{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,20]],"date-time":"2025-10-20T10:28:41Z","timestamp":1760956121681,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":39,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030854393"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030854409"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-85440-9_2","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,13]],"date-time":"2021-08-13T15:03:36Z","timestamp":1628867016000},"page":"20-36","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Augmenting Modelers with Semantic Autocompletion of Processes"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Maayan","family":"Goldstein","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Cecilia","family":"Gonz\u00e1lez-\u00c1lvarez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,14]]},"reference":[{"key":"2_CR1","unstructured":"Antunes, G., Bakhshandeh, M., et al.: The process model matching contest 2015, GI-Edition. Lecture Notes in Informatics, Proceedings, vol. 248, pp. 127\u2013155 (2015)"},{"key":"2_CR2","unstructured":"APROMORE: An advanced process model repository (2021). https:\/\/git.io\/Jmgci"},{"key":"2_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Awad, A., Polyvyanyy, A., Weske, M.: Semantic querying of business process models. In: 12th International IEEE Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pp. 85\u201394. IEEE (2008)","DOI":"10.1109\/EDOC.2008.11"},{"key":"2_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bondy, J.A.: Graph Theory With Applications. Elsevier Science Ltd., New York (1976). GBR","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-349-03521-2"},{"key":"2_CR5","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-00328-8_51","volume-title":"Business Process Management Workshops","author":"M Born","year":"2009","unstructured":"Born, M., Brelage, C., Markovic, I., Pfeiffer, D., Weber, I.: Auto-completion for executable business process models. In: Ardagna, D., Mecella, M., Yang, J. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNBIP, vol. 17, pp. 510\u2013515. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-00328-8_51"},{"key":"2_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burgue\u00f1o, L., Claris\u00f3, R., Li, S., G\u00e9rard, S., Cabot, J.: A NLP-based architecture for the autocompletion of partial domain models, November 2020","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-79382-1_6"},{"key":"2_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cer, D., Yang, Y., yi Kong, S., Hua, N., Limtiaco, N., John, R.S., et al.: Universal sentence encoder (2018)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/D18-2029"},{"key":"2_CR8","unstructured":"Cornea, R.C., Weininger, N.B.: Providing autocomplete suggestions (2014), US Patent 8,645,825"},{"key":"2_CR9","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-98648-7_18","volume-title":"Business Process Management","author":"P De Koninck","year":"2018","unstructured":"De Koninck, P., vanden Broucke, S., De Weerdt, J.: act2vec, trace2vec, log2vec, and\u00a0model2vec: representation learning for business processes. In: Weske, M., Montali, M., Weber, I., vom Brocke, J. (eds.) BPM 2018. LNCS, vol. 11080, pp. 305\u2013321. Springer, Cham (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-98648-7_18"},{"key":"2_CR10","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-03848-8_5","volume-title":"Business Process Management","author":"R Dijkman","year":"2009","unstructured":"Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., Garc\u00eda-Ba\u00f1uelos, L.: Graph matching algorithms for business process model similarity search. In: Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 48\u201363. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-03848-8_5"},{"key":"2_CR11","unstructured":"Fellmann, M., Zarvic, N., Metzger, D., Koschmider, A.: Requirements catalog for business process modeling recommender systems. In: Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 393\u2013407 (2015)"},{"key":"2_CR12","first-page":"64","volume":"14","author":"M Fellmann","year":"2018","unstructured":"Fellmann, M., Zarvi\u0107, N., Thomas, O.: Business processes modeling recommender systems: User expectations and empirical evidence. Complex Syst. Inf. Model. Q. 14, 64\u201379 (2018)","journal-title":"Complex Syst. Inf. Model. Q."},{"issue":"4","key":"2_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"681","DOI":"10.1007\/s11023-020-09548-1","volume":"30","author":"L Floridi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Floridi, L., Chiriatti, M.: GPT-3: its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Mind. Mach. 30(4), 681\u2013694 (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11023-020-09548-1","journal-title":"Mind. Mach."