{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,26]],"date-time":"2025-03-26T17:08:05Z","timestamp":1743008885050,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":25,"publisher":"Springer Nature Switzerland","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783031437557"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783031437564"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,1]],"date-time":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672531200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,22]],"date-time":"2023-09-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1695340800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":264,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>In this paper we address the problem of recovery from failures without re-running entire elections when elections fail to verify. We consider the setting of <jats:italic>dual voting<\/jats:italic> protocols, where the cryptographic guarantees of end-to-end verifiable voting (E2E-V) are combined with the simplicity of audit using voter-verified paper records (VVPR). We first consider the design requirements of such a system and then suggest a protocol called <jats:italic>OpenVoting<\/jats:italic>, which identifies a verifiable subset of error-free votes consistent with the VVPRs, and the polling booths corresponding to the votes that fail to verify with possible reasons for the failures.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-43756-4_2","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,21]],"date-time":"2023-09-21T23:02:23Z","timestamp":1695337343000},"page":"18-34","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["OpenVoting: Recoverability from\u00a0Failures in\u00a0Dual Voting"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Prashant","family":"Agrawal","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Kabir","family":"Tomer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Abhinav","family":"Nakarmi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Mahabir Prasad","family":"Jhanwar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Subodh Vishnu","family":"Sharma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Subhashis","family":"Banerjee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"2_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Adida, B., Rivest, R.L.: Scratch & vote: self-contained paper-based cryptographic voting. In: WPES, pp. 29\u201340 (2006)","DOI":"10.1145\/1179601.1179607"},{"key":"2_CR2","unstructured":"Agrawal, P., Nakarmi, A., Jhawar, M.P., Sharma, S., Banerjee, S.: Traceable mixnets (2023). [arXiv; cs.CR:2305.08138]"},{"key":"2_CR3","unstructured":"Banerjee, M.: Blocking the introduction of the Totaliser is not good for the secret ballot in India. LSE South Asia Center Blog (2017). Accessed 19 May 2023"},{"key":"2_CR4","unstructured":"Bell, S., et al.: STAR-vote: a secure, transparent, auditable, and reliable voting system. In: EVT\/WOTE (2013)"},{"key":"2_CR5","unstructured":"Benaloh, J.: Administrative and public verifiability: can we have both? In: EVT, pp. 5:1\u20135:10 (2008)"},{"key":"2_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bernhard, M., et al.: Public evidence from secret ballots. In: EVOTE-ID, pp. 84\u2013109 (2017)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-68687-5_6"},{"key":"2_CR7","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-24676-3_4","volume-title":"Advances in Cryptology - EUROCRYPT 2004","author":"D Boneh","year":"2004","unstructured":"Boneh, D., Boyen, X.: Short signatures without random oracles. In: Cachin, C., Camenisch, J.L. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3027, pp. 56\u201373. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-540-24676-3_4"},{"key":"2_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chaum, D., et al.: Scantegrity: end-to-end voter-verifiable optical-scan voting. IEEE S &P 6(3), 40\u201346 (2008)","DOI":"10.1109\/MSP.2008.70"},{"key":"2_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1007\/s10207-010-0119-9","volume":"9","author":"I Damg\u00e5rd","year":"2010","unstructured":"Damg\u00e5rd, I., Jurik, M., Nielsen, J.B.: A generalization of Paillier\u2019s public-key system with applications to electronic voting. Intl. J. Inf. Secur. 9, 371\u2013385 (2010)","journal-title":"Intl. J. Inf. Secur."},{"issue":"4","key":"2_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1002\/ett.4460050407","volume":"5","author":"Y Desmedt","year":"1994","unstructured":"Desmedt, Y.: Threshold cryptography. Eur. Trans. Telecommun. 5(4), 449\u2013458 (1994)","journal-title":"Eur. Trans. Telecommun."