{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,26]],"date-time":"2025-03-26T02:48:59Z","timestamp":1742957339425,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":19,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030898106"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030898113"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-89811-3_2","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,26]],"date-time":"2021-11-26T06:24:53Z","timestamp":1637907893000},"page":"15-30","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Identification of Legislative Errors Through Knowledge Representation and\u00a0Interpretive Argumentation"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2524-3976","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Micha\u0142","family":"Araszkiewicz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9129-3157","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tomasz","family":"Zurek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"2_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Allen, L.E., Lysaght, L.J.: Modern logic as a tool for remedying ambiguities in legal documents and analyzing the structure of legal documents\u2019 contained definitions. In: Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking, pp. 383\u2013407 (2015)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-19575-9_14"},{"key":"2_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Allen, L.E., Saxon, C.S.: More IA needed in AI: interpretation assistance for coping with the problem of multiple structural interpretations. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 1991, Oxford, England, 25\u201328 June 1991, pp. 53\u201361 (1991)","DOI":"10.1145\/112646.112652"},{"key":"2_CR3","unstructured":"Amaya, A.: The Tapestry of Reason: An Inquiry into the Nature of Coherence and its Role in Legal Argument. Bloomsbury (2015)"},{"key":"2_CR4","unstructured":"Araszkiewicz, M.: Towards systematic research on statutory interpretation in AI and law. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2013: The Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference, 11\u201313 December 2013, University of Bologna, Italy, pp. 15\u201324 (2013)"},{"key":"2_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Araszkiewicz, M., Savelka, J.: Coherence: Insights From Philosophy, Jurisprudence and Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Dordrecht (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-94-007-6110-0","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-6110-0"},{"key":"2_CR6","unstructured":"Araszkiewicz, M., Zurek, T.: Comprehensive framework embracing the complexity of statutory interpretation. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2015: The Twenty-Eighth Annual Conference, Braga, Portual, 10\u201311 December 2015, pp. 145\u2013148 (2015)"},{"key":"2_CR7","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/b106624","volume-title":"Law and the Semantic Web","year":"2005","unstructured":"Benjamins, V.R., Casanovas, P., Breuker, J., Gangemi, A. (eds.): Law and the Semantic Web. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3369. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/b106624"},{"key":"2_CR8","unstructured":"Chomsky, N., Lightfoot, D.W.: Syntactic Structures. De Gruyter (2009)"},{"key":"2_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Endicott, T.: Vagueness in Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780198268406.001.0001"},{"key":"2_CR10","unstructured":"Gizbert-Studnicki, T.: Types of vagueness. In: Krawietz, W., Summers, R., Weinberger, O., von Wright, G.H. (eds.) The Reasonable as Rational? On Legal Argumentation and Justification. Festschrift for Aulis Aarnio, pp. 135\u2013144. Duncker & Humblot (2000)"},{"key":"2_CR11","unstructured":"Karasek-Wojciechowicz, I.: Roszczenie o wykonanie zobowi\u0105zania z umowy zgodnie z jego tre\u015bci\u0105 (The claim to perform a contractual obligation in accordance with its content). Wolters Kluwer (2014)"},{"key":"2_CR12","unstructured":"MacCormick, N., Summers, R.: Interpreting Statutes. A Comparative Study. Ashgate, Dartmouth (1991)"},{"key":"2_CR13","unstructured":"Minsky, M.: A framework for representing knowledge. Technical report, USA (1974)"},{"key":"2_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sovrano, F., Palmirani, M., Vitali, F.: Legal knowledge extraction for knowledge graph based question-answering. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2020: The Thirty-third Annual Conference, Brno, Czech Republic, 9\u201311 December 2020, pp. 143\u2013153 (2020)","DOI":"10.3233\/FAIA200858"},{"key":"2_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Doesburg, R., van Engers, T.: The false, the former, and the parish priest. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2019, pp. 194\u2013198, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery (2019)","DOI":"10.1145\/3322640.3326718"},{"key":"2_CR16","unstructured":"van Kralingen, R.W.: A Conceptual Frame-Based Ontology for the Law, pp. 15\u201322. University of Melbourne (1997)"},{"key":"2_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Visser, P.R.S., van Kralingen, R.W., Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: A method for the development of legal knowledge systems. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 1997, pp. 151\u2013160, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery (1997)","DOI":"10.1145\/261618.261648"},{"key":"2_CR18","unstructured":"Waismann, F.: Verifiability. Supplementary Volume XI (3), 119\u2013150 (1945)"},{"key":"2_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.1007\/978-90-481-9452-0_18","volume-title":"Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation","author":"D Walton","year":"2018","unstructured":"Walton, D., Sartor, G., Macagno, F.: Statutory interpretation as argumentation. In: Bongiovanni, G., Postema, G., Rotolo, A., Sartor, G., Valentini, C., Walton, D. (eds.) Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation, pp. 519\u2013560. Springer, Dordrecht (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-90-481-9452-0_18"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems XI-XII"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-89811-3_2","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,26]],"date-time":"2021-11-26T06:25:27Z","timestamp":1637907927000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-89811-3_2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"ISBN":["9783030898106","9783030898113"],"references-count":19,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-89811-3_2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"assertion":[{"value":"27 November 2021","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"AICOL","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Workshop on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2020","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"9 December 2020","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"9 December 2020","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"XII","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"aicol2020","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"http:\/\/aicol.eu","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"39","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"17","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"4","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"44% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"4","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"4","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"No","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}