2012, vol. 245, pp. 261\u2013272. IOS Press (2012)","key":"16_CR24"},{"issue":"11","key":"16_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ipl.2010.04.005","volume":"110","author":"W Dvor\u00e1k","year":"2010","unstructured":"Dvor\u00e1k, W., Woltran, S.: Complexity of semi-stable and stage semantics in argumentation frameworks. Inf. Process. Lett. 110(11), 425\u2013430 (2010)","journal-title":"Inf. Process. Lett."},{"unstructured":"Grossi, D., Modgil, S.: On the graded acceptability of arguments. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2015, pp. 868\u2013874 (2015)","key":"16_CR26"},{"key":"16_CR27","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-11558-0_4","volume-title":"Logics in Artificial Intelligence","author":"A Hunter","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hunter, A.: Opportunities for argument-centric persuasion in behaviour change. In: Ferm\u00e9, E., Leite, J. (eds.) JELIA 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8761, pp. 48\u201361. Springer, Cham (2014). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-11558-0_4"},{"key":"16_CR28","volume-title":"Computational complexity","author":"CH Papadimitriou","year":"1994","unstructured":"Papadimitriou, C.H.: Computational complexity. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1994)"},{"unstructured":"Verheij, B.: Two approaches to dialectical argumentation: admissible sets and argumentation stages. In: Proceedings of BNAIC 1996 (1996)","key":"16_CR29"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Multi-Agent Systems and Agreement Technologies"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-01713-2_16","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,6]],"date-time":"2022-09-06T20:40:20Z","timestamp":1662496820000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-01713-2_16"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018]]},"ISBN":["9783030017125","9783030017132"],"references-count":29,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-01713-2_16","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018]]}}}