{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,28]],"date-time":"2025-03-28T05:46:43Z","timestamp":1743140803492,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":14,"publisher":"Springer Nature Switzerland","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783031189098"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783031189104"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-18910-4_20","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,26]],"date-time":"2022-10-26T23:03:53Z","timestamp":1666825433000},"page":"240-250","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Statistical Characteristics of\u00a03-D PET Imaging: A Comparison Between Conventional and\u00a0Total-Body PET Scanners"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Yuejie","family":"Lin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"En-tao","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Tian","family":"Mou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,27]]},"reference":[{"issue":"12","key":"20_CR1","first-page":"2083","volume":"46","author":"M Brambilla","year":"2005","unstructured":"Brambilla, M., et al.: Performance characteristics obtained for a new 3-dimensional lutetium oxyorthosilicate-based whole-body PET\/CT scanner with the national electrical manufacturers association NU 2\u20132001 standard. J. Nucl. Med. 46(12), 2083\u20132091 (2005)","journal-title":"J. Nucl. Med."},{"issue":"11","key":"20_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1629","DOI":"10.2967\/jnumed.119.226597","volume":"60","author":"A Braune","year":"2019","unstructured":"Braune, A., Hofheinz, F., Bluth, T., Kiss, T., Wittenstein, J., Scharffenberg, M., Kotzerke, J., de Abreu, M.G.: Comparison of static and dynamic 18F-FDG PET\/CT for quantification of pulmonary inflammation in acute lung injury. J. Nucl. Med. 60(11), 1629\u20131634 (2019)","journal-title":"J. Nucl. Med."},{"issue":"1","key":"20_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics12010070","volume":"12","author":"E Burchardt","year":"2021","unstructured":"Burchardt, E., Warenczak-Florczak, Z., Ceg\u0142a, P., Piotrowski, A., Cybulski, Z., Burchardt, W., Roszak, A., Cholewi\u0144ski, W.: Differences between [18F] FLT and [18F] FDG uptake in PET\/CT imaging in CC depend on vaginal bacteriology. Diagnostics 12(1), 70 (2021)","journal-title":"Diagnostics"},{"key":"20_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Christian, P., et al.: Optimization of 89Zr-PET clinical imaging for multi-site improved quantification and lesion detection using an anthropomorphic phantom (2018)","DOI":"10.2967\/jnmt.119.230474"},{"issue":"3","key":"20_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"615","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm11030615","volume":"11","author":"F Dondi","year":"2022","unstructured":"Dondi, F., Pasinetti, N., Gatta, R., Albano, D., Giubbini, R., Bertagna, F.: Comparison between two different scanners for the evaluation of the role of 18F-FDG PET\/CT semiquantitative parameters and radiomics features in the prediction of final diagnosis of thyroid incidentalomas. J. Clin. Med. 11(3), 615 (2022)","journal-title":"J. Clin. Med."},{"issue":"2","key":"20_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1397","DOI":"10.21037\/qims-21-742","volume":"12","author":"A Girard","year":"2022","unstructured":"Girard, A., et al.: Impact of point-spread function reconstruction on dynamic and static 18F-DOPA PET\/CT quantitative parameters in glioma. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 12(2), 1397 (2022)","journal-title":"Quant. Imaging Med. Surg."},{"key":"20_CR7","unstructured":"Hanafi, M.H., Noor, N.M., Hassan, M.H.: Inconsistency of lesion quantitative assessment in 2D SUV and 3D SUV quantification techniques for [18F]-FDG PET\/CT: a phantom study. Mal. J. Med. Health Sci. 17(2), 289\u2013293 (2021)"},{"issue":"6","key":"20_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1479","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers14061479","volume":"14","author":"MA Hoffmann","year":"2022","unstructured":"Hoffmann, M.A., et al.: Comparison of [18F] PSMA-1007 with [68Ga] Ga-PSMA-11 PET\/CT in restaging of prostate cancer patients with PSA relapse. Cancers 14(6), 1479 (2022)","journal-title":"Cancers"},{"key":"20_CR9","unstructured":"Lantos, J., Mittra, E.S., Levin, C.S., Iagaru, A.: Standard OSEM vs. regularized PET image reconstruction: qualitative and quantitative comparison using phantom data and various clinical radiopharmaceuticals. Am. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 8(2), 110 (2018)"},{"issue":"3","key":"20_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1036","DOI":"10.1007\/s12350-015-0385-z","volume":"24","author":"R Matheoud","year":"2017","unstructured":"Matheoud, R., et al.: Comparative analysis of iterative reconstruction algorithms with resolution recovery and time of flight modeling for 18F-FDG cardiac PET: a multi-center phantom study. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 24(3), 1036\u20131045 (2017)","journal-title":"J. Nucl. Cardiol."},{"key":"20_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Pfaehler, E., et al.: Experimental multicenter and multivendor evaluation of pet radiomic features performance using 3D printed phantom inserts. J. Nucl. Med. 61(3), 469\u2013476 (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2967\/jnumed.119.229724","DOI":"10.2967\/jnumed.119.229724"},{"key":"20_CR12","unstructured":"Shimada, N., et al.: A multi-center phantom study towards harmonization of FDG-PET: variability in maximum and peak SUV in relation to image noise (2020)"},{"issue":"11","key":"20_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4498","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-017-4859-z","volume":"27","author":"I Shiri","year":"2017","unstructured":"Shiri, I., Rahmim, A., Ghaffarian, P., Geramifar, P., Abdollahi, H., Bitarafan-Rajabi, A.: The impact of image reconstruction settings on 18F-FDG PET radiomic features: multi-scanner phantom and patient studies. Eur. Radiol. 27(11), 4498\u20134509 (2017)","journal-title":"Eur. Radiol."},{"issue":"2","key":"20_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.2967\/jnumed.119.230565","volume":"61","author":"X Zhang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Zhang, X., et al.: Total-body dynamic reconstruction and parametric imaging on the uexplorer. J. Nucl. Med. 61(2), 285\u2013291 (2020)","journal-title":"J. Nucl. Med."}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-031-18910-4_20","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,26]],"date-time":"2022-10-26T23:33:52Z","timestamp":1666827232000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-031-18910-4_20"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"ISBN":["9783031189098","9783031189104"],"references-count":14,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-031-18910-4_20","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"assertion":[{"value":"27 October 2022","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"PRCV","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Chinese Conference on Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision  (PRCV)","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Shenzhen","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"China","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2022","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"14 October 2022","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"17 October 2022","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"5","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"ccprcv2022","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"http:\/\/en.prcv.cn\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Double-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"microsoft","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"564","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"233","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"41% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3.03","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3.35","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"No","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}