{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,27]],"date-time":"2025-03-27T07:57:23Z","timestamp":1743062243957,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":27,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030190330"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030190347"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]],"date-time":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1546300800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>The necessity of software as stand-alone products, and as central parts of non-traditional software products have changed how software products are developed. It started with the introduction of the agile manifesto and has resulted in a change of how software process improvements (SPI) are conducted. Although there are agile SPI methods and several agile practices for evaluating and improving current processes and ways-of-working, no method or practices for evaluating the backlog exists. To address this gap, the Backlog Assessment Method (BAM) was developed and applied in collaboration with Telenor Sweden. BAM enables agile organizations to assess backlogs, and assure that the backlog items are good-enough for their needs and well aligned with the decision process. The results from the validation show that BAM is feasible and relevant in an industrial environment, and it indicates that BAM is useful as a tool to perform analysis of items in a specific backlog.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-19034-7_4","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,10]],"date-time":"2019-05-10T23:08:11Z","timestamp":1557529691000},"page":"53-68","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["BAM - Backlog Assessment Method"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Richard Berntsson","family":"Svensson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Tony","family":"Gorschek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Per-Olof","family":"Bengtsson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Jonas","family":"Widerberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"4_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1479","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2009.03.036","volume":"82","author":"K Petersen","year":"2009","unstructured":"Petersen, K., Wohlin, C.: A comparison of issues and advantages in agile and incremental development between state of the art and an industrial case. J. Syst. Softw. 82, 1479\u20131490 (2009)","journal-title":"J. Syst. Softw."},{"key":"4_CR2","unstructured":"Agile Alliance: Manifesto for agile software development (2001). https:\/\/www.agilealliance.org\/agile101\/the-agile-manifesto\/. Accessed 5 Jan 2019"},{"key":"4_CR3","volume-title":"Succeeding with Agile: Software Development Using Scrum","author":"M Cohn","year":"2009","unstructured":"Cohn, M.: Succeeding with Agile: Software Development Using Scrum. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2009)"},{"key":"4_CR4","first-page":"81","volume":"13","author":"I Aaen","year":"2001","unstructured":"Aaen, I., Arent, J., Mathiassen, L., Ngwenyama, O.: A conceptual MAP of software process improvement. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 13, 81\u2013101 (2001)","journal-title":"Scand. J. Inf. Syst."},{"issue":"1","key":"4_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1002\/spip.305","volume":"12","author":"O Salo","year":"2007","unstructured":"Salo, O., Abrahamsson, P.: An iterative improvement process for agile software development. Softw. Process. Improv. Pract. 12(1), 81\u2013100 (2007)","journal-title":"Softw. Process. Improv. Pract."},{"key":"4_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1145\/1226736.1226739","volume":"50","author":"S Nerur","year":"2007","unstructured":"Nerur, S., Balijepally, V.: Theoretical reflections on agile development methodologies. Commun. ACM 50, 79\u201383 (2007)","journal-title":"Commun. ACM"},{"key":"4_CR7","volume-title":"Agile Project Management with Scrum","author":"K Schwaber","year":"2004","unstructured":"Schwaber, K.: Agile Project Management with Scrum. Microsoft Press, Washington DC (2004)"},{"key":"4_CR8","volume-title":"A Practical Guide to the Most Popular Agile Process","author":"KS Rubin","year":"2013","unstructured":"Rubin, K.S.: A Practical Guide to the Most Popular Agile Process. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2013)"},{"issue":"1","key":"4_CR9","first-page":"67","volume":"5","author":"I Allison","year":"2005","unstructured":"Allison, I.: Towards an agile approach to software process improvement: addressing the changing needs of software products. Commun. IIMA 5(1), 67\u201376 (2005)","journal-title":"Commun. IIMA"},{"key":"4_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Santana, C., Queiroz, F., Vasconcelos, A., Gusmao, C.: Software process improvement in agile software development: a systematic literature review. In: 41st Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, pp. 325\u2013332 (2015)","DOI":"10.1109\/SEAA.2015.82"},{"issue":"1","key":"4_CR11","first-page":"3","volume":"2","author":"C Patel","year":"2009","unstructured":"Patel, C., Rumachandran, M.: Agile maturity model (AMM): a software process improvement framework for agile software development practices. Int. J. Softw. Eng. 2(1), 3\u201328 (2009)","journal-title":"Int. J. Softw. Eng."},{"key":"4_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McCaffery, F., Pikkarainen, M., Richardson, I.: AHAA - agile, hybrid assessment method for automotive safety critical SMEs. In: 30th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 551\u2013560 (2008)","DOI":"10.1145\/1368088.1368164"},{"key":"4_CR13","series-title":"Communications in Computer and Information Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-22206-1_15","volume-title":"Systems, Software and Service Process Improvement","author":"MA Ringstad","year":"2011","unstructured":"Ringstad, M.A., Dings\u00f8yr, T., Brede Moe, N.: Agile process improvement: diagnosis and planning to improve teamwork. In: O\u2019Connor, R.V., Pries-Heje, J., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2011. CCIS, vol. 172, pp. 167\u2013178. