{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,15]],"date-time":"2025-12-15T19:42:39Z","timestamp":1765827759333,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":30,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030157418"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030157425"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]],"date-time":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1546300800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-15742-5_14","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,12]],"date-time":"2019-03-12T03:02:45Z","timestamp":1552359765000},"page":"154-161","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Are Papers with Open Data More Credible? An Analysis of Open Data Availability in Retracted PLoS Articles"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3709-375X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Michael","family":"Lesk","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5693-2611","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Janice Bially","family":"Mattern","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7783-7069","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Heather","family":"Moulaison Sandy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"14_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1038\/483531a","volume":"483","author":"CG Begley","year":"2012","unstructured":"Begley, C.G., Ellis, L.M.: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature 483, 531\u2013533 (2012)","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"14_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Benjamin, D.J., et al.: Redefine statistical significance, 22 July 2017. \n                      https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31234\/osf.io\/mky9j","DOI":"10.31234\/osf.io\/mky9j"},{"issue":"6251","key":"14_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"910","DOI":"10.1126\/science.349.6251.910","volume":"349","author":"J Bohannon","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bohannon, J.: Many psychology papers fail replication test. Science 349(6251), 910\u2013911 (2015)","journal-title":"Science"},{"issue":"6162","key":"14_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1041","DOI":"10.1126\/science.342.6162.1041-b","volume":"342","author":"B Bolukbasi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bolukbasi, B., et al.: Open data: crediting a culture of cooperation. Science 342(6162), 1041\u20131042 (2013)","journal-title":"Science"},{"issue":"1","key":"14_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1021\/nn3000912","volume":"6","author":"DA Bonnell","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bonnell, D.A., et al.: Recycling is not always good: the dangers of self-plagiarism. ACS Nano 6(1), 1\u20134 (2012). \n                      https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1021\/nn3000912","journal-title":"ACS Nano"},{"issue":"6","key":"14_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1059","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.22634","volume":"63","author":"CL Borgman","year":"2012","unstructured":"Borgman, C.L.: The conundrum of sharing research data. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 63(6), 1059\u20131078 (2012)","journal-title":"J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol."},{"key":"14_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"637","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-018-0399-z","volume":"2","author":"CF Camerer","year":"2018","unstructured":"Camerer, C.F., et al.: Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 637\u2013644 (2018)","journal-title":"Nat. Hum. Behav."},{"key":"14_CR8","volume-title":"The Reinhart and Rogoff Controversy: A Summing Up","author":"J Cassidy","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cassidy, J.: The Reinhart and Rogoff Controversy: A Summing Up. The New Yorker, New York (2013)"},{"key":"14_CR9","unstructured":"Editorial and Publishing Policies. PLoS (2018). \n                      https:\/\/www.plos.org\/editorial-publishing-policies"},{"issue":"2","key":"14_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0118053","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0118053","volume":"10","author":"B Fecher","year":"2015","unstructured":"Fecher, B., Friesike, S., Hebing, M.: What drives academic data sharing? PLoS ONE 10(2), e0118053 (2015). \n                      https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0118053","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"7584","key":"14_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1038\/nj7584-117a","volume":"529","author":"V Gewin","year":"2016","unstructured":"Gewin, V.: Data sharing: an open mind on open data. Nature 529(7584), 117\u2013119 (2016). \n                      https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nj7584-117a","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"14_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"662","DOI":"10.1080\/01930826.2011.601269","volume":"51","author":"PB Heidorn","year":"2011","unstructured":"Heidorn, P.B.: The emerging role of libraries in data curation and e-science. J. Libr. Adm. 51, 662\u2013672 (2011)","journal-title":"J. Libr. Adm."},{"key":"14_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1016\/j.futures.2016.12.004","volume":"91","author":"N K\u00f8nig","year":"2017","unstructured":"K\u00f8nig, N., B\u00f8rsen, T., Emmeche, C.: The ethos of post-normal science. Futures 91, 12\u201324 (2017). \n                      https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.futures.2016.12.004","journal-title":"Futures"},{"key":"14_CR14","unstructured":"Labb\u00e9, C., Labb\u00e9, D., Portet, F.: Detection of computer generated papers in scientific literature \u2009<hal-01134598>\u2009(2015). \n                      https:\/\/hal.archives-ouvertes.fr\/hal-01134598"},{"key":"14_CR15","unstructured":"Leeming, J.: How will open data advance scientific discovery?\u202f Naturejobs Blog (2017). \n                      http:\/\/blogs.nature.com\/naturejobs\/2017\/10\/25\/how-will-open-data-advance-scientific-discovery\/\n                      \n                    . Accessed 9 May 2018"},{"key":"14_CR16","volume-title":"What\u2019s Behind Big Science Frauds?","author":"A Marcus","year":"2015","unstructured":"Marcus, A., Oransky, I.: What\u2019s Behind Big Science Frauds? The New York Times, New York (2015). \n                      https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2015\/05\/23\/opinion\/whats-behind-big-science-frauds.html"},{"issue":"12","key":"14_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1001195","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pbio.1001195","volume":"9","author":"JC Molloy","year":"2011","unstructured":"Molloy, J.C.: The Open Knowledge Foundation: open data means better science. PLoS Biol. 9(12), e1001195 (2011). \n                      https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pbio.1001195","journal-title":"PLoS Biol."