{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,3]],"date-time":"2025-08-03T04:37:03Z","timestamp":1754195823635,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":24,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030890216"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030890223"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-89022-3_7","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,15]],"date-time":"2021-10-15T10:01:29Z","timestamp":1634292089000},"page":"74-84","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Top-Down Versus Operational-Only Business Process Modeling: An Experimental Evaluation of the Approach Leading to Higher Quality Representations"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8668-2011","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Pavani","family":"Vemuri","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6560-9787","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yves","family":"Wautelet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Stephan","family":"Poelmans","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Simon","family":"Verwimp","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6037-0914","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Samedi","family":"Heng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,16]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"7_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"731","DOI":"10.1016\/j.im.2003.08.010","volume":"41","author":"K Amoako-Gyampah","year":"2004","unstructured":"Amoako-Gyampah, K., Salam, A.F.: An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Inf. Manag. 41(6), 731\u2013745 (2004)","journal-title":"Inf. Manag."},{"issue":"1","key":"7_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/S0169-2607(00)00102-4","volume":"65","author":"S Arndt","year":"2001","unstructured":"Arndt, S., Magnotta, V.: Generating random series with known values of Kendall\u2019s tau. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 65(1), 17\u201323 (2001)","journal-title":"Comput. Methods Programs Biomed."},{"key":"7_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Avila, D.T., dos Santos, R.I., Mendling, J., Thom, L.H.: A systematic literature review of process modeling guidelines and their empirical support. BPM J. (2020)","DOI":"10.1108\/BPMJ-10-2019-0407"},{"key":"7_CR4","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-45594-9_3","volume-title":"Business Process Management","author":"J Becker","year":"2000","unstructured":"Becker, J., Rosemann, M., von Uthmann, C.: Guidelines of business process modeling. In: van der Aalst, W., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 1806, pp. 30\u201349. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/3-540-45594-9_3"},{"key":"7_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/j.datak.2017.11.003","volume":"113","author":"F Corradini","year":"2018","unstructured":"Corradini, F., et al.: A guidelines framework for understandable BPMN models. Data Knowl. Eng. 113, 129\u2013154 (2018)","journal-title":"Data Knowl. Eng."},{"key":"7_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.2307\/249008","volume":"13","author":"FD Davis","year":"1989","unstructured":"Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319\u2013340 (1989)","journal-title":"MIS Q."},{"key":"7_CR7","unstructured":"De Meyer, P., Claes, J.: An overview of process model quality literature-the comprehensive process model quality framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.07930 (2018)"},{"key":"7_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2017.09.001","volume":"93","author":"A Dikici","year":"2018","unstructured":"Dikici, A., Turetken, O., Demirors, O.: Factors influencing the understandability of process models: a systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 93, 112\u2013129 (2018)","journal-title":"Inf. Softw. Technol."},{"key":"7_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gassen, J.B., Mendling, J., Thom, L.H., de Oliveira, J.P.M.: Business process modeling: vocabulary problem and requirements specification. In: SIGDOC 2014, pp. 1\u201310 (2014)","DOI":"10.1145\/2666216.2666217"},{"issue":"1","key":"7_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1057\/palgrave.ejis.3000598","volume":"15","author":"J Krogstie","year":"2006","unstructured":"Krogstie, J., et al.: Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 15(1), 91\u2013102 (2006)","journal-title":"Eur. J. Inf. Syst."},{"key":"7_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-89224-3","volume-title":"Metrics for Process Models: Empirical Foundations of Verification, Error Prediction, and Guidelines for Correctness","author":"J Mendling","year":"2008","unstructured":"Mendling, J.: Metrics for Process Models: Empirical Foundations of Verification, Error Prediction, and Guidelines for Correctness, vol. 6. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-540-89224-3"},{"issue":"2","key":"7_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2009.08.004","volume":"52","author":"J Mendling","year":"2010","unstructured":"Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M.: Seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG). Inf. Softw. Technol. 52(2), 127\u2013136 (2010)","journal-title":"Inf. Softw. Technol."},{"key":"7_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2014.07.011","volume":"58","author":"IMM de Oca","year":"2015","unstructured":"de Oca, I.M.M., Snoeck, M., Reijers, H.A., Rodr\u00edguez-Morffi, A.: A systematic literature review of studies on business process modeling quality. Inf. Soft. Technol. 58, 187\u2013205 (2015)","journal-title":"Inf. Soft. Technol."