{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,11]],"date-time":"2024-09-11T11:16:02Z","timestamp":1726053362438},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":33,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030302740"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030302757"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]],"date-time":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1546300800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-30275-7_22","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,2]],"date-time":"2019-10-02T23:20:05Z","timestamp":1570058405000},"page":"285-298","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Comparing Static and Dynamic Weighted Software Coupling Metrics"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Henning","family":"Schnoor","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Wilhelm","family":"Hasselbring","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"22_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ahmad, M.O., Markkula, J., Oivo, M.: Kanban in software development: a systematic literature review. In: 2013 39th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, pp. 9\u201316, September 2013. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/SEAA.2013.28","DOI":"10.1109\/SEAA.2013.28"},{"key":"22_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Allier, S., Vaucher, S., Dufour, B., Sahraoui, H.A.: Deriving coupling metrics from call graphs. In: Tenth IEEE International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation, SCAM 2010, Timisoara, Romania, pp. 43\u201352, 12\u201313 September 2010. IEEE Computer Society (2010). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/SCAM.2010.25","DOI":"10.1109\/SCAM.2010.25"},{"key":"22_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chug, A., Sharma, H.: Dynamic metrics are superior than static metrics in maintainability prediction: an empirical case study. In: 2015 4th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (ICRITO)(Trends and Future Directions), pp. 1\u20136. IEEE (2015)","DOI":"10.1109\/ICRITO.2015.7359354"},{"key":"22_CR4","unstructured":"Apache Software Foundation: Commons BCEL: Byte code engineering library (2016). \n                    https:\/\/commons.apache.org\/proper\/commons-bcel\/"},{"issue":"8","key":"22_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.2004.41","volume":"30","author":"E Arisholm","year":"2004","unstructured":"Arisholm, E., Briand, L.C., F\u00f8yen, A.: Dynamic coupling measurement for object-oriented software. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 30(8), 491\u2013506 (2004). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/TSE.2004.41","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Software Eng."},{"key":"22_CR6","unstructured":"Atlassian: JIRA project and issue tracking (2017). \n                    https:\/\/www.atlassian.com\/software\/jira\/"},{"key":"22_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bogner, J., Wagner, S., Zimmermann, A.: Automatically measuring the maintainability of service-and microservice-based systems: a literature review. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Workshop on Software Measurement and 12th International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement, pp. 107\u2013115. ACM (2017)","DOI":"10.1145\/3143434.3143443"},{"issue":"1","key":"22_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00125812","volume":"1","author":"L Briand","year":"1996","unstructured":"Briand, L., Emam, K.E., Morasca, S.: On the application of measurement theory in software engineering. Empirical Softw. Eng. 1(1), 61\u201388 (1996). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF00125812","journal-title":"Empirical Softw. Eng."},{"key":"22_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1016\/S0065-2458(02)80005-5","volume":"56","author":"LC Briand","year":"2002","unstructured":"Briand, L.C., W\u00fcst, J.: Empirical studies of quality models in object-oriented systems. Adv. Comput. 56, 97\u2013166 (2002). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0065-2458(02)80005-5","journal-title":"Adv. Comput."},{"issue":"3","key":"22_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1016\/S0164-1212(99)00102-8","volume":"51","author":"LC Briand","year":"2000","unstructured":"Briand, L.C., W\u00fcst, J., Daly, J.W., Porter, D.V.: Exploring the relationships between design measures and software quality in object-oriented systems. J. Syst. Softw. 51(3), 245\u2013273 (2000). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0164-1212(99)00102-8","journal-title":"J. Syst. Softw."},{"issue":"3","key":"22_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24:1","DOI":"10.1145\/2928268","volume":"25","author":"I Candela","year":"2016","unstructured":"Candela, I., Bavota, G., Russo, B., Oliveto, R.: Using cohesion and coupling for software remodularization: is it enough? ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 25(3), 24:1\u201324:28 (2016). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2928268","journal-title":"ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol."},{"issue":"6","key":"22_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1109\/32.689404","volume":"24","author":"RH Carver","year":"1998","unstructured":"Carver, R.H., Counsell, S., Nithi, R.V.: An evaluation of the MOOD set of object-oriented software metrics. