{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,22]],"date-time":"2026-03-22T02:22:42Z","timestamp":1774146162632,"version":"3.50.1"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":42,"publisher":"Springer Nature Switzerland","isbn-type":[{"value":"9783031436185","type":"print"},{"value":"9783031436192","type":"electronic"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,1]],"date-time":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672531200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,1]],"date-time":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672531200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-43619-2_15","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,23]],"date-time":"2023-09-23T15:02:40Z","timestamp":1695481360000},"page":"209-224","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["A Principle-Based Analysis of\u00a0Bipolar Argumentation Semantics"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7200-6001","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Liuwen","family":"Yu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8750-1849","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Caren","family":"Al Anaissy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4382-0928","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Srdjan","family":"Vesic","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7788-2414","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Xu","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4330-3717","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Leendert","family":"van der Torre","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"15_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2018.05.004","volume":"99","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2018","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Ben-Naim, J.: Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 99, 39\u201355 (2018)","journal-title":"Int. J. Approximate Reasoning"},{"issue":"2","key":"15_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2013.10.010","volume":"55","author":"L Amgoud","year":"2014","unstructured":"Amgoud, L., Vesic, S.: Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 55(2), 585\u2013606 (2014)","journal-title":"Int. J. Approximate Reasoning"},{"issue":"10\u201315","key":"15_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"675","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2007.04.004","volume":"171","author":"P Baroni","year":"2007","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Giacomin, M.: On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics. Artif. Intell. 171(10\u201315), 675\u2013700 (2007)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"15_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2005.05.006","volume":"168","author":"P Baroni","year":"2005","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Giacomin, M., Guida, G.: SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics. Artif. Intell. 168(1\u20132), 162\u2013210 (2005)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"key":"15_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Rago, A., Toni, F.: How many properties do we need for gradual argumentation? In: Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2018)","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v32i1.11544"},{"issue":"1","key":"15_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2014.1001791","volume":"6","author":"P Baroni","year":"2015","unstructured":"Baroni, P., Romano, M., Toni, F., Aurisicchio, M., Bertanza, G.: Automatic evaluation of design alternatives with quantitative argumentation. Argument Comput. 6(1), 24\u201349 (2015)","journal-title":"Argument Comput."},{"key":"15_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baumann, R., Brewka, G., Ulbricht, M.: Comparing weak admissibility semantics to their Dung-style counterparts-reduct, modularization, and strong equivalence in abstract argumentation. In: International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, vol. 17, pp. 79\u201388 (2020)","DOI":"10.24963\/kr.2020\/9"},{"key":"15_CR8","unstructured":"Boella, G., Gabbay, D.M., van der Torre, L., Villata, S.: Support in abstract argumentation. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2010), pp. 40\u201351. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, IOS Press (2010)"},{"key":"15_CR9","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-40381-1_12","volume-title":"Scalable Uncertainty Management","author":"R Booth","year":"2013","unstructured":"Booth, R., Kaci, S., Rienstra, T., van der Torre, L.: A logical theory about dynamics in abstract argumentation. In: Liu, W., Subrahmanian, V.S., Wijsen, J. (eds.) SUM 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8078, pp. 148\u2013161. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-40381-1_12"},{"key":"15_CR10","unstructured":"Cabrio, E., Villata, S.: Node: A benchmark of natural language arguments. In: Computational Models of Argument, pp. 449\u2013450. IOS Press (2014)"},{"key":"15_CR11","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Cohen, A., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: Higher-order interactions (bipolar or not) in abstract argumentation: A state of the art. In: Gabbay, D., Giacomin, M., Simari, G.R., Thimm, M. (eds.) Handbook of Formal Argumentation, vol. 2, pp. 15\u2013130. College Publications, Norcross (2021)"},{"key":"15_CR12","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.1007\/11518655_32","volume-title":"Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty","author":"C Cayrol","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: Gradual valuation for bipolar argumentation frameworks. In: Godo, L. (ed.) ECSQARU 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3571, pp. 366\u2013377. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/11518655_32"},{"key":"15_CR13","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1007\/11518655_33","volume-title":"Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty","author":"C Cayrol","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks. In: Godo, L. (ed.) ECSQARU 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3571, pp. 378\u2013389. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/11518655_33"},{"key":"15_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: Bipolar abstract argumentation systems. In: Simari, G., Rahwan, I. (eds.) Argumentation in Artificial, pp. 65\u201384. Springer, Boston (2009). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_4","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_4"},{"issue":"7","key":"15_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"876","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2013.03.001","volume":"54","author":"C Cayrol","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 54(7), 876\u2013899 (2013)","journal-title":"Int. J. Approximate Reasoning"},{"key":"15_CR16","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-28460-6_5","volume-title":"Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation","author":"C Cayrol","year":"2015","unstructured":"Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C.: An axiomatic approach to support in argumentation. In: Black, E., Modgil, S., Oren, N. (eds.) TAFA 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9524, pp. 74\u201391. Springer, Cham (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-28460-6_5"},{"key":"15_CR17","unstructured":"Chen, W.: Aggregation of support-relations of bipolar argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pp. 1804\u20131806 (2020)"},{"issue":"5","key":"15_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888913000325","volume":"29","author":"A Cohen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Cohen, A., Gottifredi, S., Garc\u00eda, A.J., Simari, G.R.: A survey of different approaches to support in argumentation systems. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 29(5), 513\u2013550 (2014)","journal-title":"Knowl. Eng. Rev."},{"key":"15_CR19","first-page":"342","volume":"12","author":"S Coste-Marquis","year":"2012","unstructured":"Coste-Marquis, S., Konieczny, S., Marquis, P., Ouali, M.A.: Selecting extensions in weighted argumentation frameworks. COMMA 12, 342\u2013349 (2012)","journal-title":"COMMA"},{"key":"15_CR20","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_7","volume-title":"Logic and Argumentation","author":"J Dauphin","year":"2021","unstructured":"Dauphin, J., Rienstra, T., van der Torre, L.: New weak admissibility semantics for abstract argumentation. In: Baroni, P., Benzm\u00fcller, C., W\u00e1ng, Y.N. (eds.) CLAR 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 13040, pp. 112\u2013126. Springer, Cham (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_7"},{"issue":"2","key":"15_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321\u2013357 (1995)","journal-title":"Artif. Intell."},{"issue":"3","key":"15_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1080\/12460125.2014.886496","volume":"23","author":"V Evripidou","year":"2014","unstructured":"Evripidou, V., Toni, F.: Quaestio-it.com: a social intelligent debating platform. J. Decis. Syst. 23(3), 333\u2013349 (2014)","journal-title":"J. Decis. Syst."},{"key":"15_CR23","unstructured":"Gargouri, A., Konieczny, S., Marquis, P., Vesic, S.: On a notion of monotonic support for bipolar argumentation frameworks. In: 20th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (2020)"},{"key":"15_CR24","unstructured":"Gordon, T.F.: Towards requirements analysis for formal argumentation. In: Baroni, P., Gabbay, D., Giacomin, M., van der Torre, L. (eds.) Handbook of formal argumentation, vol. 1, pp. 145\u2013156. College Publications, Norcross (2018)"},{"key":"15_CR25","unstructured":"Kaci, S., van der Torre, L., Vesic, S., Villata, S.: Preference in abstract argumentation. In: Gabbay, D., Giacomin, M., Simari, G.R., Thimm, M. (eds.) Handbook of Formal Argumentation, vol. 2, pp. 211\u2013248. College Publications, Norcross (2021)"},{"key":"15_CR26","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-20807-7_5","volume-title":"Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty","author":"S Konieczny","year":"2015","unstructured":"Konieczny, S., Marquis, P., Vesic, S.: On supported inference and extension selection in abstract argumentation frameworks. In: Destercke, S., Denoeux, T. (eds.) ECSQARU 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9161, pp. 49\u201359. Springer, Cham (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-20807-7_5"},{"issue":"2","key":"15_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exac095","volume":"33","author":"MC Lagasquie-Schiex","year":"2023","unstructured":"Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: Handling support cycles and collective interactions in the logical encoding of higher-order bipolar argumentation frameworks. J. Log. Comput. 33(2), 289\u2013318 (2023)","journal-title":"J. Log. Comput."