{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,2]],"date-time":"2025-08-02T04:31:06Z","timestamp":1754109066012},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":19,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030280048"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030280055"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]],"date-time":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1546300800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-28005-5_30","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,8]],"date-time":"2019-09-08T23:03:18Z","timestamp":1567983798000},"page":"392-401","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Why Do Organizations Focus on Assessments Instead of Their Process-Improvement Objectives?"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Maria","family":"Eckey","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Christian","family":"Greiner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Thomas","family":"Peisl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"30_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e62","DOI":"10.7717\/peerj-cs.62","volume":"2","author":"M Kuhrmann","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kuhrmann, M., Diebold, P., M\u00fcnch, J.: Software process improvement: a systematic mapping study on the state of the art. Peer J. Comput. Sci. 2, e62 (2016)","journal-title":"Peer J. Comput. Sci."},{"issue":"9","key":"30_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"700","DOI":"10.1002\/smr.1704","volume":"27","author":"M Niazi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Niazi, M.: A comparative study of software process improvement implementation success factors. J. Softw. Evol. Process 27(9), 700\u2013722 (2015)","journal-title":"J. Softw. Evol. Process"},{"key":"30_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Idri, A., Cheikhi, L.: A survey of secondary studies in software process improvement. In: 13th IEEE\/ACS International Conference of Computer Systems and Applications, AICCSA 2016 (2017)","DOI":"10.1109\/AICCSA.2016.7945655"},{"key":"30_CR4","unstructured":"Pries-Heje, J., Johansen, J.: SPI Manifesto (2010)"},{"issue":"12","key":"30_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1317","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2012.07.007","volume":"54","author":"R Wendler","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wendler, R.: The maturity of maturity model research: a systematic mapping study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54(12), 1317\u20131339 (2012)","journal-title":"Inf. Softw. Technol."},{"key":"30_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/j.csi.2017.01.008","volume":"52","author":"A Uskarc\u0131","year":"2017","unstructured":"Uskarc\u0131, A., Demir\u00f6rs, O.: Do staged maturity models result in organization-wide continuous process improvement? Insight from employees. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 52, 25\u201340 (2017)","journal-title":"Comput. Stand. Interfaces"},{"key":"30_CR7","unstructured":"ISO\/IEC 33001:2015-03: Information technology\u2014Process assessment\u2014Concepts and terminology (2015)"},{"key":"30_CR8","unstructured":"ISO\/IEC 33004:2015-03: Information technology\u2014Process assessment\u2014Requirements for process reference, process assessment and maturity models (2015)"},{"key":"30_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Garc\u00eda-Mireles, G.A., Moraga, M.\u00c1., Garc\u00eda, F.: Development of maturity models: a systematic literature review. In: 16th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE 2012, vol. 2012, no. 1, pp. 279\u2013283 (2012)","DOI":"10.1049\/ic.2012.0036"},{"key":"30_CR10","unstructured":"ISO\/IEC 33002:2015-03: Information technology\u2014Process assessment\u2014Requirements for performing process assessment (2015)"},{"key":"30_CR11","unstructured":"ISO\/IEC 33003:2015-03: Information technology\u2014Process assessment\u2014Requirements for performing process assessment frameworks (2015)"},{"key":"30_CR12","unstructured":"VDA QMC Working Group 13 Automotive SIG: Automotive SPICE - Process Reference Model Version 3.1, p. 132 (2017)"},{"key":"30_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paulk, M.: Capability maturity model for software. In: Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, 15 January 2002","DOI":"10.1002\/0471028959.sof589"},{"issue":"7","key":"30_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"605","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2007.07.003","volume":"50","author":"M Staples","year":"2008","unstructured":"Staples, M., Niazi, M.: Systematic review of organizational motivations for adopting CMM-based SPI. Inf. Softw. Technol. 50(7), 605\u2013620 (2008)","journal-title":"Inf. Softw. Technol."},{"key":"30_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kuhrmann, M., M\u00fcnch, J.: SPI is dead, isn\u2019t it? Clear the stage for continuous learning! (2019)","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSSP.2019.00012"},{"key":"30_CR16","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"360","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-49094-6_23","volume-title":"Product-Focused Software Process Improvement","author":"A Schmitt","year":"2016","unstructured":"Schmitt, A., Diebold, P.: Why do we do software process improvement? In: Abrahamsson, P., Jedlitschka, A., Nguyen Duc, A., Felderer, M., Amasaki, S., Mikkonen, T. (eds.) PROFES 2016. LNCS, vol. 10027, pp. 360\u2013367. Springer, Cham (2016). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-49094-6_23"},{"key":"30_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Parnas, D., Clements, P.C.: A rational design process: how and why to fake it, vol. SE-12 (1986)","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.1986.6312940"},{"key":"30_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lavall\u00e9e, M., Robillard, P.N.: The impacts of software process improvement on developers: a systematic review. In: 2012 34th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 113\u2013122 (2012)","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSE.2012.6227201"},{"key":"30_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2016.09.030","volume":"123","author":"FJS Vasconcellos","year":"2017","unstructured":"Vasconcellos, F.J.S., Landre, G.B., Cunha, J.A.O.G., Oliveira, J.L., Ferreira, R.A., Vincenzi, A.M.R.: Approaches to strategic alignment of software process improvement: a systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 123, 45\u201363 (2017)","journal-title":"J. Syst. Softw."}],"container-title":["Communications in Computer and Information Science","Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-28005-5_30","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,8]],"date-time":"2019-09-08T23:07:46Z","timestamp":1567984066000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-28005-5_30"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"ISBN":["9783030280048","9783030280055"],"references-count":19,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-28005-5_30","relation":{},"ISSN":["1865-0929","1865-0937"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1865-0929"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1865-0937"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"assertion":[{"value":"22 August 2019","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"EuroSPI","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"European Conference on Software Process Improvement","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Edinburgh","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"United Kingdom","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2019","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"18 September 2019","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"20 September 2019","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"26","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"eurospi2019","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"http:\/\/2019.eurospi.net\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"2019.eurospi.net","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"28","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"18","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"64% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"4","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"4","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"No","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Research track: 18 papers out of 28 submissions. Selected and invited workshop papers: 41","order":10,"name":"additional_info_on_review_process","label":"Additional Info on Review Process","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}