{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,27]],"date-time":"2025-03-27T06:17:36Z","timestamp":1743056256974,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":20,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030893903"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030893910"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_8","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,14]],"date-time":"2021-10-14T11:33:44Z","timestamp":1634211224000},"page":"127-146","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["On Restricting the Impact of Self-attacking Arguments in Gradual Semantics"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5722-7025","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Vivien","family":"Beuselinck","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1691-4731","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"J\u00e9r\u00f4me","family":"Delobelle","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4382-0928","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Srdjan","family":"Vesic","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"8_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amgoud, L.: A replication study of semantics in argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI\u201919) (2019)","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2019\/874"},{"key":"8_CR2","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-40381-1_11","volume-title":"Scalable Uncertainty Management","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2013","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Ben-Naim, J.: Ranking-based semantics for argumentation frameworks. In: Liu, W., Subrahmanian, V.S., Wijsen, J. (eds.) SUM 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8078, pp. 134\u2013147. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-40381-1_11"},{"key":"8_CR3","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Ben-Naim, J.: Axiomatic foundations of acceptability semantics. In: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference, KR 2016, pp. 2\u201311. AAAI Press (2016)"},{"key":"8_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Ben-Naim, J., Doder, D., Vesic, S.: Acceptability semantics for weighted argumentation frameworks. In: Sierra, C. (ed.) Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (IJCAI\u201917), pp. 56\u201362 (2017)","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2017\/9"},{"key":"8_CR5","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Doder, D.: Gradual semantics accounting for varied-strength attacks. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, (AAMAS\u201919). pp. 1270\u20131278 (2019)"},{"issue":"4","key":"8_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888911000166","volume":"26","author":"P Baroni","year":"2011","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Caminada, M., Giacomin, M.: An introduction to argumentation semantics. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 26(4), 365\u2013410 (2011)","journal-title":"Knowl. Eng. Rev."},{"key":"8_CR7","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"440","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-45062-7_36","volume-title":"Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty","author":"P Baroni","year":"2003","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Giacomin, M.: Solving semantic problems with odd-length cycles in argumentation. In: Nielsen, T.D., Zhang, N.L. (eds.) ECSQARU 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2711, pp. 440\u2013451. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-540-45062-7_36"},{"key":"8_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baumann, R., Brewka, G., Ulbricht, M.: Comparing weak admissibility semantics to their dung-style counterparts - reduct, modularization, and strong equivalence in abstract argumentation. In: Calvanese, D., Erdem, E., Thielscher, M. (eds.) Proc. of the 17th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, (KR\u201920), pp. 79\u201388 (2020)","DOI":"10.24963\/kr.2020\/9"},{"key":"8_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baumann, R., Brewka, G., Ulbricht, M.: Revisiting the foundations of abstract argumentation - semantics based on weak admissibility and weak defense. In: Proceedings of the 34th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (AAAI\u201920), pp. 2742\u20132749 (2020)","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v34i03.5661"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"8_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(01)00071-6","volume":"128","author":"P Besnard","year":"2001","unstructured":"Besnard, P., Hunter, A.: A logic-based theory of deductive arguments. Artif. Intell. 128(1\u20132), 203\u2013235 (2001)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"4","key":"8_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jal.2007.06.012","volume":"7","author":"GA Bodanza","year":"2009","unstructured":"Bodanza, G.A., Tohm\u00e9, F.A.: Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack. J. Appl. Log. 7(4), 403\u2013420 (2009)","journal-title":"J. Appl. Log."},{"key":"8_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bonzon, E., Delobelle, J., Konieczny, S., Maudet, N.: A comparative study of ranking-based semantics for abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI\u201916), pp. 914\u2013920 (2016)","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v30i1.10116"},{"key":"8_CR13","unstructured":"Bonzon, E., Delobelle, J., Konieczny, S., Maudet, N.: Combining extension-based semantics and ranking-based semantics for abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR\u201918), pp. 118\u2013127 (2018)"},{"key":"8_CR14","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1007\/11853886_11","volume-title":"Logics in Artificial Intelligence","author":"M Caminada","year":"2006","unstructured":"Caminada, M.: On the issue of reinstatement in argumentation. In: Fisher, M., van der Hoek, W., Konev, B., Lisitsa, A. (eds.) JELIA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4160, pp. 111\u2013123. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/11853886_11"},{"key":"8_CR15","unstructured":"Cerutti, F., Vallati, M., Giacomin, M.: Afbenchgen2: a generator for random argumentation frameworks (2017). http:\/\/argumentationcompetition.org\/2017\/AFBenchGen2.pdf"},{"key":"8_CR16","unstructured":"Dauphin, J., Rienstra, T., van der Torre, L.: A principle-based analysis of weakly admissible semantics. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, (COMMA\u201920), Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 326, pp. 167\u2013178 (2020)"},{"issue":"2","key":"8_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321\u2013358 (1995)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"4","key":"8_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1007\/s11787-015-0119-7","volume":"9","author":"DM Gabbay","year":"2015","unstructured":"Gabbay, D.M., Rodrigues, O.: Equilibrium states in numerical argumentation networks. Log. Univers. 9(4), 411\u2013473 (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11787-015-0119-7","journal-title":"Log. Univers."},{"key":"8_CR19","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-87803-2_24","volume-title":"Logics in Artificial Intelligence","author":"P-A Matt","year":"2008","unstructured":"Matt, P.-A., Toni, F.: A game-theoretic measure of argument strength for abstract argumentation. In: H\u00f6lldobler, S., Lutz, C., Wansing, H. (eds.) JELIA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5293, pp. 285\u2013297. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-540-87803-2_24"},{"key":"8_CR20","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"290","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-12096-6_26","volume-title":"Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management","author":"F Pu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Pu, F., Luo, J., Zhang, Y., Luo, G.: Argument ranking with categoriser function. In: Buchmann, R., Kifor, C.V., Yu, J. (eds.) KSEM 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8793, pp. 290\u2013301. Springer, Cham (2014). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-12096-6_26"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Logic and Argumentation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_8","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,12]],"date-time":"2023-01-12T07:40:42Z","timestamp":1673509242000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"ISBN":["9783030893903","9783030893910"],"references-count":20,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_8","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 October 2021","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"CLAR","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Logic and Argumentation","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Hangzhou","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"China","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2021","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"20 October 2021","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"22 October 2021","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"4","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"clar2021","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/www.xixilogic.org\/events\/clar2021\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"58","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"20","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"10","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"34% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"5 invited papers","order":10,"name":"additional_info_on_review_process","label":"Additional Info on Review Process","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}