{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,9]],"date-time":"2025-12-09T08:22:29Z","timestamp":1765268549710,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":27,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030190330"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030190347"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]],"date-time":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1546300800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>There is a growing interest in making software more accessible for everyone, which is emphasized by the numerous suggestions passed into law in many countries. However, many software organizations that use agile methods postpone or neglect accessibility testing. We aimed to understand how accessibility testing can be better integrated into the daily routine of agile projects by conducting a case study in a Norwegian software company. We investigated three accessibility testing tools: automatic checker, simulation glasses, and a dyslexia simulator. We hosted sessions at which agile project members used the tools while thinking out loud, responded to questionnaires, and were interviewed at the end. Additionally, we observed the project members for 18 workdays. Our results show that all three tools are suitable for agile projects. Especially the automatic checker and simulation glasses worked well in finding accessibility issues and were described as easy to use by the project members. Software organizations should empower their agile project members with low-cost and efficient accessibility testing tools to make their products more accessible for all. Doing this early and often in the development cycle may save the project from potential high costs at a later stage.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-19034-7_6","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,10]],"date-time":"2019-05-10T23:08:11Z","timestamp":1557529691000},"page":"86-101","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Empowering Agile Project Members with Accessibility Testing Tools: A Case Study"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Viktoria","family":"Stray","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Aleksander","family":"Bai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nikolai","family":"Sverdrup","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Heidi","family":"Mork","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,27]]},"reference":[{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Petrie, H., Bevan, N.: The evaluation of accessibility, usability, and user experience. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) The Universal Access Handbook, pp. 1\u201316. CRC Press (2009)","key":"6_CR1","DOI":"10.1201\/9781420064995-c20"},{"key":"6_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1016\/j.procs.2014.02.031","volume":"27","author":"M-L S\u00e1nchez-Gord\u00f3n","year":"2014","unstructured":"S\u00e1nchez-Gord\u00f3n, M.-L., Moreno, L.: Toward an integration of Web accessibility into testing processes. Procedia Comput. Sci. 27, 281\u2013291 (2014)","journal-title":"Procedia Comput. Sci."},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kane, D.: Finding a place for discount usability engineering in agile development: throwing down the gauntlet. In: Proceedings of the Agile Development Conference, pp. 40\u201346. IEEE (2003)","key":"6_CR3","DOI":"10.1109\/ADC.2003.1231451"},{"key":"6_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1007\/s10209-007-0108-6","volume":"7","author":"G Zimmermann","year":"2008","unstructured":"Zimmermann, G., Vanderheiden, G.: Accessible design and testing in the application development process: considerations for an integrated approach. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 7, 117\u2013128 (2008)","journal-title":"Univ. Access Inf. Soc."},{"unstructured":"Nielsen, J.: Return on Investment for Usability. Jakob Nielsen\u2019s Alertbox (2003)","key":"6_CR5"},{"unstructured":"Eklund, J., Levingston, C.: Usability in Agile Development, pp. 1\u20137. UX Research (2008)","key":"6_CR6"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stray, V., Moe, N.B., Hoda, R.: Autonomous agile teams: challenges and future directions for research. In: Proceedings of the XP2018 Scientific Workshops, Porto, Portugal. ACM (2018)","key":"6_CR7","DOI":"10.1145\/3234152.3234182"},{"unstructured":"Mikalsen, M., Moe, N.B., Stray, V., Nyrud, H.: Agile digital transformation: a case study of interdependencies. In: Proceedings of the Thirty Ninth International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2018), San Francisco (2018)","key":"6_CR8"},{"unstructured":"Luj\u00e1n-Mora, S., Masri, F.: Integration of web accessibility into agile methods. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2012), pp. 123\u2013127 (2012)","key":"6_CR9"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ferreira, J., Noble, J., Biddle, R.: Agile development iterations and UI design. In: Agile Conference (AGILE), pp. 50\u201358. IEEE (2007)","key":"6_CR10","DOI":"10.1109\/AGILE.2007.8"},{"unstructured":"Fuglerud, K.S.: Inclusive design of ICT: The challenge of diversity (2014)","key":"6_CR11"},{"key":"6_CR12","volume-title":"Case Study Research: Design and Methods","author":"RK Yin","year":"2009","unstructured":"Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2009)"},{"key":"6_CR13","volume-title":"Cost-Justifying Usability: An Update for the Internet Age","author":"RG Bias","year":"2005","unstructured":"Bias, R.G., Mayhew, D.J.: Cost-Justifying Usability: An Update for the Internet Age. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2005)"},{"unstructured":"Bai, A., Mork, H.C., Stray, V.: A cost-benefit analysis of accessibility testing in agile software development: results from a multiple case study. Int. J. Adv. Softw. 10, 1 (2017)","key":"6_CR14"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Haskins, B., Stecklein, J., Dick, B., Moroney, G., Lovell, R., Dabney, J.: Error cost escalation through the project life cycle. In: INCOSE International Symposium, pp. 1723\u20131737. Wiley Online Library (2004)","key":"6_CR15","DOI":"10.1002\/j.2334-5837.2004.tb00608.x"},{"key":"6_CR16","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-33515-5_1","volume-title":"Agile Processes, in Software Engineering, and Extreme Programming","author":"S Bordin","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bordin, S., De Angeli, A.: Focal points for a more user-centred agile development. In: Sharp, H., Hall, T. (eds.) XP 2016. LNBIP, vol. 251, pp. 3\u201315. Springer, Cham (2016). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-33515-5_1"},{"key":"6_CR17","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1007\/11774129_15","volume-title":"Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering","author":"S Chamberlain","year":"2006","unstructured":"Chamberlain, S., Sharp, H., Maiden, N.: Towards a framework for integrating agile development and user-centred design. In: Abrahamsson, P., Marchesi, M., Succi, G. (eds.) XP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4044, pp. 143\u2013153. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/11774129_15"},{"key":"6_CR18","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"168","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-30350-0_12","volume-title":"Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming","author":"AM Moreno","year":"2012","unstructured":"Moreno, A.M., Yag\u00fce, A.: Agile user stories enriched with usability. In: Wohlin, C. (ed.) XP 2012. LNBIP, vol. 111, pp. 168\u2013176. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-30350-0_12"},{"unstructured":"Meszaros, G., Aston, J.: Adding usability testing to an agile project. In: Agile Conference, pp. 289\u2013294. IEEE (2006)","key":"6_CR19"},{"key":"6_CR20","first-page":"821","volume":"256","author":"A Bai","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bai, A., Fuglerud, K., Skjerve, R.A., Halbach, T.: Categorization and comparison of accessibility testing methods for software development. Stud. Health Technol. Inf. 256, 821\u2013831 (2018)","journal-title":"Stud. Health Technol. Inf."},{"unstructured":"W3C Working Group Reading Level: Understanding Success Criterion 3.1.5. https:\/\/www.w3.org\/tr\/understanding-WCAG20\/meaning-supplements.html","key":"6_CR21"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Stray, V., Moe, N.B., Sj\u00f8berg, D.I.K.: The daily stand-up meeting: start breaking the rules. IEEE Softw. (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ms.2018.2875988","key":"6_CR22","DOI":"10.1109\/ms.2018.2875988"},{"unstructured":"Derby, E., Larsen, D., Schwaber, K.: Agile Retrospectives: Making Good Teams Great. Pragmatic Bookshelf (2006)","key":"6_CR23"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Edwards, R., Holland, J.: What is Qualitative Interviewing? A&C Black (2013)","key":"6_CR24","DOI":"10.5040\/9781472545244"},{"unstructured":"Albert, W., Tullis, T.: Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics. Newnes (2013)","key":"6_CR25"},{"key":"6_CR26","first-page":"30","volume":"4","author":"L Constantine","year":"1995","unstructured":"Constantine, L.: What do users want? Engineering usability into software. Windows Tech J. 4, 30\u201339 (1995)","journal-title":"Windows Tech J."},{"key":"6_CR27","first-page":"1","volume":"3","author":"C Nancarrow","year":"2000","unstructured":"Nancarrow, C., Brace, I.: Saying the \u201cright thing\u201d: coping with social desirability bias in marketing research. Bristol Bus. Sch. Teach. Res. Rev. 3, 1\u201311 (2000)","journal-title":"Bristol Bus. Sch. Teach. Res. Rev."}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-19034-7_6","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,12]],"date-time":"2024-03-12T13:39:29Z","timestamp":1710250769000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-19034-7_6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"ISBN":["9783030190330","9783030190347"],"references-count":27,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-19034-7_6","relation":{},"ISSN":["1865-1348","1865-1356"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1865-1348"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1865-1356"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"assertion":[{"value":"27 April 2019","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"XP","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Agile Software Development","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Montreal, QC","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Canada","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2019","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"21 May 2019","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"25 May 2019","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"20","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"xpu2019","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/www.agilealliance.org\/xp2019\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"45","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"15","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"33% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"4","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"4","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}