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-22206-1_15"},{"key":"4_CR14","volume-title":"Crystal Clear: A Human-powered Methodology for Small Teams","author":"A Cockburn","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cockburn, A.: Crystal Clear: A Human-powered Methodology for Small Teams. Wesley, Stoughton (2005)"},{"issue":"12","key":"4_CR15","first-page":"1074","volume":"26","author":"M Khurum","year":"2014","unstructured":"Khurum, M., Petersen, K., Gorschek, T.: Extending value stream mapping through waste definition beyond customer perspective. J. Softw.: Eval. Process. 26(12), 1074\u20131105 (2014)","journal-title":"J. Softw.: Eval. Process."},{"key":"4_CR16","unstructured":"Derby, E., Larsen, D.: Agile Retrospectives: Making Good Teams Great!. Pragmatic Bookshelf (2006)"},{"issue":"6","key":"4_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"921","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2012.12.001","volume":"55","author":"K Wnuk","year":"2013","unstructured":"Wnuk, K., Gorschek, T., Zahda, S.: Obsolete software requirements. Inf. Softw. Technol. 55(6), 921\u2013940 (2013)","journal-title":"Inf. Softw. Technol."},{"key":"4_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gren, L., Berntsson Svensson, R., Unterkalmsteiner, M.: Is it possible to disregard obsolete requirements? - An initial experiment on a potentially new bias in software effort estimation. In: 10th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering, pp. 56\u201361 (2017)","DOI":"10.1109\/CHASE.2017.10"},{"issue":"6","key":"4_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"795","DOI":"10.1142\/S0218194006003002","volume":"16","author":"A Aurum","year":"2006","unstructured":"Aurum, A., Wohlin, C., Porter, A.: Aligning software project decisions: a case study. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng. 16(6), 795\u2013818 (2006)","journal-title":"Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng."},{"key":"4_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Robson, C.: Real World Research. Blackwell (2002)","DOI":"10.1016\/S0262-1762(02)80276-0"},{"key":"4_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9781118181034","volume-title":"Case Study Research in Software Engineering: Guidelines and Examples","author":"P Runeson","year":"2012","unstructured":"Runeson, P., H\u00f6st, M., Rainer, A., Regnell, B.: Case Study Research in Software Engineering: Guidelines and Examples. Wiley, Hoboken (2012)"},{"issue":"5","key":"4_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1080\/01972240490507974","volume":"20","author":"MJ Eppler","year":"2004","unstructured":"Eppler, M.J., Menigs, J.: The concept of information overload: a review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. Inf. Soc. 20(5), 325\u2013344 (2004)","journal-title":"Inf. Soc."},{"issue":"6","key":"4_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1498","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2012.12.052","volume":"86","author":"E Tom","year":"2013","unstructured":"Tom, E., Aurum, A., Vidgen, R.: An exploration of technical debt. J. Syst. Softw. 86(6), 1498\u20131516 (2013)","journal-title":"J. Syst. Softw."},{"key":"4_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Savolainen, J., Kuusela, J., Vilavaara, A.: Transition to agile development - rediscovery of important requirements engineering practices. In: 18th IEEE Requirements Engineering Conference, pp. 289\u2013294 (2010)","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2010.41"},{"issue":"7","key":"4_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1224","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2013.01.006","volume":"55","author":"R Berntsson Svensson","year":"2013","unstructured":"Berntsson Svensson, R., Olsson, T., Regnell, B.: An investigation of how quality requirements are specified in industrial practice. Inf. Softw. Technol. 55(7), 1224\u20131236 (2013)","journal-title":"Inf. Softw. Technol."},{"key":"4_CR26","volume-title":"Software Requirements: Styles and Techniques","author":"S Lauesen","year":"2002","unstructured":"Lauesen, S.: Software Requirements: Styles and Techniques. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2002)"},{"key":"4_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Berczuk, S.: Back to basics: the role of agile principles in success with a distributed scrum team. In: Agile Conference, pp. 13\u201317 (2007)","DOI":"10.1109\/AGILE.2007.17"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-19034-7_4","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,12]],"date-time":"2024-03-12T13:38:54Z","timestamp":1710250734000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-19034-7_4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"ISBN":["9783030190330","9783030190347"],"references-count":27,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-19034-7_4","relation":{},"ISSN":["1865-1348","1865-1356"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1865-1348"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1865-1356"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"assertion":[{"value":"27 April 2019","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"XP","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Agile Software Development","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Montreal, QC","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Canada","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2019","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"21 May 2019","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"25 May 2019","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"20","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"xpu2019","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/www.agilealliance.org\/xp2019\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"45","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"15","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"33% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"4","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"4","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}