{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,11]],"date-time":"2025-10-11T08:29:00Z","timestamp":1760171340397,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":28,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030893903"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030893910"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_12","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,14]],"date-time":"2021-10-14T11:33:44Z","timestamp":1634211224000},"page":"209-223","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Explanations of Non-monotonic Inference in Admissibility-Based Abstract Argumentation"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Timotheus","family":"Kampik","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kristijonas","family":"\u010cyras","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"12_CR1","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Caminada, M., Giacomin, M.: Abstract argumentation frameworks and their semantics (chap. 4). In: Baroni, P., Gabbay, D., Massimiliano, G., van der Torre, L. (eds.) Handbook of Formal Argumentation, pp. 159\u2013236. College Publications (2018)"},{"key":"12_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2018.11.019","volume":"105","author":"P Baroni","year":"2019","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Rago, A., Toni, F.: From fine-grained properties to broad principles for gradual argumentation: a principled spectrum. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 105, 252\u2013286 (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijar.2018.11.019","journal-title":"Int. J. Approximate Reasoning"},{"issue":"8","key":"12_CR3","first-page":"2779","volume":"4","author":"R Baumann","year":"2017","unstructured":"Baumann, R.: On the nature of argumentation semantics: existence and uniqueness, expressibility, and replaceability. J. Appl. Log. 4(8), 2779\u20132886 (2017)","journal-title":"J. Appl. Log."},{"key":"12_CR4","first-page":"75","volume":"10","author":"R Baumann","year":"2010","unstructured":"Baumann, R., Brewka, G.: Expanding argumentation frameworks: enforcing and monotonicity results. COMMA 10, 75\u201386 (2010)","journal-title":"COMMA"},{"key":"12_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baumann, R., Brewka, G., Ulbricht, M.: Revisiting the foundations of abstract argumentation-semantics based on weak admissibility and weak defense. In: AAAI, pp. 2742\u20132749 (2020)","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v34i03.5661"},{"key":"12_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Booth, R., Gabbay, D.M., Kaci, S., Rienstra, T., van der Torre, L.: Abduction and dialogical proof in argumentation and logic programming. In: Schaub, T., Friedrich, G., O\u2019Sullivan, B. (eds.) 21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 263, pp. 117\u2013122. IOS Press, Prague (2014). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/978-1-61499-419-0-117","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-61499-419-0-117"},{"key":"12_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.2965","volume":"38","author":"C Cayrol","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., de Saint-Cyr, F.D., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: adding an argument. J. Arti. Intell. Res. 38, 49\u201384 (2010)","journal-title":"J. Arti. Intell. Res."},{"key":"12_CR8","unstructured":"Cocarascu, O., \u010cyras, K., Rago, A., Toni, F.: Explaining with argumentation frameworks mined from data. In: 1st International Workshop on Dialogue, Explanation and Argumentation in Human-Agent Interaction (DEXAHAI), Southampton (2018)"},{"key":"12_CR9","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-19570-0_7","volume-title":"Logics in Artificial Intelligence","author":"M Cramer","year":"2019","unstructured":"Cramer, M., Guillaume, M.: Empirical study on human evaluation of complex argumentation frameworks. In: Calimeri, F., Leone, N., Manna, M. (eds.) JELIA 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11468, pp. 102\u2013115. Springer, Cham (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-19570-0_7"},{"key":"12_CR10","unstructured":"\u010cyras, K., et al.: Machine reasoning explainability. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.00418 (2020)"},{"key":"12_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"\u010cyras, K., Rago, A., Albini, E., Baroni, P., Toni, F.: Argumentative XAI: a survey. In: Zhou, Z.H. (ed.) 30th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 4392\u20134399. IJCAI, Montreal (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.24963\/ijcai.2021\/600","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2021\/600"},{"key":"12_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-180425","volume":"9","author":"S Doutre","year":"2018","unstructured":"Doutre, S., Mailly, J.G.: Constraints and changes: a survey of abstract argumentation dynamics. Argum. Comput. 9, 223\u2013248 (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/AAC-180425","journal-title":"Argum. Comput."},{"issue":"2","key":"12_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321\u2013357 (1995)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"2","key":"12_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2005.07.002","volume":"170","author":"PM Dung","year":"2006","unstructured":"Dung, P.M., Kowalski, R., Toni, F.: Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation. Artif. Intell. 170(2), 114\u2013159 (2006). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.artint.2005.07.002","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"10\u201315","key":"12_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"642","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.05.003","volume":"171","author":"PM Dung","year":"2007","unstructured":"Dung, P.M., Mancarella, P., Toni, F.: Computing ideal sceptical argumentation. Artif. Intell. 171(10\u201315), 642\u2013674 (2007). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.artint.2007.05.003","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"4","key":"12_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1149","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exu006","volume":"26","author":"W Dvo\u0159\u00e1k","year":"2014","unstructured":"Dvo\u0159\u00e1k, W., Gaggl, S.A.: Stage semantics and the SCC-recursive schema for argumentation semantics. J. Log. Comput. 