{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,20]],"date-time":"2026-02-20T23:02:44Z","timestamp":1771628564353,"version":"3.50.1"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":22,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"value":"9783030867713","type":"print"},{"value":"9783030867720","type":"electronic"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_15","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,21]],"date-time":"2021-09-21T11:05:54Z","timestamp":1632222354000},"page":"201-214","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Gradual Semantics for Weighted Bipolar SETAFs"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9370-3917","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bruno","family":"Yun","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4382-0928","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Srdjan","family":"Vesic","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"15_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Ben-Naim, J.: Weighted bipolar argumentation graphs: axioms and semantics. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2018 (2018)","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2018\/720"},{"key":"15_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Ben-Naim, J., Doder, D., Vesic, S.: Acceptability semantics for weighted argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2017, pp. 56\u201362 (2017)","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2017\/9"},{"issue":"10","key":"15_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1062","DOI":"10.1002\/int.20307","volume":"23","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2008","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C., Livet, P.: On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 23(10), 1062\u20131093 (2008)","journal-title":"Int. J. Intell. Syst."},{"key":"15_CR4","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Doder, D.: Gradual semantics accounting for varied-strength attacks. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, AAMAS 2019, pp. 1270\u20131278 (2019)"},{"key":"15_CR5","first-page":"247","volume":"2006","author":"TJM Bench-Capon","year":"2006","unstructured":"Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Prakken, H.: Justifying actions by accruing arguments. Comput. Models Argument Proc. COMMA 2006, 247\u2013258 (2006)","journal-title":"Comput. Models Argument Proc. COMMA"},{"key":"15_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bonzon, E., Delobelle, J., Konieczny, S., Maudet, N.: A comparative study of ranking-based semantics for abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 914\u2013920 (2016)","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v30i1.10116"},{"key":"15_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C.: On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks. In: Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, 8th European Conference, ECSQARU 2005, Proceedings, pp. 378\u2013389 (2005)","DOI":"10.1007\/11518655_33"},{"key":"15_CR8","unstructured":"Leite, J., Martins, J.: Social abstract argumentation. In: IJCAI 2011, Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 2287\u20132292 (2011)"},{"key":"15_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lucero, M.J.G., Ches\u00f1evar, C.I., Simari, G.R.: Modelling argument accrual in possibilistic defeasible logic programming. In: Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, 10th European Conference, ECSQARU 2009, pp. 131\u2013143 (2009)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-02906-6_13"},{"key":"15_CR10","unstructured":"Lucero, M.J.G., Ches\u00f1evar, C.I., Simari, G.R.: On the accrual of arguments in defeasible logic programming. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2009, pp. 804\u2013809 (2009)"},{"key":"15_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Matt, P.-A., Toni, F.: A game-theoretic measure of argument strength for abstract argumentation. In: Logics in Artificial Intelligence, 11th European Conference, JELIA 2008, Proceedings, pp. 285\u2013297 (2008)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-87803-2_24"},{"key":"15_CR12","unstructured":"Modgil, S., Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Integrating dialectical and accrual modes of argumentation. In: Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010, 8\u201310 September, 2010, pp. 335\u2013346 (2010)"},{"key":"15_CR13","unstructured":"Mossakowski, T., Neuhaus, F.: Bipolar Weighted Argumentation Graphs. CoRR, abs\/1611.08572 (2016)"},{"key":"15_CR14","unstructured":"Mossakowski, T., Neuhaus, F.: Modular Semantics and Characteristics for Bipolar Weighted Argumentation Graphs. CoRR, abs\/1807.06685 (2018)"},{"key":"15_CR15","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-75526-5_4","volume-title":"Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems","author":"S\u00f8ren Holbech Nielsen","year":"2007","unstructured":"Nielsen, S\u00f8ren Holbech., Parsons, Simon: A generalization of dung\u2019s abstract framework for argumentation: arguing with sets of attacking arguments. In: Maudet, Nicolas, Parsons, Simon, Rahwan, Iyad (eds.) ArgMAS 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4766, pp. 54\u201373. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-540-75526-5_4"},{"key":"15_CR16","unstructured":"C. d. C. Pereira, A. Tettamanzi, and S. Villata. Changing One\u2019s Mind: Erase or Rewind? In Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2011, pages 164\u2013171, 2011"},{"key":"15_CR17","unstructured":"Potyka, N.: Continuous dynamical systems for weighted bipolar argumentation. In: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference, KR 2018, pp. 148\u2013157 (2018)"},{"key":"15_CR18","first-page":"85","volume":"2005","author":"H Prakken","year":"2005","unstructured":"Prakken, H.: A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2005, 85\u201394 (2005)","journal-title":"Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL"},{"key":"15_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken, H.: Modelling accrual of arguments in ASPIC+. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2019, pp. 103\u2013112 (2019)","DOI":"10.1145\/3322640.3326703"},{"key":"15_CR20","unstructured":"Rago, A., Toni, F., Aurisicchio, M., Baroni, P.: Discontinuity-free decision support with quantitative argumentation debates. In: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference, KR 2016, pp. 63\u201373 (2016)"},{"key":"15_CR21","unstructured":"Verheij, B.: Accrual of arguments in defeasible argumentation, pp. 217\u2013224. In Dutch\/German Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning. Proceedings of the Second Workshop, Delft University of Technology, Universiteit Utrecht (1995)"},{"key":"15_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yun, B., Vesic, S., Croitoru, M.: Ranking-based semantics for sets of attacking arguments. In: The Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2020, pp. 3033\u20133040 (2020)","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v34i03.5697"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_15","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,9]],"date-time":"2023-01-09T21:04:12Z","timestamp":1673298252000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_15"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"ISBN":["9783030867713","9783030867720"],"references-count":22,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_15","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0302-9743","type":"print"},{"value":"1611-3349","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 September 2021","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"ECSQARU","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches with Uncertainty","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Prague","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Czech Republic","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2021","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"21 September 2021","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"24 September 2021","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"16","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"ecsqaru2021","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"http:\/\/ecsqaru.utia.cas.cz\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"63","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"48","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"76% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3.95","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3.25","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}