{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,27]],"date-time":"2025-03-27T14:36:32Z","timestamp":1743086192833,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":23,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783031216855"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783031216862"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-21686-2_29","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,18]],"date-time":"2022-11-18T08:30:15Z","timestamp":1668760215000},"page":"413-428","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["On AGM Belief Revision for\u00a0Computational Tree Logic"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5373-7271","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marlo","family":"Souza","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,19]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"29_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.2307\/2274239","volume":"50","author":"CE Alchourr\u00f3n","year":"1985","unstructured":"Alchourr\u00f3n, C.E., G\u00e4rdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. J. Symbolic Logic 50(2), 510\u2013530 (1985)","journal-title":"J. Symbolic Logic"},{"key":"29_CR2","series-title":"Springer Graduate Texts in Philosophy","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"813","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-20451-2_39","volume-title":"Readings in Formal Epistemology","author":"A Baltag","year":"2016","unstructured":"Baltag, A., Smets, S.: A qualitative theory of dynamic interactive belief revision. In: Arl\u00f3-Costa, H., Hendricks, V.F., van Benthem, J. (eds.) Readings in Formal Epistemology. SGTP, vol. 1, pp. 813\u2013858. Springer, Cham (2016). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-20451-2_39"},{"key":"29_CR3","volume-title":"Handbook of modal logic","author":"P Blackburn","year":"2006","unstructured":"Blackburn, P., van Benthem, J.F., Wolter, F.: Handbook of modal logic, vol. 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL (2006)"},{"key":"29_CR4","unstructured":"Booth, R., Ferm\u00e9, E., Konieczny, S., P\u00e9rez, R.P.: Credibility-limited revision operators in propositional logic. In: Thirteenth International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (2012)"},{"key":"29_CR5","volume-title":"Conditional logics for default reasoning and belief revision","author":"C Boutilier","year":"1992","unstructured":"Boutilier, C.: Conditional logics for default reasoning and belief revision. University of British Columbia, Tech. rep. (1992)"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"29_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1016\/0304-3975(88)90098-9","volume":"59","author":"MC Browne","year":"1988","unstructured":"Browne, M.C., Clarke, E.M., Gr\u00fcmberg, O.: Characterizing finite kripke structures in propositional temporal logic. Theor. Comput. Sci. 59(1\u20132), 115\u2013131 (1988)","journal-title":"Theor. Comput. Sci."},{"key":"29_CR7","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1007\/BFb0025774","volume-title":"Logics of Programs","author":"EM Clarke","year":"1982","unstructured":"Clarke, E.M., Emerson, E.A.: Design and synthesis of synchronization skeletons using branching time temporal logic. In: Kozen, D. (ed.) Logic of Programs 1981. LNCS, vol. 131, pp. 52\u201371. Springer, Heidelberg (1982). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BFb0025774"},{"key":"29_CR8","unstructured":"Clarke Jr, E.M., Grumberg, O., Kroening, D., Peled, D., Veith, H.: Model checking. MIT press (2018)"},{"key":"29_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Flouris, G., Plexousakis, D., Antoniou, G.: On applying the AGM theory to DLs and OWL. In: ISWC, pp. 216\u2013231 (2005)","DOI":"10.1007\/11574620_18"},{"key":"29_CR10","series-title":"Outstanding Contributions to Logic","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-06025-5_8","volume-title":"Johan van Benthem on Logic and Information Dynamics","author":"P Girard","year":"2014","unstructured":"Girard, P., Rott, H.: Belief revision and dynamic logic. In: Baltag, A., Smets, S. (eds.) Johan van Benthem on Logic and Information Dynamics. OCL, vol. 5, pp. 203\u2013233. Springer, Cham (2014). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-06025-5_8"},{"issue":"2","key":"29_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00247909","volume":"17","author":"A Grove","year":"1988","unstructured":"Grove, A.: Two modelings for theory change. J. Philosophical Logic 17(2), 157\u2013170 (1988)","journal-title":"J. Philosophical Logic"},{"issue":"3","key":"29_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1007\/s10472-019-09656-4","volume":"87","author":"PT Guerra","year":"2019","unstructured":"Guerra, P.T., Wassermann, R.: Two agm-style characterizations of model repair. Ann. Math Artif. Intell. 87(3), 233\u2013257 (2019)","journal-title":"Ann. Math Artif. Intell."},{"key":"29_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hansson, S.O.: Preference logic. In: Handbook of philosophical logic, pp. 319\u2013393. Springer (2001). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-94-017-0456-4","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-0456-4"},{"issue":"2","key":"29_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1005577906029","volume":"50","author":"S Lindstr\u00f6m","year":"1999","unstructured":"Lindstr\u00f6m, S., Rabinowicz, W.: DDL unlimited: dynamic doxastic logic for introspective agents. Erkenntnis 50(2), 353\u2013385 (1999)","journal-title":"Erkenntnis"},{"key":"29_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-1344-4","volume-title":"Reasoning about preference dynamics","author":"F Liu","year":"2011","unstructured":"Liu, F.: Reasoning about preference dynamics, vol. 354. Springer, New York, US (2011)"},{"key":"29_CR16","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-25423-4_6","volume-title":"Formal Methods and Software Engineering","author":"JS Ribeiro","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ribeiro, J.S., Andrade, A.: A 3-Valued contraction model checking game: deciding on the world of partial information. In: Butler, M., Conchon, S., Za\u00efdi, F. (eds.) ICFEM 2015. LNCS, vol. 9407, pp. 84\u201399. Springer, Cham (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-25423-4_6"},{"key":"29_CR17","unstructured":"Ribeiro, J.S., Nayak, A., Wassermann, R.: Towards belief contraction without compactness. In: Sixteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (2018)"},{"key":"29_CR18","unstructured":"Sauerwald, K., Kern-Isberner, G., Beierle, C.: On limited non-prioritised belief revision operators with dynamic scope. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07769 (2021)"},{"key":"29_CR19","series-title":"Trends in Logic","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-011-4574-9_8","volume-title":"Logic, Language and Reasoning","author":"K Segerberg","year":"1999","unstructured":"Segerberg, K.: Two traditions in the logic of belief: bringing them together. In: Ohlbach, H.J., Reyle, U. (eds.) Logic, Language and Reasoning. TL, vol. 5, pp. 135\u2013147. Springer, Dordrecht (1999). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-94-011-4574-9_8"},{"key":"29_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jlamp.2021.100689","volume":"122","author":"M Souza","year":"2021","unstructured":"Souza, M., Moreira, \u00c1.: Belief base change as priority change: a study based on dynamic epistemic logic. J. Logical Algebraic Methods Programm. 122, 100689 (2021)","journal-title":"J. Logical Algebraic Methods Programm."},{"key":"29_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Souza, M., Vieira, R., Moreira, \u00c1.: Dynamic preference logic meets iterated belief change: Representation results and postulates characterization. Theor. Comput. Sci. 872, 15\u201340(2020)","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tcs.2020.12.042"},{"issue":"2","key":"29_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1111\/theo.12028","volume":"80","author":"J Van Benthem","year":"2014","unstructured":"Van Benthem, J., Grossi, D., Liu, F.: Priority structures in deontic logic. Theoria 80(2), 116\u2013152 (2014)","journal-title":"Theoria"},{"key":"29_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.2420","volume":"31","author":"Y Zhang","year":"2008","unstructured":"Zhang, Y., Ding, Y.: Ctl model update for system modifications. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 31, 113\u2013155 (2008)","journal-title":"J. Artif. Intell. Res."}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Intelligent Systems"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-031-21686-2_29","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,7]],"date-time":"2024-03-07T17:12:13Z","timestamp":1709831533000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-031-21686-2_29"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"ISBN":["9783031216855","9783031216862"],"references-count":23,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-031-21686-2_29","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 November 2022","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"BRACIS","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Campinas","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Brazil","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2022","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"28 November 2022","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"1 December 2022","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"11","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"bracis2022","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/www2.sbc.org.br\/bracis2022\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Double-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"JEMS","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"225","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"89","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"40% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"4","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"No","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}