{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,28]],"date-time":"2025-03-28T05:54:01Z","timestamp":1743141241102,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":27,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030867713"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030867720"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_10","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,21]],"date-time":"2021-09-21T11:05:54Z","timestamp":1632222354000},"page":"130-143","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Generalizing Complete Semantics to\u00a0Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1749-5233","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nico","family":"Potyka","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"10_CR1","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-61581-3_3","volume-title":"Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2017","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Ben-Naim, J.: Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs. In: Antonucci, A., Cholvy, L., Papini, O. (eds.) ECSQARU 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10369, pp. 25\u201335. Springer, Cham (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-61581-3_3"},{"key":"10_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Ben-Naim, J., Doder, D., Vesic, S.: Acceptability semantics for weighted argumentation frameworks. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) (2017)","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2017\/9"},{"issue":"10","key":"10_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1062","DOI":"10.1002\/int.20307","volume":"23","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2008","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C., Livet, P.: On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 23(10), 1062\u20131093 (2008)","journal-title":"Int. J. Intell. Syst."},{"key":"10_CR4","volume-title":"Handbook of Formal Argumentation","author":"P Baroni","year":"2018","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Gabbay, D.M., Giacomin, M., van der Torre, L.: Handbook of Formal Argumentation. College Publications, London (2018)"},{"issue":"1","key":"10_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2014.1001791","volume":"6","author":"P Baroni","year":"2015","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Romano, M., Toni, F., Aurisicchio, M., Bertanza, G.: Automatic evaluation of design alternatives with quantitative argumentation. Argum. Comput. 6(1), 24\u201349 (2015)","journal-title":"Argum. Comput."},{"key":"10_CR6","unstructured":"Black, E., Coles, A., Hampson, C.: Optimal simple strategies for persuasion. In: European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), pp. 1736\u20131737 (2016)"},{"key":"10_CR7","unstructured":"Boella, G., Gabbay, D.M., van der Torre, L., Villata, S.: Support in abstract argumentation. In: International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA), pp. 40\u201351. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, IOS Press (2010)"},{"key":"10_CR8","unstructured":"Brewka, G., Woltran, S.: Abstract dialectical frameworks. In: International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), pp. 102\u2013111 (2010)"},{"issue":"2\u20133","key":"10_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1007\/s11225-009-9218-x","volume":"93","author":"MW Caminada","year":"2009","unstructured":"Caminada, M.W., Gabbay, D.M.: A logical account of formal argumentation. Studia Logica 93(2\u20133), 109 (2009)","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"issue":"7","key":"10_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"876","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2013.03.001","volume":"54","author":"C Cayrol","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 54(7), 876\u2013899 (2013)","journal-title":"Int. J. Approx. Reason."},{"key":"10_CR11","unstructured":"Cocarascu, O., Rago, A., Toni, F.: Extracting dialogical explanations for review aggregations with argumentative dialogical agents. In: International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 1261\u20131269 (2019)"},{"issue":"2","key":"10_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321\u2013357 (1995)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"10_CR13","unstructured":"Gargouri, A., Konieczny, S., Marquis, P., Vesic, S.: On a notion of monotonic support for bipolar argumentation frameworks. In: International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS) (2020)"},{"key":"10_CR14","unstructured":"Hadoux, E., Hunter, A.: Learning and updating user models for subpopulations in persuasive argumentation using beta distribution. In: International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS), vol. 17, pp. 1141\u20131149. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) (2018)"},{"key":"10_CR15","unstructured":"Hunter, A.: Modelling the persuadee in asymmetric argumentation dialogues for persuasion. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 3055\u20133061 (2015)"},{"key":"10_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hunter, A., Noor, K.: Aggregation of perspectives using the constellations approach to probabilistic argumentation. In: AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 2846\u20132853 (2020)","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v34i03.5674"},{"key":"10_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kotonya, N., Toni, F.: Gradual argumentation evaluation for stance aggregation in automated fake news detection. In: Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Argument Mining, pp. 156\u2013166 (2019)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/W19-4518"},{"key":"10_CR18","unstructured":"Oren, N., Norman, T.J.: Semantics for evidence-based argumentation. In: International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA), pp. 276\u2013284. IOS Press (2008)"},{"key":"10_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2017.11.009","volume":"93","author":"S Polberg","year":"2018","unstructured":"Polberg, S., Hunter, A.: Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 93, 487\u2013543 (2018)","journal-title":"Int. J. Approx. Reason."},{"key":"10_CR20","unstructured":"Potyka, N.: Continuous dynamical systems for weighted bipolar argumentation. In: International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), pp. 148\u2013157 (2018)"},{"key":"10_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Potyka, N.: Extending modular semantics for bipolar weighted argumentation. In: International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 1722\u20131730 (2019)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-30179-8_23"},{"key":"10_CR22","unstructured":"Potyka, N.: Abstract argumentation with markov networks. In: European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), pp. 865\u2013872 (2020)"},{"key":"10_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Potyka, N.: Bipolar abstract argumentation with dual attacks and supports. In: International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), pp. 677\u2013686 (2020)","DOI":"10.24963\/kr.2020\/69"},{"key":"10_CR24","unstructured":"Prakken, H.: On validating theories of abstract argumentation frameworks: The case of bipolar argumentation frameworks. In: International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA), pp. 21\u201330 (2020)"},{"key":"10_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rago, A., Cocarascu, O., Toni, F.: Argumentation-based recommendations: Fantastic explanations and how to find them. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 1949\u20131955 (2018)","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2018\/269"},{"key":"10_CR26","unstructured":"Rago, A., Toni, F., Aurisicchio, M., Baroni, P.: Discontinuity-free decision support with quantitative argumentation debates. In: International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), pp. 63\u201373 (2016)"},{"key":"10_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yu, L., Markovich, R., van der Torre, L.: Interpretations of support among arguments. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2020. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 334, pp. 194\u2013203. IOS Press (2020)","DOI":"10.3233\/FAIA200863"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_10","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,8]],"date-time":"2024-09-08T17:12:29Z","timestamp":1725815549000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_10"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"ISBN":["9783030867713","9783030867720"],"references-count":27,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_10","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 September 2021","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"ECSQARU","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches with Uncertainty","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Prague","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Czech Republic","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2021","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"21 September 2021","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"24 September 2021","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"16","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"ecsqaru2021","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"http:\/\/ecsqaru.utia.cas.cz\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"63","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"48","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"76% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3.95","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3.25","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}