{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,2]],"date-time":"2025-08-02T05:06:09Z","timestamp":1754111169912,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":15,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030587925"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030587932"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-58793-2_14","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,30]],"date-time":"2020-08-30T23:04:02Z","timestamp":1598828642000},"page":"169-183","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["A Personal Opinion Survey on Process Compliance Checking in the Safety Context"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Julieth Patricia","family":"Castellanos Ardila","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Barbara","family":"Gallina","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"14_CR1","unstructured":"Bertram, D.: Likert Scales Are the Meaning of Life. CPSC 681-Topic Report (2006). http:\/\/poincare.matf.bg.ac.rs\/~kristina\/topic-dane-likert.pdf"},{"key":"14_CR2","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-45480-1_28","volume-title":"Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security","author":"M Borg","year":"2016","unstructured":"Borg, M., de la Vara, J.L., Wnuk, K.: Practitioners\u2019 perspectives on change impact analysis for safety-critical software \u2013 a preliminary analysis. In: Skavhaug, A., Guiochet, J., Schoitsch, E., Bitsch, F. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2016. LNCS, vol. 9923, pp. 346\u2013358. Springer, Cham (2016). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-45480-1_28"},{"key":"14_CR3","unstructured":"Castellanos Ardila, J.P., Gallina, B.: Formal contract logic based patterns for facilitating compliance checking against ISO 26262. In: 1st Workshop on Technologies for Regulatory Compliance, pp. 65\u201372 (2017)"},{"key":"14_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Castellanos Ardila, J.P., Gallina, B., Ul Muram, F.: Enabling compliance checking against safety standards from SPEM 2.0 Process Models. In: Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, pp. 45\u201349 (2018)","DOI":"10.1109\/SEAA.2018.00017"},{"key":"14_CR5","series-title":"Communications in Computer and Information Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-00623-5_16","volume-title":"Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination","author":"JP Castellanos Ardila","year":"2018","unstructured":"Castellanos Ardila, J.P., Gallina, B., Ul Muram, F.: Transforming SPEM 2.0-compatible process models into models checkable for compliance. In: Stamelos, I., O\u2019Connor, R.V., Rout, T., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2018. CCIS, vol. 918, pp. 233\u2013247. Springer, Cham (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-00623-5_16"},{"key":"14_CR6","unstructured":"Castellanos Ardila, J., Gallina, B., Governatori, G.: Lessons learned while formalizing ISO 26262 for compliance checking. In: 2nd Workshop on Technologies for Regulatory Compliance, pp. 1\u201312 (2018)"},{"key":"14_CR7","unstructured":"Davis, F.: A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1985)"},{"issue":"12","key":"14_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1095","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.2016.2553032","volume":"42","author":"J De La Vara","year":"2016","unstructured":"De La Vara, J., Borg, M., Wnuk, K., Moonen, L.: An industrial survey of safety evidence change impact analysis practice. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 42(12), 1095\u20131117 (2016)","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng."},{"issue":"11","key":"14_CR9","first-page":"1","volume":"29","author":"P Diebold","year":"2017","unstructured":"Diebold, P., Scherr, S.: Software process models vs descriptions: what do practitioners use and need? J. Softw.: Evol. Process 29(11), 1\u201313 (2017)","journal-title":"J. Softw.: Evol. Process"},{"issue":"02n03","key":"14_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1142\/S0218843005001092","volume":"14","author":"G Governatori","year":"2005","unstructured":"Governatori, G.: Representing business contracts in RuleML. Int. J. Coop. Inf. Syst. 14(02n03), 181\u2013216 (2005)","journal-title":"Int. J. Coop. Inf. Syst."},{"key":"14_CR11","unstructured":"Javed, M., Gallina, B.: Get EPF Composer back to the future: a trip from Galileo to Photon after 11 years. In: EclipseCon (2018)"},{"key":"14_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-84800-044-5_3","volume-title":"Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering","author":"B Kitchenham","year":"2008","unstructured":"Kitchenham, B., Pfleeger, S.: Personal opinion surveys. In: Shull, F., Singer, J., Sj\u00f8berg, D.I.K. (eds.) Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering, pp. 63\u201392. Springer, London (2008). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-1-84800-044-5_3"},{"issue":"7","key":"14_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2014.03.001","volume":"56","author":"S Nair","year":"2014","unstructured":"Nair, S., De La Vara, J., Sabetzadeh, M., Briand, L.: An extended systematic literature review on provision of evidence for safety certification. Inf. Softw. Technol. 56(7), 689\u2013717 (2014)","journal-title":"Inf. Softw. Technol."},{"key":"14_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2014.12.002","volume":"60","author":"S Nair","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nair, S., De La Vara, J., Sabetzadeh, M., Falessi, D.: Evidence management for compliance of critical systems with safety standards: a survey on the state of practice. Inf. Softw. Technol. 60, 1\u201315 (2015)","journal-title":"Inf. Softw. Technol."},{"key":"14_CR15","unstructured":"Nair, S., Kelly, T., J\u00f8rgensen, M.: A report on the state-of-the-practice of safety evidence assessment. Technical report (2014)"}],"container-title":["Communications in Computer and Information Science","Quality of Information and Communications Technology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-58793-2_14","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,24]],"date-time":"2021-04-24T00:30:37Z","timestamp":1619224237000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-58793-2_14"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020]]},"ISBN":["9783030587925","9783030587932"],"references-count":15,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-58793-2_14","relation":{},"ISSN":["1865-0929","1865-0937"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1865-0929"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1865-0937"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020]]},"assertion":[{"value":"31 August 2020","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"QUATIC","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Faro","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Portugal","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2020","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"9 September 2020","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"11 September 2020","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"13","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"quatic2020","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/2020.quatic.org\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Double-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"81","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"27","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"12","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"33% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"2","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"No","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"The conference was held virtually due to the COVID-19 pandemic.","order":10,"name":"additional_info_on_review_process","label":"Additional Info on Review Process","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}