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 24(6), 491\u2013496 (1998). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/32.689404","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Software Eng."},{"issue":"5","key":"22_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1016","DOI":"10.1007\/s11390-010-9384-3","volume":"25","author":"JK Chhabra","year":"2010","unstructured":"Chhabra, J.K., Gupta, V.: A survey of dynamic software metrics. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 25(5), 1016\u20131029 (2010). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11390-010-9384-3","journal-title":"J. Comput. Sci. Technol."},{"key":"22_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chidamber, S.R., Kemerer, C.F.: Towards a metrics suite for object oriented design. In: OOPSLA, pp. 197\u2013211. ACM (1991)","DOI":"10.1145\/118014.117970"},{"issue":"6","key":"22_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"476","DOI":"10.1109\/32.295895","volume":"20","author":"SR Chidamber","year":"1994","unstructured":"Chidamber, S.R., Kemerer, C.F.: A metrics suite for object oriented design. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 20(6), 476\u2013493 (1994). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/32.295895","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Software Eng."},{"issue":"5","key":"22_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"684","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.2009.28","volume":"35","author":"B Cornelissen","year":"2009","unstructured":"Cornelissen, B., Zaidman, A., van Deursen, A., Moonen, L., Koschke, R.: A systematic survey of program comprehension through dynamic analysis. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 35(5), 684\u2013702 (2009)","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Software Eng."},{"key":"22_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2018.11.008","volume":"107","author":"E Fregnan","year":"2019","unstructured":"Fregnan, E., Baum, T., Palomba, F., Bacchelli, A.: A survey on software coupling relations and tools. Inf. Softw. Technol. 107, 159\u2013178 (2019). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.infsof.2018.11.008","journal-title":"Inf. Softw. Technol."},{"issue":"2","key":"22_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1145\/2579281.2579296","volume":"39","author":"R Geetika","year":"2014","unstructured":"Geetika, R., Singh, P.: Dynamic coupling metrics for object oriented software systems: a survey. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 39(2), 1\u20138 (2014). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2579281.2579296","journal-title":"SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes"},{"key":"22_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1177\/0013164493053001007","volume":"53","author":"AR Gilpin","year":"1993","unstructured":"Gilpin, A.R.: Table for conversion of Kendall\u2019s tau to Spearman\u2019s rho within the context of measures of magnitude of effect for meta-analysis. Educ. Psychol. Measur. 53, 87\u201392 (1993). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0013164493053001007","journal-title":"Educ. Psychol. Measur."},{"key":"22_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"van Hoorn, A., Waller, J., Hasselbring, W.: Kieker: a framework for application performance monitoring and dynamic software analysis. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM\/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering (ICPE 2012), pp. 247\u2013248. ACM, April 2012. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2188286.2188326","DOI":"10.1145\/2188286.2188326"},{"issue":"1\/2","key":"22_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.2307\/2332226","volume":"30","author":"MG Kendall","year":"1938","unstructured":"Kendall, M.G.: A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 30(1\/2), 81\u201393 (1938)","journal-title":"Biometrika"},{"key":"22_CR22","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-45337-7_18","volume-title":"ECOOP 2001 \u2014 Object-Oriented Programming","author":"G Kiczales","year":"2001","unstructured":"Kiczales, G., Hilsdale, E., Hugunin, J., Kersten, M., Palm, J., Griswold, W.G.: An overview of aspectJ. In: Knudsen, J.L. (ed.) ECOOP 2001. LNCS, vol. 2072, pp. 327\u2013354. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/3-540-45337-7_18"},{"issue":"4","key":"22_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1842-n\/a","DOI":"10.1002\/smr.1842,e1842smr.1842","volume":"29","author":"S Kirbas","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kirbas, S., et al.: The relationship between evolutionary coupling and defects in large industrial software. J. Softw. Evol. Process 29(4), e1842-n\/a (2017). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/smr.1842,e1842smr.1842","journal-title":"J. Softw. Evol. Process"},{"issue":"1","key":"22_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.18417\/emisa.14.1","volume":"14","author":"H Knoche","year":"2019","unstructured":"Knoche, H., Hasselbring, W.: Drivers and barriers for microservice adoption - a survey among professionals in Germany. Enterpr. Model. Inf. Syst. Architectures (EMISAJ-Int. J. Conceptual Model.) 14(1), 1\u201335 (2019). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18417\/emisa.14.1","journal-title":"Enterpr. Model. Inf. Syst. Architectures (EMISAJ-Int. J. Conceptual Model.)"