},{"key":"14_CR18","unstructured":"The National Science Foundation Open government plan: 4.0, September 2016. \n                      https:\/\/www.nsf.gov\/pubs\/2016\/nsf16131\/nsf16131.pdf"},{"key":"14_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1038\/461160a","volume":"461","author":"B Nelson","year":"2009","unstructured":"Nelson, B.: Data sharing: empty archives. Nature 461, 160\u2013163 (2009). \n                      https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/461160a","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"14_CR20","unstructured":"Peer, L.: Reproducible research practices at ISPS, 30 April 2018. \n                      https:\/\/isps.yale.edu\/news\/blog\/2018\/05\/reproducible-research-practices-at-isps"},{"key":"14_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Piwowar, H.A., Vision, T.J.: Data reuse and the open data citation advantage. PeerJ: Bioinformatics and Genomics section, 1 October 2013","DOI":"10.7717\/peerj.175"},{"key":"14_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"712","DOI":"10.1038\/nrd3439-c1","volume":"10","author":"F Prinz","year":"2011","unstructured":"Prinz, F., Schlange, T., Asadullah, K.: Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 10, 712 (2011)","journal-title":"Nat. Rev. Drug Discov."},{"issue":"4","key":"14_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"638","DOI":"10.1177\/0306312714535679","volume":"44","author":"OB Rekdal","year":"2014","unstructured":"Rekdal, O.B.: Academic urban legends. Soc. Stud. Sci. 44(4), 638\u2013654 (2014). \n                      https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0306312714535679","journal-title":"Soc. Stud. Sci."},{"key":"14_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijinfomgt.2017.01.003","volume":"37","author":"S Sadiq","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sadiq, S., Marta Indulska, M.: Open data: quality over quantity. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 37, 150\u2013154 (2017). \n                      https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijinfomgt.2017.01.003","journal-title":"Int. J. Inf. Manage."},{"key":"14_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.futures.2017.05.010","volume":"91","author":"A Saltelli","year":"2017","unstructured":"Saltelli, A., Funtowicz, S.: What is science\u2019s crisis really about? Futures 91, 5\u201311 (2017). \n                      https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.futures.2017.05.010","journal-title":"Futures"},{"key":"14_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1016\/j.futures.2016.11.012","volume":"91","author":"A Saltelli","year":"2017","unstructured":"Saltelli, A., Giampietro, M.: What is wrong with evidence based policy, and how can it be improved? Futures 91, 62\u201371 (2017). \n                      https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.futures.2016.11.012","journal-title":"Futures"},{"issue":"1","key":"14_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.5860\/crl.79.1.2","volume":"79","author":"F Sayre","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sayre, F., Riegelman, A.: The reproducibility crisis and academic libraries. Coll. Res. Libr. 79(1), 2 (2018). \n                      https:\/\/crl.acrl.org\/index.php\/crl\/article\/view\/16846\/18452","journal-title":"Coll. Res. Libr."},{"key":"14_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tenopir, C., et al.: Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions. PLoS One, 29 June 2011. \n                      https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0021101","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0021101"},{"key":"14_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J.A., Dobr\u00e1nszki, J.: Potential dangers with open access data files in the expanding open data movement. Publ. Res. Q. 31, 298\u2013305 (2015). \n                      https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12109-015-9420-9","DOI":"10.1007\/s12109-015-9420-9"},{"key":"14_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Noorden, R.: Publishers withdraw more than 120 gibberish papers: conference proceedings removed from subscription databases after scientist reveals that they were computer-generated. Nature News (February 24, 2014; Updated February 25, 2014)","DOI":"10.1038\/nature.2014.14763"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Information in Contemporary Society"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-15742-5_14","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,20]],"date-time":"2019-05-20T08:39:36Z","timestamp":1558341576000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-15742-5_14"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"ISBN":["9783030157418","9783030157425"],"references-count":30,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-15742-5_14","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"assertion":[{"value":"13 March 2019","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"iConference","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Information","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Washington, DC","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"USA","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2019","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"31 March 2019","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"3 April 2019","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"14","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"iconference2019","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/ischools.org\/the-iconference\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Double-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"ConfTool","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"133","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"44","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"33","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"33% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"-","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"88 short papers were submitted in addition to the 133 full papers.","order":10,"name":"additional_info_on_review_process","label":"Additional Info on Review Process","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}}]}}