{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,26]],"date-time":"2025-03-26T00:10:34Z","timestamp":1742947834447,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":35,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030110291"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030110307"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]],"date-time":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1546300800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-11030-7_12","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,31]],"date-time":"2019-01-31T04:13:06Z","timestamp":1548907986000},"page":"259-283","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Generation and Validation of Frame Conditions in Formal Models"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Philipp","family":"Niemann","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nils","family":"Przigoda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Robert","family":"Wille","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rolf","family":"Drechsler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,1]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"12_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1007\/s10270-004-0058-x","volume":"4","author":"W Ahrendt","year":"2005","unstructured":"Ahrendt, W., et al.: The KeY tool. Softw. Syst. Model. 4(1), 32\u201354 (2005)","journal-title":"Softw. Syst. Model."},{"key":"12_CR2","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"436","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-75209-7_30","volume-title":"Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems","author":"K Anastasakis","year":"2007","unstructured":"Anastasakis, K., Bordbar, B., Georg, G., Ray, I.: UML2Alloy: a challenging model transformation. In: Engels, G., Opdyke, B., Schmidt, D.C., Weil, F. (eds.) MODELS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4735, pp. 436\u2013450. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). \n                  https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-540-75209-7_30"},{"key":"12_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Beckert, B., Schmitt, P.H.: Program verification using change information. In: SEFM, p. 91 (2003)","DOI":"10.1109\/SEFM.2003.1236211"},{"key":"12_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"785","DOI":"10.1109\/32.469460","volume":"21","author":"A Borgida","year":"1995","unstructured":"Borgida, A., Mylopoulos, J., Reiter, R.: On the frame problem in procedure specifications. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 21, 785\u2013798 (1995)","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng."},{"key":"12_CR5","unstructured":"Brucker, A.D., Tuong, F., Wolff, B.: Featherweight OCL: a proposal for a machine-checked formal semantics for OCL 2.5. Archive of Formal Proofs (2014)"},{"key":"12_CR6","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-78743-3_8","volume-title":"Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering","author":"AD Brucker","year":"2008","unstructured":"Brucker, A.D., Wolff, B.: HOL-OCL: a formal proof environment for uml\/ocl. In: Fiadeiro, J.L., Inverardi, P. (eds.) FASE 2008. LNCS, vol. 4961, pp. 97\u2013100. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). \n                  https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-540-78743-3_8"},{"key":"12_CR7","unstructured":"Cabot, J.: Ambiguity issues in OCL postconditions. In: OCL Workshop, pp. 194\u2013204 (2006)"},{"key":"12_CR8","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-75563-0_15","volume-title":"Conceptual Modeling - ER 2007","author":"J Cabot","year":"2007","unstructured":"Cabot, J.: From declarative to imperative UML\/OCL operation specifications. In: Parent, C., Schewe, K.-D., Storey, V.C., Thalheim, B. (eds.) ER 2007. LNCS, vol. 4801, pp. 198\u2013213. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). \n                  https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-540-75563-0_15"},{"key":"12_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cabot, J., Claris\u00f3, R., Riera, D.: Verification of UML\/OCL class diagrams using constraint programming. In: ICST, pp. 73\u201380 (2008)","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSTW.2008.54"},{"key":"12_CR10","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-00255-7_4","volume-title":"Integrated Formal Methods","author":"J Cabot","year":"2009","unstructured":"Cabot, J., Claris\u00f3, R., Riera, D.: Verifying UML\/OCL operation contracts. In: Leuschel, M., Wehrheim, H. (eds.) IFM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5423, pp. 40\u201355. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). \n                  https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-00255-7_4"},{"issue":"1","key":"12_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1145\/1921532.1921561","volume":"36","author":"C Choppy","year":"2011","unstructured":"Choppy, C., Klai, K., Zidani, H.: Formal verification of UML state diagrams: a Petri net based approach. Softw. Eng. Notes 36(1), 1\u20138 (2011)","journal-title":"Softw. Eng. Notes"},{"key":"12_CR12","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-78800-3_24","volume-title":"Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems","author":"L Moura de","year":"2008","unstructured":"de Moura, L., Bj\u00f8rner, N.: Z3: an efficient SMT solver. In: Ramakrishnan, C.R., Rehof, J. (eds.) TACAS 2008. LNCS, vol. 4963, pp. 337\u2013340. