{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T08:26:51Z","timestamp":1760171211877,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":49,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030867713"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030867720"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_11","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,21]],"date-time":"2021-09-21T11:05:54Z","timestamp":1632222354000},"page":"144-158","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Philosophical Reflections on Argument Strength and Gradual Acceptability"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3431-7757","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Henry","family":"Prakken","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"11_CR1","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-40381-1_11","volume-title":"Scalable Uncertainty Management","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2013","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Ben-Naim, J.: Ranking-based semantics for argumentation frameworks. In: Liu, W., Subrahmanian, V.S., Wijsen, J. (eds.) SUM 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8078, pp. 134\u2013147. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-40381-1_11"},{"unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Ben-Naim, J.: Evaluation of arguments from support relations: axioms and semantics. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-16), pp. 900\u2013906 (2016)","key":"11_CR2"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Ben-Naim, J.: Weighted bipolar argument graphs: axioms and semantics. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-18), pp. 5194\u20135198 (2018)","key":"11_CR3","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2018\/720"},{"key":"11_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1007\/s10458-005-1166-x","volume":"11","author":"K Atkinson","year":"2005","unstructured":"Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., McBurney, P.: A dialogue game protocol for multi-agent argument over proposals for action. J. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 11, 153\u2013171 (2005)","journal-title":"J. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst."},{"key":"11_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888911000166","volume":"26","author":"P Baroni","year":"2011","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Caminada, M., Giacomin, M.: An introduction to argumentation semantics. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 26, 365\u2013410 (2011)","journal-title":"Knowl. Eng. Rev."},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Rago, A., Toni, F.: How many properties do we need for gradual argumentation? In: Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2018), pp. 1736\u20131743 (2018)","key":"11_CR6","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v32i1.11544"},{"key":"11_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2014.1001791","volume":"6","author":"P Baroni","year":"2015","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Romano, M., Toni, F., Aurisicchio, M., Bertanza, G.: Automatic evaluation of design alternatives with quantitative argumentation. Argum. Comput. 6, 24\u201349 (2015)","journal-title":"Argum. Comput."},{"unstructured":"Baumann, R.: What does it take to enforce an argument? Minimal change in abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 127\u2013132 (2012)","key":"11_CR8"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bonzon, E., Delobelle, J., Konieczny, S., Maudet, N.: A comparative study of ranking-based semantics for abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 30st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2016), pp. 914\u2013920 (2016)","key":"11_CR9","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v30i1.10116"},{"unstructured":"Bonzon, E., Delobelle, J., Konieczny, S., Maudet, N.: Combining extension-based semantics and ranking-based semantics for abstract argumentation. In: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference, pp. 118\u2013127. AAAI Press (2018)","key":"11_CR10"},{"key":"11_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-200905","volume":"12","author":"E Bonzon","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bonzon, E., Delobelle, J., Konieczny, S., Maudet, N.: A parametrized ranking-based semantics compatible with persuasion principles. Argum. Comput. 12, 49\u201385 (2021)","journal-title":"Argum. Comput."},{"key":"11_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.1411","volume":"23","author":"C Cayrol","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: Graduality in argumentation. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 23, 245\u2013297 (2005)","journal-title":"J. Artif. Intell. Res."},{"key":"11_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_4","volume-title":"Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence","author":"C Cayrol","year":"2009","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: Bipolar abstract argumentation systems. In: Rahwan, I., Simari, G. (eds.) Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 65\u201384. Springer, Berlin (2009). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_4"},{"key":"11_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2017.12.008","volume":"94","author":"A Cohen","year":"2018","unstructured":"Cohen, A., Parsons, S., Sklar, E., McBurney, P.: A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 94, 76\u2013104 (2018)","journal-title":"Int. J. Approx. Reason."