{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T08:27:22Z","timestamp":1760171242178,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":16,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030867713"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030867720"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_12","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,21]],"date-time":"2021-09-21T11:05:54Z","timestamp":1632222354000},"page":"159-172","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["An Abstract Argumentation and Logic Programming Comparison Based on 5-Valued Labellings"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6593-5788","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Samy","family":"S\u00e1","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4297-2970","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jo\u00e3o","family":"Alc\u00e2ntara","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"12_CR1","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-14726-0_18","volume-title":"Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation","author":"P Baroni","year":"2015","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Giacomin, M., Liao, B.: I don\u2019t care, i don\u2019t know ... i know too much! on incompleteness and undecidedness in abstract argumentation. In: Eiter, T., Strass, H., Truszczy\u0144ski, M., Woltran, S. (eds.) Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9060, pp. 265\u2013280. Springer, Cham (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-14726-0_18"},{"key":"12_CR2","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1007\/11853886_11","volume-title":"Logics in Artificial Intelligence","author":"M Caminada","year":"2006","unstructured":"Caminada, M.: On the issue of reinstatement in argumentation. In: Fisher, M., van der Hoek, W., Konev, B., Lisitsa, A. (eds.) JELIA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4160, pp. 111\u2013123. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/11853886_11"},{"key":"12_CR3","unstructured":"Caminada, M.: Semi-stable semantics. In: Dunne, P.E., Bench-Capon, T.J.M. (eds.) Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006, September 11\u201312, 2006, Liverpool, UK. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 144, pp. 121\u2013130. IOS Press (2006). http:\/\/www.booksonline.iospress.nl\/Content\/View.aspx?piid=1932"},{"key":"12_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Caminada, M., Harikrishnan, S., S\u00e1, S.: Comparing logic programming and formal argumentation; the case of ideal and eager semantics. In: Argument and Computation Pre-press, pp. 1\u201328 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/AAC-200528","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-200528"},{"key":"12_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2014.12.004","volume":"58","author":"M Caminada","year":"2015","unstructured":"Caminada, M., S\u00e1, S., Alc\u00e2ntara, J., Dvo\u0159\u00e1k, W.: On the equivalence between logic programming semantics and argumentation semantics. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 58, 87\u2013111 (2015)","journal-title":"Int. J. Approx. Reason."},{"key":"12_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1016\/0743-1066(95)94697-X","volume":"24","author":"P Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.: An argumentation procedure for disjunctive logic programs. J. Logic Program. 24, 151\u2013177 (1995)","journal-title":"J. Logic Program."},{"key":"12_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"P Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and $$n$$-person games. Artif. Intell. 77, 321\u2013357 (1995)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"12_CR8","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-41524-1_7","volume-title":"Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management","author":"W Dvo\u0159\u00e1k","year":"2013","unstructured":"Dvo\u0159\u00e1k, W., Gaggl, S.A., Wallner, J.P., Woltran, S.: Making use of advances in answer-set programming for abstract argumentation systems. In: Tompits, H., Abreu, S., Oetsch, J., P\u00fchrer, J., Seipel, D., Umeda, M., Wolf, A. (eds.) INAP\/WLP -2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7773, pp. 114\u2013133. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-41524-1_7"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"12_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1018947420290","volume":"19","author":"T Eiter","year":"1997","unstructured":"Eiter, T., Leone, N., Sacc\u00e1, D.: On the partial semantics for disjunctive deductive databases. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 19(1\u20132), 59\u201396 (1997)","journal-title":"Ann. Math. Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"2","key":"12_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/9.2.215","volume":"9","author":"H Jakobovits","year":"1999","unstructured":"Jakobovits, H., Vermeir, D.: Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks. J. Logic Comput. 9(2), 215\u2013261 (1999)","journal-title":"J. Logic Comput."},{"issue":"4","key":"12_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1017\/S1471068408003359","volume":"8","author":"JC Nieves","year":"2008","unstructured":"Nieves, J.C., Cort\u00e9s, U., Osorio, M.: Preferred extensions as stable models. Theory Pract. Logic Program. 8(4), 527\u2013543 (2008)","journal-title":"Theory Pract. Logic Program."},{"key":"12_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2013.11.001","volume":"207","author":"S Nofal","year":"2014","unstructured":"Nofal, S., Atkinson, K., Dunne, P.E.: Algorithms for decision problems in argument systems under preferred semantics. Artif. Intell. 207, 23\u201351 (2014)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"4","key":"12_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.3233\/FI-1990-13404","volume":"13","author":"T Przymusinski","year":"1990","unstructured":"Przymusinski, T.: The well-founded semantics coincides with the three-valued stable semantics. Fundamenta Informaticae 13(4), 445\u2013463 (1990)","journal-title":"Fundamenta Informaticae"},{"key":"12_CR14","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-20832-4_11","volume-title":"Logic Programming, Knowledge Representation, and Nonmonotonic Reasoning","author":"F Toni","year":"2011","unstructured":"Toni, F., Sergot, M.: Argumentation and answer set programming. In: Balduccini, M., Son, T.C. (eds.) Logic Programming, Knowledge Representation, and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6565, pp. 164\u2013180. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-20832-4_11"},{"issue":"4","key":"12_CR15","first-page":"12","volume":"3","author":"Y Wu","year":"2010","unstructured":"Wu, Y., Caminada, M.: A labelling-based justification status of arguments. Stud. Logic 3(4), 12\u201329 (2010)","journal-title":"Stud. Logic"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"12_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1007\/s11225-009-9210-5","volume":"93","author":"Y Wu","year":"2009","unstructured":"Wu, Y., Caminada, M., Gabbay, D.M.: Complete extensions in argumentation coincide with 3-valued stable models in logic programming. Studia Logica 93(1\u20132), 383\u2013403 (2009)","journal-title":"Studia Logica"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_12","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]],"date-time":"2021-11-01T10:08:04Z","timestamp":1635761284000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_12"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"ISBN":["9783030867713","9783030867720"],"references-count":16,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_12","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 September 2021","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"ECSQARU","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches with Uncertainty","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Prague","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Czech Republic","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2021","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"21 September 2021","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"24 September 2021","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"16","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"ecsqaru2021","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"http:\/\/ecsqaru.utia.cas.cz\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"63","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"48","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"76% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3.95","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3.25","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}