{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,1]],"date-time":"2026-04-01T18:10:49Z","timestamp":1775067049737,"version":"3.50.1"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":24,"publisher":"Springer Nature Switzerland","isbn-type":[{"value":"9783031339752","type":"print"},{"value":"9783031339769","type":"electronic"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,1]],"date-time":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672531200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,20]],"date-time":"2023-05-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1684540800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":139,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Technical Debt Management (TDM) includes activities such as identifying, measuring, and prioritizing technical debt. It is mainly performed to proactively mitigate the risk of losing the maintainability and evolvability of the software product which results in reducing the team velocity. Despite the importance of TDM, its adoption in software companies remain limited. Software companies are witnessing high market demand and competition that make delivering customer value outweighs the effort invested in TDM activities. Since the impacts of technical debt are uncertain and evident only in the long run, it is more difficult for companies with very limited resources to proactively spend their resources on TDM. In this paper, we propose a lean approach to facilitate the adoption of TDM in software companies with very limited resources. Based on this approach, TDM is driven by project management metrics, such as team or sprint velocity, and velocity variance. We conducted an initial evaluation of the concept of this approach through a short survey of 43 software project\/product managers. Most of the survey respondents have a positive impression about our approach, which will encourage us to proceed further using more robust empirical evaluation.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-33976-9_5","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,19]],"date-time":"2023-05-19T20:24:29Z","timestamp":1684527869000},"page":"67-76","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["A Lean Approach of Managing Technical Debt in Agile Software Projects \u2013 A Proposal and Empirical Evaluation"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Abdullah","family":"Aldaeej","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anh","family":"Nguyen-Duc","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Varun","family":"Gupta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,20]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"5_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1109\/MS.2012.167","volume":"29","author":"P Kruchten","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kruchten, P., Nord, R.L., Ozkaya, I.: Technical debt: from metaphor to theory and practice. IEEE Softw. 29(6), 18\u201321 (2012). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/MS.2012.167","journal-title":"IEEE Softw."},{"key":"5_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1016\/j.scico.2018.03.007","volume":"163","author":"A Martini","year":"2018","unstructured":"Martini, A., Besker, T., Bosch, J.: Technical debt tracking: current state of practice: a survey and multiple case study in 15 large organizations. Sci. Comput. Program. 163, 42\u201361 (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.scico.2018.03.007","journal-title":"Sci. Comput. Program."},{"key":"5_CR3","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-67292-8_8","volume-title":"Software Business","author":"O Cico","year":"2021","unstructured":"Cico, O., Souza, R., Jaccheri, L., Nguyen Duc, A., Machado, I.: Startups transitioning from early to growth phase - a pilot study of\u00a0technical debt perception. In: Klotins, E., Wnuk, K. (eds.) ICSOB 2020. LNBIP, vol. 407, pp. 102\u2013117. Springer, Cham (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-67292-8_8"},{"key":"5_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2016.05.018","volume":"120","author":"J Yli-Huumo","year":"2016","unstructured":"Yli-Huumo, J., Maglyas, A., Smolander, K.: How do software development teams manage technical debt? \u2013 an empirical study. J. Syst. Softw. 120, 195\u2013218 (2016). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jss.2016.05.018","journal-title":"J. Syst. Softw."},{"key":"5_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2016.07.008","volume":"120","author":"Y Guo","year":"2016","unstructured":"Guo, Y., Seaman, C., da Silva, F.Q.B.: Costs and obstacles encountered in technical debt management \u2013 a case study. J. Syst. Softw. 120, 156\u2013169 (2016). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jss.2016.07.008","journal-title":"J. Syst. Softw."},{"key":"5_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2017.11.015","volume":"96","author":"J Holvitie","year":"2018","unstructured":"Holvitie, J., et al.: Technical debt and agile software development practices and processes: an industry practitioner survey. Inf. Softw. Technol. 96, 141\u2013160 (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.infsof.2017.11.015","journal-title":"Inf. Softw. Technol."},{"key":"5_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111114","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2021.111114","volume":"184","author":"R Rama\u010d","year":"2022","unstructured":"Rama\u010d, R., et al.: Prevalence, common causes and effects of technical debt: Results from a family of surveys with the IT industry. J. Syst. Softw. 184, 111114 (2022). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jss.2021.111114","journal-title":"J. Syst. Softw."},{"key":"5_CR8","unstructured":"Kruchten, P., Nord, R., Ozkaya, I.: Managing Technical debt - Reducing friction in software development. in SEI Software Engineering. Pearson Education (2019)"},{"key":"5_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2019.06.004","author":"T Besker","year":"2019","unstructured":"Besker, T., Martini, A., Bosch, J.: Software developer productivity loss due to technical debt - a replication and extension study examining developers\u2019 development work. J. Syst. Softw. (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jss.2019.06.004","journal-title":"J. Syst. Softw."},{"key":"5_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2015.02.005","volume":"62","author":"E Kupiainen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kupiainen, E., M\u00e4ntyl\u00e4, M.V., Itkonen, J.: Using metrics in agile and lean software development \u2013 a systematic literature review of industrial studies. Inf. Softw. Technol. 62, 143\u2013163 (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.infsof.2015.02.005","journal-title":"Inf. Softw. Technol."