{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,19]],"date-time":"2026-10-19T05:32:08Z","timestamp":1792387928423,"version":"4.4.0"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":37,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"value":"9783031084720","type":"print"},{"value":"9783031084737","type":"electronic"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-08473-7_22","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,16]],"date-time":"2022-06-16T18:03:10Z","timestamp":1655402590000},"page":"240-252","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["A Decade of Legal Argumentation Mining: Datasets and Approaches"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8818-8540","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gechuan","family":"Zhang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7214-4666","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Paul","family":"Nulty","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5702-4463","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"David","family":"Lillis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,13]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"22_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(01)00071-6","volume":"128","author":"P Besnard","year":"2001","unstructured":"Besnard, P., Hunter, A.: A logic-based theory of deductive arguments. Artif. Intell. 128(1\u20132), 203\u2013235 (2001)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"2","key":"22_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-020-09270-4","volume":"29","author":"A Bibal","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bibal, A., Lognoul, M., de Streel, A., Fr\u00e9nay, B.: Legal requirements on explainability in machine learning. Artif. Intell. Law 29(2), 149\u2013169 (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-020-09270-4","journal-title":"Artif. Intell. Law"},{"key":"22_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cabrio, E., Villata, S.: Five years of argument mining: a data-driven analysis. In: IJCAI, vol. 18, pp. 5427\u20135433 (2018)","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2018\/766"},{"key":"22_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chalkidis, I., Androutsopoulos, I., Aletras, N.: Neural legal judgment prediction in English. In: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 4317\u20134323 (2019)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/P19-1424"},{"issue":"1","key":"22_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1177\/001316446002000104","volume":"20","author":"J Cohen","year":"1960","unstructured":"Cohen, J.: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Measure. 20(1), 37\u201346 (1960)","journal-title":"Educ. Psychol. Measure."},{"issue":"2","key":"22_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321\u2013357 (1995)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"22_CR7","unstructured":"Galassi, A., Lippi, M., Torroni, P.: Multi-task attentive residual networks for argument mining. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.12227 (2021)"},{"key":"22_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grabmair, M., et al.: Introducing LUIMA: an experiment in legal conceptual retrieval of vaccine injury decisions using a UIMA type system and tools. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 69\u201378 (2015)","DOI":"10.1145\/2746090.2746096"},{"key":"22_CR9","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-28460-6_10","volume-title":"Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation","author":"M Lippi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lippi, M., Torroni, P.: Argument mining: a machine learning perspective. In: Black, E., Modgil, S., Oren, N. (eds.) TAFA 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9524, pp. 163\u2013176. Springer, Cham (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-28460-6_10"},{"issue":"2","key":"22_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1145\/2850417","volume":"16","author":"M Lippi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lippi, M., Torroni, P.: Argumentation mining: state of the art and emerging trends. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. (TOIT) 16(2), 1\u201325 (2016)","journal-title":"ACM Trans. Internet Technol. (TOIT)"},{"key":"22_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mochales, R., Ieven, A.: Creating an argumentation corpus: do theories apply to real arguments? A case study on the legal argumentation of the ECHR. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 21\u201330 (2009)","DOI":"10.1145\/1568234.1568238"},{"key":"22_CR12","unstructured":"Mochales, R., Moens, M.F.: Study on the structure of argumentation in case law. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, pp. 11\u201320. IOS Press (2008)"},{"issue":"1","key":"22_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-010-9104-x","volume":"19","author":"R Mochales","year":"2011","unstructured":"Mochales, R., Moens, M.F.: Argumentation mining. Artif. Intell. Law 19(1), 1\u201322 (2011)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell. Law"},{"key":"22_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nallapati, R., Manning, C.D.: Legal docket-entry classification: where machine learning stumbles. In: 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, p. 438 (2008)","DOI":"10.3115\/1613715.1613771"},{"key":"22_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Niculae, V., Park, J., Cardie, C.: Argument mining with structured SVMs and RNNs. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 985\u2013995 (2017)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/P17-1091"},{"key":"22_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Park, J., Blake, C., Cardie, C.: Toward machine-assisted participation in eRulemaking: an argumentation model of evaluability. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 206\u2013210 (2015)","DOI":"10.1145\/2746090.2746118"},{"key":"22_CR17","unstructured":"Park, J., Cardie, C.: A corpus of eRulemaking user comments for measuring evaluability of arguments. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018) (2018)"},{"key":"22_CR18","unstructured":"Poudyal, P., \u0160avelka, J., Ieven, A., Moens, M.F., Gon\u00e7alves, T., Quaresma, P.: ECHR: legal corpus for argument mining. In: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Argument Mining, pp. 67\u201375 (2020)"},{"key":"22_CR19","first-page":"21","volume":"58","author":"J Savelka","year":"2017","unstructured":"Savelka, J., Walker, V.R., Grabmair, M., Ashley, K.D.: Sentence boundary detection in adjudicatory decisions in the united states. Traitement automatique des langues 58, 21 (2017)","journal-title":"Traitement automatique des langues"},{"key":"22_CR20","unstructured":"Stab, C., Gurevych, I.: Annotating argument components and relations in persuasive essays. In: Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, pp. 1501\u20131510 (2014)"},{"key":"22_CR21","unstructured":"Teruel, M., Cardellino, C., Cardellino, F., Alemany, L.A., Villata, S.: Legal text processing within the MIREL project. In: 1st Workshop on Language Resources and Technologies for the Legal Knowledge Graph, p. 42 (2018)"},{"key":"22_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Toulmin, S.E.: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511840005"},{"key":"22_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Urchs, S., Mitrovic, J., Granitzer, M.: Design and implementation of German legal decision corpora. In: ICAART, vol. 2, pp. 515\u2013521 (2021)","DOI":"10.5220\/0010187305150521"},{"key":"22_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walker, V., Foerster, D., Ponce, J.M., Rosen, M.: Evidence types, credibility factors, and patterns or soft rules for weighing conflicting evidence: argument mining in the context of legal rules governing evidence assessment. In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Argument Mining, pp. 68\u201378 (2018)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/W18-5209"},{"key":"22_CR25","first-page":"193","volume":"47","author":"VR Walker","year":"2006","unstructured":"Walker, V.R.: A default-logic paradigm for legal fact-finding. Jurimetrics 47, 193 (2006)","journal-title":"Jurimetrics"},{"issue":"4","key":"22_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-011-9115-2","volume":"19","author":"VR Walker","year":"2011","unstructured":"Walker, V.R., Carie, N., DeWitt, C.C., Lesh, E.: A framework for the extraction and modeling of fact-finding reasoning from legal decisions: lessons from the vaccine\/injury project corpus. Artif. Intell. Law 19(4), 291\u2013331 (2011)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell. Law"},{"key":"22_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walker, V.R., Han, J.H., Ni, X., Yoseda, K.: Semantic types for computational legal reasoning: propositional connectives and sentence roles in the veterans\u2019 claims dataset. In: Proceedings of the 16th Edition of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 217\u2013226 (2017)","DOI":"10.1145\/3086512.3086535"},{"key":"22_CR28","unstructured":"Walker, V.R., Pillaipakkamnatt, K., Davidson, A.M., Linares, M., Pesce, D.J.: Automatic classification of rhetorical roles for sentences: comparing rule-based scripts with machine learning. In: ASAIL@ ICAIL (2019)"},{"key":"22_CR29","unstructured":"Walker, V.R., Strong, S.R., Walker, V.E.: Automating the classification of finding sentences for linguistic polarity. In: ASAIL@ JURIX (2020)"},{"key":"22_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Walton, D.: Argumentation theory: a very short introduction. In: Simari, G., Rahwan, I. (eds.) Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1\u201322. Springer, Boston (2009). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_1","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_1"},{"key":"22_CR31","unstructured":"Westermann, H., Savelka, J., Walker, V.R., Ashley, K.D., Benyekhlef, K.: Computer-assisted creation of Boolean search rules for text classification in the legal domain. In: JURIX, pp. 123\u2013132 (2019)"},{"key":"22_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Xu, H., \u0160avelka, J., Ashley, K.D.: Using argument mining for legal text summarization. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, pp. 184\u2013193. IOS Press (2020)","DOI":"10.3233\/FAIA200862"},{"key":"22_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Xu, H., Savelka, J., Ashley, K.D.: Accounting for sentence position and legal domain sentence embedding in learning to classify case sentences. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, pp. 33\u201342. IOS Press (2021)","DOI":"10.3233\/FAIA210314"},{"key":"22_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Xu, H., Savelka, J., Ashley, K.D.: Toward summarizing case decisions via extracting argument issues, reasons, and conclusions. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 250\u2013254 (2021)","DOI":"10.1145\/3462757.3466098"},{"key":"22_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ye, Y., Teufel, S.: End-to-end argument mining as biaffine dependency parsing. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume, pp. 669\u2013678 (2021)","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2021.eacl-main.55"},{"key":"22_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhang, G., Lillis, D., Nulty, P.: Can domain pre-training help interdisciplinary researchers from data annotation poverty? A case study of legal argument mining with BERT-based transformers. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Digital Humanities (NLP4DH), pp. 121\u2013130. Association for Computational Linguistics (2021)","DOI":"10.46298\/jdmdh.9147"},{"key":"22_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zhang, G., Nulty, P., Lillis, D.: Enhancing legal argument mining with domain pre-training and neural networks. J. Data Mining Digit. Humanit. NLP4DH (2022). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.46298\/jdmdh.9147","DOI":"10.46298\/jdmdh.9147"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Natural Language Processing and Information Systems"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-031-08473-7_22","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,16]],"date-time":"2022-06-16T18:09:17Z","timestamp":1655402957000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-031-08473-7_22"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"ISBN":["9783031084720","9783031084737"],"references-count":37,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-031-08473-7_22","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0302-9743","type":"print"},{"value":"1611-3349","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"assertion":[{"value":"13 June 2022","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"NLDB","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Valencia","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Spain","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2022","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"15 June 2022","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"17 June 2022","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"27","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"nldb2022","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/nldb2022.prhlt.upv.es\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Double-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"106","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"28","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"20","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"26% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"No","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}