{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,27]],"date-time":"2025-03-27T08:28:33Z","timestamp":1743064113280,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":21,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030893903"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030893910"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_16","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,14]],"date-time":"2021-10-14T11:33:44Z","timestamp":1634211224000},"page":"284-301","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Integrating Individual Preferences into Collective Argumentation"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2558-9221","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Chonghui","family":"Li","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9653-217X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Beishui","family":"Liao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"16_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-160014","volume":"8","author":"G Bodanza","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bodanza, G., Tohm\u00e9, F., Auday, M.: Collective argumentation: a survey of aggregation issues around argumentation frameworks. Argument Comput. 8, 1\u201334 (2017)","journal-title":"Argument Comput."},{"key":"16_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"730","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.012","volume":"171","author":"S Coste-Marquis","year":"2007","unstructured":"Coste-Marquis, S., Devred, C., Konieczny, S., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C., Marquis, P.: On the merging of Dung\u2019s argumentation systems. Artif. Intell. 171, 730\u2013753 (2007)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"16_CR3","unstructured":"Delobelle, J., Haret, A., Konieczny, S., Mailly, J.G., Rossit, J., Woltran, S.: Merging of abstract argumentation frameworks. In: KR, pp. 33\u201342 (2016)"},{"key":"16_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C.: Weighted argumentation systems: a tool for merging argumentation systems. In: 2011 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pp. 629\u2013632 (2011)","DOI":"10.1109\/ICTAI.2011.99"},{"key":"16_CR5","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-32897-8_14","volume-title":"Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems","author":"D Gabbay","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gabbay, D., Rodrigues, O.: A numerical approach to the merging of argumentation networks. In: Fisher, M., van der Torre, L., Dastani, M., Governatori, G. (eds.) CLIMA 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7486, pp. 195\u2013212. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-32897-8_14"},{"key":"16_CR6","first-page":"1671","volume":"28","author":"J Delobelle","year":"2018","unstructured":"Delobelle, J., Konieczny, S., Vesic, S.: On the aggregation of argumentation frameworks: operators and postulates. J. Log. Comput. 28, 1671\u20131699 (2018)","journal-title":"J. Log. Comput."},{"key":"16_CR7","unstructured":"Konczak, K., Lang, J.: Voting procedures with incomplete preferences. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 2005 Multidisciplinary Workshop on Advances in Preference Handling, vol. 20 (2005)"},{"key":"16_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77, 321\u2013357 (1995)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"16_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1021603608656","volume":"29","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2002","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks. J. Autom. Reason. 29, 125\u2013169 (2002)","journal-title":"J. Autom. Reason."},{"key":"16_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2013.10.010","volume":"55","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2014","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Vesic, S.: Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 55, 585\u2013606 (2014)","journal-title":"Int. J. Approximate Reasoning"},{"key":"16_CR11","unstructured":"Kaci, S., van der Torre, L., Villata, S.: Preference in abstract argumentation. In: 7th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA), vol. 305, pp. 405\u2013412 (2018)"},{"key":"16_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.5436","volume":"60","author":"S Airiau","year":"2017","unstructured":"Airiau, S., Bonzon, E., Endriss, U., Maudet, N., Rossit, J.: Rationalisation of profiles of abstract argumentation frameworks: characterisation and complexity. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 60, 149\u2013177 (2017)","journal-title":"J. Artif. Intell. Res."},{"key":"16_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lisowski, G., Doutre, S., Grandi, U.: Aggregation in value-based argumentation frameworks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.09113 (2019)","DOI":"10.4204\/EPTCS.297.20"},{"issue":"3","key":"16_CR14","first-page":"33","volume":"23","author":"B Liao","year":"2020","unstructured":"Liao, B., Li, C.: A solution to ethical dilemmas based on preference aggregation and formal argumentation. J. Hunan Univ. Sci. Technol. (Soc. Sci. Ed.) 23(3), 33\u201349 (2020)","journal-title":"J. Hunan Univ. Sci. Technol. (Soc. Sci. Ed.)"},{"key":"16_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2018.10.003","volume":"269","author":"W Chen","year":"2019","unstructured":"Chen, W., Endriss, U.: Preservation of semantic properties in collective argumentation: the case of aggregating abstract argumentation frameworks. Artif. Intell. 269, 27\u201348 (2019)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"16_CR16","unstructured":"Dunne, P.E., Marquis, P., Wooldridge, M.: Argument aggregation: basic axioms and complexity results. In: Computational Models of Argument, vol. 129\u2013140. IOS Press (2012)"},{"key":"16_CR17","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-22152-1_8","volume-title":"Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2011","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Vesic, S.: Two roles of preferences in argumentation frameworks. In: Liu, W. (ed.) ECSQARU 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6717, pp. 86\u201397. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-22152-1_8"},{"key":"16_CR18","unstructured":"Coste-Marquis, S., Konieczny, S., Mailly, J.G., Marquis P.: On the revision of argumentation systems: minimal change of arguments statuses. In: KR, pp. 52\u201361 (2014)"},{"key":"16_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/13.3.429","volume":"13","author":"TJ Bench-Capon","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bench-Capon, T.J.: Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. J. Log. Comput. 13, 429\u2013448 (2003)","journal-title":"J. Log. Comput."},{"key":"16_CR20","unstructured":"Lu, T., Boutilier, C.: Robust approximation and incremental elicitation in voting protocols. In: IJCAI, pp. 287\u2013293 (2011)"},{"key":"16_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2018.08.001","volume":"264","author":"D Baumeister","year":"2018","unstructured":"Baumeister, D., Neugebauer, D., Rothe, J., Schadrack, H.: Verification in incomplete argumentation frameworks. Artif. Intell. 264, 1\u201326 (2018)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Logic and Argumentation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_16","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,14]],"date-time":"2021-10-14T11:42:29Z","timestamp":1634211749000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_16"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"ISBN":["9783030893903","9783030893910"],"references-count":21,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_16","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 October 2021","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"CLAR","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Logic and Argumentation","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Hangzhou","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"China","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2021","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"20 October 2021","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"22 October 2021","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"4","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"clar2021","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/www.xixilogic.org\/events\/clar2021\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"58","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"20","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"10","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"34% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"5 invited papers","order":10,"name":"additional_info_on_review_process","label":"Additional Info on Review Process","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}