{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,25]],"date-time":"2025-03-25T14:48:59Z","timestamp":1742914139049,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":24,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030157418"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030157425"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]],"date-time":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1546300800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-15742-5_65","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,12]],"date-time":"2019-03-12T03:02:45Z","timestamp":1552359765000},"page":"690-696","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Authority Claim in Rationale-Containing Online Comments"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Lu","family":"Xiao","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Xin","family":"Huo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"65_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bar-Haim, R., Edelstein, L., Jochim, C., Slonim, N.: Improving claim stance classification with lexical knowledge expansion and context utilization. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Argument Mining, pp. 32\u201338 (2017)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/W17-5104"},{"key":"65_CR2","unstructured":"Bender, E.M., et al.: Annotating social acts: authority claims and alignment moves in Wikipedia talk pages. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Languages in Social Media, pp. 48\u201357 (2011)"},{"key":"65_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Biran, O., Rambow, O.: Identifying justifications in written dialogs. In: Proceedings of 5th IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing, pp. 162\u2013168 (2011)","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSC.2011.41"},{"key":"65_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Boltu\u017ei\u0107, F., \u0160najder, J.: Back up your stance: recognizing arguments in online discussions. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Argumentation Mining, pp. 49\u201358 (2014)","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/W14-2107"},{"key":"65_CR5","unstructured":"De Waard, A., Maat, H.P.: Epistemic modality and knowledge attribution in scientific discourse: a taxonomy of types and overview of features. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Detecting Structure in Scholarly Discourse, pp. 47\u201355 (2012)"},{"issue":"1","key":"65_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1080\/19312450709336664","volume":"1","author":"AF Hayes","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hayes, A.F., Krippendorff, K.: Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Commun. Methods Measures 1(1), 77\u201389 (2007)","journal-title":"Commun. Methods Measures"},{"key":"65_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hidey, C., Musi, E., Hwang, A., Muresan, S., McKeown, K.: Analyzing the semantic types of claims and premises in an online persuasive forum. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Argument Mining, pp. 11\u201321 (2017)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/W17-5102"},{"key":"65_CR8","volume-title":"History of Rhetoric, Volume I: The Art of Persuasion in Greece","author":"GA Kennedy","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kennedy, G.A.: History of Rhetoric, Volume I: The Art of Persuasion in Greece, vol. 1. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2015)"},{"key":"65_CR9","unstructured":"Khazaei, T., Xiao, L., Mercer, R.: Writing to persuade: analysis and detection of persuasive discourse. In: Proceedings of iConference. \n                      https:\/\/www.ideals.illinois.edu\/handle\/2142\/96673\n                      \n                    . Accessed 15 Sept 2018 (2017)"},{"key":"65_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Khazaei, T., Xiao, L., Mercer, R.: Identification and disambiguation of lexical cues of rhetorical relations across different text genres. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Linking Computational Models of Lexical, Sentential and Discourse-Level Semantics, pp. 54\u201363 (2015)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/W15-2706"},{"key":"65_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Khazaei, T., Xiao, L.: Corpus-based analysis of rhetorical relations: a study of lexical cues. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing, pp. 417\u2013423 (2015)","DOI":"10.1109\/ICOSC.2015.7050842"},{"key":"65_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Koreeda, Y., Yanase, T., Yanai, K., Sato, M., Niwa, Y.: Neural attention model for classification of sentences that support promoting\/suppressing relationship. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Argument Mining, pp. 76\u201381 (2016)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/W16-2809"},{"issue":"3","key":"65_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1515\/text.1.1988.8.3.243","volume":"8","author":"WC Mann","year":"1988","unstructured":"Mann, W.C., Thompson, S.A.: Rhetorical structure theory: toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8(3), 243\u2013281 (1988)","journal-title":"Text"},{"key":"65_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mao, W.T., Xiao, L., Mercer, R.: The use of text similarity and sentiment analysis to examine rationales in the large-scale online deliberations. In: Proceedings of 5th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment & Social Media Analysis, pp. 147\u2013153 (2014)","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/W14-2624"},{"key":"65_CR15","unstructured":"Park, J.S., Cardie, C.: Identifying appropriate support for propositions in online user comments. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), p. 29 (2014). \n                      http:\/\/aclweb.org\/anthology\/W\/W14\/W14-2105.pdf"},{"key":"65_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rajendran, P., Bollegala, D., Parsons, S.: Contextual stance classification of opinions: a step towards enthymeme reconstruction in online reviews. In: Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Argument Mining (ArgMining2016), pp. 31\u201339 (2016)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/W16-2804"},{"issue":"4","key":"65_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"514","DOI":"10.1177\/1362168815584455","volume":"20","author":"A Rouhshad","year":"2016","unstructured":"Rouhshad, A., Wigglesworth, G., Storch, N.: The nature of negotiations in face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication in pair interactions. Lang. Teach. Res. 20(4), 514\u2013534 (2016)","journal-title":"Lang. Teach. Res."},{"issue":"3","key":"65_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1007\/s10869-016-9465-6","volume":"32","author":"J Schulze","year":"2017","unstructured":"Schulze, J., Schultze, M., West, S.G., Krumm, S.: The knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics required for face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication: similar or distinct constructs? J. Bus. Psychol. 32(3), 283\u2013300 (2017)","journal-title":"J. Bus. Psychol."},{"key":"65_CR19","volume-title":"Persuasion: Understanding, Practice, and Analysis","author":"HW Simons","year":"1976","unstructured":"Simons, H.W.: Persuasion: Understanding, Practice, and Analysis. Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Reading (1976)"},{"key":"65_CR20","unstructured":"Van den Hoonaard, W.C.: Inter-and intracoder reliability. In: The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, vol. 1, pp. 445\u2013446 (2008)"},{"key":"65_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wacholder, N., Muresan, S., Ghosh, D., Aakhus, M.: Annotating multiparty discourse: challenges for agreement metrics. In: Proceedings of LAW VIII-The 8th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, pp. 120\u2013128 (2014)","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/W14-4918"},{"key":"65_CR22","unstructured":"Walker, M.A., Tree, J.E.F., Anand, P., Abbott, R., King, J.: A corpus for research on deliberation and debate. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), 21\u201327 May, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 812\u2013817 (2012)"},{"key":"65_CR23","unstructured":"Wyner, A., Schneider, J., Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T.: Semi-automated argumentative analysis of online product reviews. In: Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, vol. 245, pp. 43\u201350 (2012)"},{"issue":"12","key":"65_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2783","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23882","volume":"68","author":"L Xiao","year":"2017","unstructured":"Xiao, L., Conroy, N.: Discourse relations in rationale-containing text-segments. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 68(12), 2783\u20132794 (2017)","journal-title":"J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol."}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Information in Contemporary Society"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-15742-5_65","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,20]],"date-time":"2019-05-20T08:48:34Z","timestamp":1558342114000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-15742-5_65"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"ISBN":["9783030157418","9783030157425"],"references-count":24,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-15742-5_65","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"assertion":[{"value":"13 March 2019","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"iConference","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Information","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Washington, DC","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"USA","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2019","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"31 March 2019","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"3 April 2019","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"14","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"iconference2019","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/ischools.org\/the-iconference\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Double-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"ConfTool","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"133","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"44","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"33","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"33% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"-","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}},{"value":"88 short papers were submitted in addition to the 133 full papers.","order":10,"name":"additional_info_on_review_process","label":"Additional Info on Review Process","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information"}}]}}