{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]],"date-time":"2026-03-10T10:57:03Z","timestamp":1773140223776,"version":"3.50.1"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":39,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"value":"9783031253829","type":"print"},{"value":"9783031253836","type":"electronic"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,1]],"date-time":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672531200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,1]],"date-time":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672531200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-25383-6_19","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,10]],"date-time":"2023-02-10T19:44:56Z","timestamp":1676058296000},"page":"257-273","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["A Systematic Comparison of\u00a0Case Management Languages"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Julia","family":"Holz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5182-2587","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Luise","family":"Pufahl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4833-5921","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ingo","family":"Weber","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"19_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Andrews, K., Steinau, S., Reichert, M.: Enabling runtime flexibility in data-centric and data-driven process execution engines (2021). IS 101, 101447","DOI":"10.1016\/j.is.2019.101447"},{"issue":"4","key":"19_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1007\/s00766-004-0202-8","volume":"9","author":"A Bajaj","year":"2004","unstructured":"Bajaj, A.: The effect of the number of concepts on the readability of schemas: an empirical study with data models. Requirements Eng. 9(4), 261\u2013270 (2004)","journal-title":"Requirements Eng."},{"issue":"6","key":"19_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.17705\/1jais.00201","volume":"10","author":"A Burton-Jones","year":"2009","unstructured":"Burton-Jones, A., Wand, Y., Weber, R.: Guidelines for empirical evaluations of conceptual modeling grammars. JAIS 10(6), 495\u2013532 (2009)","journal-title":"JAIS"},{"key":"19_CR4","unstructured":"de Man, H.: Case management: a review of modeling approaches. BPTrends, January (2009)"},{"issue":"1","key":"19_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1022883727209","volume":"14","author":"WM van Der Aalst","year":"2003","unstructured":"van Der Aalst, W.M., Ter Hofstede, A.H., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.P.: Workflow patterns. Distrib. Parallel Databases 14(1), 5\u201351 (2003)","journal-title":"Distrib. Parallel Databases"},{"issue":"1","key":"19_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1007\/s13740-014-0038-4","volume":"4","author":"C Di Ciccio","year":"2015","unstructured":"Di Ciccio, C., Marrella, A., Russo, A.: Knowledge-intensive processes: characteristics, requirements and analysis of contemporary approaches. JoDS 4(1), 29\u201357 (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13740-014-0038-4","journal-title":"JoDS"},{"key":"19_CR7","first-page":"1","volume":"20","author":"F Gonzalez-Lopez","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gonzalez-Lopez, F., Pufahl, L., Munoz-Gama, J., Herskovic, V., Sep\u00falveda, M.: Case model landscapes: toward an improved representation of knowledge-intensive processes using the fCM-language. SoSym 20, 1\u201325 (2021)","journal-title":"SoSym"},{"key":"19_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s41469-021-00098-z","volume":"10","author":"S Haarmann","year":"2021","unstructured":"Haarmann, S., Holfter, A., Pufahl, L., Weske, M.: Formal framework for checking compliance of data-driven case management. JoDS 10, 1\u201321 (2021)","journal-title":"JoDS"},{"key":"19_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hauder, M., Pigat, S., Matthes, F.: Research challenges in adaptive case management: a literature review. In: 2014 IEEE 18th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops and Demonstrations (EDOCW) (2014)","DOI":"10.1109\/EDOCW.2014.24"},{"key":"19_CR10","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-45468-9_3","volume-title":"Business Process Management Forum","author":"M Hewelt","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hewelt, M., Weske, M.: A hybrid approach for flexible case modeling and execution. In: La Rosa, M., Loos, P., Pastor, O. (eds.) BPM 2016. LNBIP, vol. 260, pp. 38\u201354. Springer, Cham (2016). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-45468-9_3"},{"key":"19_CR11","unstructured":"Hinkelmann, K., Pierfranceschi, A.: Combining process modelling and case modelling. In: MeTTeG14, pp. 83\u201393. Universitas Studiorum, Mantova (2014)"},{"key":"19_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Holz, J.: A Systematic Comparison of Case Management Approaches. Master\u2019s Thesis, TU Berlin (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.13140\/RG.2.2.22243.68649","DOI":"10.13140\/RG.2.2.22243.68649"},{"key":"19_CR13","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-79186-5_10","volume-title":"Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling","author":"A Jalali","year":"2021","unstructured":"Jalali, A.: Evaluating perceived usefulness and ease of use of CMMN and DCR. In: Augusto, A., Gill, A., Nurcan, S., Reinhartz-Berger, I., Schmidt, R., Zdravkovic, J. (eds.) BPMDS\/EMMSAD -2021. LNBIP, vol. 421, pp. 147\u2013162. Springer, Cham (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-79186-5_10"},{"key":"19_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4757-3304-4","volume-title":"Basics of Software Engineering Experimentation","author":"N Juristo","year":"2001","unstructured":"Juristo, N., Moreno, A.M.: Basics of Software Engineering Experimentation. Springer, Boston (2001)"},{"issue":"4","key":"19_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1002\/smr.524","volume":"23","author":"V K\u00fcnzle","year":"2011","unstructured":"K\u00fcnzle, V., Reichert, M.: PHILharmonicFlows: towards a framework for object-aware process management. J. Softw. Evol. Process. 