{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,11]],"date-time":"2024-09-11T11:32:28Z","timestamp":1726054348096},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":18,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030316044"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030316051"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]],"date-time":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1546300800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-31605-1_10","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,10]],"date-time":"2019-10-10T16:41:22Z","timestamp":1570725682000},"page":"115-130","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Reasoning by a Bipolar Argumentation Framework for PROLEG"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Tatsuki","family":"Kawasaki","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Sosuke","family":"Moriguchi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Kazuko","family":"Takahashi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"10_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_18","volume-title":"Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2009","unstructured":"Bench-Capon, T., Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: Argumentation in legal reasoning. In: Simari, G., Rahwan, I. (eds.) Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 363\u2013382. Springer, Boston (2009). \n                      https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_18"},{"key":"10_CR2","unstructured":"Boella, G., Gabbay, D.M., van der Torre, L., Villata, S.: Support in abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of COMMA 2010, pp. 40\u201351 (2010)"},{"key":"10_CR3","unstructured":"Brewka, G., Woltran, S.: Abstract dialectical frameworks. In: Proceedings of KR 2010, pp. 102\u2013111 (2010)"},{"key":"10_CR4","unstructured":"Brewka, G., Ellmauthaler, S., Strass, H., Wallner, J.P., Woltran, S.: Abstract dialectical frameworks revisited. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2013, pp. 803\u2013809 (2013)"},{"key":"10_CR5","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1007\/11853886_11","volume-title":"Logics in Artificial Intelligence","author":"M Caminada","year":"2006","unstructured":"Caminada, M.: On the issue of reinstatement in argumentation. In: Fisher, M., van der Hoek, W., Konev, B., Lisitsa, A. (eds.) JELIA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4160, pp. 111\u2013123. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). \n                      https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/11853886_11"},{"key":"10_CR6","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1007\/11518655_33","volume-title":"Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty","author":"C Cayrol","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks. In: Godo, L. (ed.) ECSQARU 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3571, pp. 378\u2013389. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). \n                      https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/11518655_33"},{"key":"10_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1002\/int.20389","volume":"25","author":"C Cayrol","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.: Coalitions of arguments: a tool for handling bipolar argumentation frameworks. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 25, 83\u2013109 (2010)","journal-title":"Int. J. Intell. Syst."},{"key":"10_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"876","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2013.03.001","volume":"54","author":"C Cayrol","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.: Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 54, 876\u2013899 (2013)","journal-title":"Int. J. Approximate Reasoning"},{"key":"10_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77, 321\u2013357 (1995)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"10_CR10","unstructured":"Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: The stable model semantics for logic programming. In: Proceedings of ICLP, pp. 1070\u20131080 (1988)"},{"key":"10_CR11","unstructured":"Kawasaki, T., Moriguchi, S., Takahashi, K.: Transformation from PROLEG to a bipolar argumentation framework. In: Proceedings of SAFA 2018, pp. 36\u201347 (2018)"},{"key":"10_CR12","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-23963-2_14","volume-title":"Scalable Uncertainty Management","author":"F Nouioua","year":"2011","unstructured":"Nouioua, F., Risch, V.: Argumentation frameworks with necessities. In: Benferhat, S., Grant, J. (eds.) SUM 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6929, pp. 163\u2013176. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). \n                      https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-23963-2_14"},{"key":"10_CR13","unstructured":"Oren, N., Norman, T.J.: Semantics for evidence-based argumentation. In: Proceedings of COMMA 2008, pp. 276\u2013284 (2008)"},{"key":"10_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken, H., Reed, C., Walton, D.: Dialogues about the burden of proof. In: Proceedings of ICAIL 2005, pp. 115\u2013124 (2005)","DOI":"10.1145\/1165485.1165503"},{"key":"10_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0","volume-title":"Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence","year":"2009","unstructured":"Rahwan, I., Simari, G. (eds.): Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Boston (2009). \n                      https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0"},{"key":"10_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"961","DOI":"10.1142\/S0218213004001922","volume":"13","author":"C Reed","year":"2004","unstructured":"Reed, C., Rowe, G.: Araucaria: software for argument analysis, diagramming and representation. Int. J. AI Tools 13, 961\u2013980 (2004)","journal-title":"Int. J. AI Tools"},{"key":"10_CR17","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-25655-4_14","volume-title":"New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","author":"K Satoh","year":"2011","unstructured":"Satoh, K., et al.: PROLEG: an implementation of the presupposed ultimate fact theory of Japanese civil code by PROLOG technology. In: Onada, T., Bekki, D., McCready, E. (eds.) JSAI-isAI 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6797, pp. 153\u2013164. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). \n                      https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-25655-4_14"},{"key":"10_CR18","unstructured":"Satoh, K., et al.: On generality of PROLEG knowledge representation. In: Proceedings of JURISIN 2012, pp. 115\u2013128 (2012)"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-31605-1_10","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,10,10]],"date-time":"2019-10-10T17:10:03Z","timestamp":1570727403000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-31605-1_10"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"ISBN":["9783030316044","9783030316051"],"references-count":18,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-31605-1_10","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"assertion":[{"value":"11 October 2019","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"JSAI-isAI","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"JSAI International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Yokohama","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Japan","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2018","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"12 November 2018","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"14 November 2018","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"jsai2018a","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"http:\/\/www.ai-gakkai.or.jp\/isai\/isai2018","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Double-blind\/Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"97","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"28","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"5","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"29% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"2-3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"2-3","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}