},{"key":"2_CR11","unstructured":"Essex, A., Clark, J.: Punchscan in practice: an E2E election case study. In: WOTE (2007)"},{"key":"2_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Essex, A., Henrich, C., Hengartner, U.: Single layer optical-scan voting with fully distributed trust. In: EVOTE-ID, pp. 122\u2013139 (2012)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-32747-6_8"},{"key":"2_CR13","unstructured":"Farhi, N.: An implementation of dual (paper and cryptograhic) voting system. Master\u2019s thesis, The Blatavnik School of Computer Sciences, Tel Aviv University (2013)"},{"key":"2_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Haines, T., M\u00fcller, J.: SoK: techniques for verifiable mix nets. In: CSF, pp. 49\u201364 (2020)","DOI":"10.1109\/CSF49147.2020.00012"},{"key":"2_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"K\u00fcsters, R., Truderung, T., Vogt, A.: Accountability: definition and relationship to verifiability. In: CCS, pp. 526\u2013535 (2010)","DOI":"10.1145\/1866307.1866366"},{"key":"2_CR16","unstructured":"Lindeman, M., Stark, P.B., Yates, V.S.: BRAVO: ballot-polling risk-limiting audits to verify outcomes. In: EVT\/WOTE (2012)"},{"key":"2_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lundin, D., Ryan, P.Y.A.: Human readable paper verification of Pr\u00eat \u00e0 voter. In: ESORICS, pp. 379\u2013395 (2008)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-88313-5_25"},{"key":"2_CR18","unstructured":"NDI: The constitutionality of electronic voting in Germany (2019). Accessed 8 June 2019"},{"key":"2_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paillier, P.: Public-key cryptosystems based on composite degree residuosity classes. In: International Conference on Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques, pp. 223\u2013238 (1999)","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-48910-X_16"},{"key":"2_CR20","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-46766-1_9","volume-title":"Advances in Cryptology\u2014CRYPTO \u201991","author":"TP Pedersen","year":"1992","unstructured":"Pedersen, T.P.: Non-interactive and information-theoretic secure verifiable secret sharing. In: Feigenbaum, J. (ed.) CRYPTO 1991. LNCS, vol. 576, pp. 129\u2013140. Springer, Heidelberg (1992). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/3-540-46766-1_9"},{"key":"2_CR21","unstructured":"Stark, P.B.: Super-simple simultaneous single-ballot risk-limiting audits. In: EVT\/WOTE (2010)"},{"key":"2_CR22","unstructured":"Popoveniuc, S., Regenscheid, A.: Sigma ballots. In: EVOTE-ID, vol. P-167, pp. 179\u2013190 (2010)"},{"key":"2_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rivest, R.L.: On the notion of software independence in voting systems. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 366(1881), 3759\u20133767 (2008)","DOI":"10.1098\/rsta.2008.0149"},{"issue":"4","key":"2_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"662","DOI":"10.1109\/TIFS.2009.2033233","volume":"4","author":"PYA Ryan","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ryan, P.Y.A., Bismark, D., Heather, J., Schneider, S., Xia, Z.: Pr\u00eaT \u00e0 Voter: a voter-verifiable voting system. Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 4(4), 662\u2013673 (2009)","journal-title":"Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur."},{"key":"2_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stark, P.B.: Conservative statistical post-election audits. Ann. Appl. Stat. 2, 550\u2013581 (2008)","DOI":"10.1214\/08-AOAS161"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Electronic Voting"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-031-43756-4_2","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,21]],"date-time":"2023-09-21T23:03:06Z","timestamp":1695337386000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-031-43756-4_2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023]]},"ISBN":["9783031437557","9783031437564"],"references-count":25,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-031-43756-4_2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023]]},"assertion":[{"value":"22 September 2023","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"E-Vote-ID","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Joint Conference on Electronic Voting","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Luxembourg City","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Luxembourg","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2023","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"3 October 2023","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"6 October 2023","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"8","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"evoteid2023","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/e-vote-id.org\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Double-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"38","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"9","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"24% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3-4","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"No","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}