},{"issue":"1","key":"2_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1011468107287","volume":"4","author":"D Hawking","year":"2001","unstructured":"Hawking, D., Craswell, N., Bailey, P., Griffihs, K.: Measuring search engine quality. Inf. Retr. 4(1), 33\u201359 (2001). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1011468107287","journal-title":"Inf. Retr."},{"key":"2_CR15","unstructured":"Hornung, T., Koschmider, A., Oberweis, A.: Rule-based autocompletion of business process models. In: CAiSE Forum, vol. 247, pp. 222\u2013232. Citeseer (2007)"},{"key":"2_CR16","unstructured":"IACD playbooks, workflows, and local instance examples (2021). https:\/\/www.iacdautomate.org\/playbook-and-workflow-examples"},{"key":"2_CR17","unstructured":"Ivanov, S., Kalenkova, A.A., van der Aalst, W.M.: BPMNDiffViz: a tool for BPMN models comparison. In: BPM (Demos), pp. 35\u201339 (2015)"},{"key":"2_CR18","unstructured":"Kluza, K., Kaczor, K.: Overview of BPMN model equivalences: towards normalization of bpmn diagrams. In: 8th Workshop on Knowledge Engineering and Software Engineering (KESE2012), vol. 28, pp. 38\u201345 (2012)"},{"issue":"1","key":"2_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s40537-018-0127-6","volume":"5","author":"T Koohi-Var","year":"2018","unstructured":"Koohi-Var, T., Zahedi, M.: Cross-domain graph based similarity measurement of workflows. J. Big Data 5(1), 1\u201316 (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40537-018-0127-6","journal-title":"J. Big Data"},{"issue":"6","key":"2_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1016\/j.datak.2011.02.002","volume":"70","author":"A Koschmider","year":"2011","unstructured":"Koschmider, A., Hornung, T., Oberweis, A.: Recommendation-based editor for business process modeling. Data Knowl. Eng. 70(6), 483\u2013503 (2011)","journal-title":"Data Knowl. Eng."},{"issue":"3","key":"2_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1057\/jit.2009.21","volume":"25","author":"A Koschmider","year":"2010","unstructured":"Koschmider, A., Song, M., Reijers, H.A.: Social software for business process modeling. J. Inf. Technol. 25(3), 308\u2013322 (2010). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1057\/jit.2009.21","journal-title":"J. Inf. Technol."},{"key":"2_CR22","unstructured":"Lavi, A.: Evaluating the output of machine translation systems. In: AMTA Tutorial (2010)"},{"key":"2_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lavie, A., Agarwal, A.: Meteor: an automatic metric for mt evaluation with high levels of correlation with human judgments. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pp. 228\u2013231 (2007)","DOI":"10.3115\/1626355.1626389"},{"issue":"1","key":"2_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"502","DOI":"10.1109\/TII.2013.2258677","volume":"10","author":"Y Li","year":"2014","unstructured":"Li, Y., Cao, B., Xu, L., Yin, J., Deng, S., Yin, Y., Wu, Z.: An efficient recommendation method for improving business process modeling. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 10(1), 502\u2013513 (2014)","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf."},{"key":"2_CR25","unstructured":"Mathur, N., Wei, J., Freitag, M., Ma, Q., Bojar, O.: Results of the WMT20 metrics shared task. In: Fifth Conference on Machine Translation, pp. 688\u2013725 (2020)"},{"issue":"11","key":"2_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1145\/219717.219748","volume":"38","author":"GA Miller","year":"1995","unstructured":"Miller, G.A.: Wordnet: a lexical database for English. Commun. ACM 38(11), 39\u201341 (1995)","journal-title":"Commun. ACM"},{"key":"2_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., Zhu, W.J.: BLEU: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 311\u2013318 (2002)","DOI":"10.3115\/1073083.1073135"},{"issue":"4","key":"2_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1145\/3092694","volume":"50","author":"A Schoknecht","year":"2017","unstructured":"Schoknecht, A., Thaler, T., Fettke, P., Oberweis, A., Laue, R.: Similarity of business process models-a state-of-the-art analysis. ACM Comput. Surv. 50(4), 1\u201333 (2017)","journal-title":"ACM Comput. Surv."},{"key":"2_CR29","unstructured":"Shahzad, K., Pervaz, I., Nawab, A.: Wordnet based semantic similarity measures for process model matching. In: BIR Workshops, pp. 33\u201344 (2018)"},{"issue":"12","key":"2_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1143","DOI":"10.14778\/2732977.2732988","volume":"7","author":"J Starlinger","year":"2014","unstructured":"Starlinger, J., Brancotte, B., Cohen-Boulakia, S., Leser, U.: Similarity search for scientific workflows. Proc. VLDB Endow. 7(12), 1143\u20131154 (2014)","journal-title":"Proc. VLDB Endow."