{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,11]],"date-time":"2024-09-11T13:24:37Z","timestamp":1726061077327},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":23,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030355135"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030355142"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]],"date-time":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1546300800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-35514-2_7","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,2]],"date-time":"2019-12-02T16:20:37Z","timestamp":1575303637000},"page":"79-92","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Hybrid Reasoning on a Bipolar Argumentation Framework"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Tatsuki","family":"Kawasaki","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Sosuke","family":"Moriguchi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Kazuko","family":"Takahashi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,2]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"7_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.3233\/IA-180002","volume":"12","author":"G Alfano","year":"2018","unstructured":"Alfano, G., Greco, S., Parisi, F.: A meta-argumentation approach for the efficient computation of stable and preferred extensions in dynamic bipolar argumentation frameworks. Intelligenza Artificiale 12(2), 193\u2013211 (2018)","journal-title":"Intelligenza Artificiale"},{"issue":"10","key":"7_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1062","DOI":"10.1002\/int.20307","volume":"23","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2008","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C., Livet, P.: On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 23(10), 1062\u20131093 (2008)","journal-title":"Int. J. Intell. Syst."},{"key":"7_CR3","unstructured":"Baumann, R., Ulbricht, M.: If nothing is accepted - repairing argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of KR 2010, pp. 108\u2013117 (2018)"},{"key":"7_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_18","volume-title":"Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2009","unstructured":"Bench-Capon, T., Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: Argumentation in legal reasoning. In: Simari, G., Rahwan, I. (eds.) Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 363\u2013382. Springer, Boston (2009). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_18"},{"key":"7_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(97)00015-5","volume":"93","author":"A Bondarenko","year":"1997","unstructured":"Bondarenko, A., Dung, P.M., Kowalski, R., Toni, F.: An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning. Artif. Intell. 93, 63\u2013101 (1997)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"7_CR6","unstructured":"Boella, G., Gabbay, D.M., van der Torre, L., Villata, S.: Support in abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of COMMA 2010, pp. 40\u201351 (2010)"},{"key":"7_CR7","unstructured":"Brewka, G., Woltran, S.: Abstract dialectical frameworks. In: Proceedings of KR 2010, pp. 102\u2013111 (2010)"},{"key":"7_CR8","unstructured":"Brewka, G., Ellmauthaler, S., Strass, H., Wallner, J.P., Woltran, S.: Abstract dialectical frameworks revisited. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2013, pp. 803\u2013809 (2013)"},{"key":"7_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Caminada, M.: On the issue of reinstatement in argumentation. In: Proceedings of JELIA 2006, 111\u2013123 (2006)","DOI":"10.1007\/11853886_11"},{"key":"7_CR10","first-page":"378","volume-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","author":"C. Cayrol","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.: On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of ECSQARU 2005, pp. 378\u2013389 (2005)"},{"key":"7_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.2965","volume":"28","author":"C Cayrol","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., de Saint-Cyr, F.D., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.: Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: adding an argument. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 28, 49\u201384 (2010)","journal-title":"J. Artif. Intell. Res."},{"issue":"5","key":"7_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888913000325","volume":"29","author":"A Cohen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cohen, A., Gottifredi, S., Garcia, A., Simari, G.: A survey of different approaches to support in argumentation systems. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 29(5), 513\u2013550 (2013)","journal-title":"Knowl. Eng. Rev."},{"key":"7_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"C\u0306yras, K., Schulz, C., Toni, F.: Capturing bipolar argumentation in non-flat assumption-based argumentation. In: Proceedings of PRIMA 2017, pp. 386\u2013402 (2017)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-69131-2_23"},{"issue":"3","key":"7_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-180425","volume":"9","author":"S Doutre","year":"2018","unstructured":"Doutre, S., Jean-Guyb, M.: Constraints and changes: a survey of abstract argumentation dynamics. Argum. Comput. 9(3), 223\u2013248 (2018)","journal-title":"Argum. Comput."},{"key":"7_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77, 321\u2013357 (1995)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"7_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5","volume":"70","author":"AC Kakas","year":"2002","unstructured":"Kakas, A.C., Moraitis, P.: Argumentative agent deliberation, roles and context. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 70, 39\u201353 (2002)","journal-title":"Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci."},{"key":"7_CR17","unstructured":"Kawasaki, T., Moriguchi, S., Takahashi, K.: Transformation from PROLEG to a bipolar argumentation framework. In: Proceedings of SAFA 2018, pp. 36\u201347 (2018)"},{"key":"7_CR18","first-page":"163","volume-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","author":"Farid Nouioua","year":"2011","unstructured":"Nouioua, F., Risch, V.: Argumentation framework with necessities. In: Proceedings of SUM 2011, pp. 163\u2013176 (2011)"},{"key":"7_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(88)90077-X","volume":"36","author":"D Poole","year":"1988","unstructured":"Poole, D.: Logical framework for default reasoning. Artif. Intell. 36, 27\u201347 (1988)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"7_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2015.06.005","volume":"36","author":"H Prakken","year":"2015","unstructured":"Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective. Artif. Intell. 36, 214\u2013245 (2015)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"7_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0","volume-title":"Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence","year":"2009","unstructured":"Rahwan, I., Simari, G. (eds.): Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Boston (2009). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0"},{"key":"7_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1080\/11663081.2018.1487241","volume":"28","author":"C Sakama","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sakama, C.: Abduction in argumentation frameworks. J. Appl. Non-Class. Log. 28, 218\u2013239 (2018)","journal-title":"J. Appl. Non-Class. Log."},{"key":"7_CR23","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-25655-4_14","volume-title":"New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","author":"K Satoh","year":"2011","unstructured":"Satoh, K., et al.: PROLEG: an implementation of the presupposed ultimate fact theory of Japanese civil code by PROLOG technology. In: Onada, T., Bekki, D., McCready, E. (eds.) JSAI-isAI 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6797, pp. 153\u2013164. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-25655-4_14"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Scalable Uncertainty Management"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-35514-2_7","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,2]],"date-time":"2019-12-02T16:25:32Z","timestamp":1575303932000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-35514-2_7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"ISBN":["9783030355135","9783030355142"],"references-count":23,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-35514-2_7","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2 December 2019","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"SUM","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Compi\u00e8gne","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"France","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2019","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"16 December 2019","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"18 December 2019","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"13","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"sum2019a","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/sum2019.hds.utc.fr\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Easychair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"44","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"25","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"57% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"No","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}