{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,28]],"date-time":"2025-03-28T02:35:15Z","timestamp":1743129315294,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":17,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030867713"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030867720"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_7","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,21]],"date-time":"2021-09-21T11:05:54Z","timestamp":1632222354000},"page":"89-102","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["The Degrees of Monotony-Dilemma in Abstract Argumentation"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Timotheus","family":"Kampik","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dov","family":"Gabbay","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"7_CR1","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Caminada, M., Giacomin, M.: Abstract argumentation frameworks and their semantics, chap. 4. In: Baroni, P., Gabbay, D., Massimiliano, G., van der Torre, L. (eds.) Handbook of Formal Argumentation. College Publications, pp. 159\u2013236. College Publications (2018)"},{"key":"7_CR2","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Gabbay, D.M., Giacomin, M., van der Torre, L.: Handbook of Formal Argumentation. College Publications (2018)"},{"issue":"8","key":"7_CR3","first-page":"2779","volume":"4","author":"R Baumann","year":"2017","unstructured":"Baumann, R.: On the nature of argumentation semantics: Existence and uniqueness, expressibility, and replaceability. J. Appl. Logics 4(8), 2779\u20132886 (2017)","journal-title":"J. Appl. Logics"},{"key":"7_CR4","first-page":"75","volume":"10","author":"R Baumann","year":"2010","unstructured":"Baumann, R., Brewka, G.: Expanding argumentation frameworks: enforcing and monotonicity results. COMMA 10, 75\u201386 (2010)","journal-title":"COMMA"},{"key":"7_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baumann, R., Brewka, G., Ulbricht, M.: Revisiting the foundations of abstract argumentation-semantics based on weak admissibility and weak defense. In: AAAI, pp. 2742\u20132749 (2020)","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v34i03.5661"},{"issue":"3","key":"7_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/13.3.429","volume":"13","author":"TJ Bench-Capon","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bench-Capon, T.J.: Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. J. Log. Comput. 13(3), 429\u2013448 (2003)","journal-title":"J. Log. Comput."},{"key":"7_CR7","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-28460-6_6","volume-title":"Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation","author":"K \u010cyras","year":"2015","unstructured":"\u010cyras, K., Toni, F.: Non-monotonic inference properties for assumption-based argumentation. In: Black, E., Modgil, S., Oren, N. (eds.) TAFA 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9524, pp. 92\u2013111. Springer, Cham (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-28460-6_6"},{"key":"7_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-180425","volume":"9","author":"S Doutre","year":"2018","unstructured":"Doutre, S., Mailly, J.G.: Constraints and changes: a survey of abstract argumentation dynamics. Argument Comput. 9, 223\u2013248 (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/AAC-180425","journal-title":"Argument Comput."},{"key":"7_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dumas, M., Rosa, M.L., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management (2018)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-662-56509-4"},{"issue":"2","key":"7_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321\u2013357 (1995)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"7_CR11","series-title":"NATO ASI Series","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-82453-1_15","volume-title":"Logics and Models of Concurrent Systems","author":"DM Gabbay","year":"1985","unstructured":"Gabbay, D.M.: Theoretical foundations for non-monotonic reasoning in expert systems. In: Apt, K.R. (ed.) Logics and Models of Concurrent Systems. NATO ASI Series, pp. 439\u2013457. Springer, Heidelberg (1985). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-82453-1_15"},{"key":"7_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kampik, T., Nieves, J.C.: Abstract argumentation and the rational man. J. Logic Comput. 31(2), 654\u2013699 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/logcom\/exab003","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exab003"},{"key":"7_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kraus, S., Lehmann, D., Magidor, M.: Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artif. Intell. 44(1), 167\u2013207 (1990). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0004-3702(90)90101-5, https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/0004370290901015","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(90)90101-5"},{"key":"7_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lankhorst, M.: Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication and Analysis. The Enterprise Engineering Series, Springer, Heidelberg (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-662-53933-0","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-662-53933-0"},{"key":"7_CR15","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-50701-9_16","volume-title":"Non-Monotonic Reasoning","author":"D Makinson","year":"1989","unstructured":"Makinson, D.: General theory of cumulative inference. In: Reinfrank, M., de Kleer, J., Ginsberg, M.L., Sandewall, E. (eds.) NMR 1988. LNCS, vol. 346, pp. 1\u201318. Springer, Heidelberg (1989). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/3-540-50701-9_16"},{"key":"7_CR16","unstructured":"van der Torre, L., Vesic, S.: The principle-based approach to abstract argumentation semantics. IfCoLog J. Logics Appl. 4(8), 1\u201344 (2017)"},{"key":"7_CR17","first-page":"357","volume":"96","author":"B Verheij","year":"1996","unstructured":"Verheij, B.: Two approaches to dialectical argumentation: admissible sets and argumentation stages. Proc. NAIC 96, 357\u2013368 (1996)","journal-title":"Proc. NAIC"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_7","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,1]],"date-time":"2021-11-01T10:07:38Z","timestamp":1635761258000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"ISBN":["9783030867713","9783030867720"],"references-count":17,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_7","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 September 2021","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"ECSQARU","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches with Uncertainty","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Prague","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Czech Republic","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2021","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"21 September 2021","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"24 September 2021","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"16","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"ecsqaru2021","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"http:\/\/ecsqaru.utia.cas.cz\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"63","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"48","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"76% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3.95","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3.25","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}