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). \n                  https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-540-78800-3_24"},{"key":"12_CR13","unstructured":"Demuth, B., Wilke, C.: Model and object verification by using dresden OCL. In: IIT-TP, p. 81. Technical University (2009)"},{"key":"12_CR14","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-07452-8_4","volume-title":"Engineering Secure Future Internet Services and Systems","author":"MAG Dios de","year":"2014","unstructured":"de Dios, M.A.G., Dania, C., Basin, D., Clavel, M.: Model-driven development of a secure ehealth application. In: Heisel, M., Joosen, W., Lopez, J., Martinelli, F. (eds.) Engineering Secure Future Internet Services and Systems. LNCS, vol. 8431, pp. 97\u2013118. Springer, Cham (2014). \n                  https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-07452-8_4"},{"issue":"1\u20133","key":"12_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1016\/j.scico.2007.01.013","volume":"69","author":"M Gogolla","year":"2007","unstructured":"Gogolla, M., B\u00fcttner, F., Richters, M.: USE: a UML-based specification environment for validating UML and OCL. Sci. Comput. Program. 69(1\u20133), 27\u201334 (2007)","journal-title":"Sci. Comput. Program."},{"key":"12_CR16","unstructured":"Gogolla, M., Hamann, L., Hilken, F., Kuhlmann, M., France, R.B.: From application models to filmstrip models: an approach to automatic validation of model dynamics. In: Modellierung, pp. 273\u2013288 (2014)"},{"key":"12_CR17","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-02949-3_8","volume-title":"Tests and Proofs","author":"M Gogolla","year":"2009","unstructured":"Gogolla, M., Kuhlmann, M., Hamann, L.: Consistency, independence and consequences in UML and OCL models. In: Dubois, C. (ed.) TAP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5668, pp. 90\u2013104. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). \n                  https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-02949-3_8"},{"key":"12_CR18","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-09099-3_8","volume-title":"Tests and Proofs","author":"F Hilken","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hilken, F., Niemann, P., Gogolla, M., Wille, R.: Filmstripping and unrolling: a comparison of verification approaches for UML and OCL behavioral models. In: Seidl, M., Tillmann, N. (eds.) TAP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8570, pp. 99\u2013116. Springer, Cham (2014). \n                  https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-09099-3_8"},{"key":"12_CR19","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.1007\/11880240_47","volume-title":"Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems","author":"P Kosiuczenko","year":"2006","unstructured":"Kosiuczenko, P.: Specification of invariability in OCL. In: Nierstrasz, O., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds.) MODELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4199, pp. 676\u2013691. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). \n                  https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/11880240_47"},{"issue":"2","key":"12_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1007\/s10270-011-0215-y","volume":"12","author":"P Kosiuczenko","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kosiuczenko, P.: Specification of invariability in OCL - specifying invariable system parts and views. Softw. Syst. Model. 12(2), 415\u2013434 (2013)","journal-title":"Softw. Syst. Model."},{"key":"12_CR21","unstructured":"Leino, K.R.M.: This is Boogie 2. Technical report (2008). \n                  http:\/\/research.microsoft.com\/apps\/pubs\/default.aspx?id=147643"},{"issue":"10","key":"12_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1109\/2.161279","volume":"25","author":"B Meyer","year":"1992","unstructured":"Meyer, B.: Applying design by contract. IEEE Comput. 25(10), 40\u201351 (1992)","journal-title":"IEEE Comput."