{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,30]],"date-time":"2025-08-30T22:40:06Z","timestamp":1756593606385,"version":"3.44.0"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":38,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030847883"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030847890"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,31]],"date-time":"2021-08-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1630368000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":242,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:p>When a public sector organisation (PSO) uses a software as a service (SaaS) solution from a global provider this imposes risks for different types of lock-in effects. In turn, use of such solutions by PSOs may prevent full control of digital assets that need to be created, processed, maintained, and archived for use and reuse over long life-cycles. This paper addresses perceived and actual lock-in effects related to use of SaaS solutions in the public sector. We review perceptions of lock-in amongst government agencies and investigate how 46 PSOs have addressed challenges related to obtaining licences and an effective exit plan related to use of the Microsoft Office 365 SaaS solution. Through a review of responses to a survey conducted by the Swedish Government Offices we find significant misconceptions concerning lock-in effects. We find that every one of the 46 PSOs investigated neither obtained necessary licences nor established an effective exit strategy to allow the PSO to independently access, process and maintain digital assets processed by the SaaS solution after decommissioning. We present recommendations for any PSO considering use of a SaaS solution.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-84789-0_5","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,30]],"date-time":"2021-08-30T19:16:32Z","timestamp":1630350992000},"page":"59-72","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Perceived and Actual Lock-in Effects Amongst Swedish Public Sector Organisations When Using a SaaS Solution"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Bj\u00f6rn","family":"Lundell","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Jonas","family":"Gamalielsson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Andrew","family":"Katz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Mathias","family":"Lindroth","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"5_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bekkers, R., Updegrove, A.: IPR Policies and Practices of a Representative Group of Standards-Setting Organizations Worldwide. Commissioned by the Committee on Intellectual Property Management in Standard-Setting Processes, National Research Council, Washington, May 2013","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.2333445"},{"key":"5_CR2","unstructured":"Blind, K., B\u00f6hm, M.: The relationship between open source software and standard setting. In: Thumm, N. (ed.) EUR 29867 EN, JRC (Joint Research Centre) Science for Policy Report, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2019). ISBN 978-92-76-11593-9"},{"issue":"1","key":"5_CR3","first-page":"39","volume":"80","author":"JL Contreras","year":"2015","unstructured":"Contreras, J.L.: A brief history of FRAND: analyzing current debates in standard setting and antitrust through a historical lens. Antitrust Law J. 80(1), 39\u2013120 (2015)","journal-title":"Antitrust Law J."},{"key":"5_CR4","unstructured":"DIGG: Analys av DIGG:s policy f\u00f6r utveckling av programvara. Agency for Digital Government, 3 June 2020. https:\/\/www.digg.se\/om-oss\/nyheter\/2020\/analys-av-diggs-policy-for-utveckling-av-programvara"},{"key":"5_CR5","unstructured":"EC: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Unleashing the Potential of Cloud Computing in Europe, SWD (2012). 271 final, European Commission"},{"key":"5_CR6","unstructured":"EC: Patents and Standards: A modern framework for IPR-based standardization. Final report, A study prepared for the European Commission Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry, 25 March 2014. ISBN 978-92-79-35991-0"},{"key":"5_CR7","unstructured":"EC: Standard-essential patents. European Commission, Competition policy brief, Issue 8 June 2014. ISBN 978-92-79-35553-0"},{"key":"5_CR8","unstructured":"EC: Shaping Europe\u2019s Digital Future, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, European Commission, Communication, COM(2020) 67 final, 19 February 2020"},{"issue":"6","key":"5_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"605","DOI":"10.1016\/j.csi.2007.04.001","volume":"29","author":"T Egyedi","year":"2007","unstructured":"Egyedi, T.: Standard-compliant, but incompatible?! Comput. Stand. Interf. 