{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,9]],"date-time":"2026-01-09T21:39:37Z","timestamp":1767994777323,"version":"3.49.0"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":31,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"value":"9783030793814","type":"print"},{"value":"9783030793821","type":"electronic"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-79382-1_29","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,23]],"date-time":"2021-06-23T09:06:33Z","timestamp":1624439193000},"page":"483-498","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Comparing UML-Based and DSL-Based Modeling from Subjective and Objective Perspectives"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"\u00c1frica","family":"Domingo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Jorge","family":"Echeverr\u00eda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"\u00d3scar","family":"Pastor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Carlos","family":"Cetina","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,24]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"29_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"997","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2012.11.023","volume":"86","author":"LTW Agner","year":"2013","unstructured":"Agner, L.T.W., Soares, I.W., Stadzisz, P.C., Sim\u00e3O, J.M.: A Brazilian survey on UML and model-driven practices for embedded software development. J. Syst. Softw. 86(4), 997\u20131005 (2013)","journal-title":"J. Syst. Softw."},{"key":"29_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sysarc.2018.09.007","volume":"91","author":"D Akdur","year":"2018","unstructured":"Akdur, D., Garousi, V., Demir\u00f6rs, O.: A survey on modeling and model-driven engineering practices in the embedded software industry. J. Syst. Archit. 91, 62\u201382 (2018)","journal-title":"J. Syst. Archit."},{"issue":"9","key":"29_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"888","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2010.05.004","volume":"52","author":"A Ampatzoglou","year":"2010","unstructured":"Ampatzoglou, A., Stamelos, I.: Software engineering research for computer games: a systematic review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 52(9), 888\u2013901 (2010)","journal-title":"Inf. Softw. Technol."},{"issue":"4","key":"29_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-006-9020-6","volume":"11","author":"B Anda","year":"2006","unstructured":"Anda, B., Hansen, K., Gullesen, I., Thorsen, H.K.: Experiences from introducing UML-based development in a large safety-critical project. Empirical Softw. Eng. 11(4), 555\u2013581 (2006)","journal-title":"Empirical Softw. Eng."},{"key":"29_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bernardino, M., Rodrigues, E.M., Zorzo, A.F.: Performance testing modeling: an empirical evaluation of DSL and UML-based approaches. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1660\u20131665 (2016)","DOI":"10.1145\/2851613.2851832"},{"key":"29_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"110804","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2020.110804","volume":"171","author":"D Blasco","year":"2021","unstructured":"Blasco, D., Font, J., Zamorano, M., Cetina, C.: An evolutionary approach for generating software models: the case of Kromaia in game software engineering. J. Syst. Softw. 171, 110804 (2021)","journal-title":"J. Syst. Softw."},{"key":"29_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Budgen, D., Burn, A.J., Brereton, O.P., Kitchenham, B.A., Pretorius, R.: Empirical evidence about the UML: a systematic literature review. Softw. Pract. Exp. 41(4), 363\u2013392 (2011)","DOI":"10.1002\/spe.1009"},{"issue":"4","key":"29_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1007\/s10270-012-0278-4","volume":"11","author":"MR Chaudron","year":"2012","unstructured":"Chaudron, M.R., Heijstek, W., Nugroho, A.: How effective is UML modeling? Softw. Syst. Model. 11(4), 571\u2013580 (2012)","journal-title":"Softw. Syst. Model."},{"key":"29_CR9","volume-title":"Statistical Power for the Social Sciences","author":"J Cohen","year":"1988","unstructured":"Cohen, J.: Statistical Power for the Social Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Hillsdale (1988)"},{"issue":"3","key":"29_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.2307\/249008","volume":"13","author":"FD Davis","year":"1989","unstructured":"Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319\u2013340 (1989)","journal-title":"MIS Q."},{"issue":"5","key":"29_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-009-9127-7","volume":"15","author":"A De Lucia","year":"2010","unstructured":"De Lucia, A., Gravino, C., Oliveto, R., Tortora, G.: An experimental comparison of ER and UML class diagrams for data modelling. Empirical Softw. Engi. 15(5), 455\u2013492 (2010)","journal-title":"Empirical Softw. Engi."},{"key":"29_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dean, A., Voss, D., Dragulji\u0107, D., et al.: Design and Analysis of Experiments, vol. 1. Springer, New York (1999). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/b97673","DOI":"10.1007\/b97673"},{"issue":"5","key":"29_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1145\/1125944.1125949","volume":"49","author":"B Dobing","year":"2006","unstructured":"Dobing, B., Parsons, J.: How UML is used. Commun. ACM 49(5), 109\u2013113 (2006)","journal-title":"Commun. ACM"},{"key":"29_CR14","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-49435-3_22","volume-title":"Advanced Information Systems Engineering","author":"\u00c1 Domingo","year":"2020","unstructured":"Domingo, \u00c1., Echeverr\u00eda, J., Pastor, \u00d3., Cetina, C.: Evaluating the benefits of model-driven development. In: Dustdar, S., Yu, E., Salinesi, C., Rieu, D., Pant, V. (eds.) CAiSE 2020. LNCS, vol. 12127, pp. 353\u2013367. Springer, Cham (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-49435-3_22"},{"key":"29_CR15","volume-title":"UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language","author":"M Fowler","year":"2004","unstructured":"Fowler, M.: UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2004)"},{"key":"29_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2014.03.082","volume":"95","author":"T Gorschek","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gorschek, T., Tempero, E., Angelis, L.: On the use of software design models in software development practice: an empirical investigation. J. Syst. Softw. 95, 176\u2013193 (2014)","journal-title":"J. Syst. Softw."},{"issue":"6","key":"29_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2004.09.005","volume":"47","author":"M Grossman","year":"2005","unstructured":"Grossman, M., Aronson, J.E., McCarthy, R.V.: Does UML make the grade? insights from the software development community. Inf. Softw. Technol. 