{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,26]],"date-time":"2025-03-26T06:46:46Z","timestamp":1742971606110,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":35,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030713041"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030713058"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-71305-8_31","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,19]],"date-time":"2021-03-19T00:16:30Z","timestamp":1616112990000},"page":"374-383","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Research Agenda-Setting in Medicine: Shifting from a Research-Centric to a Patient-Centric Approach"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3158-8436","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ania","family":"Korsunska","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"31_CR1","volume-title":"User-centered design","author":"C Abras","year":"2004","unstructured":"Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D., Preece, J.: User-centered design. Sage Publications, Berkshire Encyclopedia of Human-computer Interaction (2004)"},{"key":"31_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Alahdab, F., Murad, M.H.: Evidence maps: a tool to guide research agenda setting. BMJ Evi. Based Med. 24(6), 209\u2013211 (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjebm-2018-111137","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjebm-2018-111137"},{"key":"31_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Booth, W.C., Booth, W.C., Colomb, G.G., Colomb, G.G., Williams, J.M., Williams, J.M.: The Craft of Research. University of Chicago press, Chicago (2003)","DOI":"10.7208\/chicago\/9780226065694.001.0001"},{"key":"31_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bourdieu, P.: The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Soc. Sci. Inf. 14(6), 19\u201347 (1975). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/053901847501400602","DOI":"10.1177\/053901847501400602"},{"key":"31_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77\u2013101 (2006). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa"},{"key":"31_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chalmers, I., Glasziou, P.: Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence. 114(6), 5 (2009). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c3020d","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c3020d"},{"key":"31_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Desselle, M.R., et al.: Institutional profile: community for open antimicrobial drug discovery \u2013 crowdsourcing new antibiotics and antifungals. Future Sci. OA 3(2) (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4155\/fsoa-2016-0093","DOI":"10.4155\/fsoa-2016-0093"},{"key":"31_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Fajgenbaum, D.C., Ruth, J.R., Kelleher, D., Rubenstein, A.H.: The collaborative network approach: a new framework to accelerate Castleman\u2019s disease and other rare disease research. Lancet Haematol. 3(4), e150\u2013e152 (2016). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S2352-3026(16)00007-7","DOI":"10.1016\/S2352-3026(16)00007-7"},{"key":"31_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Fortunato, S., et al.: Science of science. Science 359(6379), eaao0185 (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.aao0185","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aao0185"},{"key":"31_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Foster, J.G., Rzhetsky, A., Evans, J.A.: Tradition and innovation in scientists\u2019 research strategies. Am. Socio. Rev. 80(5), 875\u2013908 (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0003122415601618","DOI":"10.1177\/0003122415601618"},{"key":"31_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gauchat, G.: Politicization of science in the public sphere: a study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. Am. Socio. Rev. 77(2), 167\u2013187 (2012). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0003122412438225","DOI":"10.1177\/0003122412438225"},{"key":"31_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Grammer, A.C., et al.: Drug repositioning in SLE: crowd-sourcing, literature-mining and big data analysis. Lupus 25(10), 1150\u20131170 (2016). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0961203316657437","DOI":"10.1177\/0961203316657437"},{"key":"31_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Grewal, A., Kataria, H., Dhawan, I.: Literature search for research planning and identification of research problem. Ind. J. Anaesthesia 60(9), 635. (2016). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/0019-5049.190618","DOI":"10.4103\/0019-5049.190618"},{"key":"31_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gross, C.P., Anderson, G.F. and Powe, N.R.: The relation between funding by the national institutes of health and the burden of disease. New England J. Med. 340(24), 1881\u20131887 (1999). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJM199906173402406","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199906173402406"},{"key":"31_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Haddaway, N.R., Collins, A.M., Coughlin, D., Kirk, S.: The role of google scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PLOS ONE 10(9), e0138237 (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0138237","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0138237"},{"key":"31_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Haerlin, B., Parr, D.: How to restore public trust in science. Nature 400(6744), 499\u2013499 (1999). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/2286","DOI":"10.1038\/2286"},{"key":"31_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ioannidis, J.P.A.: Why most clinical research is not useful. PLOS Med. 13(6), e1002049 (2016). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002049","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1002049"},{"key":"31_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jain, V., Raut, D.: Medical literature search dot com. Ind. J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 77(2), 135 (2011). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/0378-6323.77451","DOI":"10.4103\/0378-6323.77451"},{"key":"31_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kuhn, T.S.: The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1977)","DOI":"10.7208\/chicago\/9780226217239.001.0001"},{"key":"31_CR20","unstructured":"Kuhn, T.S.