29(6), 605\u2013613 (2007)","journal-title":"Comput. Stand. Interf."},{"issue":"2","key":"5_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1109\/MCOM.2005.1391516","volume":"43","author":"TM Egyedi","year":"2005","unstructured":"Egyedi, T.M., Hudson, J.: A standard\u2019s integrity: can it be safeguarded? IEEE Commun. Mag. 43(2), 151\u2013155 (2005)","journal-title":"IEEE Commun. Mag."},{"key":"5_CR11","unstructured":"eSam: Checklista inf\u00f6r beslut om molntj\u00e4nster i offentlig sektor. eSam, 31 October 2018. www.esamverka.se"},{"key":"5_CR12","unstructured":"F\u00f6rs\u00e4kringskassan: Cloud Services in Sustaining Societal Functions\u2013Risks, Appropriateness and the Way Forward, Swedish Social Insurance Agency, Dnr. 013428-2019, Version 1.0, 18 November 2019"},{"key":"5_CR13","unstructured":"Furberg, P., Westberg, M.: M\u00e5ste myndigheter f\u00f6lja lagarna? Om utkontraktering och legalitet i digital milj\u00f6. Juridisk tidskrift 2, 406\u2013417 (2020)"},{"key":"5_CR14","unstructured":"GAIA: Project GAIA-X: A Federated Data Infrastructure as the Cradle of a Vibrant European Ecosystem. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi), Berlin, October 2019"},{"key":"5_CR15","unstructured":"Ghosh, R.A.: Open Standards and Interoperability Report: An Economic Basis for Open Standards. Deliverable D4, MERIT, University of Maastricht, December 2005"},{"issue":"1","key":"5_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2006.05.003","volume":"24","author":"L Guijarro","year":"2007","unstructured":"Guijarro, L.: Interoperability frameworks and enterprise architectures in e-government initiatives in Europe and the United States. Gov. Inf. Q. 24(1), 89\u2013101 (2007)","journal-title":"Gov. Inf. Q."},{"issue":"1","key":"5_CR17","first-page":"79","volume":"16","author":"WK Hon","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hon, W.K., Millard, C., Walden, I.: Negotiating cloud contracts: looking at clouds from both sides now. Stanford Technol. Law Rev. 16(1), 79\u2013129 (2012)","journal-title":"Stanford Technol. Law Rev."},{"key":"5_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Katz, A.: Google, APIs and the law. Use, reuse and lock-in. In: Lopez-Tarruella, A. (ed.) Google and the Law: Empirical Approaches to Legal Aspects of Knowledge-Economy Business Models, pp. 287\u2013301. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague (2012). ISBN 978-90-6704-845-3","DOI":"10.1007\/978-90-6704-846-0_10"},{"issue":"1","key":"5_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s13677-019-0143-x","volume":"8","author":"K Kritikos","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kritikos, K., et al.: Multi-cloud provisioning of business processes. J. Cloud Comput. 8(1), 1\u201329 (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13677-019-0143-x","journal-title":"J. Cloud Comput."},{"issue":"1","key":"5_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.4018\/IJSR.2015010103","volume":"13","author":"B Lundell","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lundell, B., Gamalielsson, J., Katz, A.: On implementation of open standards in software: to what extent can ISO standards be implemented in open source software? Int. J. Standard. Res. 13(1), 47\u201373 (2015)","journal-title":"Int. J. Standard. Res."},{"key":"5_CR21","unstructured":"Lundell, B., Gamalielsson, J., Katz, A.: Implementing IT standards in software: challenges and recommendations for organisations planning software development covering IT standards. Eur. J. Law Technol. 10(2) (2019)"},{"key":"5_CR22","unstructured":"Lundell, B., Gamalielsson, J., Katz, A.: Addressing lock-in effects in the public sector: how can organisations deploy a SaaS solution while maintaining control of their digital assets?. In: Virkar, S., et al. (eds.) CEUR Workshop Proceedings: EGOV-CeDEM-ePart 2020, vol. 2797, pp. 289\u2013296 (2020). ISSN 1613-0073"},{"key":"5_CR23","unstructured":"Lundell, B., Gamalielsson, J., Tengblad, S.: IT-standarder, inl\u00e5sning och konkurrens: En analys av policy och praktik inom svensk f\u00f6rvaltning, Uppdragsforskningsrapport 2016:2, Konkurrensverket (the Swedish Competition Authority) (2016). ISSN: 1652-8089"},{"key":"5_CR24","unstructured":"Mannheimer Swartling: Applicability of Chinese National Intelligence Law to Chinese and non-Chinese Entities, Mannheimer