{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,25]],"date-time":"2025-03-25T14:40:07Z","timestamp":1742913607420,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":51,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030378721"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030378738"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-37873-8_3","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,2]],"date-time":"2020-01-02T20:03:00Z","timestamp":1577995380000},"page":"50-75","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["The Understandability of Models for Behaviour"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7775-0780","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Vladimir","family":"Estivill-Castro","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9668-849X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ren\u00e9","family":"Hexel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"3_CR1","unstructured":"A crash course in UML state machines (2015). \nhttps:\/\/www.state-machine.com\/doc\/AN_Crash_Course_in_UML_State_Machines.pdf\n\n. Accessed 20 June 2019"},{"key":"3_CR2","unstructured":"State machine diagram tutorial (2018). \nhttps:\/\/www.lucidchart.com\/pages\/uml-state-machine-diagram\n\n. Accessed 20 June 2019"},{"issue":"4","key":"3_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"456","DOI":"10.1109\/32.799939","volume":"25","author":"VR Basili","year":"1999","unstructured":"Basili, V.R., Shull, F., Lanubile, F.: Building knowledge through families of experiments. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 25(4), 456\u2013473 (1999)","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng."},{"key":"3_CR4","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-44518-8_13","volume-title":"Abstract State Machines - Theory and Applications","author":"E B\u00f6rger","year":"2000","unstructured":"B\u00f6rger, E., Cavarra, A., Riccobene, E.: Modeling the dynamics of UML state machines. In: Gurevich, Y., Kutter, P.W., Odersky, M., Thiele, L. (eds.) ASM 2000. LNCS, vol. 1912, pp. 223\u2013241. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/3-540-44518-8_13"},{"issue":"1","key":"3_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1109\/JRA.1986.1087032","volume":"2","author":"R Brooks","year":"1986","unstructured":"Brooks, R.: A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE J. Robot. Autom. 2(1), 14\u201323 (1986)","journal-title":"IEEE J. Robot. Autom."},{"issue":"2","key":"3_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1007\/s11023-007-9061-7","volume":"17","author":"T Colburn","year":"2007","unstructured":"Colburn, T., Shute, G.: Abstraction in computer science. Minds Mach. 17(2), 169\u2013184 (2007)","journal-title":"Minds Mach."},{"issue":"6","key":"3_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"685","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-009-9106-z","volume":"14","author":"JA Cruz-Lemus","year":"2009","unstructured":"Cruz-Lemus, J.A., Genero, M., Manso, M.E., Morasca, S., Piattini, M.: Assessing the understandability of UML statechart diagrams with composite states\u2013a family of empirical studies. Empir. Softw. Eng. 14(6), 685\u2013719 (2009)","journal-title":"Empir. Softw. Eng."},{"key":"3_CR8","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1007\/11557432_9","volume-title":"Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems","author":"JA Cruz-Lemus","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cruz-Lemus, J.A., Genero, M., Manso, M.E., Piattini, M.: Evaluating the effect of composite states on the understandability of UML statechart diagrams. In: Briand, L., Williams, C. (eds.) MODELS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3713, pp. 113\u2013125. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/11557432_9"},{"issue":"11","key":"3_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2209","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2010.01.026","volume":"180","author":"JA Cruz-Lemus","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cruz-Lemus, J.A., Maes, A., Genero, M., Poels, G., Piattini, M.: The impact of structural complexity on the understandability of UML statechart diagrams. Inf. Sci. 180(11), 2209\u20132220 (2010)","journal-title":"Inf. Sci."},{"issue":"5","key":"3_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-009-9127-7","volume":"15","author":"A Lucia De","year":"2010","unstructured":"De Lucia, A., Gravino, C., Oliveto, R., Tortora, G.: An experimental comparison of ER and UML class diagrams for data modelling. Empir. Softw. Eng. 15(5), 455\u2013492 (2010)","journal-title":"Empir. Softw. Eng."},{"key":"3_CR11","volume-title":"Teaching and Learning Formal Methods, pp. vii\u2013viii","author":"EW Dijkstra","year":"1996","unstructured":"Dijkstra, E.W.: Foreword. In: Hinchey, M.G., Dean, N.C. (eds.) Teaching and Learning Formal Methods, pp. vii\u2013viii. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1996)"},{"key":"3_CR12","volume-title":"Doing Hard Time: Developing Real-Time Systems with UML, Objects, Frameworks, and Patterns","author":"BP Douglass","year":"1999","unstructured":"Douglass, B.P.: Doing Hard Time: Developing Real-Time Systems with UML, Objects, Frameworks, and Patterns. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1999)"},{"key":"3_CR13","volume-title":"Modeling and Verification Using UML Statecharts: A Working Guide to Reactive System Design, Runtime Monitoring and Execution-based Model Checking","author":"D Drusinsky","year":"2006","unstructured":"Drusinsky, D.: Modeling and Verification Using UML Statecharts: A Working Guide to Reactive System Design, Runtime Monitoring and Execution-based Model Checking. Newnes, Oxford (2006)"},{"issue":"3","key":"3_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.2008.15","volume":"34","author":"WJ Dzidek","year":"2008","unstructured":"Dzidek, W.J., Arisholm, E., Briand, L.C.: A realistic empirical evaluation of the costs and benefits of UML in software maintenance. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 34(3), 407\u2013432 (2008)","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng."},{"key":"3_CR15","unstructured":"Estivill-Castro, V., Hexel, R.: Downloads (2016). \nhttp:\/\/mipal.net.au\/downloads.php\n\n. Accessed 20 June 2019"},{"key":"3_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Estivill-Castro, V., Hexel, R.: Resolving the asymmetry of on-exit versus on-entry in executable models of behaviour. In: 7th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development, MODELSWARD, pp. 51\u201363 (2019)","DOI":"10.5220\/0007323300510063"},{"key":"3_CR17","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-11900-7_16","volume-title":"Simulation, Modeling, and Programming for Autonomous Robots","author":"V Estivill-Castro","year":"2014","unstructured":"Estivill-Castro, V., Hexel, R., Lusty, C.: High performance relaying of C++11 objects across processes and logic-labeled finite-state machines. In: Brugali, D., Broenink, J.F., Kroeger, T., MacDonald, B.A. (eds.) SIMPAR 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8810, pp. 182\u2013194. Springer, Cham (2014). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-11900-7_16"},{"key":"3_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Estivill-Castro, V., Hexel, R., Rosenblueth, D.A.: Efficient model checking and FMEA analysis with deterministic scheduling of transition-labeled finite-state machines. In: 3rd World Congress on Software Engineering, WCSE 2012, pp. 65\u201372. IEEE Computer Society (CPS), Wuhan (2012)","DOI":"10.1109\/WCSE.2012.20"},{"key":"3_CR19","unstructured":"Fakhroutdinov, K.: State Machine Diagrams (2009). \nhttps:\/\/www.uml-diagrams.org\/state-machine-diagrams.html\n\n. Accessed 20 June 2019"},{"issue":"2","key":"3_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1109\/32.485225","volume":"22","author":"K Finney","year":"1996","unstructured":"Finney, K.: Mathematical notation in formal specification: too difficult for the masses? IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 22(2), 158\u2013159 (1996)","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng."},{"key":"3_CR21","first-page":"117","volume-title":"Teaching and Learning Formal Methods","author":"K Finney","year":"1996","unstructured":"Finney, K., Fedorec, A.M.: An empirical study of specification readability. In: Hinchey, M.G., Dean, N.C. (eds.) Teaching and Learning Formal Methods, pp. 117\u2013129. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1996)"},{"key":"3_CR22","unstructured":"Gansner, E.R., Koutsofios, E., North, S.: Drawing graphs with dot (2015). \nhttps:\/\/www.graphviz.org\/pdf\/dotguide.pdf\n\n. Accessed 20 June 2019"},{"key":"3_CR23","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-39597-3_12","volume-title":"Conceptual Modeling for Novel Application Domains","author":"M Genero","year":"2003","unstructured":"Genero, M., Miranda, D., Piattini, M.: Defining metrics for UML statechart diagrams in a methodological way. In: Jeusfeld, M.A., Pastor, \u00d3. (eds.) ER 2003. LNCS, vol. 2814, pp. 118\u2013128. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-540-39597-3_12"},{"key":"3_CR24","unstructured":"Glinz, M.: Problems and deficiencies of UML as a requirements specification language. In: 10th International Workshop on Software Specification and Design, p. 11. IEEE Computer Society (2000)"},{"key":"3_CR25","volume-title":"Modeling Reactive Systems with Statecharts: The STATEMATE Approach","author":"D Harel","year":"1998","unstructured":"Harel, D., Politi, M.: Modeling Reactive Systems with Statecharts: The STATEMATE Approach. McGraw-Hill, New York (1998)"},{"issue":"3","key":"3_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1026586415054","volume":"5","author":"M H\u00f6st","year":"2000","unstructured":"H\u00f6st, M., Regnell, B., Wohlin, C.: Using students as subjects\u2013a comparative study of students and professionals in lead-time impact assessment. Empir. Softw. Eng. 5(3), 201\u2013214 (2000)","journal-title":"Empir. Softw. Eng."