{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,27]],"date-time":"2025-03-27T08:49:29Z","timestamp":1743065369698,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":13,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030893903"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030893910"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_21","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,14]],"date-time":"2021-10-14T11:33:44Z","timestamp":1634211224000},"page":"377-396","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Intrinsic Argument Strength in Structured Argumentation: A Principled Approach"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7027-8102","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jeroen Paul","family":"Spaans","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"21_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Ben-Naim, J., Doder, D., Vesic, S.: Acceptability semantics for weighted argumentation frameworks. In: Sierra, C. (ed.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2017, Melbourne, Australia, 19\u201325 August 2017, pp. 56\u201362. ijcai.org (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.24963\/ijcai.2017\/9","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2017\/9"},{"issue":"1\u20133","key":"21_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1014490210693","volume":"34","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2002","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 34(1\u20133), 197\u2013215 (2002). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1014490210693","journal-title":"Ann. Math. Artif. Intell."},{"key":"21_CR3","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Doder, D.: Gradual semantics accounting for varied-strength attacks. In: Elkind, E., Veloso, M., Agmon, N., Taylor, M.E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, AAMAS 2019, Montreal, QC, Canada, 13\u201317 May 2019, pp. 1270\u20131278. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2019). http:\/\/dl.acm.org\/citation.cfm?id=3331831"},{"key":"21_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases. In: Heckerman, D., Mamdani, E.H. (eds.) UAI 1993: Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, The Catholic University of America, Providence, Washington, DC, USA, 9\u201311 July 1993, pp. 411\u2013419. Morgan Kaufmann (1993). https:\/\/dslpitt.org\/uai\/displayArticleDetails.jsp?mmnu=1&smnu=2&article_id=606&proceeding_id=9","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-1-4832-1451-1.50054-8"},{"key":"21_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.1411","volume":"23","author":"C Cayrol","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.: Graduality in argumentation. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 23, 245\u2013297 (2005). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1613\/jair.1411","journal-title":"J. Artif. Intell. Res."},{"issue":"2","key":"21_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321\u2013358 (1995). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"2","key":"21_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2010.09.005","volume":"175","author":"PE Dunne","year":"2011","unstructured":"Dunne, P.E., Hunter, A., McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M.J.: Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results. Artif. Intell. 175(2), 457\u2013486 (2011). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.artint.2010.09.005","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"21_CR8","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-33152-7_2","volume-title":"Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems","author":"A Kakas","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kakas, A., Amgoud, L., Kern-Isberner, G., Maudet, N., Moraitis, P.: ABA: argumentation based agents. In: McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Rahwan, I. (eds.) ArgMAS 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7543, pp. 9\u201327. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-33152-7_2"},{"key":"21_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-9540-7","volume-title":"Triangular Norms, Trends in Logic","author":"E Klement","year":"2000","unstructured":"Klement, E., Mesiar, R., Pap, E.: Triangular Norms, Trends in Logic, vol. 8. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-94-015-9540-7"},{"key":"21_CR10","unstructured":"Knuth, D.E.: The Art of Computer Programming, Volume II: Seminumerical Algorithms, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley (1998). https:\/\/www.worldcat.org\/oclc\/312898417"},{"issue":"1","key":"21_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2013.869766","volume":"5","author":"S Modgil","year":"2014","unstructured":"Modgil, S., Prakken, H.: The $${ASPIC}^{+}$$ framework for structured argumentation: a tutorial. Argument Comput. 5(1), 31\u201362 (2014). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/19462166.2013.869766","journal-title":"Argument Comput."},{"key":"21_CR12","unstructured":"Prakken, H.: Probabilistic strength of arguments with structure. In: Thielscher, M., Toni, F., Wolter, F. (eds.) Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference, KR 2018, Tempe, Arizona, 30 October\u20132 November 2018, pp. 158\u2013167. AAAI Press (2018). https:\/\/aaai.org\/ocs\/index.php\/KR\/KR18\/paper\/view\/17978"},{"key":"21_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2018.09.038","volume":"117","author":"Q Zhong","year":"2019","unstructured":"Zhong, Q., Fan, X., Luo, X., Toni, F.: An explainable multi-attribute decision model based on argumentation. Expert Syst. Appl. 117, 42\u201361 (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eswa.2018.09.038","journal-title":"Expert Syst. Appl."}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Logic and Argumentation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_21","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,14]],"date-time":"2021-10-14T11:46:38Z","timestamp":1634211998000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_21"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"ISBN":["9783030893903","9783030893910"],"references-count":13,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_21","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 October 2021","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"CLAR","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Logic and Argumentation","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Hangzhou","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"China","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2021","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"20 October 2021","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"22 October 2021","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"4","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"clar2021","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/www.xixilogic.org\/events\/clar2021\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"58","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"20","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"10","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"34% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"5 invited papers","order":10,"name":"additional_info_on_review_process","label":"Additional Info on Review Process","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}