{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,5]],"date-time":"2026-02-05T07:26:54Z","timestamp":1770276414274,"version":"3.49.0"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":31,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"value":"9783030869410","type":"print"},{"value":"9783030869427","type":"electronic"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-86942-7_2","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,28]],"date-time":"2021-09-28T01:02:01Z","timestamp":1632790921000},"page":"17-32","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Improving the Accuracy of Ballot Scanners Using Supervised Learning"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Sameer","family":"Barretto","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"William","family":"Chown","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"David","family":"Meyer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Aditya","family":"Soni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Atreya","family":"Tata","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"J. Alex","family":"Halderman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"2_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bajcsy, A., Li-Baboud, Y.-S., Brady, M.: Systematic measurement of marginal mark types on voting ballots. Technical report (2015). https:\/\/nvlpubs.nist.gov\/nistpubs\/ir\/2015\/NIST.IR.8069.pdf. NIST","DOI":"10.6028\/NIST.IR.8069"},{"key":"2_CR2","unstructured":"Bowen, D.: Top-to-Bottom Review of voting machines certified for use in California. Technical report (2007). https:\/\/www.sos.ca.gov\/elections\/voting-systems\/oversight\/top-bottom-review\/. California Secretary of State"},{"key":"2_CR3","unstructured":"Bradski, G.: The OpenCV library. Dr. Dobb\u2019s J. Softw. Tools (2000)"},{"key":"2_CR4","unstructured":"Clark, A.: Pillow (PIL Fork) Documentation (2015). https:\/\/buildmedia.readthedocs.org\/media\/pdf\/pillow\/latest\/pillow.pdf"},{"key":"2_CR5","unstructured":"Colorado Secretary of State Elections Division: Voter Intent: Determination of Voter Intent for Colorado Elections (2013). https:\/\/www.broomfield.org\/DocumentCenter\/View\/11702\/Voter-Intent-Guide"},{"key":"2_CR6","unstructured":"Cordero, A., Ji, T., Tsai, A., Mowery, K., Wagner, D.: Efficient user-guided ballot image verification. In: Electronic Voting Technology\/Workshop on Trustworthy Elections. EVT\/WOTE (2010)"},{"key":"2_CR7","unstructured":"Curling v. Raffensperger, Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-2989-AT (N.D. Ga. Oct. 11, 2020)"},{"key":"2_CR8","unstructured":"Dominion Voting Systems: AuditMark. https:\/\/www.dominionvoting.com\/democracy-suite-ems\/"},{"key":"2_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. CoRR abs\/1512.03385 (2015). arXiv:1512.03385","DOI":"10.1109\/CVPR.2016.90"},{"key":"2_CR10","unstructured":"Humboldt County: November 3, 2009 UDEL Election: Official Canvass Precinct Report. https:\/\/humboldtgov.org\/DocumentCenter\/View\/3941\/November-3-2009-UDEL-Election-Official-Canvass-Precinct-Report-PDF"},{"key":"2_CR11","unstructured":"Hursti, H.: Critical Security Issues with Diebold Optical Scan Design, The Black Box Report (2005)"},{"key":"2_CR12","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-12980-3_10","volume-title":"Towards Trustworthy Elections","author":"DW Jones","year":"2010","unstructured":"Jones, D.W.: On optical mark-sense scanning. In: Chaum, D., et al. (eds.) Towards Trustworthy Elections. LNCS, vol. 6000, pp. 175\u2013190. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-12980-3_10"},{"key":"2_CR13","unstructured":"Kamarck, E., Ibreak, Y., Powers, A., Stewart, C.: Voting by mail in a pandemic: a state-by-state scorecard, Brookings Institution (2020). https:\/\/www.brookings.edu\/research\/voting-by-mail-in-a-pandemic-a-state-by-state-scorecard\/"},{"key":"2_CR14","unstructured":"Kiayias, A., Michel, L., Russell, A., Shvartsman, A.: Security assessment of the Diebold optical scan voting terminal (2006). https:\/\/voter.engr.uconn.edu\/voter\/wp-content\/uploads\/uconnreport-os.pdf"},{"key":"2_CR15","unstructured":"Kiayias, A., Michel, L., Russell, A., Shashidhar, N., See, A., Shvartsman, A.: An authentication and ballot layout attack against an optical scan voting terminal. In: USENIX\/ACCURATE Electronic Voting Technology Workshop (EVT) (2007)"},{"key":"2_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"LeNail, A.: NN-SVG: publication-ready neural network architecture schematics. J. Open Source Softw. 4(33), 747 (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21105\/joss.00747","DOI":"10.21105\/joss.00747"},{"key":"2_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1109\/MSP.2012.56","volume":"10","author":"M Lindeman","year":"2012","unstructured":"Lindeman, M., Stark, P.: A gentle introduction to risk-limiting audits. IEEE Secur. Priv. 10, 42\u201349 (2012)","journal-title":"IEEE Secur. Priv."