Swartling AB, Stockholm, January"},{"issue":"1","key":"5_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.2966\/scrip.060109.132","volume":"6","author":"M Mowbray","year":"2009","unstructured":"Mowbray, M.: The fog over the Grimpen Mire: cloud computing and the law. SCRIPTed 6(1), 132\u2013146 (2009)","journal-title":"SCRIPTed"},{"key":"5_CR26","unstructured":"NOC: The Netherlands in Open Connection: An action plan for the use of Open Standards and Open Source Software in the public and semi-public sector. The Ministry of Economic Affairs, The Hague, November (2007)"},{"key":"5_CR27","unstructured":"NPS: Open IT-standards. National Procurement Services, Kammarkollegiet, Stockholm, 7 March 2016. Dnr 96-38-2014"},{"key":"5_CR28","unstructured":"NPS: F\u00f6rstudierapport Webbaserat kontorsst\u00f6d. National Procurement Services, Kammarkollegiet, Stockholm, 22 February 2019. Dnr 23.2-6283-18"},{"key":"5_CR29","unstructured":"Online Services Terms: Microsoft Volume Licensing Online Services Terms (Worldwide English, February 2021), Microsoft, February 2021"},{"key":"5_CR30","unstructured":"Radar: Moln \u00f6ver kommunerna: hot eller m\u00f6jlighet?. Radar Ecosytem Specialists, Stockholm. radareco.se (2019)"},{"key":"5_CR31","unstructured":"Regeringen: Delegation f\u00f6r e-f\u00f6rvaltning. Dir. 2009:19, Swedish Government, 26 March 2009"},{"key":"5_CR32","unstructured":"Regeringen: S\u00e4ker och kostnadseffektiv it-drift f\u00f6r den offentliga f\u00f6rvaltningen. Kommitt\u00e9direktiv, Dir. 2019:64, Infrastrukturdepartementet, Regeringen, 26 September 2019"},{"key":"5_CR33","unstructured":"Regeringskansliet: Nationella upphandlingsstrategin, Finansdepartementet, Stockholm (2016)"},{"key":"5_CR34","unstructured":"Riksarkivet: Riksarkivets f\u00f6reskrifter och allm\u00e4nna r\u00e5d om elektroniska handlingar (upptagningar f\u00f6r automatiserad behandling). Riksarkivets f\u00f6rfattningssamling, RA-FS 2009:1, Riksarkivet (2009). ISSN 0283-2941"},{"key":"5_CR35","unstructured":"Riksarkivet: Riksarkivets f\u00f6reskrifter och allm\u00e4nna r\u00e5d om tekniska krav f\u00f6r elektroniska handlingar (upptagningar f\u00f6r automatiserad behandling). Riksarkivets f\u00f6rfattningssamling, RA-FS 2009:2, Riksarkivet (2009). ISSN 0283-2941"},{"key":"5_CR36","unstructured":"SOU: Strategi f\u00f6r myndigheternas arbete med e-f\u00f6rvaltning. Statens Offentliga Utredningar: SOU 2009:86. e-Delegationen, Finansdepartementet, Regeringskansliet, Stockholm, 19 October 2009"},{"key":"5_CR37","unstructured":"SOU: S\u00e4ker och kostnadseffektiv it-drift \u2013 r\u00e4ttsliga f\u00f6ruts\u00e4ttningar f\u00f6r utkontraktering. Statens Offentliga Utredningar, SOU 2021:1, Delbet\u00e4nkande fr\u00e5n IT-driftsutredningen, Stockholm (2021). ISBN 978-91-525-0001-9"},{"key":"5_CR38","unstructured":"UK: Open Standards Principles: For software interoperability, data and document formats in government IT specifications. HM Government, 7 September 2012"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Electronic Government"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-84789-0_5","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,30]],"date-time":"2025-08-30T22:03:57Z","timestamp":1756591437000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-84789-0_5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"ISBN":["9783030847883","9783030847890"],"references-count":38,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-84789-0_5","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"assertion":[{"value":"31 August 2021","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"EGOV","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Electronic Government","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Granada","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Spain","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2021","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"7 September 2021","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"9 September 2021","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"20","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"egov2021","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/dgsociety.org\/egov-2021\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Double-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"63","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"23","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"37% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"2","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}