},{"issue":"4","key":"22_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1049\/iet-sen.2011.0206","volume":"6","author":"S Misra","year":"2012","unstructured":"Misra, S., Akman, I., Palacios, R.C.: Framework for evaluation and validation of software complexity measures. IET Software 6(4), 323\u2013334 (2012). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1049\/iet-sen.2011.0206","journal-title":"IET Software"},{"key":"22_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mitchell, B.S., Mancoridis, S.: Comparing the decompositions produced by software clustering algorithms using similarity measurements. In: 2001 International Conference on Software Maintenance, ICSM 2001, Florence, Italy, pp. 744\u2013753, 6\u201310 November 2001. IEEE Computer Society (2001). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ICSM.2001.972795","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSM.2001.972795"},{"key":"22_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nagappan, N., Ball, T., Zeller, A.: Mining metrics to predict component failures. In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering (ICSE 2006), pp. 452\u2013461. ACM (2006). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1134285.1134349","DOI":"10.1145\/1134285.1134349"},{"issue":"4","key":"22_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1007\/s11219-008-9051-x","volume":"16","author":"J Offutt","year":"2008","unstructured":"Offutt, J., Abdurazik, A., Schach, S.R.: Quantitatively measuring object-oriented couplings. Software Qual. J. 16(4), 489\u2013512 (2008). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11219-008-9051-x","journal-title":"Software Qual. J."},{"issue":"12","key":"22_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1053","DOI":"10.1145\/361598.361623","volume":"15","author":"DL Parnas","year":"1972","unstructured":"Parnas, D.L.: On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Commun. ACM 15(12), 1053\u20131058 (1972). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/361598.361623","journal-title":"Commun. ACM"},{"key":"22_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Schnoor, H., Hasselbring, W.: Toward measuring software coupling via weighted dynamic metrics. In: Chaudron, M., Crnkovic, I., Chechik, M., Harman, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceeedings, ICSE 2018, Gothenburg, Sweden, pp. 342\u2013343, May 27 - June 03 2018. ACM (2018). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3183440.3195000","DOI":"10.1145\/3183440.3195000"},{"key":"22_CR31","first-page":"205","volume-title":"Classics in Software Engineering","author":"W Stevens","year":"1979","unstructured":"Stevens, W., Myers, G., Constantine, L.: Structured design. In: Yourdon, E.N. (ed.) Classics in Software Engineering, pp. 205\u2013232. Yourdon Press, Upper Saddle River (1979)"},{"issue":"5","key":"22_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1109\/MC.2017.144","volume":"50","author":"JM Voas","year":"2017","unstructured":"Voas, J.M., Kuhn, R.: What happened to software metrics? IEEE Comput. 50(5), 88\u201398 (2017). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/MC.2017.144","journal-title":"IEEE Comput."},{"key":"22_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yacoub, S.M., Ammar, H.H., Robinson, T.: Dynamic metrics for object oriented designs. In: 6th IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS 1999), Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 50\u201361, 4\u20136 November 1999. IEEE Computer Society (1999). \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/METRIC.1999.809725","DOI":"10.1109\/METRIC.1999.809725"}],"container-title":["Communications in Computer and Information Science","Information and Software Technologies"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-30275-7_22","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,2]],"date-time":"2019-10-02T23:20:22Z","timestamp":1570058422000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-30275-7_22"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"ISBN":["9783030302740","9783030302757"],"references-count":33,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-30275-7_22","relation":{},"ISSN":["1865-0929","1865-0937"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1865-0929"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1865-0937"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"assertion":[{"value":"3 October 2019","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"ICIST","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Information and Software Technologies","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Vilnius","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Lithuania","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2019","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"10 October 2019","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"12 October 2019","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"25","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"icist2019","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/icist.ktu.edu\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Double-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"121","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"46","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"38% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}