{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,26]],"date-time":"2026-03-26T00:27:53Z","timestamp":1774484873012,"version":"3.50.1"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":39,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"value":"9783030609740","type":"print"},{"value":"9783030609757","type":"electronic"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-60975-7_25","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,7]],"date-time":"2020-10-07T23:05:30Z","timestamp":1602111930000},"page":"333-351","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Political Framing: US COVID19 Blame Game"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Chereen","family":"Shurafa","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kareem","family":"Darwish","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Wajdi","family":"Zaghouani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,10,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"25_CR1","unstructured":"Abu-Jbara, A., King, B., Diab, M., Radev, D.: Identifying opinion subgroups in Arabic online discussions. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pp. 829\u2013835 (2013)"},{"key":"25_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aldayel, A., Magdy, W.: Your stance is exposed! Analysing possible factors for stance detection on social media. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 3, no. CSCW, pp. 1\u201320 (2019)","DOI":"10.1145\/3359307"},{"key":"25_CR3","unstructured":"Bakliwal, A., Foster, J., van der Puil, J., O\u2019Brien, R., Tounsi, L., Hughes, M.: Sentiment analysis of political tweets: towards an accurate classifier. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Language Analysis in Social Media, pp. 49\u201358. Association for Computational Linguistics, Atlanta, June 2013. https:\/\/www.aclweb.org\/anthology\/W13-1106"},{"key":"25_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baumer, E., Elovic, E., Qin, Y., Polletta, F., Gay, G.: Testing and comparing computational approaches for identifying the language of framing in political news. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 1472\u20131482 (2015)","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/N15-1171"},{"key":"25_CR5","unstructured":"Bermingham, A., Smeaton, A.: On using Twitter to monitor political sentiment and predict election results. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Sentiment Analysis where AI meets Psychology (SAAIP 2011), pp. 2\u201310. Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing, Chiang Mai, November 2011. https:\/\/www.aclweb.org\/anthology\/W11-3702"},{"key":"25_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Borge-Holthoefer, J., Magdy, W., Darwish, K., Weber, I.: Content and network dynamics behind Egyptian political polarization on twitter. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 700\u2013711. ACM (2015)","DOI":"10.1145\/2675133.2675163"},{"key":"25_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1080\/08838151.2015.1054999","volume":"59","author":"L Burch","year":"2015","unstructured":"Burch, L., Frederick, E., Pegoraro, A.: Kissing in the carnage: an examination of framing on twitter during the vancouver riots. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 59, 399\u2013415 (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08838151.2015.1054999","journal-title":"J. Broadcast. Electron. Media"},{"key":"25_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Card, D., Boydstun, A., Gross, J.H., Resnik, P., Smith, N.A.: The media frames corpus: annotations of frames across issues. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 2: Short Papers), pp. 438\u2013444 (2015)","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/P15-2072"},{"key":"25_CR9","unstructured":"Choi, E., Tan, C., Lee, L., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., Spindel, J.: Hedge detection as a lens on framing in the GMO debates: a position paper. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Extra-Propositional Aspects of Meaning in Computational Linguistics, pp. 70\u201379. Association for Computational Linguistics, Jeju, July 2012. https:\/\/www.aclweb.org\/anthology\/W12-3809"},{"key":"25_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054","volume":"10","author":"D Chong","year":"2007","unstructured":"Chong, D., Druckman, J.N.: Framing theory. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 10, 103\u2013126 (2007)","journal-title":"Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci."},{"key":"25_CR11","first-page":"89","volume":"133","author":"M Conover","year":"2011","unstructured":"Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M.R., Gon\u00e7alves, B., Menczer, F., Flammini, A.: Political polarization on Twitter. ICWSM 133, 89\u201396 (2011)","journal-title":"ICWSM"},{"key":"25_CR12","unstructured":"Darwish, K.: To kavanaugh or not to kavanaugh: that is the polarizing question. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.06687 (2018)"},{"key":"25_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Darwish, K., Stefanov, P., Aupetit, M.J., Nakov, P.: Unsupervised user stance detection on twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.02000 (2019)","DOI":"10.1609\/icwsm.v14i1.7286"},{"key":"25_CR14","unstructured":"Djemili, S., Longhi, J., Marinica, C., Kotzinos, D., Sarfati, G.E.: What does twitter have to say about ideology? In: NLP 4 CMC: Natural Language Processing for Computer-Mediated Communication\/Social Media-Pre-conference Workshop at Konvens 2014, vol. 1, p. http-www. Universit\u00e4tsverlag Hildesheim (2014)"},{"key":"25_CR15","unstructured":"Ebrahimi, J., Dou, D., Lowd, D.: A joint sentiment-target-stance model for stance classification in tweets. In: Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, pp. 2656\u20132665 (2016)"},{"issue":"4","key":"25_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x","volume":"43","author":"RM Entman","year":"1993","unstructured":"Entman, R.M.: Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J. Commun. 43(4), 51\u201358 (1993)","journal-title":"J. Commun."},{"key":"25_CR17","unstructured":"Fulgoni, D., Carpenter, J., Ungar, L., Preo\u0163iuc-Pietro, D.: An empirical exploration of moral foundations theory in partisan news sources. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2016), pp. 3730\u20133736. European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Portoro\u017e, Slovenia, May 2016. https:\/\/www.aclweb.org\/anthology\/L16-1591"},{"key":"25_CR18","unstructured":"Gerrish, S., Blei, D.M.: How they vote: Issue-adjusted models of legislative behavior. In: Pereira, F., Burges, C.J.C., Bottou, L., Weinberger, K.Q. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 25, pp. 2753\u20132761. Curran Associates, Inc. (2012). http:\/\/papers.nips.cc\/paper\/4715-how-they-vote-issue-adjusted-models-of-legislative-behavior.pdf"},{"key":"25_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Greene, S., Resnik, P.: More than words: syntactic packaging and implicit sentiment. In: Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 503\u2013511. Association for Computational Linguistics, Boulder, June 2009. https:\/\/www.aclweb.org\/anthology\/N09-1057","DOI":"10.3115\/1620754.1620827"},{"key":"25_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"563","DOI":"10.1177\/0894439313490401","volume":"31","author":"J Groshek","year":"2013","unstructured":"Groshek, J., Al-Rawi, A.: Public sentiment and critical framing in social media content during the 2012 U.S. presidential campaign. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 31, 563\u2013576 (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0894439313490401","journal-title":"Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev."},{"key":"25_CR21","unstructured":"Harlow, S., Johnson, T.: The arab spring\u2014overthrowing the protest paradigm? How the new york times, global voices and twitter covered the Egyptian revolution. Int. J. Commun. 5 (2011). https:\/\/ijoc.org\/index.php\/ijoc\/article\/view\/1239"},{"key":"25_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hasan, K.S., Ng, V.: Why are you taking this stance? Identifying and classifying reasons in ideological debates. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 751\u2013762 (2014)","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/D14-1083"},{"key":"25_CR23","unstructured":"Ishizaki, S., Kaufer, D.: The docuscope text analysis and visualization environment. In: McCarthy, P., Boonthum, C. (eds.) Invited Chapter for Applied Natural Language Processing and Content Analysis: Identification, Investigation, and Resolution (2011)"},{"key":"25_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Johnson, K., Goldwasser, D.: Identifying stance by analyzing political discourse on twitter. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on NLP and Computational Social Science, pp. 66\u201375 (2016)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/W16-5609"},{"key":"25_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Johnson, K., Jin, D., Goldwasser, D.: Modeling of political discourse framing on Twitter. In: Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2017)","DOI":"10.1609\/icwsm.v11i1.14958"},{"key":"25_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Johnson, K., Lee, I.T., Goldwasser, D.: Ideological phrase indicators for classification of political discourse framing on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on NLP and Computational Social Science, pp. 90\u201399. Association for Computational Linguistics, Vancouver, August 2017. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18653\/v1\/W17-2913. https:\/\/www.aclweb.org\/anthology\/W17-2913","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/W17-2913"},{"key":"25_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.010","volume":"32","author":"M Jones Jang","year":"2015","unstructured":"Jones Jang, M., Hart, P.: Polarized frames on \u201cclimate change\u201d and \u201cglobal warming\u201d across countries and states: evidence from Twitter big data. Glob. Environ. Change 32, 11\u201317 (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.010","journal-title":"Glob. Environ. Change"},{"key":"25_CR28","volume-title":"Rhetoric and the Arts of Design","author":"D Kaufer","year":"1996","unstructured":"Kaufer, D., Butler, B.: Rhetoric and the Arts of Design. Routledge, Abingdon (1996)"},{"key":"25_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9781410606037","volume-title":"Designing Interactive Worlds with Words: Principles of Writing as Representational Composition","author":"D Kaufer","year":"2000","unstructured":"Kaufer, D., Butler, B.: Designing Interactive Worlds with Words: Principles of Writing as Representational Composition. Routledge, Abingdon (2000)"},{"issue":"3","key":"25_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1024834831093","volume":"19","author":"TE Nelson","year":"1997","unstructured":"Nelson, T.E., Oxley, Z.M., Clawson, R.A.: Toward a psychology of framing effects. Polit. Behav. 