{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,19]],"date-time":"2025-04-19T16:44:18Z","timestamp":1745081058151,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":21,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030356453"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030356460"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,1]],"date-time":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1546300800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-35646-0_9","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,13]],"date-time":"2019-11-13T19:02:57Z","timestamp":1573671777000},"page":"121-130","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["SHACL Shapes Generation from Textual Documents"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"David","family":"\u0160enk\u00fd\u0159","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,14]]},"reference":[{"key":"9_CR1","unstructured":"SHACL and OWL Compared. http:\/\/spinrdf.org\/shacl-and-owl.html . Accessed 08 Jan 2019"},{"key":"9_CR2","first-page":"230","volume":"8","author":"A Arellano","year":"2015","unstructured":"Arellano, A., Zontek-Carney, E., Austin, M.A.: Frameworks for natural language processing of textual requirements. Int. J. Adv. Syst. Meas. 8, 230\u2013240 (2015)","journal-title":"Int. J. Adv. Syst. Meas."},{"key":"9_CR3","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"722","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-76298-0_52","volume-title":"The Semantic Web","author":"S Auer","year":"2007","unstructured":"Auer, S., Bizer, C., Kobilarov, G., Lehmann, J., Cyganiak, R., Ives, Z.: DBpedia: a nucleus for a web of open data. In: Aberer, K., et al. (eds.) ASWC\/ISWC -2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 722\u2013735. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-540-76298-0_52"},{"key":"9_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ben Abdessalem Karaa, W., Ben Azzouz, Z., Singh, A., Dey, N., Ashour, A.S., Ben Ghazala, H.: Automatic builder of class diagram (ABCD): an application of UML generation from functional requirements. Softw. Pract. Exp. 46(11), 1443\u20131458 (2016)","DOI":"10.1002\/spe.2384"},{"key":"9_CR5","unstructured":"Cyganiak, R., Wood, D., Lanthaler, M.: RDF 1.1 concepts and Abstract Syntax. W3C recommendation, W3C (2014). http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/2014\/REC-rdf11-concepts-20140225"},{"key":"9_CR6","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-41242-4_36","volume-title":"The Semantic Web: ESWC 2013 Satellite Events","author":"F Draicchio","year":"2013","unstructured":"Draicchio, F., Gangemi, A., Presutti, V., Nuzzolese, A.G.: FRED: from natural language text to RDF and OWL in one click. In: Cimiano, P., Fern\u00e1ndez, M., Lopez, V., Schlobach, S., V\u00f6lker, J. (eds.) ESWC 2013. LNCS, vol. 7955, pp. 263\u2013267. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-41242-4_36"},{"key":"9_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gardent, C., Shimorina, A., Narayan, S., Perez-Beltrachini, L.: The WebNLG challenge: generating text from RDF data. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Natural Language Generation, Spain, pp. 124\u2013133. Association for Computational Linguistics, Santiago de Compostela (2017)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/W17-3518"},{"key":"9_CR8","unstructured":"Guha, R., Brickley, D.: RDF Schema 1.1. W3C recommendation, W3C (2014). http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/2014\/REC-rdf-schema-20140225\/"},{"key":"9_CR9","unstructured":"Irene, P.: From OWL to SHACL in an automated way. https:\/\/www.topquadrant.com\/2018\/05\/01\/from-owl-to-shacl-in-an-automated-way (2018). Accessed 19 May 2019"},{"issue":"1","key":"9_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1007\/s11219-013-9210-6","volume":"22","author":"M Landh\u00e4u\u00dfer","year":"2014","unstructured":"Landh\u00e4u\u00dfer, M., K\u00f6rner, S.J., Tichy, W.F.: From requirements to UML models and back: how automatic processing of text can support requirements engineering. Softw. Qual. J. 22(1), 121\u2013149 (2014)","journal-title":"Softw. Qual. J."