{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,19]],"date-time":"2026-10-19T19:19:51Z","timestamp":1792437591953,"version":"4.5.0"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":24,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"value":"9783030893903","type":"print"},{"value":"9783030893910","type":"electronic"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_13","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,14]],"date-time":"2021-10-14T11:33:44Z","timestamp":1634211224000},"page":"224-243","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["The Burden of Persuasion in Abstract Argumentation"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Timotheus","family":"Kampik","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dov","family":"Gabbay","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giovanni","family":"Sartor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,15]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"13_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1021603608656","volume":"29","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2002","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks. J. Autom. Reason. 29(2), 125\u2013169 (2002). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1021603608656","journal-title":"J. Autom. Reason."},{"issue":"2","key":"13_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2013.10.010","volume":"55","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2014","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Vesic, S.: Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 55(2), 585\u2013606 (2014)","journal-title":"Int. J. Approx. Reason."},{"key":"13_CR3","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Caminada, M., Giacomin, M.: Abstract argumentation frameworks and their semantics. In: Baroni, P., Gabbay, D., Massimiliano, G., van der Torre, L. (eds.) Handbook of Formal Argumentation. College Publications, chap. 4, pp. 159\u2013236. College Publications (2018)"},{"key":"13_CR4","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Gabbay, D.M., Giacomin, M., van der Torre, L.: Handbook of Formal Argumentation. College Publications (2018)"},{"issue":"10","key":"13_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"675","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.004","volume":"171","author":"P Baroni","year":"2007","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Giacomin, M.: On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics. Artif. Intell. 171(10), 675\u2013700 (2007)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"1","key":"13_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2005.05.006","volume":"168","author":"P Baroni","year":"2005","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Giacomin, M., Guida, G.: SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics. Artif. Intell. 168(1), 162\u2013210 (2005). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.artint.2005.05.006","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"13_CR7","first-page":"75","volume":"10","author":"R Baumann","year":"2010","unstructured":"Baumann, R., Brewka, G.: Expanding argumentation frameworks: enforcing and monotonicity results. COMMA 10, 75\u201386 (2010)","journal-title":"COMMA"},{"key":"13_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baumann, R., Brewka, G., Ulbricht, M.: Revisiting the foundations of abstract argumentation-semantics based on weak admissibility and weak defense. In: AAAI, pp. 2742\u20132749 (2020)","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v34i03.5661"},{"key":"13_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_18","volume-title":"Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence","author":"T Bench-Capon","year":"2009","unstructured":"Bench-Capon, T., Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: Argumentation in legal reasoning. In: Simari, G., Rahwan, I. (eds.) Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 363\u2013382. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_18"},{"issue":"3","key":"13_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/13.3.429","volume":"13","author":"TJ Bench-Capon","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bench-Capon, T.J.: Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. J. Log. Comput. 13(3), 429\u2013448 (2003)","journal-title":"J. Log. Comput."},{"key":"13_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Calegari, R., Riveret, R., Sartor, G.: The burden of persuasion in structured argumentation. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL \u201921. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2021)","DOI":"10.1145\/3462757.3466078"},{"key":"13_CR12","unstructured":"Cramer, M., van der Torre, L.: SCF2-an argumentation semantics for rational human judgments on argument acceptability. In: Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Dynamics of Knowledge and Belief (DKB-2019) and the 7th Workshop KI$$\\backslash $$ & Kognition (KIK-2019) co-located with 44nd German Conference on Artificial Intelligence (KI 2019), Kassel, Germany, 23 September 2019, pp. 24\u201335 (2019)"},{"key":"13_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-180425","volume":"9","author":"S Doutre","year":"2018","unstructured":"Doutre, S., Mailly, J.G.: Constraints and changes: a survey of abstract argumentation dynamics. Argum. Comput. 9, 223\u2013248 (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/AAC-180425","journal-title":"Argum. Comput."},{"issue":"2","key":"13_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321\u2013357 (1995)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"4","key":"13_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1149","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exu006","volume":"26","author":"W Dvo\u0159\u00e1k","year":"2014","unstructured":"Dvo\u0159\u00e1k, W., Gaggl, S.A.: Stage semantics and the SCC-recursive schema for argumentation semantics. J. Logic Comput. 26(4), 1149\u20131202 (2014). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/logcom\/exu006","journal-title":"J. Logic Comput."},{"key":"13_CR16","first-page":"916","volume":"86","author":"RD Friedman","year":"1991","unstructured":"Friedman, R.D.: Standards of persuasion and the distinction between fact and law. Northwest. Univ. Law Rev. 86, 916 (1991)","journal-title":"Northwest. Univ. Law Rev."},{"issue":"3","key":"13_CR17","first-page":"295","volume":"7","author":"DM Gabbay","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gabbay, D.M., Rozenberg, G.: Introducing abstract argumentation with many lives. FLAP 7(3), 295\u2013336 (2020)","journal-title":"FLAP"},{"key":"13_CR18","unstructured":"Kaci, S., van der Torre, L., Villata, S.: Preference in abstract argumentation. In: Computational Models of Argument, pp. 405\u2013412. IOS Press (2018)"},{"key":"13_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kampik, T., Gabbay, D.: The \u201cDegrees of Monotony\u201d-dilemma in abstract argumentation. In: Vejnarov\u00e1, J., Wilson, N. (eds.) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty 2021. Springer, Cham (2021, to appear)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-86772-0_7"},{"key":"13_CR20","unstructured":"Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: A logical analysis of burdens of proof. In: Legal Evidence and Proof: Statistics, Stories, Logic, pp. 223\u2013253 (2009)"},{"key":"13_CR21","unstructured":"Thimm, M.: Tweety: a comprehensive collection of java libraries for logical aspects of artificial intelligence and knowledge representation. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR 2014, pp. 528\u2013537. AAAI Press (2014)"},{"issue":"8","key":"13_CR22","first-page":"2735","volume":"4","author":"L van der Torre","year":"2017","unstructured":"van der Torre, L., Vesic, S.: The principle-based approach to abstract argumentation semantics. IfCoLog J. Log. Appl. 4(8), 2735\u20132778 (2017)","journal-title":"IfCoLog J. Log. Appl."},{"key":"13_CR23","first-page":"357","volume":"96","author":"B Verheij","year":"1996","unstructured":"Verheij, B.: Two approaches to dialectical argumentation: admissible sets and argumentation stages. Proc. NAIC 96, 357\u2013368 (1996)","journal-title":"Proc. NAIC"},{"issue":"4","key":"13_CR24","first-page":"12","volume":"3","author":"Y Wu","year":"2010","unstructured":"Wu, Y., Caminada, M.: A labelling-based justification status of arguments. Stud. Logic 3(4), 12\u201329 (2010)","journal-title":"Stud. Logic"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Logic and Argumentation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_13","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,14]],"date-time":"2021-10-14T11:44:11Z","timestamp":1634211851000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_13"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"ISBN":["9783030893903","9783030893910"],"references-count":24,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_13","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0302-9743","type":"print"},{"value":"1611-3349","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 October 2021","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"CLAR","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Logic and Argumentation","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Hangzhou","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"China","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2021","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"20 October 2021","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"22 October 2021","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"4","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"clar2021","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/www.xixilogic.org\/events\/clar2021\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"58","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"20","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"10","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"34% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"5 invited papers","order":10,"name":"additional_info_on_review_process","label":"Additional Info on Review Process","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}