{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T00:59:56Z","timestamp":1740099596706,"version":"3.37.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":17,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030353322"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030353339"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]],"date-time":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1546300800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-35333-9_22","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,17]],"date-time":"2019-11-17T19:01:29Z","timestamp":1574017289000},"page":"315-322","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparison Framework for Team-Based Communication Channels"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3690-1711","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Camila","family":"Costa Silva","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1465-3315","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Fabian","family":"Gilson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3491-1833","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Matthias","family":"Galster","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"22_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Albrecht, C.C.: A comparison of distributed groupware implementation environments. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 1\u20139. IEEE (2003)","DOI":"10.1109\/HICSS.2003.1173780"},{"key":"22_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alkadhi, R., La\u0163a, T., Guzman, E., Bruegge, B.: Rationale in development chat messages: an exploratory study. In: International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), pp. 436\u2013446. IEEE (2017)","DOI":"10.1109\/MSR.2017.43"},{"issue":"3","key":"22_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"442","DOI":"10.1111\/isj.12156","volume":"28","author":"E Forsgren","year":"2018","unstructured":"Forsgren, E., Bystr\u00f6m, K.: Multiple social media in the workplace: contradictions and congruencies. Inf. Syst. J. 28(3), 442\u2013464 (2018)","journal-title":"Inf. Syst. J."},{"issue":"2","key":"22_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1016\/j.im.2008.01.001","volume":"45","author":"J Kotlarsky","year":"2008","unstructured":"Kotlarsky, J., van Fenema, P.C., Willcocks, L.P.: Developing a knowledge-based perspective on coordination: the case of global software projects. Inf. Manag. 45(2), 96\u2013108 (2008)","journal-title":"Inf. Manag."},{"key":"22_CR5","unstructured":"Lardinois, F.: Microsoft says teams now has 13M daily active users. \nhttps:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2019\/07\/11\/microsoft-says-its-slack-competitor-teams-now-has-13-million-daily-active-users\/\n\n. Accessed 23 July 2019"},{"key":"22_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lin, B., Zagalsky, A., Storey, M., Serebrenik, A.: Why developers are slacking off: understanding how software teams use slack. In: Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW), pp. 333\u2013336. ACM (2016)","DOI":"10.1145\/2818052.2869117"},{"key":"22_CR7","unstructured":"Matney, L.: Slack now has more than 10 million daily active users. \nhttps:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2019\/01\/29\/slack-now-has-more-than-10-million-daily-active-users\/\n\n. Accessed 23 July 2019"},{"key":"22_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2016.12.034","volume":"125","author":"R Rabiser","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rabiser, R., Guinea, S., Vierhauser, M., Baresi, L., Gr\u00fcnbacher, P.: A comparison framework for runtime monitoring approaches. J. Syst. Softw. 125, 309\u2013321 (2017)","journal-title":"J. Syst. Softw."},{"key":"22_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2019.04.001","volume":"153","author":"C Rieger","year":"2019","unstructured":"Rieger, C., Majchrzak, T.A.: Towards the definitive evaluation framework for cross-platform app development approaches. J. Syst. Softw. 153, 175\u2013199 (2019)","journal-title":"J. Syst. Softw."},{"key":"22_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9781118181034","volume-title":"Case Study Research in Software Engineering: Guidelines and Examples","author":"P Runeson","year":"2012","unstructured":"Runeson, P., Host, M., Rainer, A., Regnell, B.: Case Study Research in Software Engineering: Guidelines and Examples. Wiley, Hoboken (2012)"},{"key":"22_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Squire, M.: Should we move to stack overflow? Measuring the utility of social media for developer support. In: International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 219\u2013228. IEEE (2015)","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSE.2015.150"},{"issue":"2","key":"22_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.2016.2584053","volume":"43","author":"M Storey","year":"2017","unstructured":"Storey, M., Zagalsky, A., Filho, F.F., Singer, L., German, D.M.: How social and communication channels shape and challenge a participatory culture in software development. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 43(2), 185\u2013204 (2017)","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng."},{"key":"22_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Storey, M.A., Singer, L., Cleary, B., Figueira Filho, F., Zagalsky, A.: The (R)evolution of social media in software engineering. In: Future of Software Engineering at ICSE (FOSE), pp. 100\u2013116. ACM (2014)","DOI":"10.1145\/2593882.2593887"},{"key":"22_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Storey, M.A., Treude, C., van Deursen, A., Cheng, L.T.: The impact of social media on software engineering practices and tools. In: Workshop on Future of Software Engineering Research (FoSER), pp. 359\u2013364. ACM (2010)","DOI":"10.1145\/1882362.1882435"},{"key":"22_CR15","unstructured":"Wright, L.: Microsoft teams wins enterprise connect best in show award and delivers new experiences for the intelligent workplace, March 2019. \nhttps:\/\/www.microsoft.com\/en-us\/microsoft-365\/blog\/2019\/03\/19\/microsoft-teams-experiences-intelligent-workplace\/\n\n. Accessed 29 July 2019"},{"issue":"6","key":"22_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"995","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijinfomgt.2016.06.007","volume":"36","author":"M Zahedi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zahedi, M., Shahin, M., Babar, M.A.: A systematic review of knowledge sharing challenges and practices in global software development. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 36(6), 995\u20131019 (2016)","journal-title":"Int. J. Inf. Manag."},{"issue":"3","key":"22_CR17","first-page":"43","volume":"6","author":"S Zhang","year":"2010","unstructured":"Zhang, S., K\u00f6bler, F., Tremaine, M., Milewski, A.: Instant messaging in global software teams. Int. J. e-Collab. 6(3), 43\u201363 (2010)","journal-title":"Int. J. e-Collab."}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Product-Focused Software Process Improvement"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-35333-9_22","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,17]],"date-time":"2019-11-17T19:17:11Z","timestamp":1574018231000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-35333-9_22"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"ISBN":["9783030353322","9783030353339"],"references-count":17,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-35333-9_22","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"assertion":[{"value":"18 November 2019","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"PROFES","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Barcelona","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Spain","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2019","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"27 November 2019","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"29 November 2019","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"20","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"profes2019","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/profes2019.upc.edu\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"65","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"24","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"11","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"37% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"5","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"The 11 short papers were selected from 30 submissions.","order":10,"name":"additional_info_on_review_process","label":"Additional Info on Review Process","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}