},{"key":"5_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Malakuti, S., Heuschkel, J.: The need for holistic technical debt management across the value stream: lessons learnt and open challenges. In: 2021 IEEE\/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt), pp. 109\u2013113 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/TechDebt52882.2021.00021","DOI":"10.1109\/TechDebt52882.2021.00021"},{"key":"5_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Budacu, E.N., Pocatilu, P.: Real time agile metrics for measuring team performance. Informatica Economica 22(4) (2018)","DOI":"10.12948\/issn14531305\/22.4.2018.06"},{"key":"5_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Taghizadegan, S.: Design for lean\/kaizen six sigma. In: Taghizadegan, S. (ed.) Essentials of Lean Six Sigma, pp. 59\u2013101, Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington (2006). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/B978-012370502-0\/50008-4","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-012370502-0\/50008-4"},{"key":"5_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Thollander, P., Karlsson, M., Rohdin, P., Wollin, J., Rosenqvist, J.: 14 - energy management using lean. In: Thollander, P., Karlsson, M., Rohdin, P., Wollin, J., Rosenqvist, J. (eds.) Introduction to Industrial Energy Efficiency, pp. 259\u2013287. Academic Press (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/B978-0-12-817247-6.00014-6","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-12-817247-6.00014-6"},{"key":"5_CR15","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-30126-2_14","volume-title":"Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming \u2013 Workshops","author":"A Martini","year":"2019","unstructured":"Martini, A., Stray, V., Moe, N.B.: Technical-, social- and process debt in large-scale agile: an exploratory case-study. In: Hoda, R. (ed.) XP 2019. LNBIP, vol. 364, pp. 112\u2013119. Springer, Cham (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-30126-2_14"},{"key":"5_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gomes, F., dos Santos, E.P., Freire, S., Mendon\u00e7a, M., Mendes, T.S., Sp\u00ednola, R.: Investigating the point of view of project management practitioners on technical debt - a preliminary study on stack exchange. In: 2022 IEEE\/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt), pp. 31\u201340 (2022). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3524843.3528095","DOI":"10.1145\/3524843.3528095"},{"key":"5_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Seaman, C., Guo, Y.: Measuring and monitoring technical debt. In: Advances in Computers, p. 22 (2011)","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-12-385512-1.00002-5"},{"issue":"4","key":"5_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-021-10072-8","volume":"27","author":"S Baltes","year":"2022","unstructured":"Baltes, S., Ralph, P.: Sampling in software engineering research: a critical review and guidelines. Empir. Softw. Eng. 27(4), 94 (2022). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10664-021-10072-8","journal-title":"Empir. Softw. Eng."},{"key":"5_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"72524","DOI":"10.1109\/ACCESS.2021.3079271","volume":"9","author":"N Nikolaidis","year":"2021","unstructured":"Nikolaidis, N., Zisis, D., Ampatzoglou, A., Chatzigeorgiou, A., Soudris, D.: Experience with managing technical debt in scientific software development using the EXA2PRO framework. IEEE Access 9, 72524\u201372534 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ACCESS.2021.3079271","journal-title":"IEEE Access"},{"key":"5_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"106926","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2022.106926","volume":"148","author":"M Wiese","year":"2022","unstructured":"Wiese, M., Rachow, P., Riebisch, M., Schwarze, J.: Preventing technical debt with the TAP framework for technical debt aware management. Inf. Softw. Technol. 148, 106926 (2022). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.infsof.2022.106926","journal-title":"Inf. Softw. Technol."},{"issue":"4","key":"5_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-022-10121-w","volume":"27","author":"H Tu","year":"2022","unstructured":"Tu, H., Menzies, T.: DebtFree: minimizing labeling cost in self-admitted technical debt identification using semi-supervised learning. Empir. Softw. Eng. 27(4), 80 (2022). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10664-022-10121-w","journal-title":"Empir. Softw. Eng."},{"key":"5_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Avgeriou, P., et al.: An overview and comparison of technical debt measurement tools. IEEE Software (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/MS.2020.3024958","DOI":"10.1109\/MS.2020.3024958"},{"key":"5_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lenarduzzi, V., Besker, T., Taibi, D., Martini, A., Fontana, F.A.: A systematic literature review on technical debt prioritization: strategies, processes, factors, and tools. J. Syst. Softw. 171, 110827 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jss.2020.110827","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2020.110827"},{"key":"5_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbef.2017.12.004","volume":"17","author":"S Palan","year":"2018","unstructured":"Palan, S., Schitter, C.: Prolific.ac\u2014a subject pool for online experiments. J. Behav. Exp. Financ. 17, 22\u201327 (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jbef.2017.12.004","journal-title":"J. Behav. Exp. Financ."}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-031-33976-9_5","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,5]],"date-time":"2023-06-05T23:03:08Z","timestamp":1686006188000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-031-33976-9_5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023]]},"ISBN":["9783031339752","9783031339769"],"references-count":24,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-031-33976-9_5","relation":{},"ISSN":["1865-1348","1865-1356"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1865-1348","type":"print"},{"value":"1865-1356","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023]]},"assertion":[{"value":"20 May 2023","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"XP","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Agile Software Development","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Amsterdam","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"The Netherlands","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2023","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"13 June 2023","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"16 June 2023","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"24","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"xpu2023","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/www.agilealliance.org\/xp2023\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"40","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"11","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"1","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"28% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"2.6","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"2.1","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}