{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,17]],"date-time":"2025-10-17T14:04:59Z","timestamp":1760709899211,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":20,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030190330"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030190347"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]],"date-time":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1546300800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>The popularity of agile methods is constantly increasing. Information and feedback on how these frameworks were adopted can easily be found in academia and industrial knowledge bases. Such a collective experience allowed the development of many approaches in the aim of simplifying the adoption process and maximizing the chances of success. These approaches provide practitioners with guidelines to help them find the practice that suits their team best. Nonetheless, these approaches are not systematic and practitioners need to go through a long process. For instance, they need to identify the important situational factors that can have a positive\/negative effect on the agile practice adoption. Available experiences thus require lots of effort to be discovered. This research proposes an agile methods knowledge representation using an ontology so that the knowledge and experience on agile adoption reported in literature may be reusable and systematic. Based on this model, added knowledge and inference rules, practitioners will systematically be able to decide which practice to select and adopt, i.e, for a given goal, practitioners can retrieve which practices to achieve; from a situation, teams can tell what can be harmful and what can be useful for adopting a practice or what problems they may encounter; etc.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-19034-7_2","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,10]],"date-time":"2019-05-10T23:08:11Z","timestamp":1557529691000},"page":"19-34","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Agile Methods Knowledge Representation for Systematic Practices Adoption"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Soreangsey","family":"Kiv","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Samedi","family":"Heng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Manuel","family":"Kolp","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yves","family":"Wautelet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"2_CR1","unstructured":"Inference. https:\/\/www.w3.org\/standards\/semanticweb\/inference"},{"key":"2_CR2","unstructured":"DAML ontology library (2004). http:\/\/www.daml.org\/ontologies"},{"key":"2_CR3","unstructured":"Protege ontology library (2018). https:\/\/protegewiki.stanford.edu\/wiki\/Protege_Ontology_Library"},{"key":"2_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Abbas, N., Gravell, A.M., Wills, G.B.: Using factor analysis to generate clusters of agile practices (a guide for agile process improvement). In: 2010 AGILE Conference, pp. 11\u201320. IEEE (2010)","DOI":"10.1109\/AGILE.2010.15"},{"key":"2_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2015.08.035","volume":"110","author":"AS Campanelli","year":"2015","unstructured":"Campanelli, A.S., Parreiras, F.S.: Agile methods tailoring-a systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 110, 85\u2013100 (2015)","journal-title":"J. Syst. Softw."},{"key":"2_CR6","unstructured":"COLORE: Semantic technologies library. http:\/\/stl.mie.utoronto.ca\/colore"},{"key":"2_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2015.12.003","volume":"74","author":"VP Eloranta","year":"2016","unstructured":"Eloranta, V.P., Koskimies, K., Mikkonen, T.: Exploring ScrumBut\u2014an empirical study of scrum anti-patterns. Inf. Softw. Technol. 74, 194\u2013203 (2016)","journal-title":"Inf. Softw. Technol."},{"key":"2_CR8","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-14347-2_15","volume-title":"New Modeling Concepts for Today\u2019s Software Processes","author":"HC Esfahani","year":"2010","unstructured":"Esfahani, H.C., Yu, E.: A repository of agile method fragments. In: M\u00fcnch, J., Yang, Y., Sch\u00e4fer, W. (eds.) ICSP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6195, pp. 163\u2013174. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-14347-2_15"},{"key":"2_CR9","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"424","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-13094-6_33","volume-title":"Advanced Information Systems Engineering","author":"HC Esfahani","year":"2010","unstructured":"Esfahani, H.C., Yu, E., Cabot, J.: Situational evaluation of method fragments: an evidence-based goal-oriented approach. In: Pernici, B. (ed.) CAiSE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6051, pp. 424\u2013438. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-13094-6_33"},{"key":"2_CR10","unstructured":"Fitzgerald, B., Russo, N., O\u2019Kane, T.: An empirical study of system development method tailoring in practice. In: ECIS 2000 Proceedings, p. 4 (2000)"},{"key":"2_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gregorio, D.D.: How the business analyst supports and encourages collaboration on agile projects. In: 2012 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon), pp. 1\u20134. IEEE (2012)","DOI":"10.1109\/SysCon.2012.6189437"},{"key":"2_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kiv, S., Heng, S., Kolp, M., Wautelet, Y.: An intentional perspective on partial agile adoption. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Software Technologies - Volume 1, ICSOFT, pp. 116\u2013127. INSTICC, SciTePress (2017)","DOI":"10.5220\/0006429301160127"},{"key":"2_CR13","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-03673-7_2","volume-title":"Product-Focused Software Process Improvement","author":"S Kiv","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kiv, S., Heng, S., Kolp, M., Wautelet, Y.: Agile manifesto and practices selection for tailoring software development: a systematic literature review. In: Kuhrmann, M., et al. (eds.) PROFES 2018. LNCS, vol. 11271, pp. 12\u201330. Springer, Cham (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-03673-7_2"},{"key":"2_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maham, M.: Planning and facilitating release retrospectives. In: Agile 2008 Conference, pp. 176\u2013180. IEEE (2008)","DOI":"10.1109\/Agile.2008.60"},{"key":"2_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moe, N.B., Aurum, A.: Understanding decision-making in agile software development: a case-study. In: 34th Euromicro Conference on 2008 Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, SEAA 2008, pp. 216\u2013223. IEEE (2008)","DOI":"10.1109\/SEAA.2008.55"},{"issue":"8","key":"2_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"853","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2011.11.006","volume":"54","author":"NB Moe","year":"2012","unstructured":"Moe, N.B., Aurum, A., Dyb\u00e5, T.: Challenges of shared decision-making: a multiple case study of agile software development. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54(8), 853\u2013865 (2012)","journal-title":"Inf. Softw. Technol."},{"key":"2_CR17","unstructured":"Noy, N.F., McGuinness, D.L.: Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology (2001)"},{"key":"2_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paasivaara, M., Lassenius, C.: Scaling scrum in a large globally distributed organization: a case study. In: 2016 IEEE 11th International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE), pp. 74\u201383. IEEE (2016)","DOI":"10.1109\/ICGSE.2016.34"},{"key":"2_CR19","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"290","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-20677-1_21","volume-title":"Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming","author":"R Santos","year":"2011","unstructured":"Santos, R., Flentge, F., Begin, M.-E., Navarro, V.: Agile technical management of industrial contracts: scrum development of ground segment software at the European Space Agency. In: Sillitti, A., Hazzan, O., Bache, E., Albaladejo, X. (eds.) XP 2011. LNBIP, vol. 77, pp. 290\u2013305. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-20677-1_21"},{"key":"2_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stray, V.G., Lindsjorn, Y., Sjoberg, D.I.: Obstacles to efficient daily meetings in agile development projects: a case study. In: 2013 ACM\/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 95\u2013102. IEEE (2013)","DOI":"10.1109\/ESEM.2013.30"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-19034-7_2","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,12]],"date-time":"2024-03-12T13:38:42Z","timestamp":1710250722000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-19034-7_2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"ISBN":["9783030190330","9783030190347"],"references-count":20,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-19034-7_2","relation":{},"ISSN":["1865-1348","1865-1356"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1865-1348"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1865-1356"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"assertion":[{"value":"27 April 2019","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"XP","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Agile Software Development","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Montreal, QC","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Canada","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2019","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"21 May 2019","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"25 May 2019","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"20","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"xpu2019","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/www.agilealliance.org\/xp2019\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"45","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"15","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"33% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"4","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"4","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}