{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,27]],"date-time":"2025-03-27T03:59:34Z","timestamp":1743047974338,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":19,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030914516"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030914523"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-91452-3_14","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,23]],"date-time":"2021-11-23T20:00:31Z","timestamp":1637697631000},"page":"207-214","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Is Knowledge the Key? An Experiment on Debiasing Architectural Decision-Making - a Pilot Study"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7160-5950","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Klara","family":"Borowa","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Robert","family":"Dwornik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5254-4761","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Andrzej","family":"Zalewski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"14_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Borowa, K., Zalewski, A., Kijas, S.: The influence of cognitive biases on architectural technical debt. In: International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA) (2021)","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSA51549.2021.00019"},{"issue":"2","key":"14_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1007\/s11219-012-9180-0","volume":"21","author":"G \u00c7alikli","year":"2013","unstructured":"\u00c7alikli, G., Bener, A.B.: Influence of confirmation biases of developers on software quality: an empirical study. Softw. Qual. J. 21(2), 377\u2013416 (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11219-012-9180-0","journal-title":"Softw. Qual. J."},{"key":"14_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chattopadhyay, S., et al.: A tale from the trenches: cognitive biases and software development. In: International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 654\u2013665 (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3377811.3380330","DOI":"10.1145\/3377811.3380330"},{"issue":"1","key":"14_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.iheduc.2005.11.001","volume":"9","author":"DR Garrison","year":"2006","unstructured":"Garrison, D.R., Cleveland-Innes, M., Koole, M., Kappelman, J.: Revisiting methodological issues in transcript analysis: negotiated coding and reliability. Internet High. Educ. 9(1), 1\u20138 (2006). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.iheduc.2005.11.001","journal-title":"Internet High. Educ."},{"key":"14_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Halkjelsvik, T., J\u00f8rgensen, M.: Time Predictions: Understanding and Avoiding Unrealism in Project Planning and Everyday Life. Springer Nature, Heidelberg (2018)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-74953-2"},{"key":"14_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jansen, A., Bosch, J.: Software architecture as a set of architectural design decisions. In: Proceedings - 5th Working IEEE\/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, WICSA 2005, vol. 2005, pp. 109\u2013120 (2005). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/WICSA.2005.61","DOI":"10.1109\/WICSA.2005.61"},{"key":"14_CR7","unstructured":"Kahneman, D.: Thinking, Fast and Slow. Macmillan, New York City (2011)"},{"key":"14_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Manjunath, A., Bhat, M., Shumaiev, K., Biesdorf, A., Matthes, F.: Decision making and cognitive biases in designing software architectures. In: Proceedings - 2018 IEEE 15th International Conference on Software Architecture Companion, ICSA-C 2018, pp. 52\u201355 (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ICSA-C.2018.00022","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSA-C.2018.00022"},{"key":"14_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mohanani, R., Ralph, P., Shreeve, B.: Requirements fixation. In: International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 895\u2013906 (2014). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2568225.2568235","DOI":"10.1145\/2568225.2568235"},{"key":"14_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mohanani, R., Salman, I., Turhan, B., Rodriguez, P., Ralph, P.: Cognitive biases in software engineering: a systematic mapping study. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 5589(c) (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/TSE.2018.2877759","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.2018.2877759"},{"key":"14_CR11","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-25676-9_8","volume-title":"Research in Systems Analysis and Design: Models and Methods","author":"P Ralph","year":"2011","unstructured":"Ralph, P.: Toward a theory of debiasing software development. In: Wrycza, S. (ed.) SIGSAND\/PLAIS 2011. LNBIP, vol. 93, pp. 92\u2013105. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-25676-9_8"},{"key":"14_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Shepperd, M., Mair, C., J\u00f8rgensen, M.: An experimental evaluation of a de-biasing intervention for professional software developers. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3167132.3167293, http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1804.03919","DOI":"10.1145\/3167132.3167293"},{"issue":"6","key":"14_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1145\/203241.203256","volume":"38","author":"W Stacy","year":"1995","unstructured":"Stacy, W., Macmillan, J.: Cognitive bias in software engineering. Commun. ACM 38(6), 57\u201363 (1995). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/203241.203256","journal-title":"Commun. ACM"},{"key":"14_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tang, A.: Software designers, are you biased? In: Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering (January 2011), pp. 1\u20138 (2011). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1988676.1988678","DOI":"10.1145\/1988676.1988678"},{"key":"14_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tang, A., Bex, F., Schriek, C., van der Werf, J.M.E.: Improving software design reasoning-a reminder card approach. J. Syst. Softw. 144(April 2017), 22\u201340 (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jss.2018.05.019","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2018.05.019"},{"key":"14_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tang, A., Razavian, M., Paech, B., Hesse, T.M.: Human aspects in software architecture decision making: a literature review. In: Proceedings - 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture, ICSA 2017, pp. 107\u2013116 (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ICSA.2017.15","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSA.2017.15"},{"key":"14_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157), 1124\u20131131 (1974)","DOI":"10.1126\/science.185.4157.1124"},{"key":"14_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"638","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2016.01.017","volume":"117","author":"H van Vliet","year":"2016","unstructured":"van Vliet, H., Tang, A.: Decision making in software architecture. J. Syst. Softw. 117, 638\u2013644 (2016). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jss.2016.01.017","journal-title":"J. Syst. Softw."},{"key":"14_CR19","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-65831-5_9","volume-title":"Software Architecture","author":"A Zalewski","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zalewski, A., Borowa, K., Ratkowski, A.: On cognitive biases in architecture decision making. In: Lopes, A., de Lemos, R. (eds.) ECSA 2017. LNCS, vol. 10475, pp. 123\u2013137. Springer, Cham (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-65831-5_9"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Product-Focused Software Process Improvement"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-91452-3_14","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,16]],"date-time":"2021-12-16T14:10:01Z","timestamp":1639663801000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-91452-3_14"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"ISBN":["9783030914516","9783030914523"],"references-count":19,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-91452-3_14","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"assertion":[{"value":"23 November 2021","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"PROFES","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Turin","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Italy","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2021","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"26 November 2021","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"26 November 2021","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"22","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"profes2021","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/softeng.polito.it\/profes2021\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasaChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"48","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"17","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"35% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"2","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"No","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Out of the 20 accepted papers, 14 are full papers, 3 are short papers, and 3 are industry papers.","order":10,"name":"additional_info_on_review_process","label":"Additional Info on Review Process","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}