{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,18]],"date-time":"2025-11-18T15:40:49Z","timestamp":1763480449765,"version":"3.44.0"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":25,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030859091"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030859107"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-85910-7_45","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,1]],"date-time":"2021-09-01T13:03:17Z","timestamp":1630501397000},"page":"427-436","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["The Concept of Sustainable Maintenance Criteria Assessment"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8332-3192","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ma\u0142gorzata","family":"Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6048-5220","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Katarzyna","family":"Antosz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"45_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121065","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2020.121065","volume":"260","author":"C Franciosi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Franciosi, C., Voisin, A., Miranda, S., Riemma, S., Iung, B.: Measuring maintenance impacts on sustainability of manufacturing industries: from a systematic literature review to a framework proposal. J. Cleaner Prod. 260, 121065 (2020)","journal-title":"J. Cleaner Prod."},{"issue":"23","key":"45_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7292","DOI":"10.1080\/00207543.2020.1808257","volume":"58","author":"M Holgado","year":"2020","unstructured":"Holgado, M., Macchi, M., Evans, S.: Exploring the impacts and contributions of maintenance function for sustainable manufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Res. 58(23), 7292\u20137310 (2020)","journal-title":"Int. J. Prod. Res."},{"issue":"5","key":"45_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1436","DOI":"10.3390\/en14051436","volume":"14","author":"M Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek","year":"2021","unstructured":"Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, M., et al.: Application of MICMAC, fuzzy AHP, and fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluation of the maintenance factors affecting sustainable manufacturing. Energies 14(5), 1436 (2021)","journal-title":"Energies"},{"key":"45_CR4","volume-title":"The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action","author":"RS Kaplan","year":"1996","unstructured":"Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business Press, Harvard (1996)"},{"issue":"2","key":"45_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1108\/13552519810213581","volume":"4","author":"AHC Tsang","year":"1998","unstructured":"Tsang, A.H.C.: A strategic approach to managing maintenance performance. J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 4(2), 87\u201394 (1998)","journal-title":"J. Qual. Maint. Eng."},{"key":"45_CR6","volume-title":"The Maintenance Scorecard: Creating Strategic Advantage","author":"D Mather","year":"2005","unstructured":"Mather, D.: The Maintenance Scorecard: Creating Strategic Advantage. Industrial Press, New York (2005)"},{"issue":"2","key":"45_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1108\/13552510610667165","volume":"12","author":"I Alsyouf","year":"2006","unstructured":"Alsyouf, I.: Measuring maintenance performance using a balanced scorecard approach. J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 12(2), 133\u2013149 (2006)","journal-title":"J. Qual. Maint. Eng."},{"key":"45_CR8","unstructured":"Kumar, U., Ellingsen H.P.: Design and development of maintenance performance indicators for the Norwegian oil and gas industry. In: Proceedings of the 15th European Maintenance Congress: Euromaintenance 2000, Gothenburg, Sweden, March 2000, pp. 224\u2013228 (2000)."},{"issue":"3","key":"45_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1108\/13552510710780276","volume":"13","author":"A Parida","year":"2007","unstructured":"Parida, A., Chattopadhyay, G.: Development of multi-criteria hierarchical framework for maintenance performance measurement (MPM). J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 13(3), 241\u2013258 (2007)","journal-title":"J. Qual. Maint. Eng."},{"key":"45_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chopu-inwai, R., Diaotrakun, R., Thaiupathump T.: Key indicators for maintenance performance measurement: the aircraft galley and associated equipment manufacturer case study. In: 2013 10th International conference Service systems and service management (ICSSSM), Hong Kong, China, 17\u201319 July, pp. 844\u2013849 (2013)","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSSSM.2013.6602603"},{"key":"45_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"443","DOI":"10.1016\/j.procir.2014.07.163","volume":"26","author":"E Sari","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sari, E., Shaharoun, A.M., Maaram, A., Yazid, A.M.: Sustainable maintenance performance measures: a pilot survey in Malaysian automotive companies. Procedia CIRP 26, 443\u2013448 (2015)","journal-title":"Procedia CIRP"},{"issue":"4","key":"45_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"650","DOI":"10.17531\/ein.2018.4.16","volume":"20","author":"M Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek","year":"2018","unstructured":"Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, M., \u017bywica, P.: The concept of maintenance sustainability performance assessment by integrating balanced scorecard with non-additive fuzzy integral. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc Maintenance Reliability 20(4), 650\u2013661 (2018)","journal-title":"Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc Maintenance Reliability"},{"key":"45_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, M., \u017bywica, P., Gola, A.: Fuzzy set theory driven maintenance sustainability performance assessment model: a multiple criteria approach. J. Intell. Manuf. 