},{"key":"2_CR18","unstructured":"McDaniel, P., Blaze, M., Vigna, G.: EVEREST: evaluation and validation of election-related equipment, standards and testing. Technical report (2007). http:\/\/siis.cse.psu.edu\/everest.html. Ohio Secretary of State"},{"key":"2_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nagy, G., Lopresti, D., Smith, E.H.B., Wu, Z.: Characterizing challenged Minnesota ballots. In: 18th Document Recognition and Retrieval Conference (2011)","DOI":"10.1117\/12.876558"},{"key":"2_CR20","unstructured":"National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: Securing the Vote: Protecting American Democracy. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2018). https:\/\/www.nap.edu\/catalog\/25120\/securing-the-vote-protecting-american-democracy"},{"key":"2_CR21","unstructured":"National Conference of State Legislatures: Post-Election Audits (2019). http:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/research\/elections-and-campaigns\/post-election-audits635926066.aspx"},{"key":"2_CR22","unstructured":"Poulos, J., Hoover, J., Ikonomakis, N., Obradovic, G.: Marginal Marks with Pixel Count, U.S. Patent 9,710,988 B2 (2012)"},{"key":"2_CR23","unstructured":"Pueblo County Elections: Ballot Images, November 2020 Election. https:\/\/county.pueblo.org\/clerk-and-recorder\/ballot-images"},{"issue":"1881","key":"2_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3759","DOI":"10.1098\/rsta.2008.0149","volume":"366","author":"R Rivest","year":"2008","unstructured":"Rivest, R.: On the notion of \u2018software independence\u2019 in voting systems. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 366(1881), 3759\u20133767 (2008)","journal-title":"Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A"},{"key":"2_CR25","unstructured":"State of Georgia: Report of The 21st Century Voting Commission, (2001). https:\/\/voterga.files.wordpress.com\/2014\/11\/21st_century_report.pdf"},{"key":"2_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sultana, F., Sufian, A., Dutta, P.: Advancements in image classification using convolutional neural network. ICRCICN (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/icrcicn.2018.8718718","DOI":"10.1109\/icrcicn.2018.8718718"},{"key":"2_CR27","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-22270-7_8","volume-title":"E-Voting and Identity","author":"JI Toledo","year":"2015","unstructured":"Toledo, J.I., Cucurull, J., Puiggal\u00ed, J., Forn\u00e9s, A., Llad\u00f3s, J.: Document analysis techniques for automatic electoral document processing: a survey. In: Haenni, R., Koenig, R.E., Wikstr\u00f6m, D. (eds.) VOTELID 2015. LNCS, vol. 9269, pp. 129\u2013141. Springer, Cham (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-22270-7_8"},{"key":"2_CR28","unstructured":"U.S. Election Assistance Commission: Central Count Optical Scan Ballots (2008). https:\/\/www.eac.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/documentlibrary\/files\/Quick_Start_Guide_-_Central_Count_Optical_Scan_Ballots.pdf"},{"key":"2_CR29","unstructured":"Verified Voting: The Verifier: Polling Place Equipment (2021). https:\/\/www.verifiedvoting.org\/verifier\/"},{"key":"2_CR30","unstructured":"Wang, K., Kim, E., Carlini, N., Motyashov, I., Nguyen, D., Wagner, D.: Operator-assisted tabulation of optical scan ballots. In: Electronic Voting Technology\/Workshop on Trustworthy Elections. EVT\/WOTE (2012)"},{"key":"2_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Xiu, P., Lopresti, D., Baird, H., Nagy, G., Smith, E.B.: Style-based ballot mark recognition. In: 10th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (2009)","DOI":"10.1109\/ICDAR.2009.273"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Electronic Voting"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-86942-7_2","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,28]],"date-time":"2021-09-28T01:04:23Z","timestamp":1632791063000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-86942-7_2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"ISBN":["9783030869410","9783030869427"],"references-count":31,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-86942-7_2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0302-9743","type":"print"},{"value":"1611-3349","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"assertion":[{"value":"28 September 2021","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"E-Vote-ID","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Joint Conference on Electronic Voting","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2021","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"5 October 2021","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"8 October 2021","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"6","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"evoteid2021","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/e-vote-id.org\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Double-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"49","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"11","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"22% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3-4","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3-4","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}