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Original edn., University of Chicago press, Chicago (1962)"},{"key":"31_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Macleod, M.R., et al.: Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste. Lancet; London 383(9912), 101\u20134 (2014). https:\/\/dx.doi.org.libezproxy2.syr.edu. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(13)62329-6","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(13)62329-6"},{"key":"31_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mullins, C.D., Vandigo, J., Zheng, Z., Wicks, P.: Patient-centeredness in the design of clinical trials. Value Health. 17(4), 471\u2013475 (2014). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jval.2014.02.012.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2014.02.012"},{"issue":"2017","key":"31_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjinnov-2017-000203","volume":"3","author":"SW Pan","year":"2017","unstructured":"Pan, S.W., et al.: Systematic review of innovation design contests for health: spurring innovation and mass engagement. BMJ Innov. 3(2017), 227\u2013237 (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjinnov-2017-000203","journal-title":"BMJ Innov."},{"key":"31_CR24","unstructured":"Par\u00e9, G., Kitsiou, S.: Methods for literature reviews. In: Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-based Approach. University of Victoria (2017)"},{"key":"31_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ranard, B.L., et al.: Crowdsourcing--harnessing the masses to advance health and medicine, a systematic review. J. General Internal Med. 29(1), 187\u2013203 (2014). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11606-013-2536-8","DOI":"10.1007\/s11606-013-2536-8"},{"issue":"2017","key":"31_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1186\/s41073-017-0028-9","volume":"2","author":"A Rowhani-Farid","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rowhani-Farid, A., Allen, M., Barnett, A.G.: What incentives increase data sharing in health and medical research? A systematic review. Res. Integrity Peer Rev. 2(2017), 4 (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41073-017-0028-9","journal-title":"Res. Integrity Peer Rev."},{"key":"31_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Schooler, J.: Unpublished results hide the decline effect. Nature 470(7335), 437\u2013437 (2011). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/470437a","DOI":"10.1038\/470437a"},{"key":"31_CR28","unstructured":"Shaw, D.L.: Is open science the future of drug development? Yale J. Biol. Med. 90(1), 147\u2013151 (2017)"},{"key":"31_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Snyder, H.: Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 104, 333\u2013339 (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jbusres.2019.07.039","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2019.07.039"},{"key":"31_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Spangenberg, T., Burrows, J.N., Kowalczyk, P., McDonald, S., Wells, T.N.C., Willis, P.: The open access malaria box: a drug discovery catalyst for neglected diseases. PLoS ONE 8(6), e62906 (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0062906","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0062906"},{"key":"31_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tucker, J.D., Day, S., Tang, W., Bayus, B.: Crowdsourcing in medical research: concepts and applications. PeerJ 7, e6762 (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7717\/peerj.6762","DOI":"10.7717\/peerj.6762"},{"key":"31_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wang, C., et al.: Crowdsourcing in health and medical research: a systematic review. Infect. Dis. Poverty 9(1), 8 (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40249-020-0622-9","DOI":"10.1186\/s40249-020-0622-9"},{"key":"31_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wang, Q., Liu, C., Wang, Z.: An advanced and effective literature search algorithm based on analytic hierarchy process. In: 2011 IEEE 10th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications, November 2011, pp. 1264\u20131270 (2011)","DOI":"10.1109\/TrustCom.2011.170"},{"key":"31_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yarborough, M.: Openness in science is key to keeping public trust. Nat. News. 515(7527), 313 (2014). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/515313a","DOI":"10.1038\/515313a"},{"key":"31_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zuccato, M., Shilling, D., Fajgenbaum, D.C.: The collaborative network approach: a model for advancing patient-centric research for Castleman disease and other rare diseases. Emerging Topics Life Sci. 3(1), 97\u2013105 (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1042\/ETLS20180178","DOI":"10.1042\/ETLS20180178"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Diversity, Divergence, Dialogue"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-71305-8_31","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,5]],"date-time":"2021-05-05T20:18:20Z","timestamp":1620245900000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-71305-8_31"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"ISBN":["9783030713041","9783030713058"],"references-count":35,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-71305-8_31","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 March 2021","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"iConference","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Information","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Beijing","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"China","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2021","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"17 March 2021","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"31 March 2021","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"16","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"iconference2021","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/ischools.org\/iConference","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Double-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"ConfTool","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"225","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"32","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"59","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"14% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"2","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}