},{"key":"11_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-180425","volume":"9","author":"S Doutre","year":"2018","unstructured":"Doutre, S., Mailly, J.G.: Constraints and changes: a survey of abstract argumentation dynamics. Argum. Comput. 9, 223\u2013248 (2018)","journal-title":"Argum. Comput."},{"key":"11_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"P Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77, 321\u2013357 (1995)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"11_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-90-481-9473-5","volume-title":"Handbook of Argumentation Theory","author":"FH van Eemeren","year":"2014","unstructured":"van Eemeren, F.H., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E.C.W., Snoeck Henkemans, A.F., Verheij, B., Wagemans, J.H.M.: Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Springer, Dordrecht (2014). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-90-481-9473-5"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Freeman, J.: Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments. A Theory of Argument Structure. Fors\/de Gruyter, Berlin-New York (1991)","key":"11_CR18","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110875843"},{"key":"11_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1017\/S1471068403001674","volume":"4","author":"A Garcia","year":"2004","unstructured":"Garcia, A., Simari, G.: Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach. Theory Pract. Logic Program. 4, 95\u2013138 (2004)","journal-title":"Theory Pract. Logic Program."},{"key":"11_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00871972","volume":"2","author":"T Gordon","year":"1994","unstructured":"Gordon, T.: The pleadings game: an exercise in computational dialectics. Artif. Intell. Law 2, 239\u2013292 (1994)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell. Law"},{"unstructured":"Grossi, D., Modgil, S.: On the graded acceptability of arguments. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 868\u2013874 (2015)","key":"11_CR21"},{"key":"11_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2019.05.001","volume":"275","author":"D Grossi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Grossi, D., Modgil, S.: On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation. Artif. Intell. 275, 138\u2013173 (2019)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"11_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-191007","volume":"10","author":"E Hadoux","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hadoux, E., Hunter, A.: Comfort or safety? Gathering and using the concerns of a participant for better persuasion. Argum. Comput. 10, 113\u2013147 (2019)","journal-title":"Argum. Comput."},{"key":"11_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199744077.001.0001","volume-title":"Reasons as Defaults","author":"J Horty","year":"2012","unstructured":"Horty, J.: Reasons as Defaults. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)"},{"unstructured":"Hunter, A.: Making arguments more believable. In: Proceedings of the 19th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 6269\u2013274 (2004)","key":"11_CR25"},{"key":"11_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-170032","volume":"9","author":"A Hunter","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hunter, A.: Towards a framework for computational persuasion with applications in behaviour change. Argum. Comput. 9, 15\u201340 (2018)","journal-title":"Argum. Comput."},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hunter, A. (ed.): Argument and Computation, vol. 5 (2014). Special issue with Tutorials on Structured Argumentation","key":"11_CR27","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2013.869764"},{"unstructured":"Kunz, W., Rittel, H.: Issues as elements of information systems. Working Paper No. 131, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, California (1970)","key":"11_CR28"},{"unstructured":"Leite, J., Martins: Social abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-11), pp. 2287\u20132292 (2011)","key":"11_CR29"},{"key":"11_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1111\/0824-7935.00055","volume":"14","author":"R Loui","year":"1998","unstructured":"Loui, R.: Process and policy: resource-bounded non-demonstrative reasoning. Comput. Intell. 14, 1\u201338 (1998)","journal-title":"Comput. Intell."},{"key":"11_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00258422","volume":"8","author":"J Mackenzie","year":"1979","unstructured":"Mackenzie, J.: Question-begging in non-cumulative systems. J. Philos. Logic 8, 117\u2013133 (1979)","journal-title":"J. Philos. Logic"},{"key":"11_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_6","volume-title":"Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence","author":"S Modgil","year":"2009","unstructured":"Modgil, S., Caminada, M.: Proof theories and algorithms for abstract argumentation frameworks. In: Rahwan, I., Simari, G. (eds.) Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 105\u2013129. Springer, Berlin (2009). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_6"},{"unstructured":"Perelman, C., Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.: The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (1969)","key":"11_CR33"},{"key":"11_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1207\/s15516709cog1104_4","volume":"11","author":"J Pollock","year":"1987","unstructured":"Pollock, J.: Defeasible reasoning. Cogn. Sci. 11, 481\u2013518 (1987)","journal-title":"Cogn. Sci."},{"key":"11_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(01)00145-X","volume":"133","author":"J Pollock","year":"2002","unstructured":"Pollock, J.: Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification. Artif. Intell. 