{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T08:26:43Z","timestamp":1760171203626,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":29,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030584481"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030584498"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-58449-8_10","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,15]],"date-time":"2020-09-15T23:03:51Z","timestamp":1600211031000},"page":"141-155","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Belief Functions for Safety Arguments Confidence Estimation: A Comparative Study"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Yassir","family":"Idmessaoud","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Didier","family":"Dubois","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J\u00e9r\u00e9mie","family":"Guiochet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"10_CR1","unstructured":"Ayoub, A., Chang, J., Sokolsky, O., Lee, I.: Assessing the overall sufficiency of safety arguments. In: 21st Safety-critical Systems Symposium (SSS\u201913), Bristol, United Kingdom (2013)"},{"key":"10_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bloomfield, R., Netkachova, K.: Building blocks for assurance cases. In: 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops, pp. 186\u2013191. IEEE (2014)","DOI":"10.1109\/ISSREW.2014.72"},{"key":"10_CR3","unstructured":"Chatalic, P., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: An approach to approximate reasoning based on Dempster rule of combination. Int. J. Expert Syst. Res. Appl. 1, 67\u201385 (1987)"},{"issue":"1","key":"10_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ress.2010.06.027","volume":"96","author":"L Cyra","year":"2011","unstructured":"Cyra, L., G\u00f3rski, J.: Support for argument structures review and assessment. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96(1), 26\u201337 (2011)","journal-title":"Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf."},{"key":"10_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.csi.2016.10.002","volume":"50","author":"JL De La Vara","year":"2017","unstructured":"De La Vara, J.L., G\u00e9nova, G., \u00c1lvarez-Rodr\u00edguez, J.M., Llorens, J.: An analysis of safety evidence management with the structured assurance case metamodel. Comput. Stan. Interfaces 50, 179\u2013198 (2017)","journal-title":"Comput. Stan. Interfaces"},{"key":"10_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Denney, E., Pai, G., Habli, I.: Towards measurement of confidence in safety cases. In: 2011 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 380\u2013383. IEEE (2011)","DOI":"10.1109\/ESEM.2011.53"},{"issue":"2\u20133","key":"10_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.05.008","volume":"172","author":"T Denoeux","year":"2008","unstructured":"Denoeux, T.: Conjunctive and disjunctive combination of belief functions induced by nondistinct bodies of evidence. Artif. Intell. 172(2\u20133), 234\u2013264 (2008)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"18","key":"10_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3925","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2011.05.007","volume":"181","author":"S Destercke","year":"2011","unstructured":"Destercke, S., Dubois, D.: Idempotent conjunctive combination of belief functions: Extending the minimum rule of possibility theory. Inf. Sci. 181(18), 3925\u20133945 (2011)","journal-title":"Inf. Sci."},{"key":"10_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dubois, D., Faux, F., Prade, H., Rico, A.: A possibilistic counterpart to Shafer evidence theory. In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), New Orleans, LA, USA, June 23\u201326, pp. 1\u20136. IEEE (2019)","DOI":"10.1109\/FUZZ-IEEE.2019.8858931"},{"key":"10_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dubois, D., Prade, H.: A set-theoretic view of belief functions. Logical operations and approximation by fuzzy sets. Int. J. General Syst. 12(3), 193\u2013226 (1986)","DOI":"10.1080\/03081078608934937"},{"key":"10_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8640.1988.tb00279.x","volume":"4","author":"D Dubois","year":"1988","unstructured":"Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Representation and combination of uncertainty with belief functions and possibility measures. Comput. Intell. 4, 244\u2013264 (1988)","journal-title":"Comput. Intell."},{"key":"10_CR12","unstructured":"EN50129: Railway applications - Safety related electronic systems for signaling (2003), CENELEC, European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization"},{"key":"10_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ssci.2016.09.014","volume":"92","author":"PJ Graydon","year":"2017","unstructured":"Graydon, P.J., Holloway, C.M.: An investigation of proposed techniques for quantifying confidence in assurance arguments. Saf. Sci. 92, 53\u201365 (2017)","journal-title":"Saf. Sci."},{"key":"10_CR14","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-24255-2_23","volume-title":"Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security","author":"J Guiochet","year":"2015","unstructured":"Guiochet, J., Do Hoang, Q.A., Kaaniche, M.: A model for safety case confidence assessment. In: Koornneef, F., van Gulijk, C. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9337, pp. 313\u2013327. Springer, Cham (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-24255-2_23"},{"key":"10_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hobbs, C., Lloyd, M.: The application of Bayesian belief networks to assurance case preparation. In: Achieving Systems Safety, pp. 159\u2013176. Springer (2012)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4471-2494-8_12"},{"issue":"2","key":"10_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1109\/24.87125","volume":"40","author":"T Inagaki","year":"1991","unstructured":"Inagaki, T.: Interdependence between safety-control policy and multiple-sensor schemes via Dempster-Shafer theory. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 40(2), 182\u2013188 (1991)","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Reliab."},{"key":"10_CR17","unstructured":"ISO 26262: Software considerations in airborne systems and equipment certification. In: International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2011)"},{"key":"10_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J\u00f8sang, A.: Subjective Logic. Springer (2016)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-42337-1"},{"key":"10_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kelly, T.: Arguing Safety - A Systematic Approach to Safety Case Management. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of York, UK (1998)","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-48249-0_2"},{"key":"10_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kelly, T.P., McDermid, J.A.: Safety case construction and reuse using patterns. In: International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security (Safecomp) 97, pp. 55\u201369. Springer (1997)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4471-0997-6_5"},{"key":"10_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sentz, K., Ferson, S., et al.: Combination of evidence in Dempster-Shafer theory. Technical Report 0835, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA (2002)","DOI":"10.2172\/800792"},{"issue":"4","key":"10_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1016\/j.inffus.2006.04.003","volume":"8","author":"P Smets","year":"2007","unstructured":"Smets, P.: Analyzing the combination of conflicting belief functions. Inf. Fusion 8(4), 387\u2013412 (2007)","journal-title":"Inf. Fusion"},{"key":"10_CR23","volume-title":"The Uses of Argument","author":"SE Toulmin","year":"1958","unstructured":"Toulmin, S.E.: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1958)"},{"key":"10_CR24","unstructured":"Wang, R.: Confidence in safety argument-An assessment framework based on belief function theory. Ph.D. thesis, Institut National des Sciences Appliqu\u00e9es de Toulouse, France (2018)"},{"key":"10_CR25","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-45559-4_20","volume-title":"Belief Functions: Theory and Applications","author":"R Wang","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wang, R., Guiochet, J., Motet, G., Sch\u00f6n, W.: D-S theory for argument confidence assessment. In: Vejnarov\u00e1, J., Kratochv\u00edl, V. (eds.) BELIEF 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9861, pp. 190\u2013200. Springer, Cham (2016). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-45559-4_20"},{"key":"10_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wang, R., Guiochet, J., Motet, G., Sch\u00f6n, W.: Modelling confidence in railway safety case. Saf. Sci. 110(part B), 286\u2013299 (2018)","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ssci.2017.11.012"},{"key":"10_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2019.02.002","volume":"107","author":"R Wang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wang, R., Guiochet, J., Motet, G., Sch\u00f6n, W.: Safety case confidence propagation based on Dempster-Shafer theory. Int. J. Approximate Reason. 107, 46\u201364 (2019)","journal-title":"Int. J. Approximate Reason."},{"issue":"2","key":"10_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-0255(87)90007-7","volume":"41","author":"RR Yager","year":"1987","unstructured":"Yager, R.R.: On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules. Inf. Sci. 41(2), 93\u2013137 (1987)","journal-title":"Inf. Sci."},{"issue":"6","key":"10_CR29","first-page":"807","volume":"13","author":"C Yuan","year":"2017","unstructured":"Yuan, C., Wu, J., Liu, C., Yang, H.: A subjective logic-based approach for assessing confidence in assurance case. Int. J. Perform. Eng. 13(6), 807\u2013822 (2017)","journal-title":"Int. J. Perform. Eng."}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Scalable Uncertainty Management"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-58449-8_10","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,18]],"date-time":"2022-11-18T14:26:30Z","timestamp":1668781590000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-58449-8_10"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020]]},"ISBN":["9783030584481","9783030584498"],"references-count":29,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-58449-8_10","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 September 2020","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"SUM","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Bozen-Bolzano","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Italy","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2020","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"23 September 2020","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"25 September 2020","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"14","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"sum2020","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/sum2020.inf.unibz.it\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Easychair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"30","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"12","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"7","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"40% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3,2","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}