{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,25]],"date-time":"2025-03-25T14:39:01Z","timestamp":1742913541451,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":28,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030867713"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030867720"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_8","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,21]],"date-time":"2021-09-21T11:05:54Z","timestamp":1632222354000},"page":"103-116","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Constrained Incomplete Argumentation Frameworks"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9102-7329","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jean-Guy","family":"Mailly","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,19]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"8_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.2307\/2274239","volume":"50","author":"CE Alchourr\u00f3n","year":"1985","unstructured":"Alchourr\u00f3n, C.E., G\u00e4rdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: partial meet contraction and revision functions. J. Symb. Log. 50(2), 510\u2013530 (1985)","journal-title":"J. Symb. Log."},{"key":"8_CR2","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Caminada, M., Giacomin, M.: Abstract argumentation frameworks and their semantics. In: Baroni, P., Gabbay, D., Giacomin, M., van der Torre, L. (eds.) Handbook of Formal Argumentation, pp. 159\u2013236. College Publications (2018)"},{"key":"8_CR3","unstructured":"Baumann, R., Brewka, G.: Expanding argumentation frameworks: enforcing and monotonicity results. In: Proceedings of the COMMA 2010, vol. 216, pp. 75\u201386 (2010)"},{"key":"8_CR4","unstructured":"Baumann, R., Dvor\u00e1k, W., Linsbichler, T., Strass, H., Woltran, S.: Compact argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of the ECAI 2014, vol. 263, pp. 69\u201374 (2014)"},{"key":"8_CR5","unstructured":"Baumeister, D., Neugebauer, D., Rothe, J.: Credulous and skeptical acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of the COMMA 2018, pp. 181\u2013192 (2018)"},{"key":"8_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2018.08.001","volume":"264","author":"D Baumeister","year":"2018","unstructured":"Baumeister, D., Neugebauer, D., Rothe, J., Schadrack, H.: Verification in incomplete argumentation frameworks. Artif. Intell. 264, 1\u201326 (2018)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"8_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bonzon, E., Delobelle, J., Konieczny, S., Maudet, N.: A parametrized ranking-based semantics for persuasion. In: Proceedings of the SUM 2017, pp. 237\u2013251 (2017)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-67582-4_17"},{"key":"8_CR8","unstructured":"Brewka, G., Strass, H., Ellmauthaler, S., Wallner, J.P., Woltran, S.: Abstract dialectical frameworks revisited. In: Rossi, F. (ed.) Proceedings of the IJCAI 2013, pp. 803\u2013809 (2013)"},{"issue":"10\u201315","key":"8_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"730","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.012","volume":"171","author":"S Coste-Marquis","year":"2007","unstructured":"Coste-Marquis, S., Devred, C., Konieczny, S., Lagasquie-Schiex, M., Marquis, P.: On the merging of dung\u2019s argumentation systems. Artif. Intell. 171(10\u201315), 730\u2013753 (2007)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"8_CR10","unstructured":"Coste-Marquis, S., Devred, C., Marquis, P.: Constrained argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of the KR 2006, pp. 112\u2013122 (2006)"},{"key":"8_CR11","unstructured":"Coste-Marquis, S., Konieczny, S., Mailly, J.G., Marquis, P.: On the revision of argumentation systems: minimal change of arguments statuses. In: Proceedings of the KR 2014 (2014)"},{"key":"8_CR12","unstructured":"Coste-Marquis, S., Konieczny, S., Mailly, J.G., Marquis, P.: Extension enforcement in abstract argumentation as an optimization problem. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 2015, pp. 2876\u20132882 (2015)"},{"key":"8_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Coste-Marquis, S., Konieczny, S., Mailly, J.G., Marquis, P.: A translation-based approach for revision of argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of the JELIA 2014, pp. 77\u201385 (2014)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-11558-0_28"},{"key":"8_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.989","volume":"17","author":"A Darwiche","year":"2002","unstructured":"Darwiche, A., Marquis, P.: A knowledge compilation map. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 17, 229\u2013264 (2002)","journal-title":"J. Artif. Intell. Res."