47(6), 383\u2013397 (2005)","journal-title":"Inf. Softw. Technol."},{"key":"29_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Karac, E.I., Turhan, B., Juristo, N.: A Controlled Experiment with Novice Developers on the impact of task description granularity on software quality in test-driven development. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/TSE.2019.2920377","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.2019.2920377"},{"issue":"5","key":"29_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2734","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-017-9593-2","volume":"23","author":"T Kosar","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kosar, T., Gaberc, S., Carver, J.C., Mernik, M.: Program comprehension of domain-specific and general-purpose languages: replication of a family of experiments using integrated development environments. Empirical Softw. Eng. 23(5), 2734\u20132763 (2018)","journal-title":"Empirical Softw. Eng."},{"key":"29_CR20","unstructured":"Marko, N.C., et al.: Model-based engineering for embedded systems in practice. In: Research Reports in Software Engineering and Management, pp. 1\u201348 (2014)"},{"key":"29_CR21","unstructured":"Moody, D.L.: The method evaluation model: a theoretical model for validating information systems design methods. In: ECIS 2003 Proceedings, p. 79 (2003)"},{"key":"29_CR22","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-11653-2_12","volume-title":"Model-Driven Engineering Languages and Systems","author":"G Mussbacher","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mussbacher, G., et al.: The relevance of model-driven engineering thirty years from now. In: Dingel, J., Schulte, W., Ramos, I., Abrah\u00e3o, S., Insfran, E. (eds.) MODELS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8767, pp. 183\u2013200. Springer, Cham (2014). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-11653-2_12"},{"issue":"1","key":"29_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/S0950-5849(03)00108-3","volume":"46","author":"MC Otero","year":"2004","unstructured":"Otero, M.C., Dolado, J.J.: Evaluation of the comprehension of the dynamic modeling in UML. Inf. Softw. Technol. 46(1), 35\u201353 (2004)","journal-title":"Inf. Softw. Technol."},{"key":"29_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Pastor, O., Molina, J.C.: Model-Driven Architecture in Practice: A Software Production Environment Based on Conceptual Modeling. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin (2007). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-540-71868-0","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-71868-0"},{"key":"29_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Reinhartz-Berger, I., Dori, D.: OPM vs. UML-experimenting with comprehension and construction of web application models. Empirical Softw. Eng. 10(1), 57\u201380 (2005)","DOI":"10.1023\/B:EMSE.0000048323.40484.e0"},{"key":"29_CR26","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1007\/11880240_5","volume-title":"Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems","author":"M Staron","year":"2006","unstructured":"Staron, M.: Adopting model driven software development in industry \u2013 a case study at two companies. In: Nierstrasz, O., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds.) MODELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4199, pp. 57\u201372. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/11880240_5"},{"key":"29_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"St\u00f6rrle, H.: How are conceptual models used in industrial software development? a descriptive survey. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, pp. 160\u2013169 (2017)","DOI":"10.1145\/3084226.3084256"},{"issue":"2","key":"29_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.2015.2467378","volume":"42","author":"S Vegas","year":"2015","unstructured":"Vegas, S., Apa, C., Juristo, N.: Crossover designs in software engineering experiments: benefits and perils. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 42(2), 120\u2013135 (2015)","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng."},{"key":"29_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"West, B.T., Welch, K.B., Galecki, A.T.: Linear Mixed Models: A Practical Guide Using Statistical Software. Chapman and Hall\/CRC, Boca Raton (2014)","DOI":"10.1201\/b17198"},{"key":"29_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., H\u00f6st, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., Wessl\u00e9n, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin (2012). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-29044-2","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-29044-2"},{"issue":"1","key":"29_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1016\/S0164-1212(00)00114-X","volume":"57","author":"A Zendler","year":"2001","unstructured":"Zendler, A., Pfeiffer, T., Eicks, M., Lehner, F.: Experimental comparison of coarse-grained concepts in UML, OML, and TOS. J. Syst. Softw. 57(1), 21\u201330 (2001)","journal-title":"J. Syst. Softw."}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Advanced Information Systems Engineering"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-79382-1_29","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,23]],"date-time":"2021-06-23T23:22:48Z","timestamp":1624490568000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-79382-1_29"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"ISBN":["9783030793814","9783030793821"],"references-count":31,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-79382-1_29","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0302-9743","type":"print"},{"value":"1611-3349","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"assertion":[{"value":"24 June 2021","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"CAiSE","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Melbourne, VIC","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Australia","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2021","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"28 June 2021","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2 July 2021","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"33","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"caise2021","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/caise21.org\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"33","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"6","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"In addition, 18 contributions were accepted for the CAiSE 2021 Forum, and 15 papers from the Workshops. The conference was held online due to the COVID-19 pandemic.","order":10,"name":"additional_info_on_review_process","label":"Additional Info on Review Process","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}