{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,27]],"date-time":"2025-03-27T13:36:13Z","timestamp":1743082573971,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":21,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783031178337"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783031178344"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-17834-4_19","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,24]],"date-time":"2022-09-24T17:02:53Z","timestamp":1664038973000},"page":"311-321","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["An Experimental Study of\u00a0Intuitive Representations of\u00a0Process Task Annotations"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0412-1881","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Myriel","family":"Fichtner","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4190-8969","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Urs A.","family":"Fichtner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Stefan","family":"Jablonski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"19_CR1","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-38490-5_21","volume-title":"Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops","author":"K Batoulis","year":"2013","unstructured":"Batoulis, K., Eid-Sabbagh, R.-H., Leopold, H., Weske, M., Mendling, J.: Automatic business process model translation with BPMT. In: Franch, X., Soffer, P. (eds.) CAiSE 2013. LNBIP, vol. 148, pp. 217\u2013228. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-38490-5_21"},{"key":"19_CR2","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-01862-6_29","volume-title":"Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling","author":"D Fahland","year":"2009","unstructured":"Fahland, D., et al.: Declarative versus imperative process modeling languages: the issue of understandability. In: Halpin, T., et al. (eds.) BPMDS\/EMMSAD -2009. LNBIP, vol. 29, pp. 353\u2013366. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-01862-6_29"},{"key":"19_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fichtner, M., Sch\u00f6nig, S., Jablonski, S.: How LIME explanation models can be used to extend business process models by relevant process details. In: ICEIS 2022, Vol. 2, pp. 527\u2013534. SciTePress (2022)","DOI":"10.5220\/0011067600003179"},{"key":"19_CR4","unstructured":"Figl, K., Mendling, J., Strembeck, M.: Towards a usability assessment of process modeling languages. In: 8th GI-Workshop Gesch\u00e4ftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten (EPK), CEUR-WS, pp. 138\u2013156. Citeseer (2009)"},{"issue":"1","key":"19_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1007\/s00766-014-0210-2","volume":"21","author":"K Figl","year":"2014","unstructured":"Figl, K., Recker, J.: Exploring cognitive style and task-specific preferences for process representations. Requirements Eng. 21(1), 63\u201385 (2014). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00766-014-0210-2","journal-title":"Requirements Eng."},{"issue":"4","key":"19_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1007\/s00766-004-0204-6","volume":"9","author":"A Gemino","year":"2004","unstructured":"Gemino, A., Wand, Y.: A framework for empirical evaluation of conceptual modeling techniques. Requirements Eng. 9(4), 248\u2013260 (2004)","journal-title":"Requirements Eng."},{"key":"19_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Houy, C., Fettke, P., Loos, P.: On the theoretical foundations of research into the understandability of business process models. In: ECIS 2014, Tel Aviv, Israel (2014)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-45103-4_6"},{"key":"19_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1016\/j.csi.2016.04.006","volume":"48","author":"G Jo\u0161t","year":"2016","unstructured":"Jo\u0161t, G., Huber, J., Heri\u010dko, M.: An empirical investigation of intuitive understandability of process diagrams. Comput. Stand. Interf. 48, 90\u2013111 (2016)","journal-title":"Comput. Stand. Interf."},{"key":"19_CR9","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-75183-0_4","volume-title":"Business Process Management","author":"J Mendling","year":"2007","unstructured":"Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., Cardoso, J.: What makes process models understandable? In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 48\u201363. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-540-75183-0_4"},{"key":"19_CR10","unstructured":"Mohs, C., Hurtienne, J., Kindsm\u00fcller, M.: IUUI-intuitive use of user interfaces: Auf dem Weg zu einer wissenschaftlichen Basis f\u00fcr das Schlagwort \u201cIntuitivit\u00e4t.\" MMI-Interaktiv 11(11), 75\u201384 (2006)"},{"issue":"134","key":"19_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20170213","DOI":"10.1098\/rsif.2017.0213","volume":"14","author":"S Nakagawa","year":"2017","unstructured":"Nakagawa, S., Johnson, P., Schielzeth, H.: The coefficient of determination R 2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. J. Royal Soc. Interface 14(134), 20170213 (2017)","journal-title":"J. Royal Soc. Interface"},{"key":"19_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Naumann, A., Hurtienne, J.: Benchmarks for intuitive interaction with mobile devices. In: MobileHCI 2010, pp. 401\u2013402 (2010)","DOI":"10.1145\/1851600.1851685"},{"key":"19_CR13","unstructured":"Nielson, J.: Usability 101: introduction to usability (2009)"},{"key":"19_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Orendt, E., Fichtner, M., Henrich, D.: Robot programming by non-experts: intuitiveness and robustness of one-shot robot programming. In: RO-MAN 2016, pp. 192\u2013199. IEEE (2016)","DOI":"10.1109\/ROMAN.2016.7745110"},{"issue":"4","key":"19_CR15","first-page":"59","volume":"52","author":"B Palash","year":"2012","unstructured":"Palash, B.: Does cognitive overload matter in understanding Bpmn models? J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 52(4), 59\u201369 (2012)","journal-title":"J. Comput. Inf. Syst."},{"key":"19_CR16","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-15618-2_5","volume-title":"Business Process Management","author":"J Recker","year":"2010","unstructured":"Recker, J., Safrudin, N., Rosemann, M.: How novices model business processes. In: Hull, R., Mendling, J., Tai, S. (eds.) BPM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6336, pp. 29\u201344. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-15618-2_5"},{"key":"19_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rodrigues, R. et al.: An experiment on process model understandability using textual work instructions and BPMN models. In: 29th Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, pp. 41\u201350. IEEE (2015)","DOI":"10.1109\/SBES.2015.12"},{"issue":"5\u20136","key":"19_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1016\/j.intcom.2009.04.007","volume":"21","author":"B Shackel","year":"2009","unstructured":"Shackel, B.: Usability - context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. Interact. Comput. 21(5\u20136), 339\u2013346 (2009)","journal-title":"Interact. Comput."},{"key":"19_CR19","unstructured":"Wegerich, A., L\u00f6ffler, D., Maier, A.: Handbuch zur IBIS Toolbox-Evaluation Intuitiver Benutzbarkeit. Bundesministerium f\u00fcr Bildung und Forschung (2018)"},{"key":"19_CR20","series-title":"Communications in Computer and Information Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-36754-0_4","volume-title":"S-BPM ONE - Running Processes","author":"D Weitlaner","year":"2013","unstructured":"Weitlaner, D., Guettinger, A., Kohlbacher, M.: Intuitive comprehensibility of process models. In: Fischer, H., Schneeberger, J. (eds.) S-BPM ONE 2013. CCIS, vol. 360, pp. 52\u201371. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-36754-0_4"},{"key":"19_CR21","unstructured":"Wiedmann, P.: Agiles Gesch\u00e4ftsprozessmanagement auf Basis gebrauchssprachlicher Modellierung. PhD thesis, University of Bayreuth, Germany (2017)"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Cooperative Information Systems"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-031-17834-4_19","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,4]],"date-time":"2024-10-04T15:44:53Z","timestamp":1728056693000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-031-17834-4_19"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"ISBN":["9783031178337","9783031178344"],"references-count":21,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-031-17834-4_19","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"assertion":[{"value":"25 September 2022","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"CoopIS","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Bozen-Bolzano","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Italy","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2022","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"4 October 2022","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"7 October 2022","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"coopis2022","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/coopisconference.org\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"68","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"15","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"5","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"22% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"2","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}