},{"key":"2_CR31","unstructured":"Tab9: Ai smart compose for your code (2021). https:\/\/www.tabnine.com\/"},{"key":"2_CR32","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"310","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-58457-7_23","volume-title":"Business Process Management Workshops","author":"T Thaler","year":"2017","unstructured":"Thaler, T., Schoknecht, A., Fettke, P., Oberweis, A., Laue, R.: A comparative analysis of business process model similarity measures. In: Dumas, M., Fantinato, M. (eds.) BPM 2016. LNBIP, vol. 281, pp. 310\u2013322. Springer, Cham (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-58457-7_23"},{"key":"2_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-36926-1_33","volume-title":"Seminal Contributions to Information Systems Engineering","author":"B van Dongen","year":"2013","unstructured":"van Dongen, B., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J.: Measuring similarity between business process models. In: Seminal Contributions to Information Systems Engineering, pp. 405\u2013419. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-36926-1_33"},{"issue":"1","key":"2_CR34","first-page":"32","volume":"1","author":"J Wang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wang, J., Gui, S., Cao, B.: A process recommendation method using bag-of-fragments. Int. J. Intell. IoT Comput. 1(1), 32\u201342 (2019)","journal-title":"Int. J. Intell. IoT Comput."},{"key":"2_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wang, J., Lu, J., Cao, B., Fan, J., Tan, D.: KS-Diff: a key structure based difference detection method for process models. In: IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS), pp. 408\u2013412. IEEE (2019)","DOI":"10.1109\/ICWS.2019.00073"},{"key":"2_CR36","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-25370-6_4","volume-title":"Business Information Systems Workshops","author":"K Wieloch","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wieloch, K., Filipowska, A., Kaczmarek, M.: Autocompletion for business process modelling. In: Abramowicz, W., Maciaszek, L., W\u0119cel, K. (eds.) BIS 2011. LNBIP, vol. 97, pp. 30\u201340. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-25370-6_4"},{"key":"2_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yongsiriwit, K., Sellami, M., Gaaloul, W.: Semantic process fragments matching to assist the development of process variants. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, pp. 712\u2013719 (2015)","DOI":"10.1109\/SCC.2015.101"},{"key":"2_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yu, X., Wu, W., Liao, X.: Workflow recommendation based on graph embedding. In: 2020 IEEE World Congress on Services (SERVICES), pp. 89\u201394 (2020)","DOI":"10.1109\/SERVICES48979.2020.00032"},{"key":"2_CR39","unstructured":"Zhang, J., Liu, Q., Xu, K.: Flowrecommender: a workflow recommendation technique for process provenance. In: Proceedings of the 8th Australasian Data Mining Conference (AusDM 2009). ACS Press (2009)"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","Business Process Management Forum"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-85440-9_2","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,26]],"date-time":"2021-08-26T23:39:30Z","timestamp":1630021170000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-85440-9_2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"ISBN":["9783030854393","9783030854409"],"references-count":39,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-85440-9_2","relation":{},"ISSN":["1865-1348","1865-1356"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1865-1348"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1865-1356"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"assertion":[{"value":"14 August 2021","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"BPM","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Business Process Management","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Rome","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Italy","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2021","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"6 September 2021","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"10 September 2021","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"19","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"bpm2021","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/bpm2021.diag.uniroma1.it\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"92","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"16","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"17% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"4","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"4","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"For the BPM forum 16 papers were accepted; and for the BPM and RPA Forum 8 papers were accepted from 14 submissions","order":10,"name":"additional_info_on_review_process","label":"Additional Info on Review Process","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}