26(4), 1149\u20131202 (2014). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/logcom\/exu006","journal-title":"J. Log. Comput."},{"key":"12_CR17","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-28460-6_7","volume-title":"Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation","author":"X Fan","year":"2015","unstructured":"Fan, X., Toni, F.: On explanations for non-acceptable arguments. In: Black, E., Modgil, S., Oren, N. (eds.) TAFA 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9524, pp. 112\u2013127. Springer, Cham (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-28460-6_7"},{"key":"12_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fan, X., Toni, F.: On computing explanations in argumentation. In: Bonet, B., Koenig, S. (eds.) 29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1496\u20131502. AAAI Press, Austin (2015)","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v29i1.9420"},{"key":"12_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kampik, T., Gabbay, D.: The \u201cdegrees of monotony\u201d - dilemma in abstract argumentation. In: Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty 2021 (2021, to appear)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_7"},{"issue":"2","key":"12_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"654","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exab003","volume":"31","author":"T Kampik","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kampik, T., Nieves, J.C.: Abstract argumentation and the rational man. J. Log. Comput. 31(2), 654\u2013699 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/logcom\/exab003","journal-title":"J. Log. Comput."},{"key":"12_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Liao, B., van der Torre, L.: Explanation semantics for abstract argumentation. In: Prakken, H. (ed.) Computational Models of Argument, vol. 326, pp. 271\u2013282. IOS Press (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/FAIA200511","DOI":"10.3233\/FAIA200511"},{"issue":"2\u20133","key":"12_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1080\/11663081.2018.1487241","volume":"28","author":"C Sakama","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sakama, C.: Abduction in argumentation frameworks. J. Appl. Non-Class. Log. 28(2\u20133), 218\u2013239 (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/11663081.2018.1487241","journal-title":"J. Appl. Non-Class. Log."},{"key":"12_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Saribatur, Z.G., Wallner, J.P., Woltran, S.: Explaining non-acceptability in abstract argumentation. In: Giacomo, G.D., et al. (eds.) 24th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 881\u2013888. IOS Press, Santiago de Compostela (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/FAIA200179","DOI":"10.3233\/FAIA200179"},{"key":"12_CR24","unstructured":"Thimm, M.: Tweety: a comprehensive collection of Java libraries for logical aspects of artificial intelligence and knowledge representation. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. KR 2014, pp. 528\u2013537. AAAI Press (2014)"},{"issue":"8","key":"12_CR25","first-page":"2735","volume":"4","author":"L van der Torre","year":"2017","unstructured":"van der Torre, L., Vesic, S.: The principle-based approach to abstract argumentation semantics. IfCoLog J. Log. Appl. 4(8), 2735\u20132778 (2017)","journal-title":"IfCoLog J. Log. Appl."},{"key":"12_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e5","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888921000011","volume":"36","author":"A Vassiliades","year":"2021","unstructured":"Vassiliades, A., Bassiliades, N., Patkos, T.: Argumentation and explainable artificial intelligence: a survey. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 36, e5 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0269888921000011","journal-title":"Knowl. Eng. Rev."},{"key":"12_CR27","unstructured":"Verheij, B.: Two approaches to dialectical argumentation: admissible sets and argumentation stages. In: Proceedings of the NAIC 1996, pp. 357\u2013368 (1996)"},{"key":"12_CR28","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-12805-9_12","volume-title":"Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems","author":"T Wakaki","year":"2010","unstructured":"Wakaki, T., Nitta, K., Sawamura, H.: Computing abductive argumentation in answer set programming. In: McBurney, P., Rahwan, I., Parsons, S., Maudet, N. (eds.) ArgMAS 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6057, pp. 195\u2013215. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-12805-9_12"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Logic and Argumentation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_12","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,12]],"date-time":"2023-01-12T07:41:36Z","timestamp":1673509296000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_12"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"ISBN":["9783030893903","9783030893910"],"references-count":28,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_12","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 October 2021","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"CLAR","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Logic and Argumentation","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Hangzhou","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"China","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2021","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"20 October 2021","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"22 October 2021","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"4","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"clar2021","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/www.xixilogic.org\/events\/clar2021\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"58","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"20","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"10","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"34% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"5 invited papers","order":10,"name":"additional_info_on_review_process","label":"Additional Info on Review Process","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}