},{"key":"8_CR15","unstructured":"Delobelle, J., Haret, A., Konieczny, S., Mailly, J.G., Rossit, J., Woltran, S.: Merging of abstract argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of the KR 2016, pp. 33\u201342 (2016)"},{"key":"8_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dimopoulos, Y., Mailly, J.G., Moraitis, P.: Control argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of the AAAI 2018, pp. 4678\u20134685 (2018)","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v32i1.11583"},{"key":"8_CR17","unstructured":"Dimopoulos, Y., Mailly, J.G., Moraitis, P.: Argumentation-based negotiation with incomplete opponent profiles. In: Proceedings of the AAMAS 2019, pp. 1252\u20131260 (2019)"},{"key":"8_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77, 321\u2013357 (1995)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"8_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2015.07.006","volume":"228","author":"PE Dunne","year":"2015","unstructured":"Dunne, P.E., Dvor\u00e1k, W., Linsbichler, T., Woltran, S.: Characteristics of multiple viewpoints in abstract argumentation. Artif. Intell. 228, 153\u2013178 (2015)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"8_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fazzinga, B., Flesca, S., Furfaro, F.: Revisiting the notion of extension over incomplete abstract argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 2020, pp. 1712\u20131718 (2020)","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2020\/237"},{"key":"8_CR21","unstructured":"Katsuno, H., Mendelzon, A.O.: On the difference between updating a knowledge base and revising it. In: Proceedings of the KR 1991, pp. 387\u2013394 (1991)"},{"issue":"3","key":"8_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(91)90069-V","volume":"52","author":"H Katsuno","year":"1992","unstructured":"Katsuno, H., Mendelzon, A.O.: Propositional knowledge base revision and minimal change. Artif. Intell. 52(3), 263\u2013294 (1992)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"5","key":"8_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"773","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/12.5.773","volume":"12","author":"S Konieczny","year":"2002","unstructured":"Konieczny, S., P\u00e9rez, R.P.: Merging information under constraints: a logical framework. J. Log. Comput. 12(5), 773\u2013808 (2002)","journal-title":"J. Log. Comput."},{"key":"8_CR24","unstructured":"Mailly, J.G.: Possible controllability of control argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of COMMA 2020, vol. 326, pp. 283\u2013294 (2020)"},{"key":"8_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Niskanen, A., Neugebauer, D., J\u00e4rvisalo, M.: Controllability of control argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 2020, pp. 1855\u20131861 (2020)","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2020\/257"},{"key":"8_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Niskanen, A., Neugebauer, D., J\u00e4rvisalo, M., Rothe, J.: Deciding acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of the AAAI 2020, pp. 2942\u20132949 (2020)","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v34i03.5686"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"8_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-190471","volume":"11","author":"JP Wallner","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wallner, J.P.: Structural constraints for dynamic operators in abstract argumentation. Argument Comput. 11(1\u20132), 151\u2013190 (2020)","journal-title":"Argument Comput."},{"key":"8_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.5415","volume":"60","author":"JP Wallner","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wallner, J.P., Niskanen, A., J\u00e4rvisalo, M.: Complexity results and algorithms for extension enforcement in abstract argumentation. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 60, 1\u201340 (2017)","journal-title":"J. Artif. Intell. Res."}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_8","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,9]],"date-time":"2023-01-09T21:03:36Z","timestamp":1673298216000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"ISBN":["9783030867713","9783030867720"],"references-count":28,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_8","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 September 2021","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"ECSQARU","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches with Uncertainty","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Prague","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Czech Republic","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2021","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"21 September 2021","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"24 September 2021","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"16","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"ecsqaru2021","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"http:\/\/ecsqaru.utia.cas.cz\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"63","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"48","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"76% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3.95","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3.25","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}