{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,16]],"date-time":"2026-04-16T02:09:46Z","timestamp":1776305386612,"version":"3.50.1"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":41,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"value":"9783030532901","type":"print"},{"value":"9783030532918","type":"electronic"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,14]],"date-time":"2020-07-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1594684800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":195,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-53291-8_10","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,15]],"date-time":"2020-07-15T20:03:35Z","timestamp":1594843415000},"page":"165-177","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":28,"title":["MetaVal: Witness Validation via Verification"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4832-7662","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Dirk","family":"Beyer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9169-9130","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Martin","family":"Spiessl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,14]]},"reference":[{"key":"10_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Alglave, J., Donaldson, A.F., Kr\u00f6ning, D., Tautschnig, M.: Making software verification tools really work. In: Proc. ATVA, LNCS, vol. 6996, pp. 28\u201342. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-24372-1_3","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-24372-1_3"},{"key":"10_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Artho, C., Havelund, K., Honiden, S.: Visualization of concurrent program executions. In: Proc. COMPSAC, pp. 541\u2013546. IEEE (2007). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/COMPSAC.2007.236","DOI":"10.1109\/COMPSAC.2007.236"},{"key":"10_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Beyer, D.: Automatic verification of C and Java programs: SV-COMP 2019. In: Proc. TACAS (3), LNCS, vol. 11429, pp. 133\u2013155. Springer, Cham (2019). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-17502-3_9","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-17502-3_9"},{"key":"10_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Beyer, D.: Advances in automatic software verification: SV-COMP 2020. In: Proc. TACAS (2), LNCS, vol. 12079, pp. 347\u2013367. Springer, Cham (2020). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-45237-7_21","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-45237-7_21"},{"key":"10_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Beyer, D.: Results of the 9th International Competition on Software Verification (SV-COMP 2020). Zenodo (2020). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.3630205","DOI":"10.5281\/zenodo.3630205"},{"key":"10_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Beyer, D.: SV-Benchmarks: Benchmark set of 9th Intl. Competition on Software Verification (SV-COMP 2020). Zenodo (2020). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.3633334","DOI":"10.5281\/zenodo.3633334"},{"key":"10_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Beyer, D.: Verification witnesses from SV-COMP 2020 verification tools. Zenodo (2020). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.3630188","DOI":"10.5281\/zenodo.3630188"},{"key":"10_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Beyer, D., Chlipala, A.J., Henzinger, T.A., Jhala, R., Majumdar, R.: Generating tests from counterexamples. In: Proc. ICSE, pp. 326\u2013335. IEEE (2004). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ICSE.2004.1317455","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSE.2004.1317455"},{"key":"10_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Beyer, D., Dangl, M.: Verification-aided debugging: An interactive web-service for exploring error witnesses. In: Proc. CAV (2), LNCS, vol. 9780, pp. 502\u2013509. Springer, Cham (2016). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-41540-6_28","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-41540-6_28"},{"key":"10_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Beyer, D., Dangl, M., Dietsch, D., Heizmann, M.: Correctness witnesses: Exchanging verification results between verifiers. In: Proc. FSE, pp. 326\u2013337. ACM (2016). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2950290.2950351","DOI":"10.1145\/2950290.2950351"},{"key":"10_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Beyer, D., Dangl, M., Dietsch, D., Heizmann, M., Stahlbauer, A.: Witness validation and stepwise testification across software verifiers. In: Proc. FSE, pp. 721\u2013733. ACM (2015). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2786805.2786867","DOI":"10.1145\/2786805.2786867"},{"key":"10_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Beyer, D., Dangl, M., Lemberger, T., Tautschnig, M.: Tests from witnesses: Execution-based validation of verification results. In: Proc. TAP, LNCS, vol. 10889, pp. 3\u201323. Springer, Cham (2018). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-92994-1_1","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-92994-1_1"},{"key":"10_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Beyer, D., Gulwani, S., Schmidt, D.: Combining model checking and data-flow analysis. In: Handbook of Model Checking, pp. 493\u2013540. Springer, Cham (2018). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-10575-8_16","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-10575-8_16"},{"key":"10_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Beyer, D., Jakobs, M.C., Lemberger, T., Wehrheim, H.: Reducer-based construction of conditional verifiers. In: Proc. ICSE, pp. 1182\u20131193. ACM (2018). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3180155.3180259","DOI":"10.1145\/3180155.3180259"},{"issue":"1","key":"10_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10009-017-0469-y","volume":"21","author":"D Beyer","year":"2017","unstructured":"Beyer, D., L\u00f6we, S., Wendler, P.: Reliable benchmarking: Requirements and solutions. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transfer 21(1), 1\u201329 (2017). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10009-017-0469-y","journal-title":"Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transfer"},{"key":"10_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Beyer, D., Spiessl, M.: Replication package (virtual machine) for article \u2018MetaVal: Witness validation via verification\u2019 in Proc. CAV 2020. Zenodo (2020). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.3831417","DOI":"10.5281\/zenodo.3831417"},{"key":"10_CR17","unstructured":"Beyer, D., Wehrheim, H.: Verification artifacts in cooperative verification: Survey and unifying component framework. arXiv\/CoRR 1905(08505), May 2019. \nhttps:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1905.08505"},{"key":"10_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Cadar, C., Ganesh, V., Pawlowski, P.M., Dill, D.L., Engler, D.R.: EXE: Automatically generating inputs of death. In: Proc. CCS, pp. 322\u2013335. ACM (2006). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1180405.1180445","DOI":"10.1145\/1180405.1180445"},{"key":"10_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Casta\u00f1o, R., Braberman, V.A., Garbervetsky, D., Uchitel, S.: Model checker execution reports. In: Proc. ASE, pp. 200\u2013205. IEEE (2017). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ASE.2017.8115633","DOI":"10.1109\/ASE.2017.8115633"},{"key":"10_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Christakis, M., Bird, C.: What developers want and need from program analysis: An empirical study. In: Proc. ASE, pp. 332\u2013343. ACM (2016). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2970276.2970347","DOI":"10.1145\/2970276.2970347"},{"key":"10_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., McMillan, K.L., Zhao, X.: Efficient generation of counterexamples and witnesses in symbolic model checking. In: Proc. DAC, pp. 427\u2013432. ACM (1995). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/217474.217565","DOI":"10.1145\/217474.217565"},{"key":"10_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Csallner, C., Smaragdakis, Y.: Check \u2018n\u2019 crash: Combining static checking and testing. In: Proc. ICSE, pp. 422\u2013431. ACM (2005). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1062455.1062533","DOI":"10.1145\/1062455.1062533"},{"key":"10_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ermis, E., Sch\u00e4f, M., Wies, T.: Error invariants. In: Proc. FM, LNCS, vol. 7436, pp. 187\u2013201. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-32759-9_17","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-32759-9_17"},{"key":"10_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Godefroid, P., Klarlund, N., Sen, K.: Dart: Directed automated random testing. In: Proc. PLDI, pp. 213\u2013223. ACM (2005). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1065010.1065036","DOI":"10.1145\/1065010.1065036"},{"key":"10_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gulavani, B.S., Henzinger, T.A., Kannan, Y., Nori, A.V., Rajamani, S.K.: Synergy: A new algorithm for property checking. In: Proc. FSE, pp. 117\u2013127. ACM (2006). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1181775.1181790","DOI":"10.1145\/1181775.1181790"},{"key":"10_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gunter, E.L., Peled, D.A.: Path exploration tool. In: Proc. TACAS, LNCS, vol. 1579, pp. 405\u2013419. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/3-540-49059-0_28","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-49059-0_28"},{"key":"10_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jakobs, M.C., Wehrheim, H.: Programs from proofs: A framework for the safe execution of untrusted software. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 39(2), 7:1\u20137:56 (2017). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3014427","DOI":"10.1145\/3014427"},{"key":"10_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Li, K., Reichenbach, C., Csallner, C., Smaragdakis, Y.: Residual investigation: Predictive and precise bug detection. In: Proc. ISSTA, pp. 298\u2013308. ACM (2012). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2338965.2336789","DOI":"10.1145\/2338965.2336789"},{"key":"10_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Majumdar, R., Sen, K.: Hybrid concolic testing. In: Proc. ICSE, pp. 416\u2013426. IEEE (2007). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ICSE.2007.41","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSE.2007.41"},{"issue":"2","key":"10_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cosrev.2010.09.009","volume":"5","author":"RM McConnell","year":"2011","unstructured":"McConnell, R.M., Mehlhorn, K., N\u00e4her, S., Schweitzer, P.: Certifying algorithms. Comput. Sci. Rev. 5(2), 119\u2013161 (2011). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cosrev.2010.09.009","journal-title":"Comput. Sci. Rev."},{"key":"10_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"M\u00fcller, P., Ruskiewicz, J.N.: Using debuggers to understand failed verification attempts. In: Proc. FM, LNCS, vol. 6664, pp. 73\u201387. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-21437-0_8","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-21437-0_8"},{"issue":"11","key":"10_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1056","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.2002.1049404","volume":"28","author":"F Plasil","year":"2002","unstructured":"Plasil, F., Visnovsky, S.: Behavior protocols for software components. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 28(11), 1056\u20131076 (2002). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/TSE.2002.1049404","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Software Eng."},{"key":"10_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rocha, H., Barreto, R.S., Cordeiro, L.C., Neto, A.D.: Understanding programming bugs in ANSI-C software using bounded model checking counter-examples. In: Proc. IFM, LNCS, vol. 7321, pp. 128\u2013142. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-30729-4_10","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-30729-4_10"},{"issue":"1","key":"10_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1145\/353323.353382","volume":"3","author":"FB Schneider","year":"2000","unstructured":"Schneider, F.B.: Enforceable security policies. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. 3(1), 30\u201350 (2000). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/353323.353382","journal-title":"ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur."},{"key":"10_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sen, K., Marinov, D., Agha, G.: Cute: A concolic unit testing engine for C. In: Proc. FSE, pp. 263\u2013272. ACM (2005). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1081706.1081750","DOI":"10.1145\/1081706.1081750"},{"key":"10_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"\u0160er\u00fd, O.: Enhanced property specification and verification in Blast. In: Proc. FASE, LNCS, vol. 5503, pp. 456\u2013469. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-00593-0_32","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-00593-0_32"},{"key":"10_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Svejda, J., Berger, P., Katoen, J.P.: Interpretation-based violation witness validation for C: NitWit. In: Proc. TACAS, LNCS, vol. 12078, pp. 40\u201357. Springer, Cham (2020). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-45190-5_3","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-45190-5_3"},{"key":"10_CR38","unstructured":"Turing, A.: Checking a large routine. In: Report on a Conference on High Speed Automatic Calculating Machines, pp. 67\u201369. Cambridge Univ. Math. Lab. (1949)"},{"key":"10_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Visser, W., P\u0103s\u0103reanu, C.S., Khurshid, S.: Test-input generation with Java PathFinder. In: Proc. ISSTA, pp. 97\u2013107. ACM (2004). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1007512.1007526","DOI":"10.1145\/1007512.1007526"},{"key":"10_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wimmer, S., von Mutius, J.: Verified certification of reachability checking for timed automata. In: Proc. TACAS, LNCS, vol. 12078, pp. 425\u2013443. Springer, Cham (2020). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-45190-5_24","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-45190-5_24"},{"key":"10_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wonisch, D., Schremmer, A., Wehrheim, H.: Programs from proofs: A PCC alternative. In: Proc. CAV, LNCS, vol. 8044, pp. 912\u2013927. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-39799-8_65","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-39799-8_65"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Computer Aided Verification"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-53291-8_10","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,15]],"date-time":"2020-07-15T20:04:55Z","timestamp":1594843495000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-53291-8_10"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020]]},"ISBN":["9783030532901","9783030532918"],"references-count":41,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-53291-8_10","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0302-9743","type":"print"},{"value":"1611-3349","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020]]},"assertion":[{"value":"14 July 2020","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"CAV","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Computer Aided Verification","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Los Angeles, CA","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"USA","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2020","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"21 July 2020","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"24 July 2020","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"32","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"cav2020","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"http:\/\/i-cav.org\/2020\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Double-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair.org","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"240","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"43","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"22","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"18% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"4","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"11","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"The conference was held virtually due to the COVID-19 pandemic.","order":10,"name":"additional_info_on_review_process","label":"Additional Info on Review Process","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}