1\u201319 (2021)","DOI":"10.1007\/s10845-020-01734-3"},{"key":"45_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Galar, D., Sandborn, P., Kumar, U.: Maintenance Cost and Life Cycle Cost Analysis. CSR Press (2017)","DOI":"10.1201\/9781315154183"},{"key":"45_CR15","first-page":"34","volume":"3","author":"U Kumar","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kumar, U., Galar, D., Parida, A., Stenstr\u00f6m, C.: Maintenance audits using balanced scorecard and maturity model. Maintworld 3, 34\u201340 (2011)","journal-title":"Maintworld"},{"key":"45_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amrina, E., Yulianto, A.: Interpretive structural model of key performance indicators for sustainable maintenance evaluatian in rubber industry. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 319(1), 012055 (2018)","DOI":"10.1088\/1757-899X\/319\/1\/012055"},{"issue":"12","key":"45_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4759","DOI":"10.3390\/su10124759","volume":"10","author":"D Maleti\u010d","year":"2018","unstructured":"Maleti\u010d, D., Maleti\u010d, M., Al-Najjar, B., Gomi\u0161\u010dek, B.: Development of a model linking physical asset management to sustainability performance: an empirical research. Sustainability 10(12), 4759 (2018)","journal-title":"Sustainability"},{"issue":"1","key":"45_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1109\/TEM.2010.2077289","volume":"59","author":"AM Maier","year":"2012","unstructured":"Maier, A.M., Moultrie, J., Clarkson, P.J.: Assessing organizational capabilities: reviewing and guiding the development of Maturity grids. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 59(1), 138\u2013159 (2012)","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag."},{"key":"45_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-7236-5_35","volume-title":"Transactions on Engineering Technologies","author":"M Oliveira","year":"2015","unstructured":"Oliveira, M., Lopes, I., Figueiredo, D.: Survey on maintenance area of companies of Manaus industrial pole. In: Kim, H.K., Amouzegar, M.A., Ao, S. (eds.) Transactions on Engineering Technologies, pp. 501\u2013514. Springer, New York (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-94-017-7236-5_35"},{"issue":"8","key":"45_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"965","DOI":"10.1108\/02656710310493652","volume":"20","author":"O Fernandez","year":"2003","unstructured":"Fernandez, O., Labib, A.W., Walmsley, R., Petty, D.J.: A decision support maintenance management system: development and implementation. Int. J. Qual. Reliability Manag. 20(8), 965\u2013979 (2003)","journal-title":"Int. J. Qual. Reliability Manag."},{"issue":"1","key":"45_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1108\/13552510410526820","volume":"10","author":"C Cholasuke","year":"2004","unstructured":"Cholasuke, C., Bhardwa, R., Antony, J.: The status of maintenance management in UK manufacturing organisations: results from a pilot survey. J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 10(1), 5\u201315 (2004)","journal-title":"J. Qual. Maint. Eng."},{"issue":"2","key":"45_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1504\/IJSEAM.2015.070621","volume":"2","author":"P Chemweno","year":"2015","unstructured":"Chemweno, P., Pintelon, L., Van Horenbeek, A., Muchiri, P.N.: Asset maintenance maturity model: structured guide to maintenance process maturity. Int. J. Strateg. Eng. Asset Manag. 2(2), 119\u2013135 (2015)","journal-title":"Int. J. Strateg. Eng. Asset Manag."},{"issue":"3","key":"45_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1108\/IJPPM-07-2018-0247","volume":"69","author":"MA Oliveira","year":"2020","unstructured":"Oliveira, M.A., Lopes, I.: Evaluation and improvement of maintenance management performance using a maturity model. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 69(3), 559\u2013581 (2020)","journal-title":"Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag."},{"issue":"3","key":"45_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.31803\/tg-20200706131623","volume":"14","author":"O Schmiedbauer","year":"2020","unstructured":"Schmiedbauer, O., Biedermann, H.: Validation of a lean smart maintenance maturity model. Tehni\u010dki glasnik 14(3), 296\u2013302 (2020)","journal-title":"Tehni\u010dki glasnik"},{"key":"45_CR25","unstructured":"SIRF Roundtables AMEA criteria and applications guidelines (2013). http:\/\/www.sirfrt.com.au\/sirfrt_new\/images\/content\/AMEA-Criteria_and_Application_Guidelines.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2017"}],"container-title":["IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology","Advances in Production Management Systems. Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable and Resilient Production Systems"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-85910-7_45","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,31]],"date-time":"2025-08-31T22:02:41Z","timestamp":1756677761000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-85910-7_45"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"ISBN":["9783030859091","9783030859107"],"references-count":25,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-85910-7_45","relation":{},"ISSN":["1868-4238","1868-422X"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1868-4238"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1868-422X"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"assertion":[{"value":"31 August 2021","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"APMS","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Nantes","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"France","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2021","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"5 September 2021","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"9 September 2021","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"apms2021","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Conftool","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"529","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"378","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"71% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3.2","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3.3","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"The conference was held virtually.","order":10,"name":"additional_info_on_review_process","label":"Additional Info on Review Process","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}