},{"issue":"1","key":"3_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/j.scico.2007.08.002","volume":"72","author":"F Jouault","year":"2008","unstructured":"Jouault, F., Allilaire, F., B\u00e9zivin, J., Kurtev, I.: ATL: a model transformation tool. Sci. Comput. Program. 72(1), 31\u201339 (2008). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.scico.2007.08.002\n\n. Special Issue on Second issue of experimental software and toolkits (EST)","journal-title":"Sci. Comput. Program."},{"issue":"8","key":"3_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"721","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.2002.1027796","volume":"28","author":"BA Kitchenham","year":"2002","unstructured":"Kitchenham, B.A., et al.: Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 28(8), 721\u2013734 (2002)","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng."},{"key":"3_CR29","series-title":"Real-Time Systems Series","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4419-8237-7","volume-title":"Real-Time Systems - Design Principles for Distributed Embedded Applications","author":"H Kopetz","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kopetz, H.: Real-Time Systems - Design Principles for Distributed Embedded Applications. RTSS, 2nd edn. Springer, Boston (2011). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-1-4419-8237-7","edition":"2"},{"issue":"6","key":"3_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1811","DOI":"10.1145\/197320.197383","volume":"16","author":"BH Liskov","year":"1994","unstructured":"Liskov, B.H., Wing, J.M.: A behavioral notion of subtyping. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 16(6), 1811\u20131841 (1994)","journal-title":"ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst."},{"key":"3_CR31","first-page":"38","volume":"13","author":"SJ Mellor","year":"2000","unstructured":"Mellor, S.J.: UML point\/counterpoint: modeling complex behavior simply. Embedded Syst. Program. 13, 38\u201342 (2000)","journal-title":"Embedded Syst. Program."},{"key":"3_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/j.entcs.2005.10.021","volume":"152","author":"T Mens","year":"2006","unstructured":"Mens, T., Van Gorp, P.: A taxonomy of model transformation. Electron. Not. Theor. Comput. Sci. 152, 125\u2013142 (2006)","journal-title":"Electron. Not. Theor. Comput. Sci."},{"key":"3_CR33","volume-title":"Design by Contract, by Example","author":"R Mitchell","year":"2002","unstructured":"Mitchell, R., McKim, J., Meyer, B.: Design by Contract, by Example. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2002)"},{"issue":"6","key":"3_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"756","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.2009.67","volume":"35","author":"D Moody","year":"2009","unstructured":"Moody, D.: The \u201cphysics\u201d of notations: toward a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 35(6), 756\u2013779 (2009). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/TSE.2009.67","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng."},{"key":"3_CR35","unstructured":"Mustafa, B.A.: An experimental comparison of use case models understanding by novice and high knowledge users. In: New Trends in Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques - 9th SoMeT 2010. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 217, pp. 182\u2013199. IOS Press (2010)"},{"key":"3_CR36","unstructured":"Object Management Group: Action language for foundational UML (Alf) \u2013 concrete syntax for a UML action language. Version 1.1. Technical report formal\/2017-07-04, An OMG Action Language for Foundational UML Publication (2017). Normative reference: \nhttp:\/\/www.omg.org\/spec\/ALF\/1.1"},{"key":"3_CR37","unstructured":"Object Management Group: OMG unified modeling language version 2.5.1. Technical report formal\/2017-12-05, OMG Object Management Group Publication (2017). Normative reference: \nhttp:\/\/www.omg.org\/spec\/UML"},{"key":"3_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Petre, M.: UML in practice. In: International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2013, pp. 722\u2013731. IEEE Press, Piscataway (2013)","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSE.2013.6606618"},{"key":"3_CR39","unstructured":"R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2016). \nhttps:\/\/www.R-project.org\/"},{"key":"3_CR40","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-46428-X_10","volume-title":"Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering","author":"G Reggio","year":"2000","unstructured":"Reggio, G., Astesiano, E., Choppy, C., Hussmann, H.: Analysing UML active classes and associated state machines - a lightweight formal approach. In: Maibaum, T. (ed.) FASE 2000. LNCS, vol. 1783, pp. 127\u2013146. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/3-540-46428-X_10"},{"key":"3_CR41","unstructured":"Reggio, G., Leotta, M., Ricca, F., Clerissi, D.: What are the used UML diagrams? A preliminary survey. In: 3rd International Workshop on Experiences and Empirical Studies in Software Modeling (EESSMod 2013 Co-Located with MODELS 2013), vol. 1078, pp. 3\u201312. CEUR (2013)"},{"key":"3_CR42","unstructured":"Richardson, M.: Guideline: Statechart Diagram. \nhttps:\/\/tinyurl.com\/RichardsonStatechart\n\n (2015). Accessed 09 Oct 2019"},{"key":"3_CR43","unstructured":"Robbins, J.E.: Cognitive support features for software development tools. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine (1999). Advisor: Prof. D. F. Redmiles"},{"key":"3_CR44","unstructured":"Rumpe, R.: Executable modeling with UML - a vision or a nightmare? In: Issues and Trends of Information Technology Management in Contemporary Associations Volume 1, pp. 697\u2013701. Idea Group Publishing (2002)"},{"key":"3_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1201\/b16463","volume-title":"Practical UML Statecharts in C\/C++, Second Edition: Event-Driven Programming for Embedded Systems","author":"M Samek","year":"2008","unstructured":"Samek, M.: Practical UML Statecharts in C\/C++, Second Edition: Event-Driven Programming for Embedded Systems. Newnes, Newton (2008)"},{"key":"3_CR46","unstructured":"Samek, M.: UML State Machine (2009). \nhttps:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/UML_state_machine\n\n. Accessed 20 June 2019"},{"key":"3_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-10575-8_3","volume-title":"Handbook of Model Checking","author":"SA Seshia","year":"2018","unstructured":"Seshia, S.A., Sharygina, N., Tripakis, S.: Modeling for verification. Handbook of Model Checking, pp. 75\u2013105. Springer, Cham (2018). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-10575-8_3"},{"issue":"2","key":"3_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/0169-023X(90)90008-2","volume":"5","author":"M Shaw","year":"1990","unstructured":"Shaw, M.: Toward higher-level abstractions for software systems. Data Knowl. Eng. 5(2), 119\u2013128 (1990)","journal-title":"Data Knowl. Eng."},{"issue":"10","key":"3_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1357","DOI":"10.1109\/TC.2008.123","volume":"57","author":"SK Wood","year":"2008","unstructured":"Wood, S.K., Akehurst, D.H., Uzenkov, O., Howells, W.G.J., McDonald-Maier, K.D.: A model-driven development approach to mapping UML state diagrams to synthesizable VHDL. IEEE Trans. Comput. 57(10), 1357\u20131371 (2008)","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Comput."},{"key":"3_CR50","unstructured":"World Wide Web Consortium: State chart XML (SCXML): State machine notation for control abstraction, 1 September 2005"},{"key":"3_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zimmerman, M.K., Lundqvist, K., Leveson, N.: Investigating the readability of state-based formal requirements specification languages. In: 24th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE, pp. 33\u201343 (2002)","DOI":"10.1145\/581344.581347"}],"container-title":["Communications in Computer and Information Science","Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-37873-8_3","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,3]],"date-time":"2020-01-03T01:11:28Z","timestamp":1578013888000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-37873-8_3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020]]},"ISBN":["9783030378721","9783030378738"],"references-count":51,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-37873-8_3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1865-0929","1865-0937"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1865-0929"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1865-0937"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020]]},"assertion":[{"value":"3 January 2020","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"MODELSWARD","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Prague","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Czech Republic","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2019","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"20 February 2019","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"22 February 2019","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"7","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"modelsward2019","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"http:\/\/www.modelsward.org\/?y=2019","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Double-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"PRIMORIS","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"76","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"16","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"25","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"21% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"4","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"No","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}