{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,30]],"date-time":"2025-03-30T21:44:05Z","timestamp":1743371045026},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":24,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030353322"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030353339"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]],"date-time":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1546300800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-35333-9_3","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,18]],"date-time":"2019-11-18T00:01:29Z","timestamp":1574035289000},"page":"37-52","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Test-Case Quality \u2013 Understanding Practitioners\u2019 Perspectives"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Huynh Khanh Vi","family":"Tran","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Nauman Bin","family":"Ali","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"J\u00fcrgen","family":"B\u00f6rstler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Michael","family":"Unterkalmsteiner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,18]]},"reference":[{"issue":"11","key":"3_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1100","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.2014.2342227","volume":"40","author":"D Athanasiou","year":"2014","unstructured":"Athanasiou, D., Nugroho, A., Visser, J., Zaidman, A.: Test code quality and its relation to issue handling performance. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 40(11), 1100\u20131125 (2014)","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng."},{"key":"3_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bowes, D., Hall, T., Petric, J., Shippey, T., Turhan, B.: How good are my tests? In: 2017 IEEE\/ACM 8th Workshop on Emerging Trends in Software Metrics (WETSoM), pp. 9\u201314, May 2017","DOI":"10.1109\/WETSoM.2017.2"},{"key":"3_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"\u010cau\u0161evi\u0107, A., Sundmark, D., Punnekkat, S.: Test case quality in test driven development: a study design and a pilot experiment. In: 16th International Conference on Evaluation Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2012), pp. 223\u2013227, May 2012","DOI":"10.1049\/ic.2012.0029"},{"issue":"1","key":"3_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1109\/52.903172","volume":"18","author":"Y Chernak","year":"2001","unstructured":"Chernak, Y.: Validating and improving test-case effectiveness. IEEE Softw. 18(1), 81\u201386 (2001)","journal-title":"IEEE Softw."},{"key":"3_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cruzes, D.S., Dyba, T.: Recommended steps for thematic synthesis in software engineering. In: 2011 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 275\u2013284, September 2011","DOI":"10.1109\/ESEM.2011.36"},{"key":"3_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Daka, E., Campos, J., Fraser, G., Dorn, J., Weimer, W.: Modeling readability to improve unit tests. In: Proceedings of the 2015 10th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering, ESEC\/FSE 2015, pp. 107\u2013118. ACM, New York (2015)","DOI":"10.1145\/2786805.2786838"},{"issue":"3","key":"3_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1109\/MS.2016.30","volume":"33","author":"V Garousi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Garousi, V., Felderer, M.: Developing, verifying, and maintaining high-quality automated test scripts. IEEE Softw. 33(3), 68\u201375 (2016)","journal-title":"IEEE Softw."},{"issue":"3","key":"3_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1109\/MS.2018.2875843","volume":"36","author":"V Garousi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Garousi, V., Kucuk, B., Felderer, M.: What we know about smells in software test code. IEEE Softw. 36(3), 61\u201373 (2019)","journal-title":"IEEE Softw."},{"key":"3_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.12.013","volume":"138","author":"V Garousi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Garousi, V., K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck, B.: Smells in software test code: a survey of knowledge in industry and academia. J. Syst. Softw. 138, 52\u201381 (2018)","journal-title":"J. Syst. Softw."},{"key":"3_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gopinath, R., Jensen, C., Groce, A.: Code coverage for suite evaluation by developers. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2014, pp. 72\u201382. ACM, New York (2014)","DOI":"10.1145\/2568225.2568278"},{"key":"3_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grano, G., Scalabrino, S., Gall, H.C., Oliveto, R.: An empirical investigation on the readability of manual and generated test cases. In: Proceedings of the 26th Conference on Program Comprehension, ICPC 2018, pp. 348\u2013351. ACM, New York (2018)","DOI":"10.1145\/3196321.3196363"},{"key":"3_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hauptmann, B., Junker, M., Eder, S., Heinemann, L., Vaas, R., Braun, P.: Hunting for smells in natural language tests. In: 2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 1217\u20131220, May 2013","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSE.2013.6606682"},{"key":"3_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Inozemtseva, L., Holmes, R.: Coverage is not strongly correlated with test suite effectiveness. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2014, pp. 435\u2013445. ACM, New York (2014)","DOI":"10.1145\/2568225.2568271"},{"key":"3_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Josyula, J., Panamgipalli, S., Usman, M., Britto, R., Ali, N.B.: Software practitioners\u2019 information needs and sources: a survey study. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Empirical Software Engineering in Practice (IWESEP), pp. 1\u20136, December 2018","DOI":"10.1109\/IWESEP.2018.00009"},{"key":"3_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jovanovikj, I., Narasimhan, V., Engels, G., Sauer, S.: Context-specific quality evaluation of test cases. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development - Volume 1: MODELSWARD, pp. 594\u2013601. INSTICC, SciTePress (2018)","DOI":"10.5220\/0006724405940601"},{"issue":"5","key":"3_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1145\/571681.571686","volume":"27","author":"B Kitchenham","year":"2002","unstructured":"Kitchenham, B., Pfleeger, S.L.: Principles of survey research: part 5: populations and samples. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 27(5), 17\u201320 (2002)","journal-title":"SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes"},{"key":"3_CR17","unstructured":"Nagappan, N., Williams, L., Osborne, J., Vouk, M., Abrahamsson, P.: Providing test quality feedback using static source code and automatic test suite metrics. In: 16th IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE 2005), pp. 10\u201394, November 2005"},{"issue":"4","key":"3_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1007\/s10009-008-0075-0","volume":"10","author":"H Neukirchen","year":"2008","unstructured":"Neukirchen, H., Zeiss, B., Grabowski, J.: An approach to quality engineering of TTCN-3 test specifications. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 10(4), 309 (2008)","journal-title":"Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf."},{"key":"3_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pfaller, C., Wagner, S., Gericke, J., Wiemann, M.: Multi-dimensional measures for test case quality. In: 2008 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation Workshop, pp. 364\u2013368, April 2008","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSTW.2008.28"},{"issue":"9","key":"3_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.5381\/jot.2007.6.9.a12","volume":"6","author":"S Reichhart","year":"2007","unstructured":"Reichhart, S., G\u00eerba, T., Ducasse, S.: Rule-based assessment of test quality. J. Object Technol. 6(9), 231\u2013251 (2007)","journal-title":"J. Object Technol."},{"key":"3_CR21","volume-title":"Real World Research: A Resource for Users of Social Research Methods in Applied Settings","author":"C Robson","year":"2016","unstructured":"Robson, C., McCartan, K.: Real World Research: A Resource for Users of Social Research Methods in Applied Settings, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2016)","edition":"4"},{"key":"3_CR22","unstructured":"Tan, H., Tarasov, V.: Test case quality as perceived in Sweden. In: 2018 IEEE\/ACM 5th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Testing (RET), pp. 9\u201312, June 2018"},{"key":"3_CR23","first-page":"231","volume-title":"Software Engineering 2007 - Fachtagung des GI-Fachbereichs Softwaretechnik","author":"B Zeiss","year":"2007","unstructured":"Zeiss, B., Vega, D., Schieferdecker, I., Neukirchen, H., Grabowski, J.: Applying the ISO 9126 quality model to test specifications - exemplified for TTCN-3 test specifications. In: Bleek, W.G., Raasch, J., Z\u00fcllighoven, H. (eds.) Software Engineering 2007 - Fachtagung des GI-Fachbereichs Softwaretechnik, pp. 231\u2013242. Gesellschaft f\u00fcr Informatik e. V, Bonn (2007)"},{"issue":"4","key":"3_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.1145\/267580.267590","volume":"29","author":"H Zhu","year":"1997","unstructured":"Zhu, H., Hall, P.A.V., May, J.H.R.: Software unit test coverage and adequacy. ACM Comput. Surv. 29(4), 366\u2013427 (1997)","journal-title":"ACM Comput. Surv."}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Product-Focused Software Process Improvement"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-35333-9_3","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,18]],"date-time":"2019-11-18T00:11:12Z","timestamp":1574035872000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-35333-9_3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"ISBN":["9783030353322","9783030353339"],"references-count":24,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-35333-9_3","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"assertion":[{"value":"18 November 2019","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"PROFES","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Barcelona","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Spain","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2019","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"27 November 2019","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"29 November 2019","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"20","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"profes2019","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/profes2019.upc.edu\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"65","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"24","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"11","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"37% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"5","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"The 11 short papers were selected from 30 submissions.","order":10,"name":"additional_info_on_review_process","label":"Additional Info on Review Process","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}