{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,11]],"date-time":"2024-09-11T13:25:01Z","timestamp":1726061101001},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":24,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030355135"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030355142"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]],"date-time":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1546300800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-35514-2_18","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,2]],"date-time":"2019-12-02T16:20:37Z","timestamp":1575303637000},"page":"236-249","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Open-Mindedness of Gradual Argumentation Semantics"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Nico","family":"Potyka","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"18_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2017.02.004","volume":"85","author":"T Alsinet","year":"2017","unstructured":"Alsinet, T., Argelich, J., B\u00e9jar, R., Fern\u00e1ndez, C., Mateu, C., Planes, J.: Weighted argumentation for analysis of discussions in Twitter. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 85, 21\u201335 (2017)","journal-title":"Int. J. Approximate Reasoning"},{"key":"18_CR2","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Ben-Naim, J.: Axiomatic foundations of acceptability semantics. In: International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), pp. 2\u201311 (2016)"},{"key":"18_CR3","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Ben-Naim, J.: Evaluation of arguments from support relations: axioms and semantics. In: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), p. 900 (2016)"},{"key":"18_CR4","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-61581-3_3","volume-title":"Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2017","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Ben-Naim, J.: Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs. In: Antonucci, A., Cholvy, L., Papini, O. (eds.) ECSQARU 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10369, pp. 25\u201335. Springer, Cham (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-61581-3_3"},{"key":"18_CR5","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Ben-Naim, J., Doder, D., Vesic, S.: Ranking arguments with compensation-based semantics. In: International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR) (2016)"},{"key":"18_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Ben-Naim, J., Doder, D., Vesic, S.: Acceptability semantics for weighted argumentation frameworks. In: IJCAI, vol. 2017, pp. 56\u201362 (2017)","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2017\/9"},{"issue":"10","key":"18_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1062","DOI":"10.1002\/int.20307","volume":"23","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2008","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C., Livet, P.: On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 23(10), 1062\u20131093 (2008)","journal-title":"Int. J. Intell. Syst."},{"key":"18_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Rago, A., Toni, F.: How many properties do we need for gradual argumentation? In: AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 1736\u20131743. AAAI (2018)","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v32i1.11544"},{"key":"18_CR9","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-40624-9_21","volume-title":"Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems","author":"P Baroni","year":"2013","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Romano, M., Toni, F., Aurisicchio, M., Bertanza, G.: An argumentation-based approach for automatic evaluation of design debates. In: Leite, J., Son, T.C., Torroni, P., van der Torre, L., Woltran, S. (eds.) CLIMA 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8143, pp. 340\u2013356. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-40624-9_21"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"18_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(01)00071-6","volume":"128","author":"P Besnard","year":"2001","unstructured":"Besnard, P., Hunter, A.: A logic-based theory of deductive arguments. Artif. Intell. 128(1\u20132), 203\u2013235 (2001)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"18_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bonzon, E., Delobelle, J., Konieczny, S., Maudet, N.: A comparative study of ranking-based semantics for abstract argumentation. In: AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 914\u2013920 (2016)","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v30i1.10116"},{"key":"18_CR12","unstructured":"Cocarascu, O., Rago, A., Toni, F.: Extracting dialogical explanations for review aggregations with argumentative dialogical agents. In: International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 1261\u20131269. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2019)"},{"issue":"2","key":"18_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321\u2013357 (1995)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"18_CR14","unstructured":"Hunter, A., Polberg, S., Potyka, N.: Updating belief in arguments in epistemic graphs. In: International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), pp. 138\u2013147 (2018)"},{"key":"18_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.5393","volume":"59","author":"A Hunter","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hunter, A., Thimm, M.: Probabilistic reasoning with abstract argumentation frameworks. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 59, 565\u2013611 (2017)","journal-title":"J. Artif. Intell. Res."},{"key":"18_CR16","unstructured":"Leite, J., Martins, J.: Social abstract argumentation. In: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), vol. 11, pp. 2287\u20132292 (2011)"},{"key":"18_CR17","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-29184-5_1","volume-title":"Theorie and Applications of Formal Argumentation","author":"H Li","year":"2012","unstructured":"Li, H., Oren, N., Norman, T.J.: Probabilistic argumentation frameworks. In: Modgil, S., Oren, N., Toni, F. (eds.) TAFA 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7132, pp. 1\u201316. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-29184-5_1"},{"key":"18_CR18","unstructured":"Mossakowski, T., Neuhaus, F.: Modular semantics and characteristics for bipolar weighted argumentation graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.06685 (2018)"},{"key":"18_CR19","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"591","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-11558-0_42","volume-title":"Logics in Artificial Intelligence","author":"S Polberg","year":"2014","unstructured":"Polberg, S., Doder, D.: Probabilistic abstract dialectical frameworks. In: Ferm\u00e9, E., Leite, J. (eds.) JELIA 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8761, pp. 591\u2013599. Springer, Cham (2014). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-11558-0_42"},{"key":"18_CR20","unstructured":"Potyka, N.: Continuous dynamical systems for weighted bipolar argumentation. In: International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), pp. 148\u2013157 (2018)"},{"key":"18_CR21","unstructured":"Potyka, N.: Extending modular semantics for bipolar weighted argumentation. In: International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 1722\u20131730. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2019)"},{"key":"18_CR22","unstructured":"Rago, A., Toni, F., Aurisicchio, M., Baroni, P.: Discontinuity-free decision support with quantitative argumentation debates. In: International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), pp. 63\u201373 (2016)"},{"key":"18_CR23","unstructured":"Rienstra, T., Thimm, M., Liao, B., van der Torre, L.: Probabilistic abstract argumentation based on SCC decomposability. In: International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), pp. 168\u2013177 (2018)"},{"key":"18_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Thiel, M., Ludwig, P., Mossakowski, T., Neuhaus, F., N\u00fcrnberger, A.: Web-retrieval supported argument space exploration. In: ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR), pp. 309\u2013312. ACM (2017)","DOI":"10.1145\/3020165.3022140"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Scalable Uncertainty Management"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-35514-2_18","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,7]],"date-time":"2022-10-07T11:08:14Z","timestamp":1665140894000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-35514-2_18"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"ISBN":["9783030355135","9783030355142"],"references-count":24,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-35514-2_18","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2 December 2019","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"SUM","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Compi\u00e8gne","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"France","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2019","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"16 December 2019","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"18 December 2019","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"13","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"sum2019a","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/sum2019.hds.utc.fr\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Easychair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"44","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"25","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"57% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"No","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}