},{"key":"12_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Niemann, P., Hilken, F., Gogolla, M., Wille, R.: Assisted generation of frame conditions for formal models. In: DATE, pp. 309\u2013312 (2015)","DOI":"10.7873\/DATE.2015.0646"},{"key":"12_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Niemann, P., Hilken, F., Gogolla, M., Wille, R.: Extracting frame conditions from operation contracts. In: MoDELS, pp. 266\u2013275 (2015)","DOI":"10.1109\/MODELS.2015.7338257"},{"key":"12_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Niemann, P., Przigoda, N., Wille, R., Drechsler, R.: Analyzing frame conditions in UML\/OCL models - consistency equivalence and independence. In: MODELSWARD, pp. 139\u2013151 (2018)","DOI":"10.5220\/0006602301390151"},{"key":"12_CR26","unstructured":"OMG - Object Management Group: Object Constraint Language (2014). \n                  http:\/\/www.omg.org\/spec\/OCL\/2.4\n                  \n                . Version 2.4, February 2014"},{"key":"12_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Przigoda, N., Filho, J.G., Niemann, P., Wille, R., Drechsler, R.: Frame conditions in symbolic representations of UML\/OCL models. In: MEMOCODE, pp. 65\u201370 (2016)","DOI":"10.1109\/MEMCOD.2016.7797747"},{"key":"12_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Przigoda, N., Hilken, C., Wille, R., Peleska, J., Drechsler, R.: Checking concurrent behavior in UML\/OCL models. In: MoDELS, pp. 176\u2013185 (2015)","DOI":"10.1109\/MODELS.2015.7338248"},{"key":"12_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"512","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cl.2017.11.002","volume":"54","author":"Nils Przigoda","year":"2018","unstructured":"Przigoda, N., Niemann, P., Filho, J.G., Wille, R., Drechsler, R.: Frame conditions in the automatic validation and verification of UML\/OCL models: a symbolic formulation of modifies only statements. Comput. Lang. Syst. Struct. (2017). \n                  https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cl.2017.11.002","journal-title":"Computer Languages, Systems & Structures"},{"issue":"1","key":"12_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1049\/iet-cps.2016.0022","volume":"1","author":"N Przigoda","year":"2016","unstructured":"Przigoda, N., Soeken, M., Wille, R., Drechsler, R.: Verifying the structure and behavior in UML\/OCL models using satisfiability solvers. IET Cyber-Phys. Syst.: Theory Appl. 1(1), 49\u201359 (2016). \n                  https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1049\/iet-cps.2016.0022","journal-title":"IET Cyber-Phys. Syst.: Theory Appl."},{"key":"12_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Przigoda, N., Stoppe, J., Seiter, J., Wille, R., Drechsler, R.: Verification-driven design across abstraction levels: a case study. In: DSD, pp. 375\u2013382. IEEE Computer Society (2015)","DOI":"10.1109\/DSD.2015.88"},{"key":"12_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Przigoda, N., Wille, R., Drechsler, R.: Ground setting properties for an efficient translation of OCL in SMT-based model finding. In: MoDELS, pp. 261\u2013271 (2016)","DOI":"10.1145\/2976767.2976780"},{"volume-title":"The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual","year":"1999","key":"12_CR33","unstructured":"Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., Booch, G. (eds.): The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd., Essex (1999)"},{"key":"12_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Soeken, M., Wille, R., Drechsler, R.: Verifying dynamic aspects of UML models. In: DATE, pp. 1077\u20131082 (2011)","DOI":"10.1109\/DATE.2011.5763177"},{"key":"12_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Soeken, M., Wille, R., Kuhlmann, M., Gogolla, M., Drechsler, R.: Verifying UML\/OCL models using Boolean satisfiability. In: DATE, pp. 1341\u20131344 (2010)","DOI":"10.1109\/DATE.2010.5457017"}],"container-title":["Communications in Computer and Information Science","Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-11030-7_12","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,20]],"date-time":"2019-05-20T23:59:03Z","timestamp":1558396743000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-11030-7_12"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"ISBN":["9783030110291","9783030110307"],"references-count":35,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-11030-7_12","relation":{},"ISSN":["1865-0929","1865-0937"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1865-0929"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1865-0937"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"assertion":[{"value":"1 February 2019","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"MODELSWARD","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Funchal","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Portugal","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2018","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"22 January 2018","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"24 January 2018","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"6","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"modelsward2018","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"http:\/\/www.modelsward.org\/?y=2018","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Double-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"Primoris","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"101","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"29","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"28","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"29% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"4","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"No","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}}]}}