19(3), 221\u2013246 (1997)","journal-title":"Polit. Behav."},{"key":"25_CR31","unstructured":"Pla, F., Hurtado, L.F.: Political tendency identification in Twitter using sentiment analysis techniques. In: Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, pp. 183\u2013192. Dublin City University and Association for Computational Linguistics, Dublin, August 2014. https:\/\/www.aclweb.org\/anthology\/C14-1019"},{"issue":"2","key":"25_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1080\/1369118X.2017.1366539","volume":"22","author":"P Pond","year":"2019","unstructured":"Pond, P., Lewis, J.: Riots and Twitter: connective politics, social media and framing discourses in the digital public sphere. Inf. Commun. Soc. 22(2), 213\u2013231 (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1369118X.2017.1366539","journal-title":"Inf. Commun. Soc."},{"key":"25_CR33","unstructured":"Recasens, M., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., Jurafsky, D.: Linguistic models for analyzing and detecting biased language. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 1650\u20131659. Association for Computational Linguistics, Sofia, August 2013. https:\/\/www.aclweb.org\/anthology\/P13-1162"},{"key":"25_CR34","unstructured":"Sim, Y., Acree, B.D.L., Gross, J.H., Smith, N.A.: Measuring ideological proportions in political speeches. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 91\u2013101. Association for Computational Linguistics, Seattle, Washington, October 2013. https:\/\/www.aclweb.org\/anthology\/D13-1010"},{"key":"25_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sridhar, D., Foulds, J., Huang, B., Getoor, L., Walker, M.: Joint models of disagreement and stance in online debate. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 116\u2013125 (2015)","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/P15-1012"},{"key":"25_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stefanov, P., Darwish, K., Atanasov, A., Nakov, P.: Predicting the topical stance and political leaning of media using tweets. In: ACL 2020 (2020)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2020.acl-main.50"},{"key":"25_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tan, C., Lee, L., Pang, B.: The effect of wording on message propagation: topic- and author-controlled natural experiments on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 175\u2013185. Association for Computational Linguistics, Baltimore, June 2014. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3115\/v1\/P14-1017. https:\/\/www.aclweb.org\/anthology\/P14-1017","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/P14-1017"},{"key":"25_CR38","unstructured":"Walker, M.A., Anand, P., Abbott, R., Grant, R.: Stance classification using dialogic properties of persuasion. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 592\u2013596. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)"},{"issue":"3","key":"25_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1162\/0891201041850885","volume":"30","author":"J Wiebe","year":"2004","unstructured":"Wiebe, J., Wilson, T., Bruce, R., Bell, M., Martin, M.: Learning subjective language. Comput. Linguist. 30(3), 277\u2013308 (2004). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/0891201041850885","journal-title":"Comput. Linguist."}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Social Informatics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-60975-7_25","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,22]],"date-time":"2022-11-22T13:24:08Z","timestamp":1669123448000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-60975-7_25"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020]]},"ISBN":["9783030609740","9783030609757"],"references-count":39,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-60975-7_25","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0302-9743","type":"print"},{"value":"1611-3349","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020]]},"assertion":[{"value":"7 October 2020","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"SocInfo","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Social Informatics","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Pisa","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Italy","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2020","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"6 October 2020","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"9 October 2020","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"12","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"socinfo2020","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/kdd.isti.cnr.it\/socinfo2020\/index.html","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Double-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"easy chair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"99","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"30","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"30% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}