},{"key":"9_CR11","series-title":"Communications in Computer and Information Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-21395-4_7","volume-title":"Knowledge Graphs and Semantic Web","author":"JL Martinez-Rodriguez","year":"2019","unstructured":"Martinez-Rodriguez, J.L., Lopez-Arevalo, I., Rios-Alvarado, A.B., Hernandez, J., Aldana-Bobadilla, E.: Extraction of RDF statements from text. In: Villaz\u00f3n-Terrazas, B., Hidalgo-Delgado, Y. (eds.) KGSWC 2019. CCIS, vol. 1029, pp. 87\u2013101. Springer, Cham (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-21395-4_7"},{"key":"9_CR12","unstructured":"McGuinness, D., van Harmelen, F.: OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. W3C recommendation, W3C (2004). http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/2004\/REC-owl-features-20040210"},{"key":"9_CR13","unstructured":"Mylopoulos, J.: Conceptual Modelling and Telos. Conceptual Modelling, Databases and CASE: An Integrated View of Information System Development. Wiley, New York (1992)"},{"key":"9_CR14","unstructured":"Pandit, H.J., O\u2019Sullivan, D., Lewis, D.: Using ontology design patterns to define SHACL shapes. In: Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Ontology Design and Patterns (WOP 2018) Co-located with 17th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2018), pp. 67\u201371 (2018)"},{"issue":"1","key":"9_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1515\/pralin-2016-0011","volume":"106","author":"R Perera","year":"2016","unstructured":"Perera, R., Nand, P., Klette, G.: RealText-lex: a lexicalization framework for RDF triples. Prague Bull. Math. Linguist. 106(1), 45\u201368 (2016)","journal-title":"Prague Bull. Math. Linguist."},{"key":"9_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"\u0160enk\u00fd\u0159, D., Kroha, P.: Patterns in textual requirements specification. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Software Technologies, Porto, Portugal, pp. 197\u2013204. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications (2018)","DOI":"10.5220\/0006827302310238"},{"key":"9_CR17","unstructured":"Speer, R., Havasi, C.: Representing General Relational Knowledge in ConceptNet 5. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2012). European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (2012)"},{"key":"9_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Staab, S., Lehmann, J., Verborgh, R.: Structured knowledge on the Web 7.0. In: Companion of the The Web Conference 2018 on The Web Conference 2018 - WWW 2018, Lyon, France, pp. 885\u2013886. ACM Press (2018)","DOI":"10.1145\/3184558.3190666"},{"key":"9_CR19","series-title":"Text, Speech and Language Technolog","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-010-0201-1_1","volume-title":"Treebanks","author":"A Taylor","year":"2003","unstructured":"Taylor, A., Marcus, M., Santorini, B.: The Penn Treebank: an overview. In: Abeill\u00e9, A. (ed.) Treebanks. Text, Speech and Language Technolog, vol. 20, pp. 5\u201322. Springer, Dordrecht (2003). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-94-010-0201-1_1"},{"key":"9_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Trisedya, B.D., Qi, J., Zhang, R., Wang, W.: GTR-LSTM: a triple encoder for sentence generation from RDF data. In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Melbourne, Australia, vol. 1, pp. 1627\u20131637. Association for Computational Linguistics (2018)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/P18-1151"},{"key":"9_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1016\/j.is.2018.11.009","volume":"81","author":"M Verdonck","year":"2019","unstructured":"Verdonck, M., Gailly, F., Pergl, R., Guizzardi, G., Martins, B., Pastor, O.: Comparing traditional conceptual modeling with ontology-driven conceptual modeling: an empirical study. Inf. Syst. 81, 92\u2013103 (2019)","journal-title":"Inf. Syst."}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-35646-0_9","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,22]],"date-time":"2023-09-22T22:16:21Z","timestamp":1695420981000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-35646-0_9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"ISBN":["9783030356453","9783030356460"],"references-count":21,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-35646-0_9","relation":{},"ISSN":["1865-1348","1865-1356"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1865-1348"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1865-1356"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019]]},"assertion":[{"value":"14 November 2019","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"EOMAS","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Workshop on Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Rome","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Italy","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2019","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"3 June 2019","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"4 June 2019","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"15","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"eomas2019","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/eomas-workshop.org\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Double-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"25","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"12","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"1","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"48% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}