{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,27]],"date-time":"2025-03-27T12:13:33Z","timestamp":1743077613368,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":13,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030030971"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030030988"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,1,1]],"date-time":"2018-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1514764800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-03098-8_29","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,23]],"date-time":"2018-10-23T12:27:33Z","timestamp":1540297653000},"page":"449-457","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Dialogue Games for Enforcement of Argument Acceptance and Rejection via Attack Removal"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"J\u00e9r\u00e9mie","family":"Dauphin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ken","family":"Satoh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,10,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"29_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2005.05.006","volume":"168","author":"P Baroni","year":"2005","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Giacomin, M., Guida, G.: SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics. Artif. Intell. 168, 162\u2013210 (2005)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"29_CR2","first-page":"127","volume":"12","author":"R Baumann","year":"2012","unstructured":"Baumann, R.: What does it take to enforce an argument? Minimal change in abstract argumentation. ECAI 12, 127\u2013132 (2012)","journal-title":"ECAI"},{"key":"29_CR3","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-02906-6_11","volume-title":"Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty","author":"G Boella","year":"2009","unstructured":"Boella, G., Kaci, S., van der Torre, L.: Dynamics in argumentation with single extensions: abstraction principles and the grounded extension. In: Sossai, C., Chemello, G. (eds.) ECSQARU 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5590, pp. 107\u2013118. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-02906-6_11"},{"key":"29_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.2965","volume":"38","author":"C Cayrol","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Dupin de Saint-Cyr, F., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C.: Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: adding an argument. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 38, 49\u201384 (2010)","journal-title":"J. Artif. Intell. Res."},{"key":"29_CR5","unstructured":"Coste-Marquis, S., Konieczny, S., Mailly, J.-G., Marquis, P.: On the revision of argumentation systems: minimal change of arguments statuses. KR 14, 52\u201361 (2014)"},{"issue":"2","key":"29_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"Phan Minh Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Phan Minh Dung: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321\u2013357 (1995)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"2","key":"29_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(03)00076-6","volume":"149","author":"PE Dunne","year":"2003","unstructured":"Dunne, P.E., Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Two party immediate response disputes: properties and efficiency. Artif. Intell. 149(2), 221\u2013250 (2003)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"29_CR8","series-title":"Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-39829-2_3","volume-title":"Advances in Social Simulation","author":"S Gabbriellini","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gabbriellini, S., Torroni, P.: A new framework for ABMs based on argumentative reasoning. In: Kami\u0144ski, B., Koloch, G. (eds.) Advances in Social Simulation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 229, pp. 25\u201336. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-39829-2_3"},{"issue":"11","key":"29_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1790","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2011.03.006","volume":"175","author":"B Liao","year":"2011","unstructured":"Liao, B., Jin, L., Koons, R.C.: Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method. Artif. Intell. 175(11), 1790\u20131814 (2011)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"29_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_6","volume-title":"Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence","author":"S Modgil","year":"2009","unstructured":"Modgil, S., Caminada, M.: Proof theories and algorithms for abstract argumentation frameworks. In: Simari, G., Rahwan, I. (eds.) Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 105\u2013129. Springer, Boston (2009). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_6"},{"key":"29_CR11","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-39644-4_22","volume-title":"Discovery Science","author":"K Satoh","year":"2003","unstructured":"Satoh, K., Uno, T.: Enumerating maximal frequent sets using irredundant dualization. In: Grieser, G., Tanaka, Y., Yamamoto, A. (eds.) DS 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2843, pp. 256\u2013268. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-540-39644-4_22"},{"key":"29_CR12","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-40006-0_17","volume-title":"Logics in Artificial Intelligence","author":"GAW Vreeswik","year":"2000","unstructured":"Vreeswik, G.A.W., Prakken, H.: Credulous and sceptical argument games for preferred semantics. In: Ojeda-Aciego, M., de Guzm\u00e1n, I.P., Brewka, G., Moniz Pereira, L. (eds.) JELIA 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1919, pp. 239\u2013253. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/3-540-40006-0_17"},{"key":"29_CR13","unstructured":"Zermelo, E.: \u00dcber eine Anwendung der Mengenlehre auf die Theorie des Schachspiels. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of Mathematicians, vol. 2, pp. 501\u2013504. II, Cambridge UP, Cambridge (1913)"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","PRIMA 2018: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-03098-8_29","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,21]],"date-time":"2023-12-21T18:04:40Z","timestamp":1703181880000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-03098-8_29"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018]]},"ISBN":["9783030030971","9783030030988"],"references-count":13,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-03098-8_29","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018]]},"assertion":[{"value":"24 October 2018","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"PRIMA","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Tokyo","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Japan","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2018","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"29 October 2018","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2 November 2018","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"21","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"prima2018","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"http:\/\/2018.prima-conference.org\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Double-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"103","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"25","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"33","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"24% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"5","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"No","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}