},{"key":"15_CR28","unstructured":"Lauren, S., Belardinelli, F., Toni, F.: Aggregating bipolar opinions. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pp. 746\u2013754 (2021)"},{"key":"15_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nouioua, F., Risch, V.: Bipolar argumentation frameworks with specialized supports. In: 2010 22nd IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 215\u2013218. IEEE (2010)","DOI":"10.1109\/ICTAI.2010.37"},{"key":"15_CR30","unstructured":"Oren, N., Luck, M., Reed, C.: Moving between argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Computational Models of Argument. IOS Press (2010)"},{"key":"15_CR31","unstructured":"Oren, N., Norman, T.J.: Semantics for evidence-based argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008, pp. 276\u2013284 (2008)"},{"key":"15_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Plug, J.: Complex argumentation in judicial decisions. Analysing conflicting arguments. In: FAPR, pp. 464\u2013479 (1996)","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-61313-7_94"},{"key":"15_CR33","unstructured":"Polberg, S.: Intertranslatability of abstract argumentation frameworks. Technical report, Technical Report DBAI-TR-2017-104, Institute for Information Systems (2017)"},{"key":"15_CR34","unstructured":"Polberg, S., Oren, N.: Revisiting support in abstract argumentation systems. In: Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 266, pp. 369\u2013376. IOS Press (2014)"},{"issue":"2","key":"15_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1080\/19462160903564592","volume":"1","author":"H Prakken","year":"2010","unstructured":"Prakken, H.: An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Argument Comput. 1(2), 93\u2013124 (2010)","journal-title":"Argument Comput."},{"key":"15_CR36","unstructured":"Prakken, H.: On support relations in abstract argumentation as abstractions of inferential relations. In: ECAI 2014, pp. 735\u2013740. IOS Press (2014)"},{"key":"15_CR37","unstructured":"Prakken, H.: Historical overview of formal argumentation. In: Baroni, P., Gabbay, D., Giacomin, M., van der Torre, L. (eds.) Handbook of formal argumentation, vol. 1, pp. 75\u2013143. College Publications, Norcross (2018)"},{"key":"15_CR38","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-28460-6_13","volume-title":"Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation","author":"T Rienstra","year":"2015","unstructured":"Rienstra, T., Sakama, C., van der Torre, L.: Persistence and monotony properties of argumentation semantics. In: Black, E., Modgil, S., Oren, N. (eds.) TAFA 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9524, pp. 211\u2013225. Springer, Cham (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-28460-6_13"},{"issue":"3","key":"15_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-200520","volume":"11","author":"T Rienstra","year":"2020","unstructured":"Rienstra, T., Sakama, C., van der Torre, L., Liao, B.: A principle-based robustness analysis of admissibility-based argumentation semantics. Argument Comput. 11(3), 305\u2013339 (2020)","journal-title":"Argument Comput."},{"key":"15_CR40","unstructured":"van der Torre, L., Vesic, S.: The principle-based approach to abstract argumentation semantics. In: Baroni, P., Gabbay, D., Giacomin, M., van der Torre, L. (eds.) Handbook of Formal Argumentation, vol. 1, pp. 797\u2013838. College Publications, Norcross (2018)"},{"key":"15_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yu, L., Chen, D., Qiao, L., Shen, Y., van der Torre, L.: A principle-based analysis of abstract agent argumentation semantics. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, vol. 18, pp. 629\u2013639 (2021)","DOI":"10.24963\/kr.2021\/60"},{"key":"15_CR42","unstructured":"Yu, L., van der Torre, L.: A principle-based approach to bipolar argumentation. In: 18th International Workshop on Non-monotinic Reasoning Notes, p. 227 (2020)"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Logics in Artificial Intelligence"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-031-43619-2_15","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,23]],"date-time":"2023-09-23T15:05:39Z","timestamp":1695481539000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-031-43619-2_15"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023]]},"ISBN":["9783031436185","9783031436192"],"references-count":42,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-031-43619-2_15","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0302-9743","type":"print"},{"value":"1611-3349","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023]]},"assertion":[{"value":"24 September 2023","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"JELIA","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Dresden","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Germany","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2023","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"20 September 2023","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"22 September 2023","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"18","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"jelia2023","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/www.jelia.eu\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"111","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"41","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"11","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"37% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3,6","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}