23(4), 205\u2013244 (2011)","journal-title":"J. Softw. Evol. Process."},{"key":"19_CR16","unstructured":"Malinova, M.: A Language for Designing Process Maps. Ph.D. thesis, WU Vienna (2016)"},{"key":"19_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mannhardt, F.: Sepsis cases - event log. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4121\/UUID:915D2BFB-7E84-49AD-A286-DC35F063A460","DOI":"10.4121\/UUID:915D2BFB-7E84-49AD-A286-DC35F063A460"},{"key":"19_CR18","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-42887-1_1","volume-title":"Business Process Management Workshops","author":"MA Marin","year":"2016","unstructured":"Marin, M.A., Hauder, M., Matthes, F.: Case management: an evaluation of existing approaches for knowledge-intensive processes. In: Reichert, M., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) BPM 2015. LNBIP, vol. 256, pp. 5\u201316. Springer, Cham (2016). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-42887-1_1"},{"key":"19_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Marjanovic, O., Freeze, R.: Knowledge intensive business processes: theoretical foundations and research challenges. In: 44th HICSS. IEEE, Piscataway (2011)","DOI":"10.1109\/HICSS.2011.271"},{"issue":"1","key":"19_CR20","first-page":"195","volume":"53","author":"J Mendling","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mendling, J., Strembeck, M., Recker, J.: Factors of process model comprehension-findings from a series of experiments. DSS 53(1), 195\u2013206 (2012)","journal-title":"DSS"},{"key":"19_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Motahari-Nezhad, H.R., Swenson, K.D.: Adaptive case management: overview and research challenges. In: 2013 IEEE 15th Conference on Business Informatics (2013)","DOI":"10.1109\/CBI.2013.44"},{"key":"19_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-36926-1_35","volume-title":"Seminal Contributions to Information Systems Engineering","author":"Michael zur Muehlen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Muehlen, Michael zur, Recker, Jan: How much language is enough? Theoretical and practical use of the business process modeling notation. In: Bubenko, J., Krogstie, J., Pastor, O., Pernici, B., Rolland, C., Solvberg, A. (eds.) Seminal Contributions to Information Systems Engineering, pp. 429\u2013443. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-36926-1_35"},{"key":"19_CR23","unstructured":"Object management group: case management model and notation (CMMN): specification. version 1.1 (2016)"},{"issue":"3","key":"19_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1016\/j.datak.2004.12.008","volume":"55","author":"J Parsons","year":"2005","unstructured":"Parsons, J., Cole, L.: What do the pictures mean? Guidelines for experimental evaluation of representation fidelity in diagrammatical conceptual modeling techniques. Data Knowl. Eng. 55(3), 327\u2013342 (2005)","journal-title":"Data Knowl. Eng."},{"key":"19_CR25","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-28108-2_37","volume-title":"Business Process Management Workshops","author":"P Pichler","year":"2012","unstructured":"Pichler, P., Weber, B., Zugal, S., Pinggera, J., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Imperative versus declarative process modeling languages: an empirical investigation. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNBIP, vol. 99, pp. 383\u2013394. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-28108-2_37"},{"issue":"4","key":"19_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.17705\/1jais.00193","volume":"10","author":"J Recker","year":"2009","unstructured":"Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., Green, P.: Business process modeling-a comparative analysis. JAIS 10(4), 1 (2009)","journal-title":"JAIS"},{"issue":"1","key":"19_CR27","first-page":"48","volume":"20","author":"J Recker","year":"2007","unstructured":"Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Krogstie, J.: Ontology-versus pattern-based evaluation of process modeling languages: a comparison. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 20(1), 48 (2007)","journal-title":"Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst."},{"issue":"03","key":"19_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1142\/S0218843003000784","volume":"12","author":"HA Reijers","year":"2003","unstructured":"Reijers, H.A., Rigter, J.H.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: The case handling case. Int. J. Coop. Inf. Syst. 12(03), 365\u2013391 (2003)","journal-title":"Int. J. Coop. Inf. Syst."