},{"issue":"5","key":"7_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1007\/s11576-012-0335-1","volume":"54","author":"S Overhage","year":"2012","unstructured":"Overhage, S., Birkmeier, D.Q., Schlauderer, S.: Qualit\u00e4tsmerkmale,-metriken und-messverfahren f\u00fcr gesch\u00e4ftsprozessmodelle. Wirtschaftsinformatik 54(5), 217\u2013235 (2012)","journal-title":"Wirtschaftsinformatik"},{"key":"7_CR15","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-31072-0_11","volume-title":"Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling","author":"J Pinggera","year":"2012","unstructured":"Pinggera, J., et al.: Modeling styles in business process modeling. In: Bider, I., et al. (eds.) BPMDS\/EMMSAD -2012. LNBIP, vol. 113, pp. 151\u2013166. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-31072-0_11"},{"key":"7_CR16","series-title":"International Handbooks on Information Systems","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-00416-2_8","volume-title":"Handbook on Business Process Management 1","author":"HA Reijers","year":"2010","unstructured":"Reijers, H.A., Mendling, J., Recker, J.: Business process quality management. In: Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management 1. International Handbooks on Information Systems, pp. 167\u2013185. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-00416-2_8"},{"key":"7_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1108\/14637150610657567","volume":"12","author":"M Rosemann","year":"2006","unstructured":"Rosemann, M.: Potential pitfalls of process modeling: part A. BPM J. 12, 249\u2013254 (2006)","journal-title":"BPM J."},{"key":"7_CR18","volume-title":"Research Methods for Business Students","author":"M Saunders","year":"2009","unstructured":"Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A.: Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson, Harlow (2009)"},{"issue":"2","key":"7_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1109\/MC.2006.58","volume":"39","author":"D Schmidt","year":"2006","unstructured":"Schmidt, D.: Guest editor\u2019s introduction: model-driven engineering. Computer 39(2), 25\u201331 (2006)","journal-title":"Computer"},{"key":"7_CR20","first-page":"179","volume":"144","author":"I Vanderfeesten","year":"2007","unstructured":"Vanderfeesten, I., Cardoso, J., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., Van der Aalst, W.: Quality metrics for business process models. BPM Workflow Handb. 144, 179\u2013190 (2007)","journal-title":"BPM Workflow Handb."},{"key":"7_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wautelet, Y.: Using the RUP\/UML business use case model for service development governance: a business and it alignment based approach. In: CBI2020, vol. 2, pp. 121\u2013130 (2020)","DOI":"10.1109\/CBI49978.2020.10069"},{"key":"7_CR22","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-54045-0_2","volume-title":"Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality","author":"Y Wautelet","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wautelet, Y., Poelmans, S.: Aligning the elements of the RUP\/UML business use-case model and the BPMN business process diagram. In: Gr\u00fcnbacher, P., Perini, A. (eds.) REFSQ 2017. LNCS, vol. 10153, pp. 22\u201330. Springer, Cham (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-54045-0_2"},{"key":"7_CR23","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-70241-4_20","volume-title":"The Practice of Enterprise Modeling","author":"Y Wautelet","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wautelet, Y., Poelmans, S.: An integrated enterprise modeling framework using the RUP\/UML business use-case model and BPMN. In: Poels, G., Gailly, F., Serral Asensio, E., Snoeck, M. (eds.) PoEM 2017. LNBIP, vol. 305, pp. 299\u2013315. Springer, Cham (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-70241-4_20"},{"key":"7_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-29044-2","volume-title":"Experimentation in Software Engineering","author":"C Wohlin","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., H\u00f6st, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., Wessl\u00e9n, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-29044-2"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Conceptual Modeling"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-89022-3_7","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,12]],"date-time":"2023-01-12T10:17:55Z","timestamp":1673518675000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-89022-3_7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"ISBN":["9783030890216","9783030890223"],"references-count":24,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-89022-3_7","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 October 2021","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"ER","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Conceptual Modeling","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2021","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"18 October 2021","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"21 October 2021","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"40","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"er2021","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/www.er2021.org\/index.html","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"85","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"14","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"18","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"16% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3.9","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"2.4","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}