133, 233\u2013282 (2002)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"11_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1009","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exi046","volume":"15","author":"H Prakken","year":"2005","unstructured":"Prakken, H.: Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation. J. Logic Comput. 15, 1009\u20131040 (2005)","journal-title":"J. Logic Comput."},{"key":"11_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1080\/19462160903564592","volume":"1","author":"H Prakken","year":"2010","unstructured":"Prakken, H.: An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Argum. Comput. 1, 93\u2013124 (2010)","journal-title":"Argum. Comput."},{"unstructured":"Prakken, H.: Modelling support relations between arguments in debates. In: Ches\u00f1evar, C., Falappa, M.A., et al. (eds.) Argumentation-based Proofs of Endearment. Essays in Honor of Guillermo R. Simari on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday, pp. 349\u2013365. College Publications, London (2018)","key":"11_CR38"},{"unstructured":"Rago, A., Toni, F., Aurisicchio, M., Baroni, P.: Discontinuity-free decision support with quantitative argumentation debates. In: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference, pp. 63\u201372. AAAI Press (2016)","key":"11_CR39"},{"key":"11_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888907001051","volume":"22","author":"C Reed","year":"2007","unstructured":"Reed, C., Walton, D., Macagno, F.: Argument diagramming in logic, law and artificial intelligence. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 22, 87\u2013109 (2007)","journal-title":"Knowl. Eng. Rev."},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Riveret, R., Prakken, H., Rotolo, A., Sartor, G.: Heuristics in argumentation: a game-theoretical investigation. In: Besnard, P., Doutre, S., Hunter, A. (eds.) Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2008, pp. 324\u2013335. IOS Press, Amsterdam etc (2008)","key":"11_CR41","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.1317349"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rosenfeld, A., Kraus, S.: Providing arguments in discussions based on the prediction of human argumentative behavior. In: Proceedings of the 29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2015), pp. 1320\u20131327 (2015)","key":"11_CR42","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v29i1.9333"},{"key":"11_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1038\/s41586-021-03215-w","volume":"591","author":"N Slonim","year":"2021","unstructured":"Slonim, N., Bilu, Y., Alzate, C.: An autonomous debating system. Nature 591, 397\u2013384 (2021)","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"11_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2013.869878","volume":"5","author":"F Toni","year":"2014","unstructured":"Toni, F.: A tutorial on assumption-based argumentation. Argum. Comput. 5, 89\u2013117 (2014)","journal-title":"Argum. Comput."},{"key":"11_CR45","volume-title":"Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning","author":"D Walton","year":"1996","unstructured":"Walton, D.: Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1996)"},{"unstructured":"Walton, D., Krabbe, E.: Commitment in Dialogue. Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. State University of New York Press, Albany (1995)","key":"11_CR46"},{"key":"11_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034","volume-title":"Argumentation Schemes","author":"D Walton","year":"2008","unstructured":"Walton, D., Reed, C., Macagno, F.: Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)"},{"key":"11_CR48","first-page":"12","volume":"3","author":"Y Wu","year":"2010","unstructured":"Wu, Y., Caminada, M.: A labelling-based justification status of arguments. Stud. Logic 3, 12\u201329 (2010)","journal-title":"Stud. Logic"},{"unstructured":"Zenker, F., Debowska-Kozlowska, K., Godden, D., Selinger, M., Wells, S.: Five approaches to argument strength: probabilistic, dialectical, structural, empirical, and computational. In: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Argumentation, pp. 653\u2013674. College Publications, London (2020)","key":"11_CR49"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_11","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,9]],"date-time":"2023-01-09T21:04:06Z","timestamp":1673298246000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_11"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"ISBN":["9783030867713","9783030867720"],"references-count":49,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_11","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 September 2021","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"ECSQARU","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches with Uncertainty","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Prague","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Czech Republic","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2021","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"21 September 2021","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"24 September 2021","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"16","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"ecsqaru2021","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"http:\/\/ecsqaru.utia.cas.cz\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"63","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"48","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"76% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3.95","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3.25","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}