{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,11]],"date-time":"2024-09-11T12:51:58Z","timestamp":1726059118142},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":38,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030353322"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030353339"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]],"date-time":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1546300800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-35333-9_19","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,18]],"date-time":"2019-11-18T00:01:29Z","timestamp":1574035289000},"page":"263-279","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Automated Functional Size Measurement: A Multiple Case Study in the Industry"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Christian","family":"Quesada-L\u00f3pez","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Alexandra","family":"Mart\u00ednez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Marcelo","family":"Jenkins","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Luis Carlos","family":"Salas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Juan Carlos","family":"G\u00f3mez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"19_CR1","unstructured":"Abrahao, S.: On the functional size measurement of object-oriented conceptual schemas: design and evaluation issues. Universidad Politecnica de Valencia (2004)"},{"key":"19_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2018.07.012","volume":"104","author":"S Abrah\u00e3o","year":"2018","unstructured":"Abrah\u00e3o, S., DeMarco, L., Ferrucci, F., Gomez, J., Gravino, C., Sarro, F.: Definition and evaluation of a cosmic measurement procedure for sizing web applications in a model-driven development environment. Inf. Softw. Technol. 104, 144\u2013161 (2018)","journal-title":"Inf. Softw. Technol."},{"key":"19_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470606834","volume-title":"Software Metrics and Software Metrology","author":"A Abran","year":"2010","unstructured":"Abran, A.: Software Metrics and Software Metrology. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)"},{"key":"19_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Akca, A., Tarhan, A.: Run-time measurement of cosmic functional size for java business applications: is it worth the cost? In: IWSM-MENSURA, pp. 54\u201359. IEEE (2013)","DOI":"10.1109\/IWSM-Mensura.2013.19"},{"key":"19_CR5","unstructured":"Albrecht, A.: Measuring application development productivity. In: Joint Share, Guide, and IBM Application Development Symposium (1979)"},{"key":"19_CR6","series-title":"Communications in Computer and Information Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-27207-3_14","volume-title":"Software Engineering, Business Continuity, and Education","author":"S Barkallah","year":"2011","unstructured":"Barkallah, S., Gherbi, A., Abran, A.: COSMIC functional size measurement using UML models. In: Kim, T., et al. (eds.) ASEA 2011. CCIS, vol. 257, pp. 137\u2013146. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-27207-3_14"},{"key":"19_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-68188-5","volume-title":"The IT Measurement Compendium: Estimating and Benchmarking Success with Functional Size Measurement","author":"M Bundschuh","year":"2008","unstructured":"Bundschuh, M., Dekkers, C.: The IT Measurement Compendium: Estimating and Benchmarking Success with Functional Size Measurement. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-540-68188-5"},{"key":"19_CR8","unstructured":"COSMIC: The COSMIC Functional Size Measurement Method Versi\u00f3n 4.0.1 Course Registration (C-REG) System Case Study. Version 2.0. COSMIC (2015)"},{"key":"19_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"De Vito, G., Ferrucci, F., Gravino, C.: Design and automation of a COSMIC measurement procedure based on UML models. Softw. Syst. Model. (2019). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10270-019-00731-2","DOI":"10.1007\/s10270-019-00731-2"},{"issue":"6","key":"19_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"976","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2011.01.029","volume":"84","author":"T Edagawa","year":"2011","unstructured":"Edagawa, T., Akaike, T., Higo, Y., Kusumoto, S., Hanabusa, S., Shibamoto, T.: Function point measurement from web application source code based on screen transitions and database accesses. J. Syst. Softw. 84(6), 976\u2013984 (2011). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jss.2011.01.029","journal-title":"J. Syst. Softw."},{"key":"19_CR11","unstructured":"Fetcke, T.: The warehouse software portfolio: a case study in functional size measurement. Citeseer (1999)"},{"issue":"1","key":"19_CR12","first-page":"28","volume":"65","author":"S Fingerman","year":"2011","unstructured":"Fingerman, S.: Practical software project estimation; a toolkit for estimating software development effort & duration. Sci-Tech News 65(1), 28 (2011)","journal-title":"Sci-Tech News"},{"key":"19_CR13","volume-title":"Function Point Analysis: Measurement Practices for Successful Software Projects","author":"D Garmus","year":"2001","unstructured":"Garmus, D., Herron, D.: Function Point Analysis: Measurement Practices for Successful Software Projects. Addison-Wesley Publishing Inc., Boston (2001)"},{"key":"19_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gonultas, R., Tarhan, A.: Run-time calculation of COSMIC functional size via automatic installment of measurement code into Java business applications. In: 2015 41st Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, pp. 112\u2013118. IEEE (2015). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/SEAA.2015.30","DOI":"10.1109\/SEAA.2015.30"},{"key":"19_CR15","unstructured":"Group, O.M.: Automated Function Points (AFP) Version 1.0, OMG Document Number: formal\/2014-01-03. OMG (2014). \nhttp:\/\/www.omg.org\/spec\/AFP"},{"issue":"9","key":"19_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1341","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2005.11.568","volume":"79","author":"M Heri\u010dko","year":"2006","unstructured":"Heri\u010dko, M., Rozman, I., \u017divkovi\u010d, A.: A formal representation of functional size measurement methods. J. Syst. Softw. 79(9), 1341\u20131358 (2006)","journal-title":"J. Syst. Softw."},{"key":"19_CR17","unstructured":"ISO: Information Technology, Software Measurement, Functional Size Measurement: Definition of Concepts. ISO\/IEC (2007)"},{"key":"19_CR18","unstructured":"ISO: ISO\/IEC 20926:2009 Software and systems engineering - Software measurement - IFPUG functional size measurement methods. ISO\/IEC (2009)"},{"key":"19_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kusumoto, S., Imagawa, M., Inoue, K., Morimoto, S., Matsusita, K., Tsuda, M.: Function point measurement from java programs. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2002, Orlando, Florida, pp. 576\u2013582. ACM, New York (2002). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/581339.581412","DOI":"10.1145\/581339.581412"},{"issue":"3","key":"19_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1093\/comjnl\/47.3.358","volume":"47","author":"E Lamma","year":"2004","unstructured":"Lamma, E., Mello, P., Riguzzi, F.: A system for measuring function points from an ER-DFD specification. Comput. J. 47(3), 358\u2013372 (2004)","journal-title":"Comput. J."},{"key":"19_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lavazza, L.: Automated function points: critical evaluation and discussion. In: 2015 IEEE\/ACM 6th International Workshop on Emerging Trends in Software Metrics, pp. 35\u201343. IEEE (2015). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/WETSoM.2015.13","DOI":"10.1109\/WETSoM.2015.13"},{"key":"19_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lavazza, L.A., del Bianco, V., Garavaglia, C.: Model-based functional size measurement. In: Proceedings of the Second ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2008, Kaiserslautern, Germany, pp. 100\u2013109. ACM, New York (2008). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1414004.1414021","DOI":"10.1145\/1414004.1414021"},{"key":"19_CR23","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"170","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-89403-2_15","volume-title":"Software Process and Product Measurement","author":"B Mar\u00edn","year":"2008","unstructured":"Mar\u00edn, B., Giachetti, G., Pastor, O.: Measurement of functional size in conceptual models: a survey of measurement procedures based on COSMIC. In: Dumke, R.R., Braungarten, R., B\u00fcren, G., Abran, A., Cuadrado-Gallego, J.J. (eds.) IWSM\/Mensura\/MetriKon -2008. LNCS, vol. 5338, pp. 170\u2013183. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-540-89403-2_15"},{"key":"19_CR24","unstructured":"\u00d6zkan, B.: Automated functional size measurement for three-tier object relational mapping architectures. Coll. Econ. Anal. Ann. (43), 51\u201368 (2017). \nhttps:\/\/ideas.repec.org\/a\/sgh\/annals\/i43y2017p51-68.html"},{"key":"19_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"\u00d6zkan, B., Demir\u00f6rs, O.: Formalization studies in functional size measurement. In: Modern Software Engineering Concepts and Practices: Advanced Approaches, pp. 242\u2013262. IGI Global (2011)","DOI":"10.4018\/978-1-60960-215-4.ch010"},{"key":"19_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"\u00d6zkan, B., Demirors, O.: On the seven misconceptions about functional size measurement. In: IWSM-MENSURA, pp. 45\u201352. IEEE (2016)","DOI":"10.1109\/IWSM-Mensura.2016.018"},{"key":"19_CR27","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-26844-6_18","volume-title":"Product-Focused Software Process Improvement","author":"C Quesada-L\u00f3pez","year":"2015","unstructured":"Quesada-L\u00f3pez, C., Jenkins, M.: Applying a verification protocol to evaluate the accuracy of functional size measurement procedures: an empirical approach. In: Abrahamsson, P., Corral, L., Oivo, M., Russo, B. (eds.) PROFES 2015. LNCS, vol. 9459, pp. 243\u2013250. Springer, Cham (2015). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-26844-6_18"},{"key":"19_CR28","unstructured":"Quesada-L\u00f3pez, C., Jenkins, M.: Procedimientos de medici\u00f3n del tama\u00f1o funcional: un mapeo sistem\u00e1tico de literatura. In: Ibero-American Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 141\u2013154 (2017)"},{"key":"19_CR29","unstructured":"Quesada-L\u00f3pez, C., Jenkins, M., Salas, L.C., G\u00f3mez, J.C.: Fastworks FPA: Una herramienta para automatizar la medici\u00f3n del tama\u00f1o funcional. In: Simposio Argentino de Ingenier\u00eda de Software, pp. 48\u201357. Sociedad de Inform\u00e1tica (2017)"},{"key":"19_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Quesada-L\u00f3pez, C., Jenkins, M., Salas, L.C., G\u00f3mez, J.C.: Towards an automated functional size measurement procedure: an industrial case study. In: IWSM-MENSURA, pp. 138\u2013144. ACM (2017)","DOI":"10.1145\/3143434.3143460"},{"key":"19_CR31","unstructured":"Quesada-L\u00f3pez, C., Madrigal-S\u00e1nchez, D., Jenkins, M.: An empirical evaluation of automated function points. In: Ibero-American Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 151\u2013165 (2016)"},{"key":"19_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Runeson, P., H\u00f6st, M., Rainer, A., Regnell, B.: Case study research in software engineering. In: Guidelines and Examples. Wiley Online Library (2012)","DOI":"10.1002\/9781118181034"},{"key":"19_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sag, M., Tarhan, A.: Measuring cosmic software size from functional execution traces of Java business applications. In: IWSM-MENSURA, pp. 272\u2013281. IEEE (2014)","DOI":"10.1109\/IWSM.Mensura.2014.29"},{"key":"19_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Soubra, H., Abran, A., Ramdane-Cherif, A.: Verifying the accuracy of automation tools for the measurement of software with COSMIC-ISO 19761 including an AUTOSAR-based example and a case study. In: IWSM-MENSURA, pp. 23\u201331. IEEE (2014)","DOI":"10.1109\/IWSM.Mensura.2014.26"},{"key":"19_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tarhan, A., \u00d6zkan, B., \u0130\u00e7\u00f6z, G.: A proposal on requirements for cosmic FSM automation from source code. In: IWSM-MENSURA, pp. 195\u2013200. IEEE (2016)","DOI":"10.1109\/IWSM-Mensura.2016.038"},{"key":"19_CR36","unstructured":"Uemura, T., Kusumoto, S., Inoue, K.: Function point measurement tool for UML design specification. In: International Software Metrics Symposium, pp. 62\u201369. IEEE (1999)"},{"key":"19_CR37","unstructured":"Ungan, E., Hammond, C., Abran, A.: Automated cosmic measurement and requirement quality improvement through scopemaster\u00ae tool. In: IWSM-MENSURA (2018)"},{"issue":"13","key":"19_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"881","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2005.02.008","volume":"47","author":"A \u017divkovi\u010d","year":"2005","unstructured":"\u017divkovi\u010d, A., Rozman, I., Heri\u010dko, M.: Automated software size estimation based on function points using uml models. Inf. Softw. Technol. 47(13), 881\u2013890 (2005)","journal-title":"Inf. Softw. Technol."}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Product-Focused Software Process Improvement"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-35333-9_19","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,18]],"date-time":"2019-11-18T00:16:24Z","timestamp":1574036184000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-35333-9_19"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"ISBN":["9783030353322","9783030353339"],"references-count":38,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-35333-9_19","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"assertion":[{"value":"18 November 2019","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"PROFES","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Barcelona","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Spain","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2019","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"27 November 2019","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"29 November 2019","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"20","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"profes2019","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/profes2019.upc.edu\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"65","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"24","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"11","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"37% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"5","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"The 11 short papers were selected from 30 submissions.","order":10,"name":"additional_info_on_review_process","label":"Additional Info on Review Process","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}