},{"key":"19_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10270-021-00880-3","volume":"20","author":"I Routis","year":"2021","unstructured":"Routis, I., Bardaki, C., Dede, G., Nikolaidou, M., Kamalakis, T., Anagnostopoulos, D.: CMMN evaluation: the modelers\u2019 perceptions of the main notation elements. SoSym 20, 1\u201321 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10270-021-00880-3","journal-title":"SoSym"},{"issue":"1","key":"19_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1007\/s13740-020-00112-9","volume":"9","author":"T Slaats","year":"2020","unstructured":"Slaats, T.: Declarative and hybrid process discovery: recent advances and open challenges. JoDS 9(1), 3\u201320 (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13740-020-00112-9","journal-title":"JoDS"},{"key":"19_CR31","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-40176-3_28","volume-title":"Business Process Management","author":"T Slaats","year":"2013","unstructured":"Slaats, T., Mukkamala, R.R., Hildebrandt, T., Marquard, M.: Exformatics declarative case management workflows as DCR graphs. In: Daniel, F., Wang, J., Weber, B. (eds.) BPM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8094, pp. 339\u2013354. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-40176-3_28"},{"issue":"4","key":"19_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2679","DOI":"10.1007\/s10270-018-0695-0","volume":"18","author":"S Steinau","year":"2019","unstructured":"Steinau, S., Marrella, A., Andrews, K., Leotta, F., Mecella, M., Reichert, M.: DALEC: a framework for the systematic evaluation of data-centric approaches to process management software. SoSym 18(4), 2679\u20132716 (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10270-018-0695-0","journal-title":"SoSym"},{"issue":"2","key":"19_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1007\/s00450-009-0057-9","volume":"23","author":"WMP van der Aalst","year":"2009","unstructured":"van der Aalst, W.M.P., Pesic, M., Schonenberg, H.: Declarative workflows: balancing between flexibility and support. CSRD 23(2), 99\u2013113 (2009). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00450-009-0057-9","journal-title":"CSRD"},{"issue":"2","key":"19_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/j.datak.2004.07.003","volume":"53","author":"WM van der Aalst","year":"2005","unstructured":"van der Aalst, W.M., Weske, M., Gr\u00fcnbauer, D.: Case handling: a new paradigm for business process support. Data Knowl. Eng. 53(2), 129\u2013162 (2005)","journal-title":"Data Knowl. Eng."},{"issue":"3","key":"19_CR35","first-page":"49","volume":"7","author":"WM van der Aalst","year":"2003","unstructured":"van der Aalst, W.M., Weske, M., Wirtz, G.: Advanced topics in workflow management: issues, requirements, and solutions. JIDPS 7(3), 49\u201377 (2003)","journal-title":"JIDPS"},{"key":"19_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"van Dongen, B.F.: BPI challenge (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4121\/uuid:d06aff4b-79f0-45e6-8ec8-e19730c248f1","DOI":"10.4121\/uuid:d06aff4b-79f0-45e6-8ec8-e19730c248f1"},{"key":"19_CR37","unstructured":"White, M.: Case mgmt.: combining knowledge with process. BPTrends (2009)"},{"issue":"8","key":"19_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1439","DOI":"10.1007\/s11548-017-1608-3","volume":"12","author":"M Wiemuth","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wiemuth, M., Junger, D., Leitritz, M.A., Neumann, J., Neumuth, T., Burgert, O.: Application fields for the new object management group (OMG) standards case management model and notation (CMMN) and decision management notation (DMN) in the perioperative field. IJCARS 12(8), 1439\u20131449 (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11548-017-1608-3","journal-title":"IJCARS"},{"key":"19_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zensen, A., K\u00fcster, J.: A comparison of flexible BPMN and CMMN in practice: a case study on component release processes. In: EDOC, pp. 105\u2013114. IEEE (2018)","DOI":"10.1109\/EDOC.2018.00023"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","Business Process Management Workshops"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-031-25383-6_19","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,10]],"date-time":"2023-02-10T20:11:58Z","timestamp":1676059918000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-031-25383-6_19"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023]]},"ISBN":["9783031253829","9783031253836"],"references-count":39,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-031-25383-6_19","relation":{},"ISSN":["1865-1348","1865-1356"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1865-1348","type":"print"},{"value":"1865-1356","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023]]},"assertion":[{"value":"9 February 2023","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"BPM","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Business Process Management","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"M\u00fcnster","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Germany","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2022","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"11 September 2022","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"16 September 2022","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"20","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"bpm2022","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/bpm2022.uni-muenster.de","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"98","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"22","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"22% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"4","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"For the BPM Forum 13 papers have been accepted out of the total of 98 submissions. The Blockchain, RPA and CEE Forum accepted 20 papers out of a total of 40 submissions. From the workshops 23 full papers and 3 short papers have been accepted from a total of 51 submissions.","order":10,"name":"